Problems Listing Users

[Ariel Mella]

MC:
the problem you are talking is when the smbpasswd got broken... if you look
the logs tell a message like:
"User bla bla bla doesnt exist in the user database..
the password file is corrupt"
i and jim have a problem ho is correct to show in a NT box.. but not in a
win98 or me client.

ideas?
----- Original Message -----
From: "McEldowney, Michael" <MMcEldowney at deltaregional.com>
To: "'Jim Jarvie'" <ntl-linux at ntlworld.com>; <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:36 PM
Subject: RE: Problems Listing Users


> Hi Jim,
>
> I had the same problem here, but fewer users in my list on Win 98 SE.
> Same result in User Manager for Domains on an NT server.  I'm using
> passwd, not NIS.  I checked the list of users in my passwd file to the
> list in smbpasswd, and found a few minor discrepancies, things like the
> user had been deleted from passwd, but not from smbpasswd.  Once I fixed
> those, the list of users on the NT server shows up in entirety.  BUT!
> Now I get no list at all on Win98SE!  All I get is a error message "You
> cannot view a list of users at this time. Try again later."
>
> I've searched the archives with no luck, and have posted to the list
> twice and received no response.  My only advice is to examine your
> smbpasswd file and your NIS database for inconsistencies.  Good luck,
> and if you get any advice that works, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike McEldowney
> Information Systems Director
> Delta Regional Medical Center
> 1400 East Union Street
> Greenville, MS 38703
>
> v. 662-334-2075
> e. mmceldowney at deltaregional.com
>
> Come and visit us on the web!
> www.deltaregional.com
>
> Quote of the Month:  "Not one shred of evidence supports the notion that
> life is serious."
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jarvie [mailto:ntl-linux at ntlworld.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:55 PM
> To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Problems Listing Users
>
>
> I have a samba server with a user list of around 1,300 users, mainly
> connected via windows 98 machines (with a few NT).
>
> I'm considering switching on user level access control on the clients -
> the windows 98 machines can then be configured with shares accessible
> only to particular specified users.
>
> However, I find a problem when I do this and attempt to obtain the list
> of users from my Samba 2.2.2 server acting as a PDC (domain logins etc.
> Work OK and have done so for some time).
>
> What I find is that on Windows 98 SE the first 100 users from my
> smbpasswd file are listed and then no more.  i.e. A total of exactly 100
>
> users of the 1300 are shown.
>
> With NT, the password list appears to work correctly - though I've not
> checked every user is shown, there are certainly many more than shown
> with W98.
>
> My password file is based on NIS.
>
> Has anyone else experienced this - or have I missed something which is
> immediately obvious to the list members ?
>
> Jim
>
>
> A level 1 debug shows :
>
> [2001/10/17 18:40:00, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(610)
>   vmware (172.16.6.88) connect to service tas as user jim (uid=65000,
> gid=59999)[2001/10/17 18:40:00, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(610)
>   vmware (172.16.6.88) connect to service office as user jim (uid=65000,
>
> gid=1)
> [2001/10/17 18:40:52, 1] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(293)
>   api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 0
> [2001/10/17 18:40:52, 1] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(293)
>   api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 0
>
>
> And, turning this up to level 3, the relevant portion is :
>
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(246)
>   se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-1651842875-601990308-2174710594-3205
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(246)
>   se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-1651842875-601990308-2174710594-3203
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(246)
>   se_access_check: also S-1-5-21-1651842875-601990308-2174710594-1121
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(246)
>   se_access_check: also S-1-1-0
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(246)
>   se_access_check: also S-1-5-2
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(246)
>   se_access_check: also S-1-5-11
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(98)
>   Initialising default vfs hooks
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(321)
>   setting sec ctx (65000, 1) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(326)
>   16 user groups:
>   1 59999 65533 1029 1024 1095 1035 1026 132 30 1097 1096 133 1102 1101
> 60
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_ChDir(658)
>   vfs_ChDir to /tmp
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(610)
>   vmware (172.16.6.88) connect to service IPC$ as user jim (uid=65000,
> gid=1) (p[2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(321)
>   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(397)
>   tconX service=ipc$ user=jim
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(860)
>   Transaction 8 of length 99
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(667)
>   switch message SMBtrans (pid 1846)
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(321)
>   setting sec ctx (65000, 1) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(326)
>   16 user groups:
>   1 59999 65533 1029 1024 1095 1035 1026 132 30 1097 1096 133 1102 1101
> 60
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(484)
>   trans <\PIPE\LANMAN> data=0 params=19 setup=0
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(335)
>   named pipe command on <LANMAN> name
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/lanman.c:api_reply(3328)
>   Got API command 13 of form <WrLh> <B16BBDz>
> (tdscnt=0,tpscnt=19,mdrcnt=66,mprc[2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3]
> smbd/lanman.c:api_reply(3332)
>   Doing RNetServerGetInfo
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(860)
>   Transaction 9 of length 99
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(667)
>   switch message SMBtrans (pid 1846)
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(484)
>   trans <\PIPE\LANMAN> data=0 params=19 setup=0
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(335)
>   named pipe command on <LANMAN> name
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/lanman.c:api_reply(3328)
>   Got API command 13 of form <WrLh> <B16BBDz>
> (tdscnt=0,tpscnt=19,mdrcnt=66,mprc[2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3]
> smbd/lanman.c:api_reply(3332)
>   Doing RNetServerGetInfo
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(860)
>   Transaction 10 of length 84
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(667)
>   switch message SMBtrans (pid 1846)
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(484)
>   trans <\PIPE\LSARPC> data=0 params=0 setup=2
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(335)
>   named pipe command on <LSARPC> name
> [2001/10/17 18:46:40, 1] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(293)
>   api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 0
>
>
>
>
>