WIN NT 4.0 NO GO & YES I HAVE ENCRYPTED PASSWORDS

[Gerry Maddock]

By the way... (off the subject) anyone know what AIFd is????

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerry Maddock [mailto:gerrym at futuremetals.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:22 AM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: WIN NT 4.0 NO GO & YES I HAVE ENCRYPTED PASSWORDS


This is everything currently running on my new sys: samba 2.2.1a:
USER       PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME COMMAND
root         1  0.0  0.1  1368  544 ?        S    01:30   0:04 init [3]
root         2  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        SW   01:30   0:00 [keventd]
root         3  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        SW   01:30   0:01 [kswapd]
root         4  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        SW   01:30   0:00 [kreclaimd]
root         5  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        SW   01:30   0:00 [bdflush]
root         6  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        SW   01:30   0:00 [kupdated]
root         7  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        SW<  01:30   0:00 [mdrecoveryd]
root        14  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        SW   01:30   0:00 [AIFd]
root       385  0.0  0.1  1428  600 ?        S    01:36   0:00 syslogd -m 0
root       390  0.0  0.2  2016 1176 ?        S    01:36   0:00 klogd -2
root       473  0.0  0.2  2348 1048 ?        S    01:36   0:00
/usr/sbin/sshd
daemon     490  0.0  0.1  2152  944 ?        S    01:36   0:00 lpd Waiting
root       518  0.0  0.0  1396  508 ?        S    01:36   0:00 gpm -t
ps/2 -m /dev/mouse
root       530  0.0  0.1  1552  700 ?        S    01:36   0:00 crond
root       568  0.0  0.0  1336  416 tty1     S    01:36   0:00
/sbin/mingetty tty1
root       569  0.0  0.0  1336  416 tty2     S    01:36   0:00
/sbin/mingetty tty2
root       570  0.0  0.0  1336  416 tty3     S    01:36   0:00
/sbin/mingetty tty3
root       571  0.0  0.0  1336  416 tty4     S    01:36   0:00
/sbin/mingetty tty4
root       572  0.0  0.0  1336  416 tty5     S    01:36   0:00
/sbin/mingetty tty5
root       573  0.0  0.0  1336  416 tty6     S    01:36   0:00
/sbin/mingetty tty6
root       848  0.0  0.3  3128 1736 ?        S    08:32   0:00
/usr/sbin/sshd
gerrym     849  0.0  0.2  2332 1300 pts/0    S    08:32   0:00 -bash
root       878  0.0  0.1  2188 1024 pts/0    S    08:32   0:00 su -
root       879  0.0  0.2  2336 1308 pts/0    S    08:32   0:00 -bash
root      1071  0.0  0.2  4180 1392 ?        S    10:19   0:00 smbd -D
root      1076  0.0  0.2  3116 1264 ?        S    10:19   0:00 nmbd -D
root      1079  0.0  0.4  4676 2060 ?        S    10:19   0:00 smbd -D
root      1087  0.0  0.1  2740  836 pts/0    R    10:21   0:00 ps -waux
root      1088  0.0  0.1  1572  572 pts/0    S    10:21   0:00 more

-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Gerry Maddock
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:07 AM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: WIN NT 4.0 NO GO & YES I HAVE ENCRYPTED PASSWORDS




-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Cave-Ayland [mailto:mca198 at ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Gerry Maddock
Subject: Re: WIN NT 4.0 NO GO & YES I HAVE ENCRYPTED PASSWORDS


On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Gerry Maddock wrote:

>     I am in the process of upgrading my existing samba 2.05a PDC on an
> old box running RH6.2 to a new faster box running Samba 2.2.1a on a
> RH7.1 box. I have all the same files and directories as the old samba
> box including the same smb.conf file (the only thing changed in the
> smb.conf were changes to its PDC so I wouldn't have 2 PDC's on the same
> subnet). All of my Nt 4.0 boxes are sp6 with all of the latest security
> patches. Whenever I try to connect to the new Samba box from my NT box I
> get:
>  \\Penguin is not accessible.
> The remote procedure call failed and did not execute.
>
> I checked the samba logs and found no errors or complaints.
> No errors or complaints in /var/log/messages as well....

Hi Gerry,

Try looking at the firewall rules on your new Redhat 7.1 box. I have
recently reinstalled Samba on a Mandrake 8 box and the firewall rules were
so strict they did not even allow SMB ports (137-139) and broadcasts on
any interface, both of which are required for Samba to work.


Cheers,

Mark.