latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2

Steve Langasek vorlon at
Wed May 9 16:03:44 GMT 2001

Hi Jerry,

On Tue, 8 May 2001, Gerald Carter wrote:

> I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the
> latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and
> --with-pam).  PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with

>   o domain logons from all Windows clients
>   o user lists for Win9x in user mode security
>   o adding/deleting/changing shares from Server Manager
>   o browsing/accessing shares on NT4/Win2k members
>     servers in a Samba domain
>   o logon scripts
>   o Windows NT4 style system policies
>   o 'domain admin group' parameter

> So looks like things are going for 2.2.1. What did I forget?
> Back to work....

I may be misremembering, but didn't most of the PAM problems show up when
using pam_unix rather than pam_pwdb?  Does all of the above work with pam_unix
as well?

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list