latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2
Steve Langasek
vorlon at netexpress.net
Wed May 9 16:03:44 GMT 2001
Hi Jerry,
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Gerald Carter wrote:
> I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the
> latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and
> --with-pam). PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with pam_pwdb.so.
> o domain logons from all Windows clients
> o user lists for Win9x in user mode security
> o adding/deleting/changing shares from Server Manager
> o browsing/accessing shares on NT4/Win2k members
> servers in a Samba domain
> o logon scripts
> o Windows NT4 style system policies
> o 'domain admin group' parameter
> So looks like things are going for 2.2.1. What did I forget?
> Back to work....
I may be misremembering, but didn't most of the PAM problems show up when
using pam_unix rather than pam_pwdb? Does all of the above work with pam_unix
as well?
Regards,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list