smb & win9x

[Richard Sharpe]

At 03:35 PM 3/12/01 -0600, Jim Morris wrote:
>Richard,
>
>Monday, March 12, 2001, 9:07:16 AM, you wrote:
>
>os level >> 33 is not needed for any Windows systems. So,
>
>RS> os level = 33 
>
>RS> is enough. If there is another samba server with an os level > 32,
then you
>RS> might not want to fight with it.
>
>I don't know what is going on here, as I am in agreement with you
>that the "os level" setting should not normally need to be higher than
>33 (I sometimes use 65 though).  Regardless, Bartlomiej is apparently
>onto something, as my problems using DHCP client PC's seems to
>disappear if I use "os level = 128" in my smb.conf (Samba 2.0.7 here).

OK, what we need to see is a trace of the problem ...



Regards
-------
Richard Sharpe, sharpe at ns.aus.com
Samba (Team member, www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member, www.ethereal.com)
Contributing author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours
Author, Special Edition, Using Samba