smb & win9x
sharpe at ns.aus.com
Tue Mar 13 01:15:20 GMT 2001
At 03:35 PM 3/12/01 -0600, Jim Morris wrote:
>Monday, March 12, 2001, 9:07:16 AM, you wrote:
>os level >> 33 is not needed for any Windows systems. So,
>RS> os level = 33
>RS> is enough. If there is another samba server with an os level > 32,
>RS> might not want to fight with it.
>I don't know what is going on here, as I am in agreement with you
>that the "os level" setting should not normally need to be higher than
>33 (I sometimes use 65 though). Regardless, Bartlomiej is apparently
>onto something, as my problems using DHCP client PC's seems to
>disappear if I use "os level = 128" in my smb.conf (Samba 2.0.7 here).
OK, what we need to see is a trace of the problem ...
Richard Sharpe, sharpe at ns.aus.com
Samba (Team member, www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member, www.ethereal.com)
Contributing author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours
Author, Special Edition, Using Samba
More information about the samba-ntdom