Samba vs. WSFU
armand at welshhome.org
Fri Jan 5 21:49:27 GMT 2001
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
NFS access which WSFU uses, doesn't authenticate against NT machines. It
allows you to connect to NFS shares, and it allows you to synchronize
password with unix, but it is not the same.
I like how samba exports shares to windows clients, so that they are
natively support by windows.
Also, I understand that NFS is not very secure. though this is through the
grape vine, as I have not used it yet.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Puchta, Milos" <M.Puchta at fscodes.cz>
To: <samba-ntdom at us5.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 3:50 AM
Subject: Samba vs. WSFU
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> I am playing with Samba now - and have problems with W2K Prof
> on client side.
> There is an alternative for access to file, namely Windows
> Services for Unix ver. 2. If we do not take into account that
> this is not free package, what are Pros and Cons, when
> comparing with Samba?
More information about the samba-ntdom