Anyone having problems with swat?

Armand Welsh armand at welshhome.org
Tue Jan 2 23:17:59 GMT 2001


*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
hmmm... I have never used apache with swat.  Swat is self contained.
doesn't use swat.  Perhaps it can be configured to use though...

The problem I have seen is that if localhost is not listed in /etc/hosts, or
if you use squid proxy, then localhost won't work, and the ip address must
be used instead.  squid tries to resolve localhost as a FQDN, but it's not.
It's just a host name.  So squid returns an error.  Solution is to not proxy
request destined to localhost and 127.0.0.1

----- Original Message -----
From: "Raymond Lillard" <rlillard at prosysmeg.com>
To: "Westmoreland, Brent" <BWestmoreland at poiusa.com>;
"'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at us5.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: Anyone having problems with swat?


> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> Brent wrote:
> > I can't get swat to work via redhat 7.0.  Am able to make changes via
> > smb.conf, but I would like some type of  gui interface.  Checke the
> > /etc/services file for the tcp port and it was fine. Any ideas?
>
> Just a longshot but, does http://localhost work?
>
> If not, have you been using linuxconf to admin Apache?
> I don't remember the exact details, but I struggled on
> RH6.2 few months back to get Apache working (so I could
> use swat) and had to hand edit httpd.conf to fix a few
> parameters that linuxconf mangled.
>
> Good Luck,
> Ray
>
>
>





More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list