samba-ntdom needed any more? (fwd)

John Benedetto jbenedet at unm.edu
Thu Apr 19 18:11:49 GMT 2001


Gerald sent this to me, and I (assume) he meant for it to go to the entire 
list...

- john

---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Date: Thursday, April 19, 2001 8:27 AM -0700
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
To: "John T. Benedetto" <jbenedet at unm.edu>
Subject: Re: samba-ntdom needed any more?

yOn Thu, 19 Apr 2001, John T. Benedetto wrote:

>
> I think folding it back in would be good idea (I, too, would like one
> less list to read, though I wonder if it would reduce traffic all that
> much, or just increase traffic on the main Samba list).

My hope would be to remove some of the redundancy in answering questions.
I'm also working on more documentation, so maybe that will help as well.

Let me add that NT domain development is still going to continue with
some experimental aspects such as LDAP, Kerberos, etc... so we may want
to review how to best coordinate this.

One option no one has mentioned to make it a moderated list.  Of course
then you need a moderator, but that is besides the point :-)  How would
people feel about this?




Cheers, jerry



---------- End Forwarded Message ----------





More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list