FW: samba-ntdom needed any more?
teilo at cdt.luth.se
Thu Apr 19 08:19:19 GMT 2001
Gerald Carter wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:24:09 Elliot Mackenzie wrote:
>> The NT domain feature is a very important (still relatively new)
>> feature that a lot of people (including myself) have at one
>> stage experienced problems with. The fact that we get up
>> to 30 emails a day through this mailing list seems to
>> suggest that there are sufficient people who use this
>> list to make it worthwhile. I would personally find it
>> more irritating having to double or triple my mail traffic
>> each day just to receive the same emails I do currently (I am
>> not a part of samba-main).
> I don;t think anyone is implying that the Domain feature
> is not important. I just don't want to be answering identical
> questions on Samba and samba-ntdom.
Then what about subscribing samba at samba.org to samba-ntdom for a
- Okay this could end up with some people getting 2 of the same emails
but as we are talking Samba/Unix'ish I'm guessing that most people have
the abiltiy to do some mailbox filtering to get rid of the duplicates.
In my view this
> This list should be for testing new features in Samba related to
> NT domains. Samba-techical should remain for coordinating
I would agree with that and it is how I have actually seen it in the past.
just my 2cents
Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet.
More information about the samba-ntdom