TNG suitablity for production systems ?

Rafał Szcześniak rszczesniak at
Wed Sep 27 13:18:53 GMT 2000

I use combination of Samba TNG and Samba HEAD
in my private two computer network, and have no
problems. In one office I installed Samba 2.0.7
(no problems also), but I'm going to implement one
or two TNG/HEAD server(s) carefully. Of course,
all the time "keeping care" of whole system.


Jeremy Allison <jeremy at>
Wysłane przez: samba-ntdom-admin at
00-09-26 20:08

        Do:     J.L.Gilmour at
        DW:     samba-ntdom at
        Temat:  Re: TNG suitablity for production systems ?

J.L.Gilmour at wrote:
> Following the recent bickering about TNG, can I ask this of the
> assembled masses...
> How many of us are using TNG in live systems?
> We're running a combination of Samba 2.x and 3.x to run a
> network of 50 or so NT boxes, 300 or so users. Office politics
> lead to the demise
> of a 'real' NT server, and Samba 3 / TNG was *tested* and found to
> be reliable for authentication and file sharing. It had a few bugs
> which stopped printing from working, hence the Samba 2.x servers
> for print sharing.
> It seems stable, but with recent claims I'm now wondering whether
> we're going to run in to BIG problems sometime soon, if the PDC
> goes, we have problems...

If it works for you for what you need, then it's fine.
We just don't want to officially support that code branch
until the functionality is migrated into the "production"
branch - that way many more developers will get familiar
with it.



Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.

More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list