TNG-stable
Craig Kelley
ink at inconnu.isu.edu
Tue Sep 26 15:32:35 GMT 2000
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> With FreeBSD I can get a DAILY update of every change to HEAD. I can run
> it too, if I dare (and dare is the right word, since it doesn't always even
> build - say much less install)
>
> If Samba's team provides less, then you ARE NOT an open development
> environment. If I cannot get the changes you check in 5 minutes after you
> do it (should I poll the CVS server at that point in time) then you're
> simply not an open project.
Give it a rest.
Different projects have different policies and people. To uphold FreeBSD
as the epitome of development is naive, and does nothing to help
Samba. You've made your point already -- dragging this out into a debate
serves no purpose.
> > What gave you the idea that the repository was filtered ?
>
> You did. You appeared to state that there were two repositories - one for
> "privileged" people, and one for the rest.
>
> If that's not what you meant, then I retract the criticism.
Every project has a privileged branch; it's all a matter of time as to
when the keystrokes convert into a distribution. Even the FreeBSD people
have to use editors and save files locally; I imagine that many may even
work on some functionallity over a long period of time without committing.
--
The wheel is turning but the hamster is dead.
Craig Kelley -- kellcrai at isu.edu
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink at inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list