W2K-Terminal Server vs Samba 2.0.7
Bart Drijver
b.drijver at nyenrode.nl
Tue Nov 14 11:11:59 GMT 2000
On 13 Dec 00, at 15:55, Gerald Carter wrote:
> Fixed. Thanks for pointing this out
>
What exactly do you mean by 'Fixed': do you mean you fixed the
W2K-TS vs Samba problem?, because this suggested Reg-key
didn't work for me!
Is there anyone who knows how to make this Reg-key which works
on NT4-TS but NOT on W2K with TS?????????????????????????
Bart Drijver
>
>
> Andrew Cherry wrote:
> >
> > As another data point, it appears as if the REG file
> > WindowsTerminalServer.reg included in the docs subdirectory of the
> > Samba dist is incorrect. It reads:
> >
> > -----------------
> > REGEDIT4
> >
> > ;Subject: Registry file to force multiple NT terminal server
> > users to have
> > their own connections.
> >
> > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters
> > ] "MultipleUsersOnConnection"=dword:00000001 -----------------
> >
> > This really should be "dword:00000000" -- otherwise, it has the
> > opposite of the desired effect! The default value is 0x1, which
> > multiplexes all of the WTS users across a single SMB connection.
> >
> > I don't know if this registry key applies to Win2K Terminal
> > Services, though.. my only experience is with the NT 4.0 Windows
> > Terminal Server.
> >
> > -Andrew Cherry
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
> \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
> http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
> http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
>
> "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
> - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list