W2K-Terminal Server vs Samba 2.0.7

Bart Drijver b.drijver at nyenrode.nl
Tue Nov 14 11:11:59 GMT 2000


On 13 Dec 00, at 15:55, Gerald Carter wrote:

> Fixed.  Thanks for pointing this out
> 
What exactly do you mean by 'Fixed': do you mean you fixed the 
W2K-TS vs Samba problem?, because this suggested Reg-key 
didn't work for me!

Is there anyone who knows how to make this Reg-key which works 
on NT4-TS but NOT on W2K with TS?????????????????????????

Bart Drijver 
> 
> 
> Andrew Cherry wrote:
> > 
> > As another data point, it appears as if the REG file
> > WindowsTerminalServer.reg included in the docs subdirectory of the
> > Samba dist is incorrect.  It reads:
> > 
> > -----------------
> > REGEDIT4
> > 
> > ;Subject:       Registry file to force multiple NT terminal server
> > users to have
> >  their own connections.
> > 
> > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters
> > ] "MultipleUsersOnConnection"=dword:00000001 -----------------
> > 
> > This really should be "dword:00000000" -- otherwise, it has the
> > opposite of the desired effect!  The default value is 0x1, which
> > multiplexes all of the WTS users across a single SMB connection.
> > 
> > I don't know if this registry key applies to Win2K Terminal
> > Services, though.. my only experience is with the NT 4.0 Windows
> > Terminal Server.
> > 
> > -Andrew Cherry
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    /\  Gerald (Jerry) Carter                     Professional Services
>  \/    http://www.valinux.com/  VA Linux Systems   gcarter at valinux.com
>        http://www.samba.org/       SAMBA Team          jerry at samba.org
>        http://www.plainjoe.org/                     jerry at plainjoe.org
> 
>        "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
>                                 - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )






More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list