Next stable version of Samba.

Paul Lussier pll at
Thu May 18 14:30:16 GMT 2000

In a message dated: Thu, 18 May 2000 16:46:59 +1000
"Ingo T. Storm" said:

>I think that the 2.2 for the release branch is favorable while the "2.1" in
>the book is unfortunate.
>How about a prominently placed "Samba version guide" right on
>I don't think anybody buying the book will get by without looking there.

I know I'd appreciate it.  I've been playing around with Samba for quite some 
time, but was off the list for a few months.  I still don't quite get the
2.0.x vs. HEAD vs. TNG thing.  Something explaining which is which, and what 
the differences/goals of each are on the website would be great!

	"I always explain our company via interpretive dance.
	     I meet lots of interesting people that way."
					  Niall Kavanagh, 10 April, 2000

	 If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!

More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list