Next stable version of Samba.
pll at mclinux.com
Thu May 18 14:30:16 GMT 2000
In a message dated: Thu, 18 May 2000 16:46:59 +1000
"Ingo T. Storm" said:
>I think that the 2.2 for the release branch is favorable while the "2.1" in
>the book is unfortunate.
>How about a prominently placed "Samba version guide" right on www.samba.org?
>I don't think anybody buying the book will get by without looking there.
I know I'd appreciate it. I've been playing around with Samba for quite some
time, but was off the list for a few months. I still don't quite get the
2.0.x vs. HEAD vs. TNG thing. Something explaining which is which, and what
the differences/goals of each are on the website would be great!
"I always explain our company via interpretive dance.
I meet lots of interesting people that way."
Niall Kavanagh, 10 April, 2000
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
More information about the samba-ntdom