Next stable version of Samba.

[Allen]

it-samba at computerbild.de said:
> I think that the 2.2 for the release branch is favorable while the
> "2.1" in the book is unfortunate.

Isn't it obvious to anyone here, that if the book says 2.1, and the released 
version is 2.2, then the 2.2 version would obviously be newer, and obviously 
fulfill the requirement as the 2.1 versiion was intended to in the book?


my 2c
-- 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Allen Bolderoff <allen at gist.net.au>
LNC -  Linux, help and commentary http://linux.netnerve.com
CTPC - Caffeine - get it here: http://www.coffee-tea-pots-cups.com/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
GPG fingerprint = CBB0 8626 702C 3D01 B5AD  A54A DC2C 93B7 3E4B 6472
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++