Next stable version of Samba.

Stephen Waters swaters at amicus.com
Wed May 17 23:41:25 GMT 2000


Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul J Collins [mailto:pjdc at eircom.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 4:25 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM
> > Subject: Re: Next stable version of Samba.
> >
> >
> > >>>>> "Gregory" == Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc at cu-portland.edu> writes:
> >
> >     >> "You will need to use at least Samba 2.1 to ensure that PDC
> >     >> functionality for Windows NT clients is present..."
> >
> >     Gregory> So, uhm, how did the Samba Team let this go out?  To the
> >     Gregory> best of my knowledge, there has never been an officially
> >     Gregory> released "Samba 2.1", so it seems that it's kind of a
> >     Gregory> strange statement.
> >
> > Samba 2.1 has always been taken to refer to "the development
> > version".  You are correct, there was no 2.1 release.
> 
> Sorry to do this, but...  If it's taken to refer to "the development
> version", and there's something in books like this that state that "Samba
> 2.1" isn't released, and that the release schedule isn't set (at the time of
> printing), then the Samba Team should have no qualms about invalidating this
> version reference.  Since it's meant to refer to "the development version",
> I'd say that we shouldn't have any qualms about invalidating this statement
> in the book "Using Samba".  Maybe that's just me...
>         Greg

You are correct, Greg. IMHO.

-s


More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list