Win9x and TNG status?

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

fantastic.  there is a lot more thanthat, i'm sure :)

On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:

> Luke,
> 
> I think I found it - there is a SO_REUSEPORT option in the 2.0.6 code that
> is NOT present (test and structure definition) in lib/util_sock.c.  I'm 
> attempting to patch in the appropriate lines from 2.0.6 and will advise.
> 
> --
> -- 
> Karl Denninger (karl at denninger.net)  Web: http://childrens-justice.org
> Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first?  See the above URL for
> a plan to do exactly that!
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:09:07PM +1100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> > 
> > > It is NOT an issue with 2.0.x on the same hardware.  I have 2.0.x on that
> > > box and it works PERFECTLY.
> > 
> > yes, exactly.  nmbd from tng is over two years old code.  these kinds of
> > issues are likely to have been fixed, by now, if they were ever
> > encountered (likely).
> > 
> 

<a href=" mailto:lkcl at samba.org" > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton    </a>
<a href=" http://cb1.com/~lkcl"  > Samba and Network Development   </a>
<a href=" http://samba.org"      > Samba Web site                  </a>
<a href=" http://www.iss.net"    > Internet Security Systems, Inc. </a>
<a href=" http://mcp.com"        > Macmillan Technical Publishing  </a>
 
ISBN1578701503 DCE/RPC over SMB: Samba and Windows NT Domain Internals