SYSKEY, TNG freeze, 2.0.x->TNG merge and other thoughts
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at samba.org
Wed Feb 9 17:48:41 GMT 2000
> Actually luke, don't mix up the RPC server/client stub code
> with the RPC *implementation* code in 2.0.x. The implementation
> code in 2.0.x is much more reliable than the TNG code (not
> the actual server/client functions though).
cvs -t co -r SAMBA_2_0 samba
cvs -t diff -u -r "1.8" source/rpc_server > foo
i'm just reviewing srv_lsa.c diffs. it shows, for example that the
implementation of lsa_open_policy() is this:
for (i = 4; i < 20; i++)
{
r_u.policy_hnd[i] = i;
}
you are not telling me that this is more reliable than the tng
implementation, i take it?
what i _do_ like about 2_0 is this:
api_reply_lsa_open_policy()
{
if (!lsa_io_q_open_policy(...)
{
return False;
}
...
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list