rpcclient from tng

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at samba.org
Wed Feb 9 05:01:00 GMT 2000


On 8 Feb 2000, Todd Sabin wrote:

> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba.org> writes:
> 
> > oops, it may be too long (large) for the current regenum code.  does
> > anyone with some MSDN / Reg* experience want to take a look at the code
> > and try and fix this?  the api is pretty much identical except it will be
> > reg_enum_values not RegEnumValues etc :)
> > 
> 
> The problem appears to be that the registry value has no name.  I.e.,
> its name is "", the null string.  Yes, the geniuses at Microsoft allow
> you to create values with the null string as its name.  If fact, large

... *blink* :)

> sections of the registry (typically the stuff developed on Win9x
> first) are full of this.  When you look at them with regedit.exe it
> calls them "Default" in the UI.  When you look at them with
> regedt32.exe it calls them "<No Name>".
> 
> Not sure what rpcclient needs to do to handle this...

i need a netmon trace and/or a debug log level 100 (log.client from
rpcclient) to track it down.



More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list