rpcclient from tng
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at samba.org
Wed Feb 9 05:01:00 GMT 2000
On 8 Feb 2000, Todd Sabin wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba.org> writes:
>
> > oops, it may be too long (large) for the current regenum code. does
> > anyone with some MSDN / Reg* experience want to take a look at the code
> > and try and fix this? the api is pretty much identical except it will be
> > reg_enum_values not RegEnumValues etc :)
> >
>
> The problem appears to be that the registry value has no name. I.e.,
> its name is "", the null string. Yes, the geniuses at Microsoft allow
> you to create values with the null string as its name. If fact, large
... *blink* :)
> sections of the registry (typically the stuff developed on Win9x
> first) are full of this. When you look at them with regedit.exe it
> calls them "Default" in the UI. When you look at them with
> regedt32.exe it calls them "<No Name>".
>
> Not sure what rpcclient needs to do to handle this...
i need a netmon trace and/or a debug log level 100 (log.client from
rpcclient) to track it down.
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list