SYSKEY, TNG freeze, 2.0.x->TNG merge and other thoughts

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

> >    TNG seems to be much further ahead on the MSRPC issues, which means
> >    there's no merge to do from 2.0.x there.
> 
> wrong. the smb/rpc layer (the prs_struct structure) is much cleaner in
> HEAD. Some RPC functions have been rewritten in HEAD and must be kept.

don't want to do it.  point me in the direction of specific functions and
i'll rewrite them in TNG.

i don't want ANY of the dce/rpc code from 2_0 or cvs main in any future
version of samba, i have no idea of its trustworthiness.

there _is_ one feature i do want: the byte-ordering that jeremy added.