SYSKEY2. Request For Comments

[Cole, Timothy D.]

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [SMTP:lkcl at samba.org]
> Sent:	Tuesday, February 08, 2000 13:30
> To:	Cole, Timothy D.
> Cc:	Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM
> Subject:	RE: SYSKEY2.  Request For Comments
> 
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Cole, Timothy D. wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:	Phil Mayers [SMTP:p.mayers at ic.ac.uk]
> > > Sent:	Monday, February 07, 2000 15:13
> > > To:	Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM
> > > Subject:	Re: SYSKEY2.  Request For Comments
> > > 
> > > Hmm. Interesting point which I hadn't considered. For LDAP I would say
> > > that the entry really ought to be ACL'd anyhow (they are here at my
> > > site) which is similar to having a seperate password-protected
> database
> > > file. Hmm. NIS and SQL I don't know about though.
> > > 
> > 	NIS is NIS.  The hashed passwords are visible to everyone.  NIS+
> 
> yes, but they're one-way hashes, not clear-text-equivalent hashes!
> 
	*whistles*

	... really?  damn... 

> > does do some sort of limited-access thing, though.
> 
> yes.