SYSKEY2. Request For Comments

[Cole, Timothy D.]

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Phil Mayers [SMTP:p.mayers at ic.ac.uk]
> Sent:	Monday, February 07, 2000 15:13
> To:	Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM
> Subject:	Re: SYSKEY2.  Request For Comments
> 
> Hmm. Interesting point which I hadn't considered. For LDAP I would say
> that the entry really ought to be ACL'd anyhow (they are here at my
> site) which is similar to having a seperate password-protected database
> file. Hmm. NIS and SQL I don't know about though.
> 
	NIS is NIS.  The hashed passwords are visible to everyone.  NIS+
does do some sort of limited-access thing, though.