Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

[Mail Delivery System]

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:

  tc-wedel.de!monscheu at s023250.tk.tc-wedel.de:
    SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:
    <tc-wedel.de!monscheu at s023250.tk.tc-wedel.de>:
    host 195.222.202.30 [195.222.202.30]:
    550 relaying to <tc-wedel.de!monscheu at s023250.tk.tc-wedel.de> prohibited by administrator

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Received: from zwitter-nt.hamburg.pop.de ([192.168.1.3] helo=smtpshield.pop.de)
	by virus.pop.de with smtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 13Qzh2-0003kp-00
	for tc-wedel.de!monscheu at s023250.tk.tc-wedel.de; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:05:20 +0200
Received: FROM virus.pop.de BY smtpshield.pop.de ; Sat Aug 22 00:07:09 1998 +0100
Received: from [195.222.210.68] (helo=uucp.hamburg.pop.de)
	by virus.pop.de with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 13Qzh1-0003kn-00
	for tc-wedel.de!monscheu at s023250.tk.tc-wedel.de; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:05:19 +0200
Received: from [203.17.0.92] (helo=samba.org)
	by uucp.hamburg.pop.de with esmtp (Exim 2.054 #1)
	id 13Qzgv-00041E-00
	for tc-wedel.de!monscheu at s023250.tk.tc-wedel.de; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:05:15 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:21209 "HELO ") by samba.org with SMTP
	id <S27794192AbQHUWGq>; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:06:46 +1000
Message-Id: <m2vgwu5l26.fsf at sto-kerrig.ondioline.org>
Errors-To: listproc-errors at samba.org
Reply-To: pjdc at eircom.net
Originator: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Sender: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Precedence: bulk
From:   Paul J Collins <pjdc at eircom.net>
To:     Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: SURS, machine accounts, etc... [wasRe: Inoltra: Re: Why machines in  passwd anyway?]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0d -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-URL:  http://lists.samba.org/
X-Comment: Discussion of NT domain controller support in Samba
In-Reply-To: Adam Williams's message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2000 07:50:38 +1000"
References: <200008141619.SAA00559 at mister.cdc.polimi.it> <14753.28129.602007.94686 at wire.cadcamlab.org> <20000821.21455200 at estate1.whitemice.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:06:46 +1000

>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> writes:

    Adam> I'm mostly just a lurker but I don't see how a search of
    Adam> /etc/passwd (or nss at least) can be avoided.  When a user
    Adam> logs on to a Samba server the smbd runs under their UID
    Adam> which comes from the /etc/passwd file (or some other nss
    Adam> source).  Calculating the RID from this already know value
    Adam> seems the most efficient process possible IMHO.  I see
    Adam> nothing wrong with the accounts in the password database.

I may be misunderstanding you, but this discussion pertains to machine
trust accounts in particular, not to user accounts in general.

Idea: Is there any reason that machine trust account passwords could
not be stored as LSA secrets, in the same fashion that inter-domain
trust passwords are?

Paul.

-- 
Paul Collins <pjdc at eircom.net> - - - - - - - [ A&P,a&f ]
 GPG: 0A49 49A9 2932 0EE5 89B2  9EE0 3B65 7154 8131 1BCD
 PGP: 88BA 2393 8E3C CECF E43A  44B4 0766 DD71 04E5 962C
"Cover up and say goodnight... say goodnight."