Compilation Problems Samba TNG-2.5 --with-profile
Matt Monacelli
mam1281 at osfmail.isc.rit.edu
Sat Apr 29 18:43:51 GMT 2000
I mistyped - my netlogon is not writable, and my profile share
is. Win9x is a pain, but not much I can do at the moment. Grr. Also,
I know my machine is slow (DEC Multia) but it takes an enormous amount
of time to perform SAMBA operations - accessing shares, logging in,
etc. I remember with Samba 2.0 it was always quick (no noticeable
lagging). Just a note...
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Paul J Collins wrote:
>>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Monacelli <mam1281 at ritvax.isc.rit.edu> writes:
>
> Matthew> When using Win9x machines on the network, how, after
> Matthew> compiling with the --with-profile option, get the Win9x
> Matthew> machines to start using the server to store profile info
> Matthew> for already existing users (in Win)? I've setup the
>
>You don't need to use the --with-profile option to get support for
>user profiles. That option is used for profiling samba's code, to
>record which functions are called by which, how often, and how long
>they take to execute. You do not need this option.
>
>I believe that there issues in the Windows 9x client relating to
>profiles; I'm not too sure quite what as I only have NT here.
>
> Matthew> smb.conf like in the examples, but nothing is being
> Matthew> created in the netlogon share (yes it is writable - I
> Matthew> chmoded it like in the FAQ). Thanks for any
>
>The netlogon share should *not* be writable. Netlogon is used to
>store logon scripts, and users should not be able to alter them.
>Profiles are normally stored in a separate profile share, which *is*
>writable.
>
> Matthew> help. By the way, as an aside question, I've been having
> Matthew> some profile troubles in windows itself. I was trying to
> Matthew> clean up the "non-profile" directories, such as
> Matthew> C:\WINDOWS\DESKTOP" from when I didn't use individual
> Matthew> profiles so that new users don't have all the crap I used
> Matthew> to have on the desktop and other stuff added (especially
> Matthew> my Outlook Express profile which isn't password protected
> Matthew> upon creating the new profile). Thanks again...
>
>I'm pretty sure that Windows 9x runs special programs when a new
>profile is created to add all that junk (you recall that "Adding
>Personalized Settings" dialog?); I'm not sure quite what you can do
>about it. Unlike Windows NT, Windows 9x doesn't have an "All Users"
>virtual profile that affects all profiles. If you look at the
>Passwords control panel, you can see that you decide if desktops and
>start menus are shared or not. That is a global option, I believe.
>
>To be honest, whenever I come across a 9x machine with profiles
>enabled, I turn it off. It's more trouble that it's worth.
>
>Paul.
>
>
--
Matthew A. Monacelli mam1281 at rit.edu
Software Support Rep (Mac Team) Cell: (716)734-1379
ITS Technical Support Services Helpdesk: 475-HELP(4357)
Rochester Institute of Technology
"...Linux is free only if your time has no value!"
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list