Samba 2.0.6 PDC - almost there, but stuck for now

[Andrew Perrin - Demography]

Actually it's not just 95 that logs into 2.0 - NT4.0 workstations are
happy to use a samba pdc running 2.0.3a.  The advantage to those of us
using it in a production environment is that the 2.0 series is far better
documented than the 2.1 series (so far).  We've run both in test
environments and found 2.0.x to be, on the whole, a better solution for
our NT/Solaris/Linux network.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew J. Perrin - aperrin at demog.berkeley.edu - NT/Unix Admin/Support
Department of Demography    -    University of California at Berkeley
2232 Piedmont Avenue #2120  -    Berkeley, California, 94720-2120 USA
http://demog.berkeley.edu/~aperrin --------------------------SEIU1199

On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Kevin Colby wrote:

> Andrew Perrin - Demography wrote:
> > 
> > Actually 2.0.3a works very nicely as a PDC
> > -- it's there but just not 'supported' in the 2.0 series.
> 
> "It" is _somewhat_ there.
> 
> Just because you can get Win95 to logon to a Samba 2.0 domain
> does not mean that 2.0 is doing everything a PDC should.
> 
> If it works for you, terrific.
> If it doesn't, don't beat a dead horse.  Get the 2.1 code.
> 
> 	- Kevin Colby
> 	  kevinc at grainsystems.com
>