vote / opinions required on rpcclient

[Mike Harris]

I agree!
----- Original Message -----
From: Luke Leighton <lkcl at samba.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: vote / opinions required on rpcclient


> i think i'm going to make rpcclient the "main" program, for backwards-
> compatibility.
>
> then create these new ones usrmgr, srvmgr, cmdat, regedit, that are
> "subsets" of the rpcclient functionality.
>
> rpcclient has 70 commands in it, and that's a bit much, and it's not even
> finished yet!
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Andrew Perrin - Demography wrote:
>
> > How about making rpcclient emulate these when called as such; then
> > hardlinks from those filenames could act as their respective MS
programs?
> > Then the functionality would all reside in one program in the back,
which
> > would be callable directly for those of us who don't commonly use the MS
> > tools.
> >
> > Cheers-
> > Andy
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Andrew J. Perrin - aperrin at demog.berkeley.edu - NT/Unix Admin/Support
> > Department of Demography    -    University of California at Berkeley
> > 2232 Piedmont Avenue #2120  -    Berkeley, California, 94720-2120 USA
> > http://demog.berkeley.edu/~aperrin --------------------------SEIU1199
> >
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Luke Leighton wrote:
> >
> > > i need to know whether people think it would be a good idea to retire
> > > rpcclient in favour of the following command suite:
> > >
> > > net
> > > usrmgr
> > > srvmgr
> > > regedit
> > > eventvwr
> > > cmdat
> > >
> > > basically, a suite of programs that match nt's .EXE equivalents.
> > >
> > > luke (samba team)
> > >
> >