vote / opinions required on rpcclient

[Luke Leighton]

i think i'm going to make rpcclient the "main" program, for backwards-
compatibility.

then create these new ones usrmgr, srvmgr, cmdat, regedit, that are
"subsets" of the rpcclient functionality.

rpcclient has 70 commands in it, and that's a bit much, and it's not even
finished yet!

On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Andrew Perrin - Demography wrote:

> How about making rpcclient emulate these when called as such; then
> hardlinks from those filenames could act as their respective MS programs?
> Then the functionality would all reside in one program in the back, which
> would be callable directly for those of us who don't commonly use the MS
> tools.
> 
> Cheers-
> Andy
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Andrew J. Perrin - aperrin at demog.berkeley.edu - NT/Unix Admin/Support
> Department of Demography    -    University of California at Berkeley
> 2232 Piedmont Avenue #2120  -    Berkeley, California, 94720-2120 USA
> http://demog.berkeley.edu/~aperrin --------------------------SEIU1199
> 
> On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Luke Leighton wrote:
> 
> > i need to know whether people think it would be a good idea to retire
> > rpcclient in favour of the following command suite:
> > 
> > net
> > usrmgr
> > srvmgr
> > regedit
> > eventvwr
> > cmdat
> > 
> > basically, a suite of programs that match nt's .EXE equivalents.
> > 
> > luke (samba team)
> > 
>