what prealpha works best?
mg at plum.de
Tue Jul 6 11:00:45 GMT 1999
Samuel Liddicott schrieb:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: samba-ntdom at samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom at samba.org]On Behalf Of
> > Allen Bolderoff
> > Sent: 06 July 1999 09:57
> > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM
> > Subject: what prealpha works best?
> > does anyone have a pre-alpha working with redhat 6.0?
> > what date is it from?
> > I need the NT PDC stuff, and need to put it into a production environment
> > kinda quickly.
> > anyone have any suggestions?
> > what is the most stable 2.1pre that can handle domain group stuff?
> It depends what clients you will be using. Will you be using winNT only
> clients, or win95 too?
> The current 2.1pre release does not work with win95 clients and hasn't for
> some time. Luke probably knows when the changes were made that broke this
> as he knows what those changes were.
> So... being a pre-alpha whichever is best for you really depends on your
> exact circumstances, but the best way to find out is to try one, if it fails
> talk about symptoms so we can identify the fault and if it was introduced
> recently you could move back to before it was introduced.
Hmm .. here 2.1pre works fine for '95 clients. (but its about 2 months
Had problems with the latest cvs version a few days ago. nearly all
segfault. So .. make revert is your friend :)
Samba NT-Domain howto (in german)
More information about the samba-ntdom