PDC upgrade from beta4 to 2.0 failure

Ignacio Coupeau icoupeau at unav.es
Sat Jan 23 10:59:46 GMT 1999

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > What this means is that 2.0 has broken code when used
> > as a PDC
> if 2.0 is used as a PDC you will run into difficulties.  the rpc code is
> broken and is about 3 months out of date.

We are using the 2.0.0 as PDC in linux(2.0.36)-intel, without problems
in 3 domains with several hundreds of NT4.0-SP3 ws ... perhaps the only
thing we are tested are:
        1. a little more tendency from the NT ws to "abandon" the domain
        2. more bottlenecks (timeouts) when a classroom log at same time
(perhaps 60 ws)

Is the 2.0B5 is more stable than 2.0.0 as PDC? 

Thanks in advance,

Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D.     e-mail: icoupeau at unav.es
CTI, Director              fax:    +48 425619
University of Navarra      voice:  +48 425600
Pamplona, SPAIN            http://www.unav.es/cti/

More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list