PDC upgrade from beta4 to 2.0 failure
Ignacio Coupeau
icoupeau at unav.es
Sat Jan 23 10:59:46 GMT 1999
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> > What this means is that 2.0 has broken code when used
> > as a PDC
>
> if 2.0 is used as a PDC you will run into difficulties. the rpc code is
> broken and is about 3 months out of date.
We are using the 2.0.0 as PDC in linux(2.0.36)-intel, without problems
in 3 domains with several hundreds of NT4.0-SP3 ws ... perhaps the only
thing we are tested are:
1. a little more tendency from the NT ws to "abandon" the domain
2. more bottlenecks (timeouts) when a classroom log at same time
(perhaps 60 ws)
Is the 2.0B5 is more stable than 2.0.0 as PDC?
Thanks in advance,
Ignacio
____________________________________________________
Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau at unav.es
CTI, Director fax: +48 425619
University of Navarra voice: +48 425600
Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list