PDC upgrade from beta4 to 2.0 failure

[Yan Seiner]

Agreed.  I'm using 2.0.0b5 in production since it came out as PDC with
no [more] problems than I had with NT server.

It's a lot more stable and once the logon problems were resolved the
system has been exemplary.

Yan

Todd Pfaff wrote:
> 
> I think you guys are being a little too hard on yourselves.  I think the
> warnings about PDC support in 2.0 were sufficiently clear and anyone
> running a samba-2.0.0 PDC is taking risks.
>