PDC upgrade from beta4 to 2.0 failure

Yan Seiner yan at cardinalengineering.com
Fri Jan 22 20:33:04 GMT 1999

Agreed.  I'm using 2.0.0b5 in production since it came out as PDC with
no [more] problems than I had with NT server.

It's a lot more stable and once the logon problems were resolved the
system has been exemplary.


Todd Pfaff wrote:
> I think you guys are being a little too hard on yourselves.  I think the
> warnings about PDC support in 2.0 were sufficiently clear and anyone
> running a samba-2.0.0 PDC is taking risks.

More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list