PDC upgrade from beta4 to 2.0 failure
yan at cardinalengineering.com
Fri Jan 22 20:33:04 GMT 1999
Agreed. I'm using 2.0.0b5 in production since it came out as PDC with
no [more] problems than I had with NT server.
It's a lot more stable and once the logon problems were resolved the
system has been exemplary.
Todd Pfaff wrote:
> I think you guys are being a little too hard on yourselves. I think the
> warnings about PDC support in 2.0 were sufficiently clear and anyone
> running a samba-2.0.0 PDC is taking risks.
More information about the samba-ntdom