From wulu at bigfoot.com Mon Aug 2 10:50:30 1999 From: wulu at bigfoot.com (wulu) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: string overflow in safe_strcpy Message-ID: <37A577F6.E7B00766@bigfoot.com> >ok, suggest doing a gdb on the core file, >followed by a "where" to get a stack trace. Found the reason for the smbd failure - it?s IE5 - what else .. I saved some web pages via IE5, which created file/dir-names like: search;cat=search;cat=entertainment;cat=music;ord=741318556-Dateien/ search;cat=search;cat=entertainment;cat=music;ord=741318556.htm after deleting those files everything works fine again. the following happends under dose when trying to recreate one of those files WIN W:\_unburned\cd18\Metallica - Garage Inc\misc\Metallica - Garage Inc_ [Disc2]-Dateien> mkdir "search;cat=search;cat=entertainment;cat=music;ord=741318556.htm" Die Sitzung wurde abgebrochen. <-- 'session closed ' WIN W:\_unburned\cd18\Metallica - Garage Inc\misc\Metallica - Garage Inc_ [Disc2]-Dateien> mkdir \"search;cat=search;cat=entertainment;cat=music;ord=741318556.htm" <-- 'this one works fine' Thanks for your response Ralf ----------------------------------- #gdb --exec=/usr/local/samba/bin/smbd --core=/core --directory=/usr/local/src/samba-CVS300799/source/ GNU gdb 4.17.0.4 with Linux/x86 hardware watchpoint and FPU support Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i486-delix-linux". Core was generated by `/usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D'. Program terminated with signal 6, Abgebrochen. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libreadline.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypt.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /lib/libncurses.so.4...done. Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done. Reading symbols from /lib/libtermcap.so.2...done. Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done. Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_files.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_nis.so.1...done. Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1...done. #0 0x400bc7d1 in __kill () (gdb) where #0 0x400bc7d1 in __kill () #1 0x400bc5ff in raise (sig=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27 #2 0x400bd80f in abort () at ../sysdeps/generic/abort.c:83 #3 0x81267c3 in ?? () #4 0x8117661 in ?? () #5 0x81176cc in ?? () #6 -------------------------------------------------- # Global parameters workgroup = SAMBA netbios name = FRAGGLE server string = Samba [%v] interfaces = 10.60.1.1/24 encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes server ntlmv2 = Auto client ntlmv2 = Auto passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd passwd chat debug = Yes username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/groups/users.map unix password sync = Yes log level = 0 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m.%U.smb max log size = 1000 time server = Yes change notify timeout = 3 keepalive = 0 read size = 4096 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE local group map = /opt/samba/lib/groups/local_groups domain group map = /opt/samba/lib/groups/domain_groups domain user map = /opt/samba/lib/groups/domain_user_map logon script = %U.bat logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U logon drive = h: logon home = \\%N\%U\data domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No wins support = Yes message command = cat %s| smbclient -M frog socket address = 10.60.1.1 time offset = 180 panic action = tail -15 /opt/samba/var/log.smb| smbclient -M frog admin users = root write list = admin, root, @staff hosts allow = 10.60. 127.0.0.1 printing = lprng print command = lpr -P%p %s lppause command = lpc hold %p %j lpresume command = lpc release %p %j queuepause command = lpc stop %p queueresume command = lpc start %p printer driver location = \\FRAGGLE\print$ mangle case = Yes hide dot files = No veto files = /dev/proc/lost+found/ map archive = No delete readonly = Yes vfs option = [audio] comment = mp3 audio filez path = /pub/audio read only = No vfs option = ---------------------------------- From yan at cardinalengineering.com Mon Aug 2 11:55:00 1999 From: yan at cardinalengineering.com (Yan Seiner) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: migrating samba servers Message-ID: <37A58714.96A9B45E@cardinalengineering.com> For the last 8 months I've been using a half and half system - my main server is a RH 5.2 machine running samba, but I have a WinNT 4.0 SRV that basically does nothing but authenticate users into the domain. I am about to build up a new server and would like to get rid of the NT server altogeter. All the user profiles are kept on the samba box. How do I migrate the user database from the NT box to the samba box without screwing up all the user profiles and losing all the machine and user accounts? TIA, Yan -- __ __ | / / /------/ -- / \ / \ -- / /\ \ / /\ \ | / | \/--|-- | \ / \ / ~~ ~~ "The older I get, the faster I was." From a.schaefer at uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de Mon Aug 2 14:46:58 1999 From: a.schaefer at uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Sch=E4fer=2C_Axel=22?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: NT-Samba Backups Message-ID: <511FDFACA857D211A0E10060084D481205CA3D@intranet> Hi! Cheapest method would be to use NT Backup. You have to have all the shares form Samba to be mapped with a drive latter under NT. You could backup all mapped drives and shares under NT. Of course it is just a "workaround" beacuse not very elegant, but it works. And you could even use one or more scripts to do so (for example to "mount" the shares to a drive-letter, to start NT Backup and to schedule the process). But be warned, it is sometimes quite depressing and complicated to do it all with NT board tools! Axel > -----Original Message----- > From: Star of the Sea [mailto:seastar@seasurf.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 29, 1999 6:23 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: NT-Samba Backups > > > Dear all, > > Is it possible to have an NT 4.0 sp4 server, with a > tape backup > drive, backup not only it's own files, but the files on other Linux > servers including the samba directories? If so, how is it done? Could > someone point me in the right direction. > > Sincerely, > > Anthony L. Sollars > System Admin > Star of the Sea School > > From autoresponder at gmx.net Tue Aug 3 05:05:40 1999 From: autoresponder at gmx.net (Global Message Exchange) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Ihre Mail an / Your message to dominik-fritz@gmx.de Message-ID: <19990803050540.15192vac1@mx2.gmx.net> Folgende Nachricht wurde fuer Sie hinterlassen: Please find below a message for you: Vielen Dank fuer ihre Mail Ich bin bis 09.08.99 im Urlaub. Mit freundlichen Gruessen Dominik Fritz =================================== GMX - Ihr E-Mail-Dienst im Internet http://www.gmx.net =================================== Copyright (c) 1998 GMX GmbH From cord at Team.OWL-Online.DE Tue Aug 3 07:08:59 1999 From: cord at Team.OWL-Online.DE (cord@Team.OWL-Online.DE) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles Message-ID: <199908030709.JAA19671@Team.OWL-Online.DE> Hi there, I'm using Debian Linux with Kernle 2.2.10 and Samba 2.04b as PDC. Everythings works fine but the Profiles are getting really big. About 50 MB per each profile. The biggest thing are the temporary Internetfiles from IE4.0 and IE 5.0. The profiles which had only an IE4.0 on there System get also temporary Internetfiles IE 5.0. Is there an option to give the profiles a permanent size or did I have to say the IE 's how big there temporary InternetFiles can be??? Thanx /// Cord -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en Cord-H.Fricke Technik OWL-Online fricke@team.owl-online.de 0 52 1 / 51 52 133 From ce at atl.dk Tue Aug 3 07:40:40 1999 From: ce at atl.dk (Christian E) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles References: <199908030709.JAA19671@Team.OWL-Online.DE> Message-ID: <37A69CF8.454FF494@atl.dk> cord@Team.OWL-Online.DE wrote: > > Hi there, > > I'm using Debian Linux with Kernle 2.2.10 and Samba 2.04b as PDC. > Everythings works fine but the Profiles are getting really big. About > 50 MB per each profile. > The biggest thing are the temporary Internetfiles from IE4.0 and IE 5.0. > The profiles which had only an IE4.0 on there System get also temporary > Internetfiles IE 5.0. > Is there an option to give the profiles a permanent size or did I have > to say the IE 's how big there temporary InternetFiles can be??? You could use the disk-quota on the Linux box to cap the size of the profiles, but that could lead to other problems... Or you could just set up IE to have the cache stored locally on the client- box (that's what we do here)....Or simply use Netscape instead, it's not bug-free but a lot easier to administer IMO .. best regards Christian -- Christian Ejstrup, RF Development Engineer/ IT- Administrator. ATL Research A/S,Sofiendalsvej 85,DK-9200 Aalborg SV,Denmark Phone:+45 96346868, Phone(direct):+45 96346860, GSM:+45 22234304 From Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE Tue Aug 3 07:46:40 1999 From: Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE (Volker Lendecke) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles In-Reply-To: <37A69CF8.454FF494@atl.dk> (message from Christian E on Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:42:57 +1000) References: <199908030709.JAA19671@Team.OWL-Online.DE> <37A69CF8.454FF494@atl.dk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > up IE to have the cache stored locally on the client- box (that's what > we do here)....Or simply use Netscape instead, it's not bug-free but a > lot easier to administer IMO .. Even better: Install squid and do not cache anything on the client. BTW (and far off-topic, sorry), how do I tell IE not to cache anything on disk? Volker -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBN6aeWT/9BWnmOc5FAQEN6AP/bhJyCE5roaE7cGaAWf8LrLwK4vAFP49k bh00tiTyW8byRKDZCjKCufXUTDaAuQgct8wAZjtGiw/EXntQFu2kyhv804TFkzn1 UYo8nuFhgrhqQogdUk0cVJZrQ6po97mL8VzYtaxBxbf0wB08VuhylNkVFb3dhdH3 N5440WT62pg= =nTGe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From SAHLKE at HAUNI.KOERBER.DE Tue Aug 3 09:09:07 1999 From: SAHLKE at HAUNI.KOERBER.DE (Sahlke, Jan) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: AW: unable to validate at nt domain Message-ID: <54CF1F45ED19D311B68E00805FFEA80E28E21E@kns033.hauni.koerber.de> Hello, i solve the problem after reinstall my pdc (NT 4.0 SP 5, germany). But, how map i a domain user to a unix user. If i use username map and the unix user don't have a /etc/passwd entry, i can't share the directory... Best regards Jan Sahlke > ---------- > Von: Jeremy Allison[SMTP:jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 1999 18:48 > An: Sahlke, Jan > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Betreff: Re: unable to validate at nt domain > > Jan Sahlke wrote: > > > > > [1999/07/27 15:51:57, 0] smbd/password.c:(1368) > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user sahlke in > > domain HAUNI to Domain > > controller . Error was NT_STATUS_INVALID_INFO_CLASS. > > > > Its the same, if a do ./smbclient ///sahlke -U sahlke > > What is the exact release version number of the NT machine you > are using as a PDC ? > > Regards, > > Jeremy Allison, > Samba Team. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > Buying an operating system without source is like buying > a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. > -------------------------------------------------------- > From ce at atl.dk Tue Aug 3 09:55:50 1999 From: ce at atl.dk (Christian E) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles References: <199908030709.JAA19671@Team.OWL-Online.DE> <37A69CF8.454FF494@atl.dk> Message-ID: <37A6BCA6.8F84BA21@atl.dk> Volker Lendecke wrote: > BTW (and far off-topic, sorry), how do I tell IE not to cache anything > on disk? I don't think you can (but I haven't got an IE to check it on as I'm using netscape) ..But you can crank it down to minumum size (which is a couple of megs as far as I remember)...Might also be some settings in the registry....... best regards Christian -- Christian Ejstrup, RF Development Engineer/ IT- Administrator. ATL Research A/S,Sofiendalsvej 85,DK-9200 Aalborg SV,Denmark Phone:+45 96346868, Phone(direct):+45 96346860, GSM:+45 22234304 From glauche at plum.de Tue Aug 3 11:38:35 1999 From: glauche at plum.de (Michael Glauche) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles References: <199908030709.JAA19671@Team.OWL-Online.DE> <37A69CF8.454FF494@atl.dk> <37A6BCA6.8F84BA21@atl.dk> Message-ID: <37A6D4BB.C6E5040D@plum.de> Christian E wrote: > > Volker Lendecke wrote: > > > BTW (and far off-topic, sorry), how do I tell IE not to cache anything > > on disk? > > I don't think you can (but I haven't got an IE to check it on as I'm > using netscape) ..But you can crank it down to minumum size (which is a > couple of megs as far as I remember)...Might also be some settings in > the registry....... IIRC you can tell IE where to cache. So, set the IE cache to local HD directory and delete it on logon ... :) For Example : [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\User Shell Folders] "Cache"="%SystemDrive%\TEMP\%USERNAME%.cache" (was that User Shell Folders or UserShellFolders ??) regards, Michael -- Samba NT-Domain howto (in german) http://www.sambahq.de From ce at atl.dk Tue Aug 3 11:57:31 1999 From: ce at atl.dk (Christian E) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles References: <199908030709.JAA19671@Team.OWL-Online.DE> <37A69CF8.454FF494@atl.dk> <37A6BCA6.8F84BA21@atl.dk> <37A6D4BB.C6E5040D@plum.de> Message-ID: <37A6D92B.F0E7FA2F@atl.dk> Michael Glauche wrote: > For Example : > > [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\User > Shell Folders] > "Cache"="%SystemDrive%\TEMP\%USERNAME%.cache" > > (was that User Shell Folders or UserShellFolders ??) > < sarcasm on > Heh..Don't you just looooove those registry entries ?? They're just so logical ;-) < /sarcasm > best regards ce -- Christian Ejstrup, RF Development Engineer/ IT- Administrator. ATL Research A/S,Sofiendalsvej 85,DK-9200 Aalborg SV,Denmark Phone:+45 96346868, Phone(direct):+45 96346860, GSM:+45 22234304 From lutz at zbs-ilmenau.de Tue Aug 3 12:01:11 1999 From: lutz at zbs-ilmenau.de (Lutz Jacob) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles References: <199908030709.JAA19671@Team.OWL-Online.DE> <37A69CF8.454FF494@atl.dk> <37A6BCA6.8F84BA21@atl.dk> <37A6D4BB.C6E5040D@plum.de> Message-ID: <00c801bedda7$e16ac3a0$0a3f25c3@zbsilmenau.de> > > I don't think you can (but I haven't got an IE to check it on as I'm > > using netscape) ..But you can crank it down to minumum size (which is a > > couple of megs as far as I remember)...Might also be some settings in > > the registry....... > > IIRC you can tell IE where to cache. So, set the IE cache to local HD > directory > and delete it on logon ... :) You can tell IE to delete its cache on exit (somewhere in extended options/security). From tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de Tue Aug 3 12:16:43 1999 From: tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de (tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles Message-ID: <0057540001348992000002L422*@MHS> Michael wrote: > Christian E wrote: >> >> Volker Lendecke wrote: >> >>> BTW (and far off-topic, sorry), how do I tell IE not to cache anything >>> on disk? >> >> I don't think you can (but I haven't got an IE to check it on as I'm >> using netscape) ..But you can crank it down to minumum size (which is a >> couple of megs as far as I remember)...Might also be some settings in >> the registry....... Directly manipulating the registry you can shrink cache to at least one byte. If you set it to zero you'll have fun. Don't do that. I can't remember the Key you have to modify. > IIRC you can tell IE where to cache. So, set the IE cache to local HD > directory > and delete it on logon ... :) > > For Example : > > [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\User > Shell Folders] > "Cache"="%SystemDrive%\TEMP\%USERNAME%.cache" > > (was that User Shell Folders or UserShellFolders ??) While keys can't have spaces it must be UserShellFolders. > regards, > Michael > > -- > Samba NT-Domain howto (in german) From nord at cdt.luth.se Tue Aug 3 12:37:33 1999 From: nord at cdt.luth.se (James Nord) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles References: <0057540001348992000002L422*@MHS> Message-ID: <37A6E28D.3ACB7706@cdt.luth.se> tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > > Michael wrote: > > > For Example : > > > > [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\User > > Shell Folders] > > "Cache"="%SystemDrive%\TEMP\%USERNAME%.cache" > > > > (was that User Shell Folders or UserShellFolders ??) > > While keys can't have spaces it must be UserShellFolders. > Yes they can and it is 'User Shell Folders' /James -- Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams From cord at Team.OWL-Online.DE Tue Aug 3 13:18:12 1999 From: cord at Team.OWL-Online.DE (cord@Team.OWL-Online.DE) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Delete on locale machine by logon Message-ID: <199908031318.PAA20039@Team.OWL-Online.DE> Hi there, is there a registry key with which one I can delete a direcroy: Example: On locale machine the profiles use C:\Temp for internet temporaryFiles. I wan?t to delete them by logoff. Know what I mean??? Thanx -- Cord-H. Fricke Technik OWL-Online.de GmbH 0 52 1 / 52 51 133 fricke@team.owl-online.de http://www.team.owl-online.de http://www.owl-online.de From lisa at usna.navy.MIL Tue Aug 3 13:43:15 1999 From: lisa at usna.navy.MIL (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Setting up samba with NIS Message-ID: <99Aug3.094323-0400edt.4996-320+3@odin.usna.navy.mil> HI: Is anybody using NIS with Samba? I have an SGI server running IRIX 6.5 and Samba 2.0.4. The SGI server is acting as an NT PDC. A couple weeks ago, we weren't running NIS. The local /etc/passwd contained entries for each user and NT machine. I could successfully log on from an NT workstation into the Samba domain But we cleaned these entries out of /etc/passwd when we implemented NIS. Now the machine and user entries are contained in /var/yp/passwd. To further complicate the situation, the SGI server running Samba is NOT a master NIS server - it is a slave. Now the NT workstation login is not working. The [homes] share is no longer resolving to my home directory, and my profile (stored in a [profiles] share on the SGI server) is not loading. Also, when I try to access the SGI server from Network Neighborhood, I am not recognized as a user! If you are running NIS with Samba, did you have to do anything special? What does your smb.conf look like? THANKS! Lisa ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 ----------------------------------------------------------  From greg at discreet.com Tue Aug 3 14:03:30 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Setting up samba with NIS In-Reply-To: <99Aug3.094323-0400edt.4996-320+3@odin.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: Hi Lisa, We do samba on SGI with NIS. There is no special setup required since samba simply uses the getpw* functions from IRIX to get users. Can users log in directly to that machine with telnet? Check your /etc/nsswitch.conf file. Also since your samba machine is your PDC you must have encrypted passwords and an smbpasswd file. Actually one thing springs to mind, did you keep the same UIDs for your users and machine accounts when you switched to NIS? Greg On 03-Aug-99 Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > HI: > > Is anybody using NIS with Samba? > > I have an SGI server running IRIX 6.5 and Samba 2.0.4. The SGI server > is acting as an NT PDC. > > A couple weeks ago, we weren't running NIS. The local /etc/passwd contained > entries for each user and NT machine. I could successfully log on from an NT > workstation into the Samba domain > > But we cleaned these entries out of /etc/passwd when we implemented > NIS. Now the machine and user entries are contained in /var/yp/passwd. > > To further complicate the situation, the SGI server running Samba is > NOT a master NIS server - it is a slave. > > Now the NT workstation login is not working. The [homes] share is no > longer resolving to my home directory, and my profile (stored in a [profiles] > share on the SGI server) is not loading. Also, when I try to access > the SGI server from Network Neighborhood, I am not recognized as a user! > > If you are running NIS with Samba, did you have to do anything special? What > does your smb.conf look like? > > THANKS! > > > Lisa > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 > United States Naval Academy - CADIG > 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 > ---------------------------------------------------------- >  --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From jphollan at sprintparanet.com Tue Aug 3 14:09:40 1999 From: jphollan at sprintparanet.com (Jason P. Holland) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Setting up samba with NIS In-Reply-To: <99Aug3.094323-0400edt.4996-320+3@odin.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: <000501beddb9$d3cbf540$0264a8c0@sophocles.swbell.net> Lisa, Here is my smb.conf file I used to get NIS working with Samba 2.0.4b. Its pretty simple, so nobody laugh :), but it works. [global] workgroup = PNT-NAMERICA server string = Solaris Samba Server hosts allow = xxx.xxx. 127. log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user domain logons = yes nis homedir = true homedir map = auto.home socket options = TCP_NODELAY dns proxy = no This was a very simple setup of Samba with NIS username/password authentication. Your Samba server should now allow NIS username/password authentication. I don't know if this will help you out, but its the best help I can offer. There is also support for NIS+, but I have yet to attempt to tackle that beast. Jason P. Holland Unix Administrator - Sprint Paranet jphollan@sprintparanet.com > > HI: > > Is anybody using NIS with Samba? > > I have an SGI server running IRIX 6.5 and Samba 2.0.4. The SGI server > is acting as an NT PDC. > > A couple weeks ago, we weren't running NIS. The local > /etc/passwd contained > entries for each user and NT machine. I could successfully log > on from an NT > workstation into the Samba domain > > But we cleaned these entries out of /etc/passwd when we implemented > NIS. Now the machine and user entries are contained in /var/yp/passwd. > > To further complicate the situation, the SGI server running Samba is > NOT a master NIS server - it is a slave. > > Now the NT workstation login is not working. The [homes] share is no > longer resolving to my home directory, and my profile (stored in > a [profiles] > share on the SGI server) is not loading. Also, when I try to access > the SGI server from Network Neighborhood, I am not recognized as a user! > > If you are running NIS with Samba, did you have to do anything > special? What > does your smb.conf look like? > > THANKS! > > > Lisa > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 > United States Naval Academy - CADIG > 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 > ---------------------------------------------------------- >  > From geurts at vanveen.nl Tue Aug 3 14:27:20 1999 From: geurts at vanveen.nl (Ton Geurts) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Samba server not visible Message-ID: <9FC75D6DD7AAD2119C820000F87AB3BB014C46@VVISERVER1> Hi, I'm a newbie when it comes to Samba. And I have a strange situation on hand. In my test network I have a Win95 PC, a NTw PC and a Linux server with Samba 2.05a. They are all in the same workgroup 'NR11' (there is *no* domain yet), but the Samba server isn't visible. Using smbclient on my Linux server I can work on shares of the Win95 and WinNT machines. But I don't see the Linux server using either Microsoft machine. Anyone any clues? Ton Geurts, Vanveen informatica bv From greg at discreet.com Tue Aug 3 14:34:41 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Samba server not visible In-Reply-To: <9FC75D6DD7AAD2119C820000F87AB3BB014C46@VVISERVER1> Message-ID: Hi Tom, Windoze browsing is highly broadcast dependant. Use WINS and it will work much better. Greg On 03-Aug-99 Ton Geurts wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a newbie when it comes to Samba. And I have a strange situation on hand. > In my test network I have a Win95 PC, a NTw PC and a Linux server with Samba > 2.05a. > They are all in the same workgroup 'NR11' (there is *no* domain yet), but > the Samba server isn't visible. > > Using smbclient on my Linux server I can work on shares of the Win95 and > WinNT machines. > But I don't see the Linux server using either Microsoft machine. > > Anyone any clues? > > Ton Geurts, > Vanveen informatica bv --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From pburch at oralis.com Tue Aug 3 15:04:58 1999 From: pburch at oralis.com (Phil Burch) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Big big profiles Message-ID: <81F006A86C19D311B1880060089A3E7206B0@PDC> Somewhere on the web, you can find .ADM templates for policies (CONFIG.POL, NTCONFIG.POL) which let you control most aspects of IE configuration including cache size and location. This is a good way to drop the cache on all your clients without visiting every machine (and changing the setting for every profile) Ah, here it is.. There is an ADM.ZIP available from this site with fore mentioned .ADM files. http://www.cadvision.com/redicks/security.htm Phil Burch Senior Network Administrator http://www.Oralis.com -----Original Message----- From: cord@Team.OWL-Online.DE [mailto:cord@Team.OWL-Online.DE] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 12:11 AM To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Big big profiles Hi there, I'm using Debian Linux with Kernle 2.2.10 and Samba 2.04b as PDC. Everythings works fine but the Profiles are getting really big. About 50 MB per each profile. The biggest thing are the temporary Internetfiles from IE4.0 and IE 5.0. The profiles which had only an IE4.0 on there System get also temporary Internetfiles IE 5.0. Is there an option to give the profiles a permanent size or did I have to say the IE 's how big there temporary InternetFiles can be??? Thanx /// Cord -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en Cord-H.Fricke Technik OWL-Online fricke@team.owl-online.de 0 52 1 / 51 52 133 From dave at www.buffalostate.edu Tue Aug 3 15:22:00 1999 From: dave at www.buffalostate.edu (Dave J. Andruczyk) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: Samba server not visible In-Reply-To: <9FC75D6DD7AAD2119C820000F87AB3BB014C46@VVISERVER1> Message-ID: > I'm a newbie when it comes to Samba. And I have a strange situation on hand. > In my test network I have a Win95 PC, a NTw PC and a Linux server with Samba > 2.05a. > They are all in the same workgroup 'NR11' (there is *no* domain yet), but > the Samba server isn't visible. > > Using smbclient on my Linux server I can work on shares of the Win95 and > WinNT machines. > But I don't see the Linux server using either Microsoft machine. > > Anyone any clues? Make sure the windoze machines ONLY have TCP/IP as their protocol, remove netbeui, IPX and DLC if they're present. Also check the IP addressing, to make sure all the machines have the proper addresses, you can also setup the windoze boxes to use the samba server for their WINS server. (just set the WINS ip to the ip of the samba server, and make sure "wins support = yes" and "wins proxy = no" is set in the smb.conf file. Dave J. Andruczyk Instructional Support Associate Department of Technology Buffalo State College From jal at mcs.le.ac.uk Tue Aug 3 15:34:28 1999 From: jal at mcs.le.ac.uk (J. A. Landamore) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: snooping network connections Message-ID: <199908031534.QAA02871@ithaca.mcs.le.ac.uk> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 784 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/19990803/ba3fe46e/attachment.bat From puru at elbvilla.de Tue Aug 3 18:10:40 1999 From: puru at elbvilla.de (Jens Puruckherr) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: What does it mean?? Message-ID: <006601beddde$38a88900$0301a8c0@k6> Hi! Our samba-server (2.04b/2.2.7) works fine and without any problems....thought I. All ca. 15 min is there an message in /var/log/messages: 10:13:56 inetd[370]: /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd: exit status 0x1 10:14:27 last message repeatet 30 times 10:14:37 last message repeatet 8 times 10:14:36 inetd[370]: netbios-ns/udp server failing (looping), service terminatet What does it mean?? There are no problems/bad performance for the users 8-( Jens Puruckherr EDV-Manager Elbvilla facility Service GmbH Scharfenberger Stra?e 2 01039 Dresden ------------------------------------------------------- Tel. 03528/446372 mail:puru@elbvilla.de Fax. 0351/8588570 http://www.wohnmarkt-dresden.de From kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us Tue Aug 3 16:40:14 1999 From: kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us (Kevin Myer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:48 2003 Subject: What does it mean?? In-Reply-To: <006601beddde$38a88900$0301a8c0@k6> Message-ID: On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Jens Puruckherr wrote: > Hi! > > Our samba-server (2.04b/2.2.7) works fine and without any > problems....thought I. > All ca. 15 min is there an message in /var/log/messages: > > 10:13:56 inetd[370]: /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd: exit status 0x1 > 10:14:27 last message repeatet 30 times > 10:14:37 last message repeatet 8 times > 10:14:36 inetd[370]: netbios-ns/udp server failing (looping), service > terminatet > > What does it mean?? There are no problems/bad performance for the users First, this is just a guess but I'll hazard that inetd is shutting down the service because its receiving too many requests per minute. From the inetd man pages: to spawn new servers. The optional ``max'' suffix (separated from ``wait'' or ``nowait'' by a dot) specifies the maximum number of server instances that may be spawned from inetd within an interval of 60 sec- onds. When omitted, ``max'' defaults to 40. Do you need to run nmbd through inetd or could you just run it as a standalone daemon? Also you could change the value of max to something that wouldn't cause it to exit, assuming it is inetd killing the process. Of course I could be totally wrong - I'm not sure what an exit status of 0x1 means in the context of inetd and nmbd. Kevin -- ~ Kevin M. Myer . . Network/System Administrator /V\ ELANCO School District // \ /( )\ ^`~'^ From kellermg at potsdam.edu Tue Aug 3 13:22:54 1999 From: kellermg at potsdam.edu (Matthew Keller) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: NT-Samba Backups References: <37A07F1C.4BE01D7@seasurf.net> Message-ID: <37A6ED2E.BEEE82F9@potsdam.edu> Star of the Sea wrote: > > Dear all, > > Is it possible to have an NT 4.0 sp4 server, with a tape backup > drive, backup not only it's own files, but the files on other Linux > servers including the samba directories? If so, how is it done? Could > someone point me in the right direction. > > Sincerely, > > Anthony L. Sollars > System Admin > Star of the Sea School I've recently implement Veritas' Backup Exec software (Backup server is NT) (formerly owned by Seagate) (www.veritas.com). The current version is very robust and has nice remote management capabilities. Among other things it backs up a TON of different UNIXs. Support for various distributions of Linux (including 5.2 and 6.0, which we are runnin Netatalk on) is included in their 'multi-server' version. This program backs up ALL Linux file perfectly (including Windows, OS/2, Mac files residing on the server). I recommend buying the software from Micro Warehouse ( http://www.warehouse.com/DataComm/Networking_Software/Utilities/Back_Up/ ) as they have the best prices available. Just though I'd share..... :) -- - Matthew Keller - Lead Programmer/Analyst Distributed Computing and Telemedia State University of New York at Potsdam Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ From jpr9c at cs.virginia.edu Tue Aug 3 18:08:43 1999 From: jpr9c at cs.virginia.edu (Scott Ruffner) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: IE Cacheing/Profile Size In-Reply-To: <37A6ED2E.BEEE82F9@potsdam.edu> Message-ID: I've had issues with this previously, and the best answer we found (leaving the IE cacheing scheme as it come from MS) is to prevent winlogon from uploading that part of the profile. You can indicate directories to be excluded when uploading the profile to the server; with NT workstation (which we use exclusively), you don't have to worry about old profiles left lying around, since other users aren't going to be able to read them. The registry key and value to prevent directories from being uploaded is: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER]\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon "ExcludeProfileDirs"="Temporary Internet Files" You can add any other directories to this, just comma delimit them. There is one other solution, the one recommended by MS; this was to have IE delete all of it's cache on close. This way there's nothing there to upload. Our users preferred to have large caches to speed things up. In most cases they typically worked on the same workstation 90% of the time and "roamed" for only 10%; consequently, they "ExcludeProfileDirs" worked best. YMMV. Regards, Scott -- Scott Ruffner Computer Science Department Systems Engineer 226E Olsson Hall ruffner@cs.virginia.edu University of Virginia (804)982-2219 From aar at cypress.com Tue Aug 3 20:01:40 1999 From: aar at cypress.com (Aaron Rainwater) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Off-Topic, Sorry - Hidden Console of WOW VDM Message-ID: <37A74AA4.AACA030F@mailhost.cadc.cypress.com> I know this is an email that should not be on this list, but I really need to get in touch with some people who might have encountered this problem before (and hopefully fixed it). I apologize for sending this to the list, and please, if you decide to help me, reply to me personally, so that I won't be the cause of any more list litter than I am already going to be guilty of. --- I've started getting this error windows when I run some DOS apps and some setup programs from my shell scripts. Window Title: "16 bit Windows Subsystem" Window Message: Hidden Console of WOW VDM %SYSTEMROOT%\SYSTEM32\CONFIG.NT. The system file is not suitable for running MS-DOS and Microsoft Windows applications or the user's home directory is not configured correctly. Choose 'Close' to terminate the application. Window Choices: "Close" & "Ignore" Some ways I've tried to run the Setup programs in my scripts: Z:\Dir\Setup.exe start "" /wait Z:\Dir\Setup.exe start Z:\Dir\Setup.exe activate /T "NULL_TITLE" Z:\Dir\Setup.exe ### activate is freeware program starter (I've tried the "start" command with a variety of options set.) As I said, it does this with some DOS apps (command line programs like "sleep" & "newpause"). But it also does it with standard windows setup programs ("setup.exe"'s). Also, I have no problem running the setup programs by double-clicking the icons. And, as long as I run the DOS programs from a command prompt window (and before my first "16 bit..." error occurs), I experience no problems with them either. I changed %SYSTEMROOT%\System32\Config.NT by REM'ing the lines shown below: REM dos=high, umb REM device=%SystemRoot%\system32\himem.sys REM files=50 REM shell=%SystemRoot%\system32\command.com /e:2048 This change allows me to start the "setup" programs from the scripts with no problem (at least so far), but the DOS apps are still not being nice. Also, I've scanned for viruses, and none are to be found. And, I did not used to get the error I'm describing, but now, it seems to start appearing right after I first install the system. Even after adding the latest service pack for WinNT 4.0 TS. This problem is very frustrating, and what's even more frustrating is that it is probably such a simple thing to fix, which would explain why there is no help for the problem on any net resources I can find. Help? :( -- Aaron Rainwater CADC Intern From jgrant at iescrow.com Tue Aug 3 20:11:38 1999 From: jgrant at iescrow.com (John Grant (Concordant Networks)) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Adding NT BDC Message-ID: <000301beddec$657e7800$5201a8c0@iescrow.com> I've read all (?) the back emails, the FAQs, quite a bit of the source too now and I'm still stuck ! I need to a) set up an NT BDC to my Samba PDC (latest CVS version), or b) get another NT PDC to trust my Samba PDC. Option (a) being preferred. The closest I have come is creating a machine account for bdc$ in samba, then building the bdc, but alas it crashes in isass.exe when trying to replicate. (I also see many code=7 in smb.log) The resulting machine can't be logged in to at all (the domain disappears from the selection list, then I get the two box log in screen, but there seems to be no good answer to the password question, so I get to reinstall). If someone has a (even brief) step by step example of how to bring up NT as BDC, or how to get an NT PDC to trust Samba, I would be, err, very grateful indeed ! From lkcl at switchboard.net Tue Aug 3 20:19:13 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Adding NT BDC In-Reply-To: <000301beddec$657e7800$5201a8c0@iescrow.com> Message-ID: On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, John Grant (Concordant Networks) wrote: > I've read all (?) the back emails, the FAQs, quite a bit of the source too > now and I'm still stuck ! > > I need to a) set up an NT BDC to my Samba PDC (latest CVS version), or b) > get another NT PDC to trust > my Samba PDC. Option (a) being preferred. > > The closest I have come is creating a machine account for bdc$ in samba, > then building the bdc, machine account? there is no such thing as a machine account. there is only: - workstation trust account (for interactive logins) - server trust account (for interactive logins and BDCs to sync SAM) - inter-domain trust accounts (self explanatory i hope). > but alas it crashes in isass.exe when trying to replicate. (I also see many > code=7 in smb.log) does it??? please send me a trace, preferably netmon. > If someone has a (even brief) step by step example of how to bring up NT as > BDC, or how to get an > NT PDC to trust Samba, I would be, err, very grateful indeed ! ok, it would help if one of the samba team members tried it first :-) From gordon at hortauto.co.nz Tue Aug 3 21:07:48 1999 From: gordon at hortauto.co.nz (Gordon Smith) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: HEAD code and LDAP libs Message-ID: <99080409140800.00629@gordon.hal> Using OpenLDAP-1.2.3 RPM and the HEAD Samba source, I am unable to configure Samba for compiling. The error reported is: configure:9002: gcc -o conftest -O conftest.c -lreadline -ldl -lcrypt -lpam -lcurses -lldap -llber 1>&5 /usr/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `res_search' /usr/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `dn_expand' /usr/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `_getshort' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The system is RedHat 6.0 kernel 2.3.8. Any suggestions? Cheers, Gordon Smith, MCP, TCP Network Administrator Horticultural Automation Ltd. From goery.valance at ac-reims.fr Tue Aug 3 22:15:20 1999 From: goery.valance at ac-reims.fr (Goery VALANCE) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Change Password, multiple users Message-ID: <007901beddfd$cc5772a0$0354a8c0@hyppolite> In my school we want to use Samba+Linux as NT server for Win95/98 clients. It's work fine but : 1) An user can't change his password from a windows machine. (Win95 say "Not good network password" but we can loggin with this password). 2) I don't know how I can write a script for register 300 users in Linux and samba. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From jjm at iname.com Tue Aug 3 23:35:29 1999 From: jjm at iname.com (Johan Meiring) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Big big profiles Message-ID: <000101bede08$df01e2e0$9fd26520@sandra98> Hi, The NT Resource kit contains a utility that you can install on the workstations that refuses to let a user log off until he reduces the size of his profile. DOn't know how it works, but I know it exists. You should probably reduce the IE temp file storage as well, as your users have no control over what IE will store in their profile. Hope this helps Johan >cord@Team.OWL-Online.DE wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> I'm using Debian Linux with Kernle 2.2.10 and Samba 2.04b as PDC. >> Everythings works fine but the Profiles are getting really big. About >> 50 MB per each profile. >> The biggest thing are the temporary Internetfiles from IE4.0 and IE 5.0. >> The profiles which had only an IE4.0 on there System get also temporary >> Internetfiles IE 5.0. >> Is there an option to give the profiles a permanent size or did I have >> to say the IE 's how big there temporary InternetFiles can be??? > > You could use the disk-quota on the Linux box to cap the size of the >profiles, but that could lead to other problems... Or you could just set >up IE to have the cache stored locally on the client- box (that's what >we do here)....Or simply use Netscape instead, it's not bug-free but a >lot easier to administer IMO .. > >best regards > >Christian > >-- >Christian Ejstrup, RF Development Engineer/ IT- Administrator. >ATL Research A/S,Sofiendalsvej 85,DK-9200 Aalborg SV,Denmark >Phone:+45 96346868, Phone(direct):+45 96346860, GSM:+45 22234304 From farhad at Tehran.Stanford.EDU Wed Aug 4 00:43:29 1999 From: farhad at Tehran.Stanford.EDU (Farhad Shakeri) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Help! ERROR: unbecome root depth is 0 Message-ID: <199908040043.RAA11403@Tehran.Stanford.EDU> Hi, I just upgraded my samba.PDC from 1.9.8 to version 2.1.0-prealpha (I had to for the service pack) But user can not login anymore with error on NT screen: C0000198 [ Oh this was a fresh install, old /usr/local/samba was renamed to old.] and on the Unix side I get: [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] passdb/sampass.c:getsamfile21pwent(108) trust account NET68$ should be in DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_USERS [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_root(387) ERROR: unbecome root depth is 0 [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_root(366) ERROR: become root depth is non zero [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_root(387) ERROR: unbecome root depth is 0 [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_root(366) ERROR: become root depth is non zero [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_root(387) ERROR: unbecome root depth is 0 [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_root(366) ERROR: become root depth is non zero [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_root(387) ERROR: unbecome root depth is 0 [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_root(366) ERROR: become root depth is non zero [1999/08/03 17:30:12, 0] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_root(387) ERROR: unbecome root depth is 0 I am running the exact same code and conf file on two other subnets and they are fine. (different DOMAIN) I have a very simple smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = ROBOSAMBA debug level = 1 server string = Robotics Samba PDC Server encrypt passwords = yes hosts allow = xxx.xxx. 127.0.0.1 localhost load printers = yes printcap name = /etc/printers.conf printing = bsd ; guest account = pcguest log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 1000 security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY remote announce = 171.64.255.255 os level = 250 domain logons = yes local master = yes domain master = yes preferred master = yes logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U dns proxy = no ; preserve case = yes ; case sensitive = yes ; END OF GLOBAL [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon guest ok = no writable = no [Profiles] path = /usr/local/samba/profiles root preexec = /usr/local/samba/bin/buildprofile %U browseable = no writeable = yes guest ok = no Any Clues? Thanks alot --- Farhad Shakeri Email: farhad@CS.Stanford.EDU Principal Systems Programmer Computer Science Department Tel: (650) 723 0009 Stanford, CA 94305-9015 Fax: (650) 723 1701 From jthomas2 at uiuc.edu Wed Aug 4 02:01:23 1999 From: jthomas2 at uiuc.edu (Jay Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Big big profiles References: <000101bede08$df01e2e0$9fd26520@sandra98> Message-ID: <37A79EF3.DFD131FB@uiuc.edu> Johan Meiring wrote: > Hi, > > The NT Resource kit contains a utility that you can install on the > workstations that refuses to let a user log off until he reduces the size of > his profile. DOn't know how it works, but I know it exists. > > You should probably reduce the IE temp file storage as well, as your users > have no control over what IE will store in their profile. > > Hope this helps > > > Johan > It does not work. In my experience it never lets the user log off if they are above quota, even after they delete the files both on the network and the local disk. You are better off defining some policy templates to take case of profile the IE temp storage and put the profile in their home directory to make them realize it takes up space. > -- > Freedom is not free. Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free. > This message Copyright (c) 1999 Jay Thomas > Jay Thomas, jthomas2@uiuc.edu http://jay.cx > From hendrik at pasadena.school.nz Wed Aug 4 02:22:42 1999 From: hendrik at pasadena.school.nz (Hendrik den Hartog) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: RedHat PW CHANGE/SYNC - WORKS! Message-ID: Hello All [Summary] I now finally have password changing /AND/ password SYNC fully working on my RedHat Linux Server. I can successfully change PWs from both Win95/98 and NT clients. (as long as the PW is 'suitable' [i.e. acceptable to PAM]) The problem on [some systems running??] RedHat Linux is a timing problem. There were in fact 2 solutions. (1) Paulo Afonso Graner Fessel (pafessel@netsol.com.br) in an earlier contribution suggesting using an alternative PW change utility. This by-passes the chat sequence, (and hence the timing issue is n/a). This works on the RPM installed SAMBA distribution. However, when using our Win clients, an error was still returned to the client (Incorrect Passord) even though the PW was changed. (There may be a way to 'fix' this - I'm not a techno so I didn't know how). (2) The solution we're using was supplied by Doug Rintoul (doug_rintoul@sil.org), which involved applying a simple addition to 'smbpasswd.c' before compiling. (i.e. you can't use this with the ready rolled RPM's). For us this meant the client gets the correct response ('Password Successfully Changed'), /and also/ that the original password had to be supplied before the change was effected (Both Impt for us as out clients are students). Suggestion? who prepares the RedHat RPMs ? is it the SAMBA team? how about considering this slight 'alteration' to the source before rolling out the RPM's to help us non technos.... Cheers! Hendrik -- Hendrik den Hartog:PASADENA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL:Auckland-NZ From is96mgs at nct.zsu.edu.cn Wed Aug 4 02:40:57 1999 From: is96mgs at nct.zsu.edu.cn (Ma Gui Sheng) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: win98 can't find PDC while changing password Message-ID: I am sorry if the question has been dicuss before, but I just can't find the answer from the maillist. I build a samba PDC on a redhat 6.0 , the samba version is 2.1prealpha (that is the HEAD-branch?) I want to change the password on my clients, including NT Workstation, NT plain Server, and win98. But these client all can't change password. Win98 told me "Couldnot find the PDC of this domain", NT Workstation & Server told me "The username or your old password is not correct". While I could not find any piece log mesg on log.%m about Win98 situation, but find NT give the mesg of [1999/08/03 21:57:26, 5] rpc_parse/parse_samr.c:make_samr_r_chgpasswd_user(5091) make_r_chgpasswd_user [1999/08/03 21:57:26, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(36) 000000 samr_io_r_chgpasswd_user [1999/08/03 21:57:26, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(160) 0000 status: c000006a [1999/08/03 21:57:26, 5] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:samr_reply_chgpasswd_user(1598) samr_chgpasswd_user: 1598 [1999/08/03 21:57:26, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpc_command(764) called api_samr_rpc [1999/08/03 21:57:26, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:create_rpc_reply(90) create_rpc_reply: data_start: 0 data_end: 4 max_tsize: 5680 I check the err code from the nterr.h and find it is "#define NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD (106)". How can I change password on the client I mentioned above? Can anyone mail his successful experiecne to me? From permath at ifi.ntnu.no Wed Aug 4 09:16:50 1999 From: permath at ifi.ntnu.no (Per Mathisen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: restrict simultaneous logins Message-ID: At the university here we are having the problem that some students bring several non-student friends to our computer labs, login with the student's username on several computers, and sit there playing games or whatnot, to the great annoyance of the students who try to do some work. We would like therefore to configure samba somehow to accept only one simultaneous domain logon for each user. Is this possible? Yours, Per I Mathisen From cord at Team.OWL-Online.DE Wed Aug 4 09:38:09 1999 From: cord at Team.OWL-Online.DE (cord@Team.OWL-Online.DE) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Profiles are gone Message-ID: <199908040938.LAA02353@Team.OWL-Online.DE> Now, after some weeks without trouble, the old problems are back in town. Logging in with NT4.0 SP4 to Samba 2.04b on Linux 2.2.10 (DEBIAN) the doze can't find the local profile and is producing a new one... WHY??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Yesterday everything works fine, this morning no one can get his/her profile from samba server... I don't know what to do and my solutions are on holiday )-: It's not possible to describe all the users to make new local profiles and delete them after logging out and hope that they can use their samba profile. HELP urgently -- Cord-H. Fricke Technik OWL-Online.de GmbH 0 52 1 / 52 51 133 fricke@team.owl-online.de http://www.team.owl-online.de http://www.owl-online.de From rsaura at retevision.es Wed Aug 4 10:04:11 1999 From: rsaura at retevision.es (rsaura@retevision.es) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Problems joining a NT domain. Message-ID: <412567C3.003CE134.00@avimsi01.retevision.es> Hello. When I try to join to my NT domain from my linux box running samba-2.0.5a I get : [root@seclin ~]# smbpasswd -j CATALUNYA cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine BCN5. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. 1999/08/04 11:16:32 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain CATALUNYA.Unable to join domain CATALUNYA. The Machine Account is created in the PDC. If I boot from the NT partitions everything goes fine. this is the relevant information from the /etc/smb.conf: [global] netbios name = A129022 workgroup = LINGROUP security = server password server = bcn5 wins server = 172.20.117.65 rgds. From svedja at lysator.liu.se Wed Aug 4 11:32:37 1999 From: svedja at lysator.liu.se (Dejan Ilic) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: restrict simultaneous logins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I have the same need for this function. Is it possible to implement it ? Dejan On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Per Mathisen wrote: > At the university here we are having the problem that some students bring > several non-student friends to our computer labs, login with the > student's username on several computers, and sit there playing games or > whatnot, to the great annoyance of the students who try to do some work. > We would like therefore to configure samba somehow to accept only one > simultaneous domain logon for each user. Is this possible? > > Yours, > Per I Mathisen -- ===================================================================== Dejan Ilic, Tech Univ. of Linkoping, Sweden Phone:+46-13-473 01 06 Email: svedja@lysator.liu.se Web: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~svedja ===================================================================== From SAHLKE at HAUNI.KOERBER.DE Wed Aug 4 12:54:00 1999 From: SAHLKE at HAUNI.KOERBER.DE (Sahlke, Jan) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Which C-Sources for Samba? Message-ID: <54CF1F45ED19D311B68E00805FFEA80E28E22F@kns033.hauni.koerber.de> Hello, i use HP-UX B.10.20 and want to compile the samba-source. the program compile break with error checking configure summary ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config Why? Which c library i need ? Best Regard Jan Sahlke Hamburg, Germany From krille at c-systems.org Wed Aug 4 14:51:44 1999 From: krille at c-systems.org (krille) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Shares over WAN... Message-ID: <37A85380.7144AF66@c-systems.org> We have a Samba NTDOM on our LAN, and it rocks.... but of course does the users on the other site have access to this share also. This server is a SUN 250 with Solaris7 and Samba 2.0.4b. conf: [global] workgroup = NT netbios name = 007 server string = Samba 2.0.4b file server interfaces = 192.168.1.1/24 security = SHARE encrypt passwords = Yes max xmit = 8192 keepalive = 30 shared mem size = 5242880 os level = 5 wins server = 192.168.1.12 remote announce = 192.168.1.255/NT 192.168.11.255/STHLM valid users = @nobody read list = @nobody write list = @nobody hosts allow = localhost, 192.168. [apps] comment = applikationer ? s?n't path = /export/apps write list = nobody, @users read only = No create mask = 0777 force create mode = 0777 directory mask = 0777 force directory mode = 0777 guest ok = Yes [sjuan] comment = ... gemensamt p? server 7 ! path = /export/home/sjuan write list = @users force group = users read only = No create mask = 0777 force create mode = 0777 directory mask = 0777 force directory mode = 0777 guest ok = Yes this server is only for sharing apps and documents. The users on the other LAN can map the share. But when they tries to copy files from the share, it breaks. If they tries to open a Word97 template... the wonderful error message of M$ appears "Operation is canceled, try to restore the network connection or insert the floppy" :-) hmmm... OK!!! If you have connections over WAN with samba and it works please give me a hint.... how it should be done..... thanks. /krille -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2515 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/19990804/02cacc3e/smime.bin From svedja at lysator.liu.se Wed Aug 4 14:57:04 1999 From: svedja at lysator.liu.se (Dejan Ilic) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Shares over WAN... In-Reply-To: <37A85380.7144AF66@c-systems.org> Message-ID: I have machines connected over WAN, with no problems at all. Just make them look at the same WINS and it works. But Windows seems very picky on lost packets and delays. Once a fibre-tranciever scrambled packets (up to 35% packetloss in periods) and I got the problems you described. Check you connections. Dejan -- ===================================================================== Dejan Ilic, Tech Univ. of Linkoping, Sweden Phone:+46-13-473 01 06 Email: svedja@lysator.liu.se Web: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~svedja ===================================================================== From alexs at saturn.nmr.ion.ucl.ac.uk Wed Aug 4 15:12:26 1999 From: alexs at saturn.nmr.ion.ucl.ac.uk (Mr. Alex Stepney) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: daemons not starting form inetd Message-ID: <199908041512.QAA02142@titania.nmr> All, I'm running Samba on various Solaris boxes (all 2.X). One machine has been running CV's from about a month ago as a PDC and all other boxes 2.0.4b. When I try to upgrade to 2.0.5a or try to install the latest CV's neither nmbd or smbd will start from inetd on any 2.5.1 box. I don't want to move my PDC from the machine its currently on, or upgrade to 2.7 (just yet!). Has anyone experienced this or found away around the problem? Thanks in advance Alex. From jblake at rosemail.rose.hp.com Wed Aug 4 15:27:23 1999 From: jblake at rosemail.rose.hp.com (John Blake) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Which C-Sources for Samba? In-Reply-To: <54CF1F45ED19D311B68E00805FFEA80E28E22F@kns033.hauni.koerber.de>; from "Sahlke, Jan" at Aug 4, 99 10:55 pm Message-ID: <199908041527.IAA01427@rosemail.rose.hp.com> Jan, I recently encountered this error when attempting to install Samba on one of our Series 800 HP-UX systems. I fixed the problem by installing the HP-ANSI-C package. Installing GNU gcc should fix it as well. Regards, John Blake > > Hello, > > i use HP-UX B.10.20 and want to compile the samba-source. > > the program compile break with error > > checking configure summary > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > Why? > > Which c library i need ? > > Best Regard > > Jan Sahlke > Hamburg, Germany > -- ***************************************************************************** John Blake Email: jblake@rose.hp.com Hewlett Packard Co., M.S. 5571 8000 Foothills Blvd. Phone: (916) 748-7388 Roseville, CA 95747 ***************************************************************************** From timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com Wed Aug 4 15:57:33 1999 From: timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com (Cole, Timothy D.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Which C-Sources for Samba? Message-ID: <51FBD4A8EFD9D111BA7300A0C927DADB5630FF@xcgmd008.md.essd.northgrum.com> Hrm. What version of Samba is this? I seem to recall something like that when I was configuring 1.9.x as non-root, but I haven't seen this with 2.0.x. Anyway, the specific problem is that configure isn't detecting working locking facilities. Why? I don't know. ISTR some of the tests failing when I wasn't configuring as root, but I thought that had changed with 2.0. Anyway, have a look through config.log for the "fcntl locking" test, and see if you can find out what the specific errors are there. I've also appeneded another mail at the bottom from Michel Stoop that may address a problem you encounter later on. > -----Original Message----- > From: Sahlke, Jan [SMTP:SAHLKE@HAUNI.KOERBER.DE] > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 8:56 > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Which C-Sources for Samba? > > Hello, > > i use HP-UX B.10.20 and want to compile the samba-source. > > the program compile break with error > > checking configure summary > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > Why? > > Which c library i need ? > > Best Regard > > Jan Sahlke > Hamburg, Germany > -----Original Message----- From: mstoop [SMTP:mstoop@xs4all.nl] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 1999 16:44 To: timothy_d_cole@md.northgrum.com Cc: samba-technical list Subject: RE: fcntl locking test Hi, > I haven't been able to build Samba 2.0.4b for the past few weeks now; I'm > not sure quite what's changed, but the fcntl locking test consistently > hangs. (this is on an HP-UX 10.20 system) There is a known problem with the locking system of HP-UX 10.20 it started with the december level of the extention software (B10.20.41) Get the latest NFS megapatch from HP to fix this problem. To check if the locking is dead, check if /usr/sbin/rpc.statd is running. If not your locking system is dead... To fix the problem you have to delete everything in /var/adm/statmon/* and reboot both systems in wich the locking problem occurs. samba 2.0.4b is running fine at our site on about 30 HP-UX systems. --- Michel Stoop, Senior Network and Systems Administrator Numeriek Centrum Groningen B.V. Vuyk Engineering Center Groningen B.V. Cono Industrie Groep N.V. Postbus 204 9700AE Groningen +31 (0)50 541 26 32 fax: +31 (0)50 542 37 17 http://www.ncg.nl mailto:stoop@ncg.nl From kellermg at potsdam.edu Wed Aug 4 16:19:15 1999 From: kellermg at potsdam.edu (Matthew Keller) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: daemons not starting form inetd References: <199908041512.QAA02142@titania.nmr> Message-ID: <37A86803.80B0B5D2@potsdam.edu> "Mr. Alex Stepney" wrote: > > All, > > I'm running Samba on various Solaris boxes (all 2.X). One machine > has been running CV's from about a month ago as a PDC and all other > boxes 2.0.4b. When I try to upgrade to 2.0.5a or try to install the > latest CV's neither nmbd or smbd will start from inetd on any 2.5.1 > box. I don't want to move my PDC from the machine its currently > on, or upgrade to 2.7 (just yet!). Has anyone experienced this or > found away around the problem? It is not recommended that you use INETD to start Samba. This demolishes the persistant state nature of SMB servers, and is unreliable, to say the least. -- - Matthew Keller - Lead Programmer/Analyst Distributed Computing and Telemedia State University of New York at Potsdam Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ From Bruce.Entwistle at per-se.com Wed Aug 4 17:41:24 1999 From: Bruce.Entwistle at per-se.com (Bruce.Entwistle@per-se.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: NT printing problems Message-ID: <852567C3.0060FA53.00@smtpgate.per-se.com> We are using the smbclient on a DG UNIX server, release 4.20MU02, to print to wireless NT workstations. Most of the time the print job runs normally, and the report arrives on the printer. However many times the report does not complete. The error message is 'error connecting to 10.19.7.2:139 (Operation already in progress)'. The PC is only running a single application, a terminal emulator, and the printer is not mapped to any other systems. So the printer should not be busy. If anyone has experienced this, or has any recommendations, please send them my way. Bruce Entwistle bruce.entwistle@per-se.com From shane at hunsley.demon.co.uk Wed Aug 4 22:28:48 1999 From: shane at hunsley.demon.co.uk (Shane Hunsley) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Which C-Sources for Samba? In-Reply-To: <54CF1F45ED19D311B68E00805FFEA80E28E22F@kns033.hauni.koerber.de> Message-ID: <000b01bedec8$b910e430$4621989e@asus> Hi, I have exactly the same error on an Ultrix 4.3a platform. All previous versions have compiled with no problems. It's only 2.0.5 that fails. No changes have been made to this machine and the compiler is gcc. I have reported this to samba-bugs@samba.org(PR#19088) but have received no reply from the Samba team. I'm desperate to try 2.0.5 to see if it fixes another problem I logged regarding deleting files and directories on Ultrix with 2.0.3 and 2.0.4. This was logged as (PR#17366). > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > Sahlke, Jan > Sent: 04 August 1999 13:55 > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Which C-Sources for Samba? > > > Hello, > > i use HP-UX B.10.20 and want to compile the samba-source. > > the program compile break with error > > checking configure summary > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > Why? > > Which c library i need ? > > Best Regard > > Jan Sahlke > Hamburg, Germany From greg at discreet.com Thu Aug 5 00:03:17 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Joining W2K to a samba domain? Message-ID: Howdy, Just tried joining a W2k WS to a samba controlled domain but surprise surprise ... it does not work. It's not a big deal but should it work? Greg ---------------------------------- Greg Dickie just a guy* *from Discreet (the Logic is gone) ---------------------------------- From sam_feagins at yahoo.com Thu Aug 5 02:26:26 1999 From: sam_feagins at yahoo.com (sam feagins) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Login Scripts Message-ID: <19990805022626.17134.rocketmail@web507.yahoomail.com> Hello All, I've got a real stupid question here.. I've got my samba server all setup to accept domain logons and it works great, except the login script. The server is mapping drive off itself, but the script output says the path is invalid. Any ideas?? Here's an example of the script... net use x: \\server\sfeagins I've tried using instead of the netbios name the ip addres, but it does the same thing. Here's my smb.conf. [global] workgroup = xdomain hosts allow = 192.168.0. security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd domain master = yes domain logins = yes logon script = %U.bat Clients are Win98... Server is RH6 Linux. Any help is appreciated.. SAM _____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com From puru at elbvilla.de Wed Aug 4 12:25:49 1999 From: puru at elbvilla.de (Jens Puruckherr) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: What does it mean?? Message-ID: <000201bedf1e$e9c88c80$0301a8c0@k6> >Do you need to run nmbd through inetd or could you just run it as a >standalone daemon? Also you could change the value of max to something >that wouldn't cause it to exit, assuming it is inetd killing the process. Good idea! I don't need to run the samba-daemons through inetd. I will try it next. But can anyone tell me, why it was changed from SUSE5 to SUSE6?? Other hand, there are just 6 clients(win95/98) at the samba server. Could they produce more than 40 instances? A look with "ps" shoes max. 5 or 6 instances of nmbd. >Of course I could be totally wrong - I'm not sure what an exit status of >0x1 means in the context of inetd and nmbd. Is ther anybody who knows it? >Kevin Jens Jens Puruckherr EDV-Manager Elbvilla facility Service GmbH Scharfenberger Stra?e 2 01039 Dresden ------------------------------------------------------- Tel. 03528/446372 mail:puru@elbvilla.de Fax. 0351/8588570 http://www.wohnmarkt-dresden.de From Abach at LKT.Uni-Erlangen.de Thu Aug 5 07:53:47 1999 From: Abach at LKT.Uni-Erlangen.de (Andreas Abach) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? Message-ID: <199908050859.KAA21188@www.lkt.uni-erlangen.de> Hi! I have to administrate an Windows NT Network with about 100 Clients (Win NT 4.0) and 1 Server. The server is an NT 4.0 system at the moment. I want to change this server to an Samba-System because is think this will me more stable than the M$-System. I read much about Samba and about it's possibilities, but I didn't find any paper about a person writing about his experience with such a system at daily work. I would like to know is there anyone out there who is doing the same thing that I am going to do? Bye Andreas Current System: 1 Server Windows NT 4.0 S (PDC, User Authentication, Files Server, Print Server) 100 Clients Windows NT 4.0 WS Planned System: 1 Server Windows NT 4.0 S (PDC, User Authentication) 1 Sever Linux Debian, (Files Server, Print Server) 100 Clients Windows NT 4.0 WS -- Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Abach *KT Lehrstuhl fuer Kunststofftechnik Uni Erlangen Tel. +49-9131-85-297-06 * Fax.: -09 * email: Abach@LKT.Uni-Erlangen.de Am Weiselgarten 9 * D-91058 Erlangen * url: http://www.lkt.uni-erlangen.de PGPID 0x5672B1F8 F-Print FD50 85C0 7580 5467 65E7 3BE8 58BC 65F4 5672 B1F8 From geurts at vanveen.nl Thu Aug 5 08:16:15 1999 From: geurts at vanveen.nl (Ton Geurts) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Joining W2K to a samba domain? Message-ID: <9FC75D6DD7AAD2119C820000F87AB3BB014C51@VVISERVER1> > Howdy, Hi. > Just tried joining a W2k WS to a samba controlled domain but > surprise surprise > .. it does not work. It's not a big deal but should it work Maybe WINS is not enabled on the W2k? It tends to use DNS for name lookup. Ton Geurts Vanveen informatica From tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de Thu Aug 5 09:06:11 1999 From: tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de (tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Login Scripts Message-ID: <0057540001378683000002L432*@MHS> Sam Feagins wrote: > Hello All, > I've got a real stupid question here.. I've got my samba server > all setup to accept domain logons and it works great, except the login > script. The server is mapping drive off itself, but the script output > says the path is invalid. Any ideas?? Here's an example of the > script... > > net use x: \\server\sfeagins > > I've tried using instead of the netbios name the ip addres, but it does > the same thing. Here's my smb.conf. > > [global] > workgroup = xdomain > hosts allow = 192.168.0. > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd > domain master = yes > domain logins = yes > logon script = %U.bat > > Clients are Win98... Server is RH6 Linux. > Any help is appreciated.. > SAM Create a share named netlogon. The name ist fixed, you can't change it: [netlogon] comment = Resource f?r Anmeldeserver path = /usr/share/netlogon pack your logon-scripts there and make them world readable. -- From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 5 12:07:28 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Joining W2K to a samba domain? References: Message-ID: <37A97E80.DE273EFD@eng.auburn.edu> Greg Dickie wrote: > > Howdy, > > Just tried joining a W2k WS to a samba controlled > domain but surprise surprise .. it does not work. It's not > a big deal but should it work? Nope. I'd be surprised if it did right now. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Thu Aug 5 11:24:32 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Joining W2K to a samba domain? References: Message-ID: <37A97470.D03E45DF@cse.unsw.edu.au> Greg Dickie wrote: > > Howdy, > Hi Greg! > Just tried joining a W2k WS to a samba controlled domain but surprise surprise > .. it does not work. It's not a big deal but should it work? No. I've been playing with it on and off but it doesn't work completely yet. Expect some fixes in the next week or so. (I'm talking about HEAD here, I'm not overly concerned about PDC functionality in 2.0. Domain functionality should now work fine in 2.0, if not please send network traces!) Matt -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 5 12:28:33 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? References: <199908050859.KAA21188@www.lkt.uni-erlangen.de> Message-ID: <37A98371.3A9C4909@eng.auburn.edu> Andreas Abach wrote: > > I would like to know is there anyone out there who > is doing the same thing that I am going to do? ~2,000 users in smbpasswd 50 NT boxes 500 Windows 9x boxes Sun Ultra 1 (~170 MHz), single CPU w/ 486 Mb RAM I have a copy of the paper I presented on this at LISA NT last month on-line http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw/non-NT_PDC/index.html Hope this helps, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From chiodi+ at pitt.edu Thu Aug 5 13:02:40 1999 From: chiodi+ at pitt.edu (John T Chiodi) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: nt profiles and win 9x profiles on 2.1prealpha Message-ID: Hi, I am running the 2.1 prealpha dled yesterday. My win 9x machines are getting their profiles fine, but my nt 4.0sp3 is not. I am using the same user for NT and 95. I have included my smb.conf below. Also my login script is working for 98 but not for nt. I included that as well. smb.conf [global] printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap workgroup = WORKGROUP load printers = yes guest account = nobody encrypt passwords = yes hosts allow = 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 domain logons = yes logon script = %U.bat security = user wide links = yes getwd cache = yes logon drive = p: unix password sync = yes passwd program = /bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successfull* logon home = "\\%N\%U" logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U\profile print command = lpr -r -P%p %s wins support = yes domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 domain group map = /usr/local/samba/lib/domaingroup.map local group map = /usr/local/samba/lib/localgroup.map domain user map = /usr/local/samba/lib/domainuser.map lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq %p preserve case = yes case sensitive = no socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY log file = /var/log/log.%m lock directory = /var/locks share modes = yes [profiles] comment = Stores Profiles browsable = no path=/windows/profiles/%U read only = no create mode = 0750 [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp printable = yes public = no writable = no create mode = 0700 [pub] comment = public area path = /export/pub/win writable = yes public = yes [cdrom] comment = cdrom path = /cdrom writable = no public = yes [netlogon] path = /smbdos/netlogon writable = no guest ok = no browsable = no public = no [xmg] comment = xmg path = /export/xmg valid users = CHIODI browsable = no public = no writable = yes [installs] comment = installs path = /soft/installs/win public = no writable = no write list = chiodi [MSOP97] comment = MS Office install path = /soft/installs/office volume = "The_CR_ROM_Label" read only = yes available = yes share modes = no locking = no public = yes [homes] comment = home path = /windows/%S public = no browsable = no writable = yes [soft] comment = software path = /soft/software/win public = no writable = yes [document] comment = Document Group path = /export/documents public = no writable = yes force group = document valid users = @document create mask = 0760 [backup] comment = backup hard drive path = /export/backup public = yes browsable = yes writable = yes login.bat @echo^M if %OS%.==Windows_NT. goto Windows_NT^M :Win9x^M net use P: \\WIGGLES\CHIODI^M net use S: \\WIGGLES\SOFT^M net use Q: \\WIGGLES\DOCUMENT^M net TIME \\WIGGLES /SET /YES^M goto end^M :Windows_NT^M net use S: \\WIGGLES\SOFT /persistent:no /yes^M net use Q: \\WIGGLES\DOCUMENT /persistent:no /yes^M net TIME \\WIGGLES /SET /YES^M goto end^M :end^M ^M _______________ Jt Chiodi Unix Administrator University of Pittsburgh chiodi@pitt.edu From w.nintzel at berlin.de Thu Aug 5 13:20:26 1999 From: w.nintzel at berlin.de (Werner Nintzel) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: nt profiles and win 9x profiles on 2.1prealpha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <000401bedf45$47a118b0$da0aa8c0@pc-rednt.rol-berlin.de> Hi Try: logon path = \\%N\Profiles\%U and [Profiles] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/profiles # or any other path to your profile Directory # don't store it in Users-Home browseable = no guest ok = yes writable = yes > logon home = "\\%N\%U" > logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U\profile > [profiles] > comment = Stores Profiles > browsable = no > path=/windows/profiles/%U > read only = no > create mode = 0750 cu Werner From ees3jp at ee.surrey.ac.uk Thu Aug 5 13:41:32 1999 From: ees3jp at ee.surrey.ac.uk (John Parsons) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Win2K mounting dir on from Samba server Message-ID: <000101bedf48$3bc072e0$1e4be383@ee.surrey.ac.uk> I have 2.0.4 running on a Solaris box, just providing shared directories and print services, no domain configuration at all. When I attempt to mount \\melian\homes from the Win2K box, using my username and password, working from NT4 or 95 box, it complains about the password being incorrect and gives me the prompt to enter another username and password. This keeps happening no matter what username and password I use, the do exist in our nispasswd tables. Do I have to fix anything on the Win2K box? It is Win2K Server. Cheers John John R Parsons Tel: 01483 876112 Computer Support Officer Mob: 0836 248733 School of EE, IT & M Fax: 01483 534139 University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 5XH UK http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/John.Parsons/home.html From lonnie at borntreger.com Thu Aug 5 14:11:47 1999 From: lonnie at borntreger.com (Lonnie J. Borntreger) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Anybody have this working? Message-ID: <001b01bedf4c$755d2620$0500000a@pocket.wh.com> Setup: - Server: Sparc 5, Solaris 7 Server, Samba 2.1-prealpha (CVS) - setup as PDC - Clients: Windows 95 - passwords: encrypted on both ends Results from different connection scenarios: - Network login: Logs into domain, runs user login script if one exists - Setting up Shared services on Win95: can browse/add from domain user list - User Manager, Server Manager: "Can't find PDC" (samba shows up as BDC) - Change Network Password: "Can't find PDC" - smbclient to view disk shares Solaris->Win95: works - Printing Solaris->Win95: session setup successful, failed tcon_X I've seen other posts with some similar problems posted, but no replies. What do I do to determine what the problems are? I've done logging levels up to 100, but I don't know enough about smb messages to know what's falling apart. (It seems that samba thinks that it replies to GETDC requests with itself, but Windows 95 isn't seeing that as meaning PDC.) I've R'd all the FMs, looked through news archives and looked through the archives of the mail list, all to no avail. So close, and yet so far... Thought? Insights? Cash? Cars? TTFN, Lonnie Borntreger lonnie@borntreger.com http://www.borntreger.com/ -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From tomek at is.fh-hamburg.de Thu Aug 5 13:23:38 1999 From: tomek at is.fh-hamburg.de (Tomek Jarosinski) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Problems with Samba 2.04b on Suse 6.1 Message-ID: <37A9905A.795A3D63@is.fh-hamburg.de> I reported few weeks ago about problems with samba running on suse 6.1 - "broken oplocks" message in samba logs and application hangs. Does anybody has oplocks problems with samba on suse 6.1 ? -- Have a nice day ! Tomek Jarosinski, Unix & NT Sysadm Fachhochschule Hamburg - University of Applied Sciences 2099 Hamburg,Berliner Tor 21, R. 429 Tel:040/42859-2802 Fax:040/42859-2889 E-Mail: tomek@is.fh-hamburg.de --Linux is like a wigwam: no gates, no windows, and an apache inside-- From tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de Thu Aug 5 15:27:54 1999 From: tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de (tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: nt profiles and win 9x profiles on 2.1prealpha Message-ID: <0057540001383640000002L402*@MHS> Jt Chiodi wrote: > Hi, > > I am running the 2.1 prealpha dled yesterday. My win 9x machines are > getting their profiles fine, but my nt 4.0sp3 is not. I am using the > same user for NT and 95. I have included my smb.conf below. Also my > login script is working for 98 but not for nt. I included that as > well. If I state the documentation correct, then profiles don't work with NT jet. Only with Win9x. But while you aren't using 2.0.5 this migth have been implementet, but maybe not working all times, cause it's a new feature. Had the same problem some time ago, then found out that it couldn't work while not implementet. -- From tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de Thu Aug 5 16:18:37 1999 From: tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de (tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Win2K mounting dir on from Samba server Message-ID: <0057540001384480000002L402*@MHS> John R Parsons wrote: > I have 2.0.4 running on a Solaris box, just providing shared directories and > print services, no domain configuration at all. > > When I attempt to mount \\melian\homes from the Win2K box, using my username > and password, working from NT4 or 95 box, it complains about the password > being incorrect and gives me the prompt to enter another username and > password. This keeps happening no matter what username and password I use, > the do exist in our nispasswd tables. > > Do I have to fix anything on the Win2K box? It is Win2K Server. Sounds as if you didn't set encrypt passwords = Yes in the globals section in your smb.conf-file. Two solutions: 1. Don't use encrypted passwords with your NT boxes. There is a registry key to revert to the old unencrypted passwords: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters] "EnablePlainTextPassword"=dword:00000001 SAMBA doc's hold a file setting this key if double clicked. 2. Set encrypted passwords in your globals section. Use smbpasswd to add all your users and there passwords. Both solutions have there own deficiencies: 1. Whoever is able to run a sniffer in your network will be able to get the unencrypted passwords --- it's a security breach. 2. You will have to maintain to password lists, completely independent from each other. I preferred the second solution. Works fine. -- From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Thu Aug 5 16:28:50 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Win2K mounting dir on from Samba server References: <0057540001384480000002L402*@MHS> Message-ID: <37A9BBC2.72222AAC@cse.unsw.edu.au> tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > > 1. Don't use encrypted passwords with your NT boxes. > There is a registry key to revert to the old unencrypted > passwords: > > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Rdr\Parameters] > "EnablePlainTextPassword"=dword:00000001 No, that's for NT4. For Win2000 it is: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkStation\Parameters] "EnablePlainTextPassword"=dword:00000001 Matt -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From simar at gmx.net Thu Aug 5 17:39:20 1999 From: simar at gmx.net (Omar Siam) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Delete on locale machine by logon References: <199908031318.PAA20039@Team.OWL-Online.DE> Message-ID: <004f01bedf69$752e95e0$0300a8c0@telekabel.at> There is at least one shareware-program which deletes temp and any other folder you wish when you start it (e. g. in the autostart group) and there is at least on program that executes programs on shutdown. Look at tucows.something or www.pcwelt.de ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 3:20 PM Subject: Delete on locale machine by logon > Hi there, > > is there a registry key with which one I can delete a direcroy: > > Example: > > On locale machine the profiles use C:\Temp for internet temporaryFiles. > I wan?t to delete them by logoff. > > Know what I mean??? > > Thanx > -- > Cord-H. Fricke > Technik > OWL-Online.de GmbH > 0 52 1 / 52 51 133 > fricke@team.owl-online.de > http://www.team.owl-online.de > http://www.owl-online.de > From giulioo at tiscalinet.it Thu Aug 5 17:13:41 1999 From: giulioo at tiscalinet.it (Giulio Orsero) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: Problems with Samba 2.04b on Suse 6.1 In-Reply-To: <37A9905A.795A3D63@is.fh-hamburg.de> References: <37A9905A.795A3D63@is.fh-hamburg.de> Message-ID: <19990805171355.C950726E3A@i3.golden.dom> On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 00:25:24 +1000, hai scritto: >I reported few weeks ago about problems with samba running on suse 6.1 - >"broken oplocks" message in samba logs and application hangs. Does >anybody has oplocks problems with samba on suse 6.1 ? This is related to samba-2.0.x, not to suse. Solution: oplocks = no. Then write to samba-bugs@samba.org, put the word oplock_break somewhere in the subject, and specify the applications/kind of files that have this problem and clients (win...) you are using, so samba team can have more data about this problem. I asked them if they needed some particular log, debug, info ... about this problem (since they say it's difficult to debug because it is random), but I got no response. If they see this problem is very common, they'll put it at the top of the list, I hope.. :-) -- giulioo@tiscalinet.it From lisa at usna.navy.MIL Thu Aug 5 18:30:39 1999 From: lisa at usna.navy.MIL (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: passwd chat setting (SGI-encryped passwd) Message-ID: <99Aug5.143054-0400edt.4998-320+14@odin.usna.navy.mil> Hi: I'm running Samba 2.0.4b on an SGI server, IRIX 6.5. I'm using Samba's PDC capabilities for NT logins, so passwords are encrypted. I just read another e-mail on this list that said the normal passwd chat setting defaults to plaintext passwords. This is why I see an error message when I run testparm. Does any SGI user out there have a "passwd chat" setting that works? Lisa From ralf at is.rice.edu Thu Aug 5 19:01:21 1999 From: ralf at is.rice.edu (Alfredo Ramos) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:49 2003 Subject: profiles Message-ID: Question; I have samba-2.0.4b running on a Solaris 2.6 box as a PDC. And I want to keep it from creating profiles (any kind of profiles, roamming or otherwise). The problem is, samba insists on creating them. If I don't use the "logon path =" to create roamming profiles, it will create the profiles on the user's home directory. Is there a switch that needs to be set, during compile or on smb.conf, to tell samba not to create profiles? Or, if it absolutely must, to create them in the client machine? Also, while we're in the profiles subject, is there a setting in Win/NT to keep it from looking for a roamming profile when logging into a domain and just use a default local profile? The way I have it set right now is I'm using the "logon path =" parameter but have the profiles share not writeable. logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U [profiles] path = /usr/site/samba-2.0.4b/profiles writable = no browseable = no guest ok = yes This way it makes an entry in the directory, but the actual profile is empty. The weird thing is, set this way, NT should ask the user "Unable to download roamming profile, Use Local?" all the time. But it doesn't. 99% of the time, the login process is very fast, no questions asked. And this is very fine with me. I can live with 99%. But I've been asked to eliminate that 1%. The problem is I don't understand why: 1.-Samba insists on creating profiles. 2.- If NT does not find a roamming profile, it does not ask the user if he wants to use the local one 100% of the time. Obviously it is using it all the time. And 3.- Can't I set NT to NOT look for roamming profiles while logging into a domain. I know these are minor things. Samba is working just great. But not understanding these three points is bothersome. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Al. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Alfredo Ramos This space available for rent. | New Media & Student Computing Get your product moving. Advertise here! | Rice University. | Email: ralf@is.rice.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de Thu Aug 5 20:21:31 1999 From: tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de (tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Antwort: profiles Message-ID: <0057540001387170000002L402*@MHS> > Question; [snip] > Is there a switch that needs to be set, during compile or on smb.conf, to > tell samba not to create profiles? Or, if it absolutely must, to > create them in the client machine? Also, while we're in the profiles > subject, is there a setting in Win/NT to keep it from looking for a > roamming profile when logging into a domain and just use a default local > profile? There is. A registry key exists allowing to switch of remote profiles. You will have to set this at your clients and to make it more work - for all users at that client: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\WinLogon] "ProfileType"="REG_DWORD:1" > The way I have it set right now is I'm using the "logon path =" parameter > but have the profiles share not writeable. > > logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U > > [profiles] > path = /usr/site/samba-2.0.4b/profiles > writable = no > browseable = no > guest ok = yes > > This way it makes an entry in the directory, but the actual profile is > empty. The weird thing is, set this way, NT should ask the user "Unable > to download roamming profile, Use Local?" all the time. But it doesn't. Logical: WinNT accesses the profile dir, there is no profile to download, thus no question for the user. > 99% of the time, the login process is very fast, no questions asked. And > this is very fine with me. I can live with 99%. But I've been asked to > eliminate that 1%. If shares are slow, WinNT runs into a timeout, beeing shure there is a share, but a slow one. While not having checked the profile for beeing empty there is a question to ask the user. There are other keys allowing to set timeout to an other value - but i can't remember them. > The problem is I don't understand why: > > 1.-Samba insists on creating profiles. Not Samba, the NT-box. > 2.- If NT does not find a roamming profile, it does not ask the user if he > wants to use the local one 100% of the time. Obviously it is using it all > the time. And > > 3.- Can't I set NT to NOT look for roamming profiles while logging into a > domain. Yes you can - i've mentioned it above. NT-Servers tell the client to use local profiles by leaving the field "Use Profile Path" empty in the user manager. Maybe there should be a way to make SAMBA behave the same? > I know these are minor things. Samba is working just great. But not > understanding these three points is bothersome. Any help would be greatly > appreciated. Minor?! You call annoying questions from computers minor!? They don't have to ask annoying questions! -- From valankar at cse.fau.edu Thu Aug 5 20:43:02 1999 From: valankar at cse.fau.edu (Viraj Alankar) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Antwort: profiles In-Reply-To: <0057540001387170000002L402*@MHS> Message-ID: On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > Yes you can - i've mentioned it above. NT-Servers tell the client > to use local profiles by leaving the field "Use Profile Path" > empty in the user manager. Maybe there should be a way to make > SAMBA behave the same? What we use in smb.conf: logon path = "" This seems to work fine for us... though I'm not sure if it is 'correct' :). Viraj. From tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de Thu Aug 5 20:49:26 1999 From: tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de (tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Antwort: profiles Message-ID: <0057540001387564000002L442*@MHS> Viraj Alankar wrote: > On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > >> Yes you can - i've mentioned it above. NT-Servers tell the client >> to use local profiles by leaving the field "Use Profile Path" >> empty in the user manager. Maybe there should be a way to make >> SAMBA behave the same? > > What we use in smb.conf: > > *logon path = "" > > This seems to work fine for us... though I'm not sure if it is 'correct' > :). It is. It's exactly what NT shows the client while logging a user with local profile on. But there is one difference: NT allows this setting on a user by user base, while SAMBA does not (would be nice to be wrong, wouldn't it?). -- From swaters at amicus.com Thu Aug 5 21:20:44 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Antwort: profiles References: <0057540001387564000002L442*@MHS> Message-ID: <37AA002C.AFCD1FFE@amicus.com> tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > > Viraj Alankar wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > > > >> Yes you can - i've mentioned it above. NT-Servers tell the client > >> to use local profiles by leaving the field "Use Profile Path" > >> empty in the user manager. Maybe there should be a way to make > >> SAMBA behave the same? > > > > What we use in smb.conf: > > > > *logon path = "" > > > > This seems to work fine for us... though I'm not sure if it is 'correct' > > :). > > It is. It's exactly what NT shows the client while logging a user with > local profile on. But there is one difference: NT allows this setting > on a user by user base, while SAMBA does not (would be nice to be wrong, > wouldn't it?). it would be nice if samba allowed either configuration (per-user or server-wide or domain-wide or whatever). -stephen waters internal sysadmin amicus, inc. From lee at hsh.com Thu Aug 5 21:44:23 1999 From: lee at hsh.com (Lee Havemann) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: samba 2.04b and NT domain problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <001b01bedf8b$af05e580$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> I must be missing something, but I just can't figure out what it is... I installed samba 2.04b on a BSDI 4.0.1 box, and have 1.9.18p10 on a 3.1 box. 1.9.18p10 works fine, but I was trying to get version 2 up and running so I can migrate over. I can't join the NT domain using the smbpasswd -j option: unb:/usr/local/samba/var# smbpasswd -j hsh -r HSHNTA -D 4 resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> [snip] cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: ED38E46AC8BFD0ED cred_session_key cred_create cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal FC784244DDD41C76 n eg: 1ff cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine HSHNTA. Er ror was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. 1999/08/05 17:32:52 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password f or domain HSH. Unable to join domain HSH. I have deleted and added hshunb using server manager on the primary NT box, and done everything according to the readme, but I keep getting this error. What am I doing wrong? (Other than using NT...) Config file: [global] workgroup = HSH server string = HSHUNB Server (%v,%h) username map = /samba/lib/username.map hosts allow = 165.254.123. 127. load printers = yes printcap name = /etc/printcap printing = bsd guest account = pcguest max log size = 50 security = domain encrypt passwords = no socket options = TCP_NODELAY interfaces = 165.254.123.197/24 local master = no os level = 30 domain master = no preferred master = no domain logons = no wins support = no wins server = 165.254.123.196 wins proxy = yes dns proxy = yes Any clues? Thanks -Lee From D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au Fri Aug 6 09:00:39 1999 From: D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au (David Bannon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Antwort: profiles In-Reply-To: <37AA002C.AFCD1FFE@amicus.com> References: <0057540001387564000002L442*@MHS> Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19990806190039.00769d18@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> At 07:24 AM 06/08/1999 +1000, Stephen Waters wrote: >tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: >> It is. It's exactly what NT shows the client while logging a user with >> local profile on. But there is one difference: NT allows this setting >> on a user by user base, while SAMBA does not (would be nice to be wrong, >> wouldn't it?). > >it would be nice if samba allowed either configuration (per-user or >server-wide or domain-wide or whatever). What I do is allow the NT to make its profiles and selectivly delete them with a script on the server. Certain users are allowed to keep their profiles, others get the default profile each time they log on. david ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon D.Bannon@latrobe.edu.au School of Biochemistry Phone 61 03 9479 2197 La Trobe University, Plenty Rd, Fax 61 03 9479 2467 Bundoora, Vic, Australia, 3083 http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au ------------------------------------------------------------ ..... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From riani at pclitbang03.inti.co.id Fri Aug 6 02:48:54 1999 From: riani at pclitbang03.inti.co.id (riani) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Samba = PDC Message-ID: <37AA4D16.36D56713@pclitbang03.inti.co.id> Hai Sorry cross posting. Is there any idea samba to be PDC, how ? Th's From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Fri Aug 6 03:37:40 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: nt profiles and win 9x profiles on 2.1prealpha References: <0057540001383640000002L402*@MHS> Message-ID: <37AA5884.49A75489@eng.auburn.edu> tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > > If I state the documentation correct, then profiles don't > work with NT jet. Only with Win9x. But while you aren't > using 2.0.5 this migth have been implementet, but maybe > not working all times, cause it's a new feature. Roaming profiles with NT clients and Samba as experiemental PDC is implemented and has been for some time. Could you be more specific? Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From mike at amipc.com Fri Aug 6 07:56:38 1999 From: mike at amipc.com (Michal Zielinski) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Help with login Message-ID: <000001bedfe1$d3ab3100$fd1dd2d8@mike> Hi i m recenly tring to use the SAMBA domain login i whant to do login scrips for my worker but it bean nice days it not working i always receve messages The domain password you supplies is not correct or access to your logon server has benn denided No idee what is that ???? i event whent to get the samba 24 heure lerning book and i realy don't now what is the prob please help or send my a sample of smb.conf with is configure to be a samba NT logon server thanks you Mike Zielinski -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au Fri Aug 6 15:45:44 1999 From: D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au (David Bannon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Help with login In-Reply-To: <000001bedfe1$d3ab3100$fd1dd2d8@mike> Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19990807014544.00a813a4@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> At 03:03 PM 06/08/1999 +1000, Michal Zielinski wrote: > Hi i m recenly tring to use the SAMBA domain login i whant to do >login scrips for my worker but it bean nice days it not working i >always receve messages The domain password you supplies is not correct >or access to your logon server has benn denided No idee what is that >???? i event whent to get the samba 24 heure lerning book and i realy >don't now what is the prob please help or send my a sample of smb.conf >with is configure to be a samba NT logon server thanks you Mike >Zielinski No one will be able to help Michael unless you tell us a few things : 1. What version of samba are you using ? ie 2.0.x or 2.1.xxx Alpha 2. What are you logging in from ? ie WinNT 4 Sp4 or Win95 3. What unix system are you using ? A few suggestions : Have you set up your sambpasswd file ? Have you raised to log levels and inspected the log files ? Is the 'security=" line in smb.conf correct for your type of use ? david ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon D.Bannon@latrobe.edu.au School of Biochemistry Phone 61 03 9479 2197 La Trobe University, Plenty Rd, Fax 61 03 9479 2467 Bundoora, Vic, Australia, 3083 http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au ------------------------------------------------------------ ..... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de Fri Aug 6 08:58:33 1999 From: tschweikle at FIDUCIA.de (tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: nt profiles and win 9x profiles on 2.1prealpha Message-ID: <0057540001395678000002L482*@MHS> jerry@eng.auburn.edu wrote: > tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: >> >> If I state the documentation correct, then profiles don't >> work with NT jet. Only with Win9x. But while you aren't >> using 2.0.5 this might have been implemented, but maybe >> not working all times, cause it's a new feature. > > Roaming profiles with NT clients and Samba as experimental > PDC is implemented and has been for some time. Could you > be more specific? Yes they are, but: 1. they work not under all circumstances. There are configurations where SAMBA tells the client there is no profile but it's there and accessible. Seems as if this problem is related to time-out settings on the client side (it occurs with NT-Server and SAMBA). 2. only part of it is implemented the way NT-Server handles them. You may not have roaming profiles on a user by user base. There's only one global setting for all users (you may give every user his own profile path - but it's impossible to give one user a roaming profile while others have local ones). Most of this isn't easy to address, because there's necessity to change how *nix handles user accounts. There should be a way to add infinite fields of information to any user --- leading to a user database. FreeBSD does it this way. Linux doesn't. It's more traditional. AIX does it too, Solaris as far as I know not. But roaming profiles work 99,9% of time. Best if your client and Server are the same subnet. -- From chiodi+ at pitt.edu Fri Aug 6 11:13:02 1999 From: chiodi+ at pitt.edu (John T Chiodi) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: nt profiles and win 9x profiles on 2.1prealpha In-Reply-To: <000401bedf45$47a118b0$da0aa8c0@pc-rednt.rol-berlin.de> Message-ID: Thanks, that worked. > Hi > > Try: > logon path = \\%N\Profiles\%U > > and > > [Profiles] > path = /usr/local/samba/lib/profiles > # or any other path to your profile Directory > # don't store it in Users-Home > browseable = no > guest ok = yes > writable = yes > > > > > logon home = "\\%N\%U" > > logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U\profile > > > [profiles] > > comment = Stores Profiles > > browsable = no > > path=/windows/profiles/%U > > read only = no > > create mode = 0750 > > cu > > Werner > _______________ Jt Chiodi Unix Administrator University of Pittsburgh chiodi@pitt.edu From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Fri Aug 6 12:51:42 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: nt profiles and win 9x profiles on 2.1prealpha References: <0057540001395678000002L482*@MHS> Message-ID: <37AADA5E.F8E9A358@eng.auburn.edu> tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > > 1. they work not under all circumstances. There are configurations > where SAMBA tells the client there is no profile but it's there > and accessible. Seems as if this problem is related to time-out > settings on the client side (it occurs with NT-Server and SAMBA). The initial question wa whether or not Samba could support NT roaming profiles. The answer is still yes. If there is a client issue as you claim, that is beyond any server's responsibility to fix. The client should be fixed. I know you probably agree. I am just stating the obvious here. > 2. only part of it is implemented the way NT-Server handles them. > You may not have roaming profiles on a user by user base. There's include = %U.conf where %U.conf contains logon path = should work. The standard logon path = \\profileserv\profile\%U is a unique path for each user, but the include line would give you the maximum flexibility. > only one global setting for all users (you may give every user > his own profile path - but it's impossible to give one user > a roaming profile while others have local ones). If I remember correctly logon path = '%systemroot%\profiles\%U' (or maybe it was 'c:\winnt\profiles\%U') does work. I have not tried but but one person did and claimed it worked. > But roaming profiles work 99,9% of time. Best if your > client and Server are the same subnet. None of my NT boxes are on the same subnet as my PDC and I rarely have problems. Of course I am using older CVS code as well so maybe this was broken lately. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Fri Aug 6 12:55:57 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: profiles References: Message-ID: <37AADB5D.FD52D249@eng.auburn.edu> Alfredo Ramos wrote: > > Question; > > I have samba-2.0.4b running on a Solaris 2.6 box as a > PDC. And I want to keep it from creating profiles (any > kind of profiles, roamming or otherwise). All users get a profile. How would you do what you desire in an NT environment and you'll probably be able to emmulate the setup in a samba domain. > Is there a switch that needs to be set, during compile > or on smb.conf, to tell samba not to create profiles? It's an NT issues. Check out some of the white papers on MS's ntserver site about profiles and policies. It would be possible to share them among users if you make them mandatory. > subject, is there a setting in Win/NT to keep it from > looking for a roamming profile when logging into a > domain and just use a default local profile? Try logon path = "%systemroot%\profiles\%U" Hope this helps, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From robert.jonsson at statsvet.su.se Fri Aug 6 12:36:13 1999 From: robert.jonsson at statsvet.su.se (Robert Jonsson) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Password Expiration and Account Lockout Message-ID: <4.1.19990806142631.019b8020@post.statsvet.su.se> Hi, I have a couple of questions regarding Samba and passwords. I have been looking all over for this but haven?t been able to find anything. Is it possible to set Password Expiration dates in Samba and is it possible to set Account lockout? If someone could just point me in the right direction I?d be extremely grateful. Regards Robert ---------------------------------------------------------- From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Fri Aug 6 13:45:35 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Password Expiration and Account Lockout References: <4.1.19990806142631.019b8020@post.statsvet.su.se> Message-ID: <37AAE6FF.EF939CAA@eng.auburn.edu> Robert Jonsson wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a couple of questions regarding Samba and > passwords. I have been looking all over for this but > haven?t been able to find anything. Is it possible to > set Password Expiration dates in Samba and is it > possible to set Account lockout? Neither of these are implemented at the moment. The expiration is hard coded to 42 days from the current time and so will never occur. To this, you would need a new parameters in smb.conf. WRT account lockout, you would need some mechanism of keeping track of failed logins over time. There is no means of storing this right now. Of course I am referring to the smbpasswd file and not an LDAP backend. I've not played with that to offer any advice. These features are implmented somewhat differently in each pasword backend. Hope this helps, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From kellermg at potsdam.edu Fri Aug 6 13:58:31 1999 From: kellermg at potsdam.edu (Matthew Keller) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Password Expiration and Account Lockout References: <4.1.19990806142631.019b8020@post.statsvet.su.se> Message-ID: <37AAEA07.1C58F6E7@potsdam.edu> Robert Jonsson wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a couple of questions regarding Samba and passwords. I have been > looking all over for this but haven?t been able to find anything. Is it > possible to set Password Expiration dates in Samba and is it possible to > set Account lockout? > > If someone could just point me in the right direction I?d be extremely > grateful. If you are NOT using Samba as a PDC, and are using "security = domain", the account lockouts/expirations will follow the Domain's policy. -- - Matthew Keller - Lead Programmer/Analyst Distributed Computing and Telemedia State University of New York at Potsdam Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ From tolga at lcsl.metu.edu.tr Fri Aug 6 14:21:15 1999 From: tolga at lcsl.metu.edu.tr (Tolga Ceylan) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Antwort: profiles In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19990806190039.00769d18@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> from "David Bannon" at Aug 6, 99 08:59:07 am Message-ID: <199908061421.RAA22243@kekik.metu.edu.tr> > > At 07:24 AM 06/08/1999 +1000, Stephen Waters wrote: > >tschweikle@FIDUCIA.de wrote: > > >> It is. It's exactly what NT shows the client while logging a user with > >> local profile on. But there is one difference: NT allows this setting > >> on a user by user base, while SAMBA does not (would be nice to be wrong, > >> wouldn't it?). > > > >it would be nice if samba allowed either configuration (per-user or > >server-wide or domain-wide or whatever). > > What I do is allow the NT to make its profiles and selectivly delete them > with a script on the server. Certain users are allowed to keep their > profiles, others get the default profile each time they log on. > > david I was experimenting on a NT 4.0 SP3 Box with FAT HDD. I had a problem when deleting profiles. Actually this is not related with Samba I suppose, but NT sometimes refuses to delete the profiles. I tried manually deleting them, not with a script. NT just complained that the profile directory was used and couldn't be deleted, although the user had exited. The message does not change even if I login as Administrator locally to NT box. NT does not let me to delete the local profiles SOMETIMES!!! And sometimes it lets me... When I used the policy file and set "delete local cached profiles after logout" it worked. Is this a bug? A program using a dll, does not free it maybe? After a reboot problem vanishes... Sincerely, Tolga Ceylan From rsaura at retevision.es Fri Aug 6 14:38:31 1999 From: rsaura at retevision.es (rsaura@retevision.es) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: sharing machine accounts Message-ID: <412567C5.00560072.00@avimsi01.retevision.es> Hello. I've been several days trying to make my linux box loggon on my PDC. Finally I successed. The problem was that the PDC only allows one download of the MAC password, and I was sharing the machine id in both linux & NT partitions. So when I first logged on my NT, it worked fine, but then the PDC rejected to give the passwd to the linux smbpasswd. Then I deleted the account and tried again from the linux box, it worked, but then the NT was rejected to login. Well, here is my question. Is there any way of share the machine ID? I wonder that it could be achieved by writing the content of the linux .mac file into one NT registry key, but i have not had any success in guessing the key. Does this key exists? is the format of the .mac file compatible with the key? Is there any other way to achive the sharing? 10x Raul. From ralf at is.rice.edu Fri Aug 6 14:55:44 1999 From: ralf at is.rice.edu (Alfredo Ramos) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: profiles In-Reply-To: <37AADB5D.FD52D249@eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: The way the lab is set up, every user logs in with a default local profile that has pointers to all the applications available and no user is allowed to modify that profile except for the administrator. The user can load programs of his own in the local machine, but those programs are gone every night when the machine is wiped clean. If samba was allowed to create profiles and users were allowed to modify them, they would keep growing, and that would lenghten the time it takes for the client to retrive them. So it is a matter of speed, for the client at login; and convenience, for the administrator to control what applications are available to the user. We use NT to give the user access to PC applications in a controlled environment, and also to provide access to their home directories in the unix box. Everything else (authentication, and services) is handled in unix by samba. Thanks; I'll use the suggestion. Al. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Alfredo Ramos This space available for rent. | New Media & Student Computing Get your product moving. Advertise here! | Rice University. | Email: ralf@is.rice.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Gerald Carter wrote: > Alfredo Ramos wrote: > > > > Question; > > > > I have samba-2.0.4b running on a Solaris 2.6 box as a > > PDC. And I want to keep it from creating profiles (any > > kind of profiles, roamming or otherwise). > > All users get a profile. How would you do what you desire > in an NT environment and you'll probably be able to > emmulate the setup in a samba domain. > > > Is there a switch that needs to be set, during compile > > or on smb.conf, to tell samba not to create profiles? > > It's an NT issues. Check out some of the white papers > on MS's ntserver site about profiles and policies. It > would be possible to share them among users if you make > them mandatory. > > > > subject, is there a setting in Win/NT to keep it from > > looking for a roamming profile when logging into a > > domain and just use a default local profile? > > Try > > logon path = "%systemroot%\profiles\%U" > > > > Hope this helps, > jerry > ________________________________________________________________________ > Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter > Engineering Network Services Auburn University > jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw > > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) > From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Fri Aug 6 15:13:05 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: sharing machine accounts References: <412567C5.00560072.00@avimsi01.retevision.es> Message-ID: <37AAFB81.8DE2BE34@eng.auburn.edu> rsaura@retevision.es wrote: > > Well, here is my question. Is there any way of share > the machine ID? No. (I always get into trouebl when I say that). But practically the answer is no. Best solution is to use different NetBIOS names for NT and Samba. Then add both to the domain/ Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From matthias at waechter.wol.at Fri Aug 6 16:55:12 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: profiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: About profiles: We use profiles, but only the NT registry is stored in the /%u/profile directory. All other stuff is located in /%u/NT-Folders, so they won't get copied when the user logs in or out. Additionally, The Temporary Internet Files are stored locally. Profiles are removed from the local workstation after logout, so nothing remains local but the Temporary Internet Files. We prefer security more than limiting the users to what applications they run. This construction allows for any data (Application data, desktop, start menu, personal) to be shared between multiple logins of the same user: If the user copies something on the desktop in session 1, it appears on the desktop in session 2 (of course, sometimes only after hitting F5 or automatic refresh). Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From dave at www.buffalostate.edu Fri Aug 6 19:23:38 1999 From: dave at www.buffalostate.edu (Dave J. Andruczyk) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: profiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > About profiles: We use profiles, but only the NT registry is stored in the > /%u/profile directory. All other stuff is located in /%u/NT-Folders, so > they won't get copied when the user logs in or out. Additionally, The > Temporary Internet Files are stored locally. > > Profiles are removed from the local workstation after logout, so nothing > remains local but the Temporary Internet Files. We prefer security more > than limiting the users to what applications they run. This construction > allows for any data (Application data, desktop, start menu, personal) to > be shared between multiple logins of the same user: If the user copies > something on the desktop in session 1, it appears on the desktop in > session 2 (of course, sometimes only after hitting F5 or automatic > refresh). I use something similar. In Win95 in policy editor I create users in the master "config.pol" file on the logon server, and configure the locations of the start menu, programs folver, and all that other stuff to be on drive letter "y:". Which is automounted upon login via the logon script. It works the same way. the only downfall is on machines that logon to the domain but are configured for LOCAL profiles, users that are in that config.pol file (i.e. me) get my profile off of the server( ONLY the menus, NOT the registry), the registry used is the local (shared between all users one). (I have verified this). So it tends to be a plus in the roving profiles mode (I always get the right start menu), but its a downer on non-roving machines as I still get my roving menus but the local registry. Dave J. Andruczyk Instructional Support Associate Department of Technology Buffalo State College From aar at cypress.com Fri Aug 6 19:40:10 1999 From: aar at cypress.com (Aaron Rainwater) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Broken stuff in 2.1.0-prealpha Message-ID: <37AB3A1A.3D7A2DC@mailhost.cadc.cypress.com> First off, I don't think I've ever really thanked the authors of Samba for such a cool set of apps. Off course, we mostly see problems on this list, but that's because it's a list for fixing problems, duh... If I weren't trying to do such fancy-shmanshy stuff with Samba, I'd have no probs at all. With that said... ;> Sorry if this info is a repeat of that which is already known, but here it goes: [ 1 ] unix realname = yes ### net user %USERNAME% /DOMAIN works ### now (crashed when using 2.0.4b), but ### now it doesn't crash, yet doesn't ### supply the user's full name like ### it used to. [ 2 ] I can't seem to send a message to the samba server from WinNT 4.0 TS. I can do it using smbclient, but not from NT. I'm probably just doing something stupid here. [ 3 ] Printing...I know this is quite well know. I got around it by just having separate print & file sharing servers. Installing the printers as lanman ports under NT 4.0 worked just fine...until you rebooted...hmmm...not a solution. Oh, well... -- Aaron Rainwater CADC Intern From pilsl at goldfisch.atat.at Fri Aug 6 21:07:23 1999 From: pilsl at goldfisch.atat.at (peter pilsl) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: when is netlogon-script executed ? Message-ID: <19990806230723.F3045@goldfisch.atat.at> user is logging on a client: can one be sure that all the userprofile is allready downloaded to the client when the netlogon-script is started ? thanks, peter ------------------------------------------- mag. peter pilsl phone: +43/(0)/6763574035 email: pilsl@goldfisch.atat.at sms: pilsl_mobil@goldfisch.atat.at pgp-key available ------------------------------------------- From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Fri Aug 6 21:33:55 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: when is netlogon-script executed ? References: <19990806230723.F3045@goldfisch.atat.at> Message-ID: <37AB54C3.DF1F0D06@eng.auburn.edu> peter pilsl wrote: > > user is logging on a client: > can one be sure that all the userprofile is > allready downloaded to the client when the > netlogon-script is started ? Under Windows NT, yes. Under Windows 9x, no. As always, corrections welcome. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From jgrant at iescrow.com Fri Aug 6 23:09:01 1999 From: jgrant at iescrow.com (John Grant (Concordant Networks)) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Dial-up permission, any headway yet ? Message-ID: <003701bee060$ac7eb5a0$5201a8c0@iescrow.com> At the end of June there was a small flurry concerning supporting the dial-up checkbox in user manager - is there now a fix allowing me to set the flag ? --- John From mike at amipc.com Sat Aug 7 07:30:43 1999 From: mike at amipc.com (Michal Zielinski) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Fw: Help with login Message-ID: <001301bee0a6$c34dc780$2a22d2d8@mike> my probleme is very simple last line of that [root@serami /root]# smbpasswd -U mike -j amiser doing parameter log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m doing parameter max log size = 50 doing parameter socket options = TCP_NODELAY doing parameter load printers = No doing parameter domain logons = Yes doing parameter os level = 64 doing parameter preferred master = Yes doing parameter domain master = Yes doing parameter wins support = Yes pm_process() returned Yes Added interface ip=204.101.212.34 bcast=204.101.212.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name SERAMI-I<0x20> resolve_name: Attempting host lookup for name SERAMI-I<0x20> resolve_name: Attempting wins lookup for name SERAMI-I<0x20> resolve_name: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS server present. resolve_name: Attempting broadcast lookup for name SERAMI-I<0x20> bind succeeded on port 0 modify_trust_password: Can't resolve address for SERAMI-I 1999/08/06 20:22:18 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain AMISER. Unable to join domain AMISER. === NEED TO HOST WEB PAGE ?? === === ask us 25/$CND monthly 75mb === === info@amipc.com -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From Bob.Hoekstra at khamsin.demon.co.uk Sat Aug 7 10:51:43 1999 From: Bob.Hoekstra at khamsin.demon.co.uk (Bob Hoekstra) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: daemons not starting form inetd References: <199908041512.QAA02142@titania.nmr> Message-ID: <37AC0FBF.248A68E@khamsin.demon.co.uk> "Mr. Alex Stepney" wrote: > > All, > > I'm running Samba on various Solaris boxes (all 2.X). One machine > has been running CV's from about a month ago as a PDC and all other > boxes 2.0.4b. When I try to upgrade to 2.0.5a or try to install the > latest CV's neither nmbd or smbd will start from inetd on any 2.5.1 > box. I don't want to move my PDC from the machine its currently > on, or upgrade to 2.7 (just yet!). Has anyone experienced this or > found away around the problem? > > Thanks in advance > > Alex. Personally, I don't like the concept of running samba from inetd. I have been running the attached script (/etc/init.d/samba, symbolic link to /etc/rc2.d/S99samba) for some time (OS from Solaris 2.4 through 7, can't remember how many sambas). It's always done the job. -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GO/! d- s++:+ a+ C++(++++) US+++$ P+ L+ E--- W++ N++ w--- O- V- PS+ PE- Y+ PGP- t+ 5++ X+ R* tv+ b+ DI++ D G e(*) h++/-- r+++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ----------------------------------------------------- Bob Hoekstra: APL & Unix Consultant Tele: +44 (0)1483 771028 (Home) +44 (0)410 562345 (Mobile) Web site: http://www.khamsin.demon.co.uk Home email: Bob.Hoekstra@khamsin.demon.co.uk ----------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- #!/bin/sh ########################################## # Start samba stuff # Bob Hoekstra, 25/1/97 ########################################## SMBDIR=/usr/local/samba/bin export SMBDIR SambaStart () { for PROC in smbd nmbd do $SMBDIR/$PROC -D && echo "Samba $PROC daemon started." done } SambaStop() { for PROC in nmbd smbd do PS=`ps -ef | grep "${SMBDIR}/${PROC}" | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}'` if [ "X$PS" = "X" ] then echo "No $PROC process running." else kill -9 $PS && echo "$PROC process killed." fi done } case "$1" in 'start') SambaStart ;; 'stop') SambaStop ;; 'restart') SambaStop sleep 5 SambaStart ;; *) echo "Usage: $0 start|stop|restart" ;; esac From rfs at aw.com.pl Sat Aug 7 14:14:55 1999 From: rfs at aw.com.pl (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Rafa=B3=20Szcze=B6niak?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: <37AC3F5F.2F25AED5@aw.com.pl> subscribe From rfs at aw.com.pl Sat Aug 7 19:06:02 1999 From: rfs at aw.com.pl (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rafa=B3=20Szcze=B6niak?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Ignored parameters Message-ID: <37AC839A.6FEFC38@aw.com.pl> Hello everybody :) Please, help me - I don't understand why samba (2.0.5a) doesn't recognize these parameters: domain group map domain user map local group map This is part of log.smb: [1999/08/06 21:00:50, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) smbd version 2.0.5a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [1999/08/06 21:00:50, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) Unknown parameter encountered: "domain group map" [1999/08/06 21:00:50, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) Ignoring unknown parameter "domain group map" [1999/08/06 21:00:50, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) Unknown parameter encountered: "domain user map" [1999/08/06 21:00:50, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) Ignoring unknown parameter "domain user map" [1999/08/06 21:00:50, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) Unknown parameter encountered: "local group map" [1999/08/06 21:00:50, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) Ignoring unknown parameter "local group map" [1999/08/06 21:00:50, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are available.listproc@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: Greetings :-) Rafa? Szcze?niak From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Sat Aug 7 19:37:21 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Ignored parameters References: <37AC839A.6FEFC38@aw.com.pl> Message-ID: <37AC8AF1.18754476@eng.auburn.edu> Rafa? Szcze?niak wrote: > > Hello everybody :) > > Please, help me - I don't understand why samba (2.0.5a) > doesn't recognize these parameters: > domain group map > domain user map > local group map These three parameters are only available the 2.1-prealpha code (aka the HEAD branch). This is noted in the Samba NT DOmain FAQ. Please read the header above the TOC and Q4.1.3 Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From roamdad at ibm.net Sat Aug 7 19:41:01 1999 From: roamdad at ibm.net (Dougl VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? References: <199908050859.KAA21188@www.lkt.uni-erlangen.de> <37A98371.3A9C4909@eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <37AC8BCC.7BC62C63@ibm.net> Gerald Carter wrote: > ~2,000 users in smbpasswd How do you get everyone into "Domain Users" ? I ran into 1024 byte limitations for the unix side group line (AIX 4.2) limiting me to around 170 5 char unix names. -- Doug VanLeuven : 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Programmer/Analyst, SCWA : doug@scwa.ca.gov Chief Engineer, USMM : roamdad@ibm.net From roamdad at ibm.net Sat Aug 7 20:16:11 1999 From: roamdad at ibm.net (Dougl VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: HEAD code and LDAP libs References: <99080409140800.00629@gordon.hal> Message-ID: <37AC940A.D6BC2F50@ibm.net> Gordon Smith wrote: > Using OpenLDAP-1.2.3 RPM and the HEAD Samba source, I am unable to configure > Samba for compiling. The error reported is: > > configure:9002: gcc -o conftest -O conftest.c -lreadline -ldl -lcrypt -lpam > -lcurses -lldap -llber 1>&5 > /usr/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `res_search' > /usr/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `dn_expand' > /usr/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `_getshort' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > The system is RedHat 6.0 kernel 2.3.8. > Any suggestions? I successfully configure & compile using OpenLDAP on a Redhat 5.2, kernel 2.0.36 machine. I rgrep'ed for these labels in /usr/include & find them to be defined in resolv.h & arpa/nameser.h. These include files & assoc. lib come with the bind-devel rpm. Cheers. -- Doug VanLeuven : 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Programmer/Analyst, SCWA : doug@scwa.ca.gov Chief Engineer, USMM : roamdad@ibm.net From awilliam at whitemice.org Sat Aug 7 02:01:22 1999 From: awilliam at whitemice.org (Adam Williams) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? In-Reply-To: Dougl VanLeuven "Re: Samba Fileserver at daily use?" (Aug 8, 5:48am) References: <199908050859.KAA21188@www.lkt.uni-erlangen.de> <37A98371.3A9C4909@eng.auburn.edu> <37AC8BCC.7BC62C63@ibm.net> Message-ID: <9908070201.ZM9486@estate1.whitemice.org> > Gerald Carter wrote: > > > ~2,000 users in smbpasswd > > How do you get everyone into "Domain Users" ? > I ran into 1024 byte limitations for the unix side > group line (AIX 4.2) limiting me to around 170 > 5 char unix names. Yep, I've had the same problem in AIX 4.2 and AIX 3.2.5, also bites you if you try to use NIS. From ldx at ibm.net Sat Aug 7 23:37:24 1999 From: ldx at ibm.net (Doug VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:50 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? References: <199908050859.KAA21188@www.lkt.uni-erlangen.de> <9908070201.ZM9486@estate1.whitemice.org> Message-ID: <37ACC334.560B11B5@ibm.net> Adam Williams wrote: > > Gerald Carter wrote: > > > > > ~2,000 users in smbpasswd > > > > How do you get everyone into "Domain Users" ? > > I ran into 1024 byte limitations for the unix side > > group line (AIX 4.2) limiting me to around 170 > > 5 char unix names. > > Yep, I've had the same problem in AIX 4.2 and AIX 3.2.5, also bites you if you > try to use NIS. Have you found a workaround ? -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov From rfs at aw.com.pl Sun Aug 8 18:57:59 1999 From: rfs at aw.com.pl (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rafa=B3=20Szcze=B6niak?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:51 2003 Subject: Sorry References: <199908081416.QAA21365@mailserv.egu.schule.ulm.de> Message-ID: <37ADD337.448F3CB4@aw.com.pl> Steffen Moser wrote: > > Hello, > > On 8 Aug 99, at 0:14, Rafa? Szcze?niak wrote: > > > subscribe > > > > You sent your subscribe command to the mailing list itsself and > not to the list processor. To do a successful subscription you > should look at http://www.samba.org. There is a explanation of > subscribing to the mailing lists correctly. > > Bye, > Steffen Thank you and sorry for making a problem. That email was my mistake. Greetings :-) Rafa? From abbas at cns.uni.edu Sun Aug 8 21:16:23 1999 From: abbas at cns.uni.edu (Melanie Abbas (CNS staff)) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:51 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? In-Reply-To: <37ACC334.560B11B5@ibm.net> Message-ID: On Sun, 8 Aug 1999, Doug VanLeuven wrote: > Adam Williams wrote: > > > > Gerald Carter wrote: > > > > > > > ~2,000 users in smbpasswd > > > > > > How do you get everyone into "Domain Users" ? > > > I ran into 1024 byte limitations for the unix side > > > group line (AIX 4.2) limiting me to around 170 > > > 5 char unix names. > > > > Yep, I've had the same problem in AIX 4.2 and AIX 3.2.5, also bites you if you > > try to use NIS. > > Have you found a workaround ? I also have ~2000 users in my smbpasswd file and I am using Solaris 7 with NIS+. The group file or group NIS+ table doesn't have to list all the members of a group in it. It only needs to list groups users are in besides their primary group. As long as the passwd file or table lists the primary group of the user as whatever group you want, you can have as many users in the same group as you can have on your system. However, that only works if you want the group to be the users primary group. I have very few users in multiple groups, so my group file/table is relatively small. All my other groups tend to have 12 or less users in them, so I don't have a problem, however, YMMV. Melanie Abbas Systems Administrator College of Natural Sciences University of Northern Iowa @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Be content with such things as you have. For God himself has said, I shall never leave you nor forsake you. -Hebrews 13:5 Office: WRT 337 Regular hours: 8:00-5:00 Phone: 273-7029 Fax: 273-7123 Beeper: 235-4135 @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ From gordon at hortauto.co.nz Sun Aug 8 22:41:05 1999 From: gordon at hortauto.co.nz (Gordon Smith) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:51 2003 Subject: HEAD code and LDAP libs References: <37AC940A.D6BC2F50@ibm.net> Message-ID: <99080910425502.03075@gordon.hal> On Sun, 08 Aug 1999, you wrote: > > I successfully configure & compile using OpenLDAP on > a Redhat 5.2, kernel 2.0.36 machine. > > I rgrep'ed for these labels in /usr/include & find them to be > defined in resolv.h & arpa/nameser.h. > These include files & assoc. lib come with the bind-devel rpm. > Cheers. > > Thanks Doug. I feel a bit silly now... :-) It was definitely a case of not seeing the forest for the trees. Cheers, -- Gordon Smith, MCP, TCP Network Administrator Horticultural Automation Ltd. From ldx at ibm.net Sun Aug 8 23:08:59 1999 From: ldx at ibm.net (Doug VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:51 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? References: Message-ID: <37AE0E0B.C88E71E3@ibm.net> Thanks. My specific circumstance is a legacy AIX system where users have been split into initial departmental groups with a umask of 002 and sgid on shared directories so departmental groups can freely read/write files. I can't change this. On the NT side, I have a legacy NT domain where logon scripts run under the permissions of "Domain Users" and need to be applied to everyone authenticated to the domain, but not guests & web users of MS IIS. I'm experimenting with LDAP to define NT groups that are not mapped to any unix group and it seems promising. But I had hoped someone had found a way around the 1024 byte limitation in group lines so we wouldn't have to maintain yet another server. "Melanie Abbas (CNS staff)" wrote: > On Sun, 8 Aug 1999, Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > > Adam Williams wrote: > > > > > > Gerald Carter wrote: > > > > > > > > > ~2,000 users in smbpasswd > > > > > > > > How do you get everyone into "Domain Users" ? > > > > I ran into 1024 byte limitations for the unix side > > > > group line (AIX 4.2) limiting me to around 170 > > > > 5 char unix names. > > > > > > Yep, I've had the same problem in AIX 4.2 and AIX 3.2.5, also bites you if you > > > try to use NIS. > > > > Have you found a workaround ? > > I also have ~2000 users in my smbpasswd file and I am using Solaris 7 with > NIS+. > > The group file or group NIS+ table doesn't have to list all the members of > a group in it. It only needs to list groups users are in besides their > primary group. As long as the passwd file or table lists the primary > group of the user as whatever group you want, you can have as many users > in the same group as you can have on your system. > > However, that only works if you want the group to be the users primary > group. I have very few users in multiple groups, so my group file/table is > relatively small. All my other groups tend to have 12 or less users in > them, so I don't have a problem, however, YMMV. > > Melanie Abbas > Systems Administrator > -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov From kellermg at potsdam.edu Sun Aug 8 23:18:40 1999 From: kellermg at potsdam.edu (Matthew Keller) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:51 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? References: <37AE0E0B.C88E71E3@ibm.net> Message-ID: <37AE1050.239A2491@potsdam.edu> Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > Thanks. My specific circumstance is a legacy AIX system where users have > been split into initial departmental groups with a umask of 002 and sgid on shared > directories so departmental groups can freely read/write files. I can't change this. > On the NT side, I have a legacy NT domain where logon scripts run under the > permissions of "Domain Users" and need to be applied to everyone authenticated > to the domain, but not guests & web users of MS IIS. > I'm experimenting with LDAP to define NT groups that are not mapped to any > unix group and it seems promising. > But I had hoped someone had found a way around the 1024 byte > limitation in group lines so we wouldn't have to maintain yet another server. The standard way around this in UNIX is to break users into subgroups, and shove them into the master group. I'll explain. Let's say you add the users to 'Domain Users', but there are too many (example below): users:1:person1,person2.....person99999 You can always add GROUPS to other groups, so you could break it up as follows: users1:12:person1,person2....person200 users2:13:person201,person202....person400 users3:14:person401,.....person500 .. .. .. users:1:@users1,@users2,@users3......@users9999 Did that make sense? I'm pretty tired.... -- - Matthew Keller - Lead Programmer/Analyst Distributed Computing and Telemedia State University of New York at Potsdam Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ From ldx at ibm.net Mon Aug 9 00:22:48 1999 From: ldx at ibm.net (Doug VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:51 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? References: <37AE0E0B.C88E71E3@ibm.net> <37AE1050.239A2491@potsdam.edu> Message-ID: <37AE1F58.9D55A864@ibm.net> Matthew Keller wrote: > Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > > > Thanks. My specific circumstance is a legacy AIX system where users have > > been split into initial departmental groups with a umask of 002 and sgid on shared > > directories so departmental groups can freely read/write files. I can't change this. > > On the NT side, I have a legacy NT domain where logon scripts run under the > > permissions of "Domain Users" and need to be applied to everyone authenticated > > to the domain, but not guests & web users of MS IIS. > > I'm experimenting with LDAP to define NT groups that are not mapped to any > > unix group and it seems promising. > > But I had hoped someone had found a way around the 1024 byte > > limitation in group lines so we wouldn't have to maintain yet another server. > > The standard way around this in UNIX is to break users into subgroups, > and shove them into the master group. I'll explain. > > Let's say you add the users to 'Domain Users', but there are too many > (example below): > users:1:person1,person2.....person99999 > You can always add GROUPS to other groups, so you could break it up as > follows: > users1:12:person1,person2....person200 > users2:13:person201,person202....person400 > users3:14:person401,.....person500 > . > . > . > users:1:@users1,@users2,@users3......@users9999 > > Did that make sense? I'm pretty tired.... > If you're talking NIS, I'm going to have to research it. Right now these systems don't use it. This is something I can implement though. I guess I'm being dense or I would have picked that up right away. Thanks. -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov From kellermg at potsdam.edu Mon Aug 9 00:24:49 1999 From: kellermg at potsdam.edu (Matthew Keller) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:51 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? References: <37AE0E0B.C88E71E3@ibm.net> <37AE1050.239A2491@potsdam.edu> <37AE1F58.9D55A864@ibm.net> Message-ID: <37AE1FD1.96B8D38B@potsdam.edu> Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > Matthew Keller wrote: > > > Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > > > > > Thanks. My specific circumstance is a legacy AIX system where users have > > > been split into initial departmental groups with a umask of 002 and sgid on shared > > > directories so departmental groups can freely read/write files. I can't change this. > > > On the NT side, I have a legacy NT domain where logon scripts run under the > > > permissions of "Domain Users" and need to be applied to everyone authenticated > > > to the domain, but not guests & web users of MS IIS. > > > I'm experimenting with LDAP to define NT groups that are not mapped to any > > > unix group and it seems promising. > > > But I had hoped someone had found a way around the 1024 byte > > > limitation in group lines so we wouldn't have to maintain yet another server. > > > > The standard way around this in UNIX is to break users into subgroups, > > and shove them into the master group. I'll explain. > > > > Let's say you add the users to 'Domain Users', but there are too many > > (example below): > > users:1:person1,person2.....person99999 > > You can always add GROUPS to other groups, so you could break it up as > > follows: > > users1:12:person1,person2....person200 > > users2:13:person201,person202....person400 > > users3:14:person401,.....person500 > > . > > . > > . > > users:1:@users1,@users2,@users3......@users9999 > > > > Did that make sense? I'm pretty tired.... > > > > If you're talking NIS, I'm going to have to research it. Right now these systems > don't use it. This is something I can implement though. > I guess I'm being dense or I would have picked that up right away. > Thanks. No, not NIS. Straight /etc/group file. -- - Matthew Keller - Lead Programmer/Analyst Distributed Computing and Telemedia State University of New York at Potsdam Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ From jthomas2 at uiuc.edu Mon Aug 9 02:01:39 1999 From: jthomas2 at uiuc.edu (Jay Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? References: <37AE0E0B.C88E71E3@ibm.net> <37AE1050.239A2491@potsdam.edu> Message-ID: <37AE3683.EBA63B63@uiuc.edu> Matthew Keller wrote: > Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > > > Thanks. My specific circumstance is a legacy AIX system where users have > > been split into initial departmental groups with a umask of 002 and sgid on shared > > directories so departmental groups can freely read/write files. I can't change this. > > On the NT side, I have a legacy NT domain where logon scripts run under the > > permissions of "Domain Users" and need to be applied to everyone authenticated > > to the domain, but not guests & web users of MS IIS. > > I'm experimenting with LDAP to define NT groups that are not mapped to any > > unix group and it seems promising. > > But I had hoped someone had found a way around the 1024 byte > > limitation in group lines so we wouldn't have to maintain yet another server. > > The standard way around this in UNIX is to break users into subgroups, > and shove them into the master group. I'll explain. > > Let's say you add the users to 'Domain Users', but there are too many > (example below): > users:1:person1,person2.....person99999 > You can always add GROUPS to other groups, so you could break it up as > follows: > users1:12:person1,person2....person200 > users2:13:person201,person202....person400 > users3:14:person401,.....person500 > . > . > . > users:1:@users1,@users2,@users3......@users9999 > The way I have traditionally done it is: users1:14:person1,person2,person3 users1:14:person1,person2,person3 AFAIK this works under HP/UX & RedHat 5.2 but I've noticed under Redhat's check group file script doesn't like it. -- Freedom is not free. Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free. This message Copyright (c) 1999 Jay Thomas Jay Thomas, jthomas2@uiuc.edu http://jay.cx From narzola at sla.com Mon Aug 9 07:32:15 1999 From: narzola at sla.com (Nelson Arzola) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: duplicate name get_home_dir Message-ID: <37AE83FE.F7585BCC@sla.com> I have been experimenting with the head NT DOM branch on a sparc running Solaris 7. Since my first installation of Samba on this machine, I've since added GNU readline 4.0. It turns out that both Samba and GNU readline define the function get_home_dir(). Obviously, this is not a happy situation if autoconf includes readline support. I've remedied the situation (haphazardly), but renaming the function get_home_dir() to smb_get_home_dir(). The easiest solution is to rename get_home_dir() to something else. I would be happy to provide the diffs if the Samba team is interested. Another solution is to have autoconf check for the condition and at least warn the user. GNU readline is not uncommon -- better to do something now than wait for a million people asking for help because of "some duplicate function get_home_dir()". Nelson Arzola Network Engineer Seitel Leeds & Associates 2 Nickerson St, Ste 201 Seattle, WA 98109 From pmal at space.gr Mon Aug 9 12:05:56 1999 From: pmal at space.gr (Panagiotis Malakoudis) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message References: <37AE0E0B.C88E71E3@ibm.net> <37AE1050.239A2491@potsdam.edu> <37AE1F58.9D55A864@ibm.net> <37AE1FD1.96B8D38B@potsdam.edu> Message-ID: <011e01bee25f$896dd680$0502000a@space.gr> Does anyone know how I can setup samba to send a Pop Up message to all the window client that are connected notifing them whenever the smb daemon will shutdown?All this must be implemented under linux. Thanx in advance. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Malakoudis Panagiotis System Administrator Space Hellas S.A. Telephone:6547400 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----- Original Message ----- From: Matthew Keller To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 3:29 AM Subject: Re: Samba Fileserver at daily use? > Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > > > Matthew Keller wrote: > > > > > Doug VanLeuven wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks. My specific circumstance is a legacy AIX system where users have > > > > been split into initial departmental groups with a umask of 002 and sgid on shared > > > > directories so departmental groups can freely read/write files. I can't change this. > > > > On the NT side, I have a legacy NT domain where logon scripts run under the > > > > permissions of "Domain Users" and need to be applied to everyone authenticated > > > > to the domain, but not guests & web users of MS IIS. > > > > I'm experimenting with LDAP to define NT groups that are not mapped to any > > > > unix group and it seems promising. > > > > But I had hoped someone had found a way around the 1024 byte > > > > limitation in group lines so we wouldn't have to maintain yet another server. > > > > > > The standard way around this in UNIX is to break users into subgroups, > > > and shove them into the master group. I'll explain. > > > > > > Let's say you add the users to 'Domain Users', but there are too many > > > (example below): > > > users:1:person1,person2.....person99999 > > > You can always add GROUPS to other groups, so you could break it up as > > > follows: > > > users1:12:person1,person2....person200 > > > users2:13:person201,person202....person400 > > > users3:14:person401,.....person500 > > > . > > > . > > > . > > > users:1:@users1,@users2,@users3......@users9999 > > > > > > Did that make sense? I'm pretty tired.... > > > > > > > If you're talking NIS, I'm going to have to research it. Right now these systems > > don't use it. This is something I can implement though. > > I guess I'm being dense or I would have picked that up right away. > > Thanks. > > No, not NIS. Straight /etc/group file. > > -- > > - Matthew Keller - > Lead Programmer/Analyst > Distributed Computing and Telemedia > State University of New York at Potsdam > > Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ > PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ From ralf at is.rice.edu Mon Aug 9 14:39:33 1999 From: ralf at is.rice.edu (Alfredo Ramos) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Samba passwords on NT Message-ID: I want to thank every one for the answers I have gotten so far. Here's one more question if you would please. I know that samba passwords are not recoverable from their encrypted form, but my question is: Has anybody migrated these passwords to be used on an NT server. 1.- Can they be used by NT the way they're encrypted? Or, 2.- If they cannot be used "as is", is there a utility that can be used to migrate them? Well, I guess this part of the question is kinda silly since in order to migrate them you would have to know what they were to begin with, right?. Any way. Has anybody had the need to do this before? I'm talking about some 4000+ passwords. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Alfredo Ramos This space available for rent. | New Media & Student Computing Get your product moving. Advertise here! | Rice University. | Email: ralf@is.rice.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Mon Aug 9 14:53:28 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Hooray!!! In-Reply-To: <37ADD337.448F3CB4@aw.com.pl> Message-ID: Win95 policies are now working with the current head relase. Thanks guys! Sam From a.schaefer at uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de Mon Aug 9 15:54:59 1999 From: a.schaefer at uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Sch=E4fer=2C_Axel=22?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Samba won't talk with PDC - strange, strange! Message-ID: <511FDFACA857D211A0E10060084D481205CA50@intranet> Hi, we are running a WinNT/Win95 network here. We need a stable file-server, so we setup a Linux box with Samba 2.0.4b. The NT Server (NT 4, SP 4, german) is serving as PDC and does all the password stuff. I successfully joined Samba to the domain and everything is working fine for some houres up to days. But then something strange happens: when I click on my Samba in the network neighbordhood, it asks for a Username and a Password. It doesn't matter, what User and Password I use, it won't let me in. Checking the log, it says: [1999/08/09 15:26:59, 1] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1243) domain_client_validate: Can't resolve address for UWTSRV1NT [1999/08/09 15:26:59, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1318) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [1999/08/09 15:26:59, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(771) NT Password did not match ! Defaulting to Lanman [1999/08/09 15:27:07, 1] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1243) domain_client_validate: Can't resolve address for UWTSRV1NT [1999/08/09 15:27:07, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1318) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [1999/08/09 15:27:07, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(771) NT Password did not match ! Defaulting to Lanman [1999/08/09 15:27:16, 1] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1243) domain_client_validate: Can't resolve address for UWTSRV1NT [1999/08/09 15:27:16, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1318) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [1999/08/09 15:27:16, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(771) NT Password did not match ! Defaulting to Lanman Where UWTSRV1NT is the NT Server (PDC). The NT is running WINS-Server and I set "WINS SERVER = ip_of_server" in smb.conf. In my opinion this is a communication problem between Samba and the NT Server. Strangely all my workstations can access the NT Server, so WINS must be running. The problem can be solved by rebooting the NT Server or joining Samba again to the domain using smbpasswd -j domain. Any Ideas? What is going wrong here - is it me, is it Samba, is it NT Server? Help needed urgently! Thanks Axel Schaefer ________________________________________________________________________ Dipl.-Wirt.Ing. Axel Schaefer Universit?t-GH-Siegen Tel.: +49-271-740 2384 FB 11, Institut fuer Systemtechnik Fax: +49-271-740 2790 Umwelttechnik Mobil: +49-172-2558520 Paul-Bonatz-Str. 9-11 Sekretariat: +49-271-740 2630 57068 Siegen WWW: http://www.mb.uni-siegen.de/d/ist3 Email: A.Schaefer@uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de ________________________________________________________________________ From lee at hsh.com Mon Aug 9 17:36:16 1999 From: lee at hsh.com (Lee Havemann) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Can't bcecome connected user? Message-ID: <003b01bee28d$af6d6200$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> Thanks to Alex, I have successfully joined our domain with smaba 2.0.4b on a BSDI 4.0.1 box. The NT challenge/response seems to go okay, but all I get is another prompt for a password, which as I understand it, I shouldn't get at all since I am using encrypted passwords and security=domain in the smb.conf file. Can somebody be kind enough to point out what is probably a dumb mistake? Here is a lever 4 debug form the samba machine: [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 1 of length 158 [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16605) [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 2 of length 154 [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16605) [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) Mapped user hshpcf to lee [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: C89CC750F1C7D32F [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) cred_session_key [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal 555CF903585B5754 neg: 1ff [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) cred_assert [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt E4F4B91D66981C9D 37af0f5e ll: 2 [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) cred_assert [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_home(1475) adding home directory lee at /home/lee [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) lee is in 8 groups: 20, 20, 0, 5, 84, 85, 100, 101 [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) uid 150 registered to name lee [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) Clearing default real name [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(765) Chained message [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtconX (pid 16605) [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) Got device type IPC [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) Connect path is /tmp [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) Can't become connected user! [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 3 of length 66 [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtconX (pid 16605) [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) Got device type IPC [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) Connect path is /tmp [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) Can't become connected user! [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) end of file from client [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) Closing connections [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) Server exit (normal exit) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(544) Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(702) Initialised IPC area of size 1048576 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) Changed root to / [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(82) open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(721) bind succeeded on port 0 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(110) open_oplock ipc: pid = 16606, global_oplock_port = 50415 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:smbd_process(974) priming nmbd [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:send_one_packet(646) sending a packet of len 1 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 of type DGRAM [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110) Serverzone is 14400 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 0 of length 72 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 1 of length 158 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16606) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 2 of length 156 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16606) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) Mapped user hshpcf to lee [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.1 hsh-gw [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.3 hshpca [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.4 hshpcb [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.5 hshpcc [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.6 hshpcd [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.7 hshvxa [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.8 hshpce [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.9 hshpcf [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.10 hshpcg [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.11 hshpch [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.12 hshpci [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.13 hshpcj [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.14 hshpck [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.15 hshpcl [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.16 hshpcm [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.17 hshpcn [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.18 hshpco [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.19 hshpcp [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.20 hshpcq [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.196 hshunb [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.197 hshntb [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.198 hshnta [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: 875175A0E2AA11AF [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) cred_session_key [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal B9165CFA70465A98 neg: 1ff [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) cred_assert [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt 1EE909D12C94BE70 37af0f61 ll: 2 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(392) cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1369) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user hshpcf in domain HSH to Domain controller HSHNTA. Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(404) Checking SMB password for user lee [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(431) smb_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(438) NT MD4 password check failed [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(444) Checking LM MD4 password [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(456) LM MD4 password check succeeded [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_home(1475) adding home directory lee at /home/lee [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) lee is in 8 groups: 20, 20, 0, 5, 84, 85, 100, 101 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) uid 150 registered to name lee [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) Clearing default real name [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(765) Chained message [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtconX (pid 16606) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) Got device type ????? [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) Connect path is /tmp [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) Can't become connected user! [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 3 of length 68 [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtconX (pid 16606) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) Got device type ????? [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) Connect path is /tmp [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) Can't become connected user! [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 [1999/08/09 13:26:58, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) end of file from client [1999/08/09 13:26:58, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) Closing connections [1999/08/09 13:26:58, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) Server exit (normal exit) [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(544) Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(702) Initialised IPC area of size 1048576 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) Changed root to / [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(82) open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(721) bind succeeded on port 0 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(110) open_oplock ipc: pid = 16607, global_oplock_port = 50421 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:smbd_process(974) priming nmbd [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/util_sock.c:send_one_packet(646) sending a packet of len 1 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 of type DGRAM [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110) Serverzone is 14400 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 0 of length 72 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 1 of length 158 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16607) [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 2 of length 156 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16607) [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) Mapped user hshpcf to lee [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.1 hsh-gw [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.3 hshpca [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.4 hshpcb [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.5 hshpcc [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.6 hshpcd [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.7 hshvxa [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.8 hshpce [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.9 hshpcf [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.10 hshpcg [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.11 hshpch [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.12 hshpci [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.13 hshpcj [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.14 hshpck [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.15 hshpcl [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.16 hshpcm [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.17 hshpcn [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.18 hshpco [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.19 hshpcp [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.20 hshpcq [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.196 hshunb [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.197 hshntb [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.198 hshnta [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: 4AF1BA10C1C53185 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) cred_session_key [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal 175FE8F4C34AC4D7 neg: 1ff [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) cred_assert [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt C61013143E6D7301 37af0f65 ll: 2 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(392) cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1369) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user hshpcf in domain HSH to Domain controller HSHNTA. Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(404) Checking SMB password for user lee [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(431) smb_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(438) NT MD4 password check failed [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(444) Checking LM MD4 password [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(460) LM MD4 password check failed [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(532) smb_password_check failed. Invalid password given for user 'lee' [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 840 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=2 ecode=2 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 3 of length 156 [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16607) [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) Mapped user hshpcf to lee [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.1 hsh-gw [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.3 hshpca [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.4 hshpcb [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.5 hshpcc [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.6 hshpcd [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.7 hshvxa [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.8 hshpce [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.9 hshpcf [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.10 hshpcg [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.11 hshpch [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.12 hshpci [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.13 hshpcj [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.14 hshpck [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.15 hshpcl [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.16 hshpcm [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.17 hshpcn [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.18 hshpco [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.19 hshpcp [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.20 hshpcq [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.196 hshunb [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.197 hshntb [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.198 hshnta [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: 9C9FF74B30E24A8C [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) cred_session_key [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal 8D62C59D2BC673D7 neg: 1ff [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) cred_assert [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt 04EF504BF9B8ADF9 37af0f66 ll: 2 [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(392) cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1369) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user hshpcf in domain HSH to Domain controller HSHNTA. Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(404) Checking SMB password for user lee [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(431) smb_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(438) NT MD4 password check failed [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(444) Checking LM MD4 password [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(460) LM MD4 password check failed [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(532) smb_password_check failed. Invalid password given for user 'lee' [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 840 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=2 ecode=2 [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) end of file from client [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) Closing connections [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) Server exit (normal exit) [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(544) Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(702) Initialised IPC area of size 1048576 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) Changed root to / [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(82) open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(721) bind succeeded on port 0 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(110) open_oplock ipc: pid = 16608, global_oplock_port = 50427 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:smbd_process(974) priming nmbd [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] lib/util_sock.c:send_one_packet(646) sending a packet of len 1 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 of type DGRAM [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110) Serverzone is 14400 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 0 of length 72 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 1 of length 158 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16608) [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 2 of length 156 [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16608) [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) Mapped user hshpcf to lee [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.1 hsh-gw [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.3 hshpca [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.4 hshpcb [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.5 hshpcc [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.6 hshpcd [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.7 hshvxa [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.8 hshpce [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.9 hshpcf [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.10 hshpcg [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.11 hshpch [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.12 hshpci [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.13 hshpcj [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.14 hshpck [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.15 hshpcl [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.16 hshpcm [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.17 hshpcn [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.18 hshpco [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.19 hshpcp [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.20 hshpcq [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.196 hshunb [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.197 hshntb [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.198 hshnta [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: 945E5A15F60070AE [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) cred_session_key [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal B6DD8A8DBADEFC72 neg: 1ff [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) cred_assert [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt 512F328DB0EF7444 37af0f68 ll: 2 [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) cred_assert [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_home(1475) adding home directory lee at /home/lee [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) lee is in 8 groups: 20, 20, 0, 5, 84, 85, 100, 101 [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) uid 150 registered to name lee [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) Clearing default real name [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(765) Chained message [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtconX (pid 16608) [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) Got device type ????? [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) Connect path is /tmp [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) Can't become connected user! [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 3 of length 68 [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtconX (pid 16608) [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) Got device type ????? [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) Connect path is /tmp [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) Can't become connected user! [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) end of file from client [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) Closing connections [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) Server exit (normal exit) ----- Lee Havemann, Comp Ops Dir. HSH Associates (973) 838-3330 Mailto: lee@hsh.com http://www.hsh.com "My opinions are probably not those of my employer" From db at med-in.uni-sb.de Tue Aug 10 07:26:50 1999 From: db at med-in.uni-sb.de (Dr. Dieter Becker) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: programs at user-startup Message-ID: <000201bee301$b5f4e2f0$0d2c6086@medin.unisb.de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sirs, Samba 2.0.5a on solaris and NT-4.0-SP4/5-Workstations I have some registry-entries which I would insert at user-startup. How can I do that, so that this is invisible by the user. regedit requires an ok from the user. - --- Is it possible to do some jobs with administrator-rights at user-startup? These questions are perhaps a little bit offtopic but I dont know where to ask qualified webmasters. So excuse please. Thanks Dieter Dr. med. dipl.-math. Dieter Becker Tel: 06841 16 3046 / 3077 Medizinische Universit?ts- und Poliklinik Fax: 06841 16 3043 / 3385 Innere Medizin III 6621 Homburg Email: db@med-in.uni-sb.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBN6/GKt9CzAYLLgjZEQLmKgCfdvO79nB8T+8VQsMZIVJo/K4iu4QAoJL7 zswZViuBPBQA/GVVE20TylG2 =o9Px -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From sbragion at email.com Tue Aug 10 10:28:03 1999 From: sbragion at email.com (Denis Sbragion) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: programs at user-startup In-Reply-To: <000201bee301$b5f4e2f0$0d2c6086@medin.unisb.de> Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990810122803.0089d640@MBox.InfoTecna.com> Hello, At 19.01 10/08/99 +1000, Dr. Dieter Becker wrote: >I have some registry-entries which I would insert at user-startup. >How can I do that, so that this is invisible by the user. regedit >requires an ok from the user. regedit /s is your friend. Bye! -- Denis Sbragion InfoTecna Tel, Fax: +39 039 2324054 URL: http://infotecna.home.dhs.org From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Tue Aug 10 11:11:26 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Hooray!!! In-Reply-To: <199908101015.MAA24381@mailserv.egu.schule.ulm.de> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: Steffen Moser [mailto:moser@egu.schule.ulm.de] > Sent: 10 August 1999 11:15 AM > To: sam@campbellsci.co.uk > Subject: Re: Hooray!!! > > > Hello, > > On 10 Aug 99, at 18:49, Samuel Liddicott wrote: > > > Win95 policies are now working with the current head relase. > > Do you know whether Samba HEAD release supports also "group > policies" yet? I don't know *how* group policies would work (how do I make someone belong to a group samba-wise?) so I can't test this, but I not that USER policies DO NOT work either. Machine policies do work, and domain logins are now quick again. Sam From dlee at cse.fau.edu Tue Aug 10 11:34:51 1999 From: dlee at cse.fau.edu (Donjuma Lee) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: programs at user-startup In-Reply-To: <000201bee301$b5f4e2f0$0d2c6086@medin.unisb.de> Message-ID: regedit /s silent install of the regfile check out http://www.ntfaq.com perhaps you should make these changes to a .pol file or to the default profile of your NT clients. On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Dr. Dieter Becker wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sirs, > > Samba 2.0.5a on solaris and NT-4.0-SP4/5-Workstations > > I have some registry-entries which I would insert at user-startup. > How can I do that, so that this is invisible by the user. regedit > requires an ok from the user. > > - --- > > Is it possible to do some jobs with administrator-rights at > user-startup? > > These questions are perhaps a little bit offtopic but I dont know > where to ask qualified webmasters. So excuse please. > > > Thanks > > Dieter > > > Dr. med. dipl.-math. Dieter Becker Tel: 06841 16 3046 / > 3077 > Medizinische Universitäts- und Poliklinik Fax: 06841 16 3043 / > 3385 > Innere Medizin III > 6621 Homburg Email: db@med-in.uni-sb.de > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use > > iQA/AwUBN6/GKt9CzAYLLgjZEQLmKgCfdvO79nB8T+8VQsMZIVJo/K4iu4QAoJL7 > zswZViuBPBQA/GVVE20TylG2 > =o9Px > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > From justo at creditoycaucion.es Tue Aug 10 11:56:38 1999 From: justo at creditoycaucion.es (Justo Alonso Achaques) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message In-Reply-To: <011e01bee25f$896dd680$0502000a@space.gr> Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Panagiotis Malakoudis wrote: > Does anyone know how I can setup samba to send a Pop Up message to all the > window client that are connected notifing them whenever the smb daemon will > shutdown?All this must be implemented under linux. > Well, one script ala wall command: With the smbstatus report, get the machines and send it the message in de file passed how argument. for i in `smbstatus -S | grep "(" | awk '{print $5}' | sort | uniq` do echo $i smbclient -i 1 -M $i < $1 done From t.maekitalo at epgmbh.de Tue Aug 10 12:30:25 1999 From: t.maekitalo at epgmbh.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Tommi_M=E4kitalo?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: NT_STATUS_INVALID_WORKSTATION Message-ID: <007601bee32c$1f726750$0d29a8c0@pc3.eckpart.de> Hi, I try to install samba on a SCO OpenServer 5.0.4 as NT-domainmember. Joining the domain worked fine, but I get a error-message when I try to access it. Here is the log-entry: [1999/08/09 10:54:25, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(371) cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_INVALID_WORKSTATION What does this mean? Is it the windows-client invalid or is it my samba-server, wich is not accepted by the PDC? Samba-version is 2.0.3 and windows-client is NT 4.0 sp3. Thanks Tommi M?kitalo Dr. Eckhardt + Partner GmbH t.maekitalo@epgmbh.de From rfs at aw.com.pl Tue Aug 10 12:36:53 1999 From: rfs at aw.com.pl (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rafa=B3=20Szcze=B6niak?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: mapping files Message-ID: <37B01CE5.34D68B3@aw.com.pl> Hello, Please tell me what are proper permissions and group- and ownership for domain group, users and local group files. I set them to root 600 and what happened ? [1999/08/10 13:41:21, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(232) Allowed connection from deimos (192.168.1.2) [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/localgroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] lib/util_file.c:file_modified(332) file_changed: Unable to stat file /usr/local/samba/private/domaingroup.map. Error was Permission denied [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_root(370) ERROR: become root depth is non zero [1999/08/10 13:41:25, 0] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_root(391) ERROR: unbecome root depth is 0 After that I've set them to root 666 for a while and there were the same errors in log. By this time I can't properly log on roaming profile. I mean, login is successful but every time there is default background color, nice message "Welcome to Windows NT" and no update of desktop properties (like desktop color) after logout. Thank you in advance Rafa? From a.schaefer at uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de Tue Aug 10 13:03:53 1999 From: a.schaefer at uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Sch=E4fer=2C_Axel=22?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Samba won't talk with PDC - strange, strange! Message-ID: <511FDFACA857D211A0E10060084D481205CA56@intranet> I got some emails from some other people, having the same or a similar problem. Besides restarting the NT Server the restart of SMB seems to be another way to things running again. Seems to be a bigger problem. Axel > -----Original Message----- > From: "Sch?fer, Axel" [mailto:a.schaefer@uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de] > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 10:53 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Samba won't talk with PDC - strange, strange! > > > Hi, > > we are running a WinNT/Win95 network here. We need a stable > file-server, so > we setup a Linux box with Samba 2.0.4b. > The NT Server (NT 4, SP 4, german) is serving as PDC and does all the > password stuff. I successfully joined Samba to the domain and > everything is > working fine for some houres up to days. But then something > strange happens: > when I click on my Samba in the network neighbordhood, it asks for a > Username and a Password. It doesn't matter, what User and > Password I use, it > won't let me in. > > Checking the log, it says: > > [1999/08/09 15:26:59, 1] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1243) > domain_client_validate: Can't resolve address for UWTSRV1NT > [1999/08/09 15:26:59, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1318) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [1999/08/09 15:26:59, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(771) > NT Password did not match ! Defaulting to Lanman > [1999/08/09 15:27:07, 1] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1243) > domain_client_validate: Can't resolve address for UWTSRV1NT > [1999/08/09 15:27:07, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1318) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [1999/08/09 15:27:07, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(771) > NT Password did not match ! Defaulting to Lanman > [1999/08/09 15:27:16, 1] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1243) > domain_client_validate: Can't resolve address for UWTSRV1NT > [1999/08/09 15:27:16, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1318) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [1999/08/09 15:27:16, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(771) > NT Password did not match ! Defaulting to Lanman > > Where UWTSRV1NT is the NT Server (PDC). The NT is running > WINS-Server and I > set "WINS SERVER = ip_of_server" in smb.conf. > In my opinion this is a communication problem between Samba and the NT > Server. Strangely all my workstations can access the NT > Server, so WINS must > be running. > The problem can be solved by rebooting the NT Server or > joining Samba again > to the domain using smbpasswd -j domain. > > Any Ideas? What is going wrong here - is it me, is it Samba, is it NT > Server? Help needed urgently! > > Thanks > > Axel Schaefer > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > Dipl.-Wirt.Ing. Axel Schaefer > Universit?t-GH-Siegen Tel.: > +49-271-740 2384 > FB 11, Institut fuer Systemtechnik Fax: > +49-271-740 2790 > Umwelttechnik Mobil: > +49-172-2558520 > Paul-Bonatz-Str. 9-11 > Sekretariat: +49-271-740 2630 > 57068 Siegen > WWW: http://www.mb.uni-siegen.de/d/ist3 > Email: A.Schaefer@uwt.mb.uni-siegen.de > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > From dave at www.buffalostate.edu Tue Aug 10 14:17:32 1999 From: dave at www.buffalostate.edu (Dave J. Andruczyk) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Samba won't talk with PDC - strange, strange! In-Reply-To: <511FDFACA857D211A0E10060084D481205CA50@intranet> Message-ID: > [1999/08/09 15:26:59, 1] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1243) > domain_client_validate: Can't resolve address for UWTSRV1NT Edit your /etc/hosts. put in a line with the IP of the PDC, and its name. This way if WINS/BORADCAST fails samba will default to using /etc/hosts and DNS. Dave J. Andruczyk Instructional Support Associate Department of Technology Buffalo State College From dave at www.buffalostate.edu Tue Aug 10 14:18:50 1999 From: dave at www.buffalostate.edu (Dave J. Andruczyk) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: programs at user-startup In-Reply-To: <000201bee301$b5f4e2f0$0d2c6086@medin.unisb.de> Message-ID: > I have some registry-entries which I would insert at user-startup. > How can I do that, so that this is invisible by the user. regedit > requires an ok from the user. regedit /y I beleive will do it. MS has some tools to do the same thing on NT. (depends on if your users are using NT of 95. ) Dave J. Andruczyk Instructional Support Associate Department of Technology Buffalo State College From matthias at waechter.wol.at Tue Aug 10 14:38:02 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Samba won't talk with PDC - strange, strange! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Dave J. Andruczyk wrote: > > [1999/08/09 15:26:59, 1] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1243) > > domain_client_validate: Can't resolve address for UWTSRV1NT > > Edit your /etc/hosts. put in a line with the IP of the PDC, and its name. > This way if WINS/BORADCAST fails samba will default to using /etc/hosts > and DNS. I think, prior to editing /etc/hosts one should solve the problem that WINS fails. The solution you present is only good after trying everything else to make WINS work. Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From jjorgens at bdsinc.com Tue Aug 10 15:05:41 1999 From: jjorgens at bdsinc.com (Jens B. Jorgensen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: Can't bcecome connected user? References: <003b01bee28d$af6d6200$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> Message-ID: <37B03FC5.64FB9009@bdsinc.com> On my system this problem was due to samba using the setreuid (and setregid?) system calls. Apparently these calls are broken on my system (or samba is using them incorrectly) once I could convince the configure script not to use these calls everything works fine. My system is Linux 2.0.34/libc 2.1.1/gcc 2.91.66. Lee Havemann wrote: > Thanks to Alex, I have successfully joined our domain with smaba 2.0.4b on > a BSDI 4.0.1 box. > > The NT challenge/response seems to go okay, but all I get is another prompt > for a password, which as I understand it, I shouldn't get at all > since I am using encrypted passwords and security=domain in the smb.conf > file. > > Can somebody be kind enough to point out what is probably a dumb mistake? > > Here is a lever 4 debug form the samba machine: > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) > netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 1 of length 158 > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16605) > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 2 of length 154 > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16605) > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > Mapped user hshpcf to lee > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) > resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) > Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) > cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: > C89CC750F1C7D32F > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) > cred_session_key > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) > cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal > 555CF903585B5754 neg: 1ff > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > cred_assert > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) > cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt E4F4B91D66981C9D 37af0f5e > ll: 2 > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > cred_assert > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_home(1475) > adding home directory lee at /home/lee > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) > lee is in 8 groups: 20, 20, 0, 5, 84, 85, 100, 101 > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) > uid 150 registered to name lee > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) > Clearing default real name > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(765) > Chained message > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16605) > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > Got device type IPC > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > Connect path is /tmp > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > Can't become connected user! > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 3 of length 66 > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16605) > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > Got device type IPC > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > Connect path is /tmp > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > Can't become connected user! > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) > end of file from client > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) > Closing connections > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) > Server exit (normal exit) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(544) > Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(702) > Initialised IPC area of size 1048576 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) > Changed root to / > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(82) > open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(721) > bind succeeded on port 0 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(110) > open_oplock ipc: pid = 16606, global_oplock_port = 50415 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:smbd_process(974) > priming nmbd > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:send_one_packet(646) > sending a packet of len 1 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 of type DGRAM > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110) > Serverzone is 14400 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 0 of length 72 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) > netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 1 of length 158 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16606) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 2 of length 156 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16606) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > Mapped user hshpcf to lee > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) > resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.1 hsh-gw > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.3 hshpca > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.4 hshpcb > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.5 hshpcc > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.6 hshpcd > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.7 hshvxa > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.8 hshpce > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.9 hshpcf > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.10 hshpcg > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.11 hshpch > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.12 hshpci > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.13 hshpcj > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.14 hshpck > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.15 hshpcl > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.16 hshpcm > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.17 hshpcn > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.18 hshpco > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.19 hshpcp > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.20 hshpcq > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.196 hshunb > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.197 hshntb > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.198 hshnta > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) > Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) > cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: > 875175A0E2AA11AF > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) > cred_session_key > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) > cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal > B9165CFA70465A98 neg: 1ff > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > cred_assert > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) > cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt 1EE909D12C94BE70 37af0f61 > ll: 2 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(392) > cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1369) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user hshpcf in > domain HSH to Domain controller HSHNTA. Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(404) > Checking SMB password for user lee > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(431) > smb_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(438) > NT MD4 password check failed > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(444) > Checking LM MD4 password > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(456) > LM MD4 password check succeeded > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_home(1475) > adding home directory lee at /home/lee > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) > lee is in 8 groups: 20, 20, 0, 5, 84, 85, 100, 101 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) > uid 150 registered to name lee > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) > Clearing default real name > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(765) > Chained message > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16606) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > Got device type ????? > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > Connect path is /tmp > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > Can't become connected user! > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 3 of length 68 > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16606) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > Got device type ????? > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > Connect path is /tmp > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > Can't become connected user! > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > [1999/08/09 13:26:58, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) > end of file from client > [1999/08/09 13:26:58, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) > Closing connections > [1999/08/09 13:26:58, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) > Server exit (normal exit) > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(544) > Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(702) > Initialised IPC area of size 1048576 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) > Changed root to / > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(82) > open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(721) > bind succeeded on port 0 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(110) > open_oplock ipc: pid = 16607, global_oplock_port = 50421 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:smbd_process(974) > priming nmbd > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/util_sock.c:send_one_packet(646) > sending a packet of len 1 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 of type DGRAM > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110) > Serverzone is 14400 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 0 of length 72 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) > netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 1 of length 158 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16607) > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 2 of length 156 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16607) > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > Mapped user hshpcf to lee > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) > resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.1 hsh-gw > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.3 hshpca > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.4 hshpcb > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.5 hshpcc > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.6 hshpcd > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.7 hshvxa > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.8 hshpce > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.9 hshpcf > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.10 hshpcg > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.11 hshpch > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.12 hshpci > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.13 hshpcj > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.14 hshpck > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.15 hshpcl > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.16 hshpcm > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.17 hshpcn > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.18 hshpco > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.19 hshpcp > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.20 hshpcq > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.196 hshunb > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.197 hshntb > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.198 hshnta > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) > Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) > cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: > 4AF1BA10C1C53185 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) > cred_session_key > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) > cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal > 175FE8F4C34AC4D7 neg: 1ff > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > cred_assert > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) > cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt C61013143E6D7301 37af0f65 > ll: 2 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(392) > cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1369) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user hshpcf in > domain HSH to Domain controller HSHNTA. Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(404) > Checking SMB password for user lee > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(431) > smb_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(438) > NT MD4 password check failed > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(444) > Checking LM MD4 password > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(460) > LM MD4 password check failed > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(532) > smb_password_check failed. Invalid password given for user 'lee' > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > error packet at line 840 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 3 of length 156 > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16607) > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > Mapped user hshpcf to lee > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) > resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.1 hsh-gw > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.3 hshpca > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.4 hshpcb > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.5 hshpcc > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.6 hshpcd > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.7 hshvxa > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.8 hshpce > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.9 hshpcf > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.10 hshpcg > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.11 hshpch > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.12 hshpci > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.13 hshpcj > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.14 hshpck > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.15 hshpcl > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.16 hshpcm > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.17 hshpcn > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.18 hshpco > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.19 hshpcp > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.20 hshpcq > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.196 hshunb > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.197 hshntb > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.198 hshnta > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) > Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) > cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: > 9C9FF74B30E24A8C > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) > cred_session_key > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) > cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal > 8D62C59D2BC673D7 neg: 1ff > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > cred_assert > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) > cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt 04EF504BF9B8ADF9 37af0f66 > ll: 2 > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(392) > cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1369) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user hshpcf in > domain HSH to Domain controller HSHNTA. Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(404) > Checking SMB password for user lee > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(431) > smb_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(438) > NT MD4 password check failed > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(444) > Checking LM MD4 password > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(460) > LM MD4 password check failed > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(532) > smb_password_check failed. Invalid password given for user 'lee' > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > error packet at line 840 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) > end of file from client > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) > Closing connections > [1999/08/09 13:27:02, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) > Server exit (normal exit) > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(544) > Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(702) > Initialised IPC area of size 1048576 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) > Changed root to / > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(82) > open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(721) > bind succeeded on port 0 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(110) > open_oplock ipc: pid = 16608, global_oplock_port = 50427 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:smbd_process(974) > priming nmbd > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] lib/util_sock.c:send_one_packet(646) > sending a packet of len 1 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 of type DGRAM > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110) > Serverzone is 14400 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 0 of length 72 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) > netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 1 of length 158 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16608) > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 2 of length 156 > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16608) > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > Mapped user hshpcf to lee > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) > resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.1 hsh-gw > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.3 hshpca > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.4 hshpcb > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.5 hshpcc > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.6 hshpcd > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.7 hshvxa > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.8 hshpce > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.9 hshpcf > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.10 hshpcg > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.11 hshpch > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.12 hshpci > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.13 hshpcj > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.14 hshpck > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.15 hshpcl > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.16 hshpcm > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.17 hshpcn > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.18 hshpco > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.19 hshpcp > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.20 hshpcq > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.196 hshunb > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.197 hshntb > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:getlmhostsent(394) > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 165.254.123.198 hshnta > [1999/08/09 13:27:03, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) > Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) > cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: > 945E5A15F60070AE > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) > cred_session_key > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) > cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal > B6DD8A8DBADEFC72 neg: 1ff > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > cred_assert > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) > cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt 512F328DB0EF7444 37af0f68 > ll: 2 > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > cred_create > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > cred_assert > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_home(1475) > adding home directory lee at /home/lee > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) > lee is in 8 groups: 20, 20, 0, 5, 84, 85, 100, 101 > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) > uid 150 registered to name lee > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) > Clearing default real name > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(765) > Chained message > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16608) > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > Got device type ????? > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > Connect path is /tmp > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > Can't become connected user! > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > Transaction 3 of length 68 > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16608) > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > Got device type ????? > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > Connect path is /tmp > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > Can't become connected user! > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) > end of file from client > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) > Closing connections > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) > Server exit (normal exit) > > ----- > > Lee Havemann, Comp Ops Dir. HSH Associates (973) 838-3330 > Mailto: lee@hsh.com http://www.hsh.com > "My opinions are probably not those of my employer" -- Jens B. Jorgensen jjorgens@bdsinc.com From owensc at enc.edu Tue Aug 10 15:57:44 1999 From: owensc at enc.edu (Charles Owens) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:52 2003 Subject: 'ulong' in LDAP code makes build under FreeBSD break Message-ID: <37B04BF8.6D989B7F@enc.edu> For example... Compiling passdb/sampass.c Compiling passdb/sampassldap.c passdb/sampassldap.c: In function `ldapsam_getdbpos': passdb/sampassldap.c:286: `ulong' undeclared (first use this function) passdb/sampassldap.c:286: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once passdb/sampassldap.c:286: for each function it appears in.) passdb/sampassldap.c:286: parse error before `ldap_entry' passdb/sampassldap.c: In function `ldapsam_setdbpos': passdb/sampassldap.c:291: `ulong' undeclared (first use this function) passdb/sampassldap.c:291: parse error before `tok' *** Error code 1 Stop. I've been able to get around this by changing every occurrance of 'ulong' to 'long' (in this file and several other LDAP-related)... but... is it kosher for me to do this? What would be the correct way to get this to build under FreeBSD? The hope is, of course, that the fix for this will eventually make it into the soures... ...some kind of conditional in a header file that defines 'ulong' if the OS is FreeBSD? BTW, I've hit this problem with using FreeBSD 3.1-stable and 3.2-stable. Thanks much, --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From leon at pi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de Tue Aug 10 16:08:36 1999 From: leon at pi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Thomas Leonhardt) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Mapping SAMBA NT-groupnames with a german NT system Message-ID: <60C3BA237601D3118C070060086E8B6301813D@pirol.pi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Hi, I want to run Samba as a PDC. (I'm using the 2.1.0 prealpha, it's only a testrun) The problem is that all my client machines are running german NT Workstations or Servers. This means, that the admin group isn't called Domain Admins but Dom?nen-Admins, with a a-umlaut. This umlaut isn't transfered correctly to the clients. It seems that this is a well known problem. Does anyone know a workaround or when there might be a fully umlaut capable samba version. Thanks Thomas From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Tue Aug 10 16:38:28 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: programs at user-startup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > Dave J. Andruczyk > Sent: 10 August 1999 03:24 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: programs at user-startup > > > > I have some registry-entries which I would insert at user-startup. > > How can I do that, so that this is invisible by the user. regedit > > requires an ok from the user. > > regedit /y I beleive will do it. MS has some tools to do the same thing > on NT. (depends on if your users are using NT of 95. ) I think it is regedit /s (for silent). Sam From matthias at waechter.wol.at Tue Aug 10 16:25:59 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Mapping SAMBA NT-groupnames with a german NT system In-Reply-To: <60C3BA237601D3118C070060086E8B6301813D@pirol.pi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Message-ID: On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Thomas Leonhardt wrote: > Hi, > I want to run Samba as a PDC. (I'm using the 2.1.0 prealpha, it's only a > testrun) > The problem is that all my client machines are running german NT > Workstations or Servers. > This means, that the admin group isn't called Domain Admins but > Dom?nen-Admins, with a a-umlaut. If the local-admin problem is the only cause you changed to 2.1, use 2.0 and say: domain admin group = @ntadmins (where ntadmins:x:1000:user1,user2,user3 is in your /etc/group file). I know that the group mechanism in 2.1 is much more advanced, but for all those people needing 8-bit support at least for filenames, that's the only way to get it (I'm one of them...). > This umlaut isn't transfered correctly to the clients. It seems that this is > a well known problem. > Does anyone know a workaround or when there might be a fully umlaut capable > samba version. I patched 2.0.3 to support Umlauts for server names, shares, descriptions. Then I patched 2.1.0 prealpha from somewhen in July to support the same, seeing that 8-bit support even for filenames (which already worked in 2.0.0) doesn't work at all. So I stopped development and wanted to wait for 2.1 to support umlauts in filenames in general. Then I wanted to continue with my efforts. Is there anyone who can (is willing to) estimate when umlauts in filenames will work (again) in 2.1? Or even point me the piece of code where the translation happens (or should happen) in 2.1? > Thanks Thomas Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From leon at pi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de Tue Aug 10 17:59:07 1999 From: leon at pi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Thomas Leonhardt) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Mapping SAMBA NT-groupnames with a german NT system Message-ID: <001a01bee35a$0bee9720$47b15382@wyrm.pi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Hi, the problem is that I need a domain admin. Because I want to install an Exchange Server on a NT Server. Which does only work if the user's got doamin admin rights and if the server is memeber of the domain. >> Hi, >> I want to run Samba as a PDC. (I'm using the 2.1.0 prealpha, it's only a >> testrun) >> The problem is that all my client machines are running german NT >> Workstations or Servers. >> This means, that the admin group isn't called Domain Admins but >> Dom?nen-Admins, with a a-umlaut. > >If the local-admin problem is the only cause you changed to 2.1, use 2.0 >and say: > >domain admin group = @ntadmins > >(where ntadmins:x:1000:user1,user2,user3 is in your /etc/group file). >... >... Thanks Thomas From lkcl at switchboard.net Tue Aug 10 20:12:31 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: 'ulong' in LDAP code makes build under FreeBSD break In-Reply-To: <37B04BF8.6D989B7F@enc.edu> Message-ID: charles, we shouldn't be using ulong, strictly speaking, as it's variable length (platform dependent). should be using uint32 instead. urm.... ldapsam_getdbpos? check smbpasswd code, should be using SMB_BIGINT or something like that, not a ulong. luke On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Charles Owens wrote: > For example... > > Compiling passdb/sampass.c > Compiling passdb/sampassldap.c > passdb/sampassldap.c: In function `ldapsam_getdbpos': > passdb/sampassldap.c:286: `ulong' undeclared (first use this function) > passdb/sampassldap.c:286: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only > once > passdb/sampassldap.c:286: for each function it appears in.) > passdb/sampassldap.c:286: parse error before `ldap_entry' > passdb/sampassldap.c: In function `ldapsam_setdbpos': > passdb/sampassldap.c:291: `ulong' undeclared (first use this function) > passdb/sampassldap.c:291: parse error before `tok' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > > I've been able to get around this by changing every occurrance of > 'ulong' to 'long' (in this file and several other LDAP-related)... > but... is it kosher for me to do this? What would be the correct way to > get this to build under FreeBSD? The hope is, of course, that the fix > for this will eventually make it into the soures... > > ..some kind of conditional in a header file that defines 'ulong' if the > OS is FreeBSD? > > BTW, I've hit this problem with using FreeBSD 3.1-stable and 3.2-stable. > > Thanks much, > --- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu > http://www.enc.edu/~owensc > Network & Systems Administrator > Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's > Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's > too dark to read." - Groucho Marx > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Samba and Network Development Samba Web site Internet Security Systems, Inc. From lkcl at switchboard.net Tue Aug 10 20:25:24 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Administrivia #28812 - NTBugtraq is hiring! (fwd) Message-ID: anyone want to work next to a lake? i went to ntbugtraq / canada day party / conference last month and had a great time meeting interesting peole in a relaxed atmosphere. i thought i'd forward this on to the samba mailing lists as a lot of the people involved with samba have to deal with heavy duty nt environments. luke p.s don't bug russ if you don't cover the job requirements, please! :) Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Samba and Network Development Samba Web site Internet Security Systems, Inc. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 16:03:58 -0400 From: Russ To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM Subject: Administrivia #28812 - NTBugtraq is hiring! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- R.C. Consulting, Inc., owners of NTBugtraq, are hiring. Our little two person shop here in Lindsay, Ontario, wants to become a little three person shop with the addition of the right person. Considering the cost of technical recruiters, and the obvious availability of talent amongst you, I apologize for this message but it didn't make sense not to send it. The job is located here in Lindsay, Ontario, and no...I can't afford to pay out of province/country relocation expenses, so the vast majority of you won't likely be interested (delete message now). For those of you still reading, here's the scoop; The position is for an Internet Researcher in the area of Microsoft Windows NT. The position involves administrative duties for the NTBugtraq Head Office (10 computers), as well as operational duties for the NTBugtraq hosted web and listserv servers. The position will require the individual to research Microsoft Windows NT security issues across the entire Internet. Reviewing and summarizing information from 50+ mailing lists and 100's of web sites dedicated to the topic. The individual will be required to author the reviews/summaries in a professional manner for submission to me in a timely fashion. Although the position requires considerable technical expertise, preference will be shown to those qualified applicants who demonstrate the best ability to gather research information and present it in publishable format. A demonstrated ability in establishing, and following, sound trouble-shooting techniques is also a requirement. *must* have lead administrative experience (1+ years) with; Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Server and Workstation Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 Microsoft SQL Server 6.5 or 7.0 Microsoft Internet Information Server 4.0 Outlook '98 (not Outlook Express) Internet Explorer 5.0 *must* have programming experience (1+ years) with; HTML Active Server Pages VBScript Exchange Forms Exchange Rules Minimum 5 years as a Network Administrator in a TCP/IP environment. Must have solid understanding of the Internet protocols such as HTTP, SMTP, DNS. Must have working knowledge of Computer Security Practices, including Firewalls, Proxy Servers, Virtual Private Networks, and Intrusion Detection Systems work, what they are for, and in principle at least, how one would manage them. Must have hands-on hardware trouble-shooting knowledge as this will be part of the job. Education is not a pre-requisite. NTBugtraq values common sense above formal education. The individual will live on email, so should be comfortable with it. The individual will be required to work in the home/office of NTBugtraq in Lindsay (a smoking environment). An opportunity exists for the individual to progress to "work from home" status within the foreseeable future (i.e. 6 months). Contact Russ Cooper at 705-878-3405 or mailto:russ.cooper@rc.on.ca with resume and salary expectations. Cheers, Russ - NTBugtraq Editor -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.0.2 iQCVAwUBN7CFrRBh2Kw/l7p5AQHfYAP/TFxqxkrWCdOvYvfF0iesQK/tS8tLKjij KAWNCG0AaAYp8OgA6GLfwLRdA8NGypxAg394jB8WHt2nLQsY+3TkfAImdID2U0mw bH74wsJF77iGefkR/Hw8JXu5woywZ/LUViQe5Drtzy2nkBIF1j7dqMEP39Efo5pN DsvEV00SEjY= =xsWd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au Wed Aug 11 08:56:34 1999 From: D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au (David Bannon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: programs at user-startup In-Reply-To: <000201bee301$b5f4e2f0$0d2c6086@medin.unisb.de> Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990811185634.00882100@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> At 07:01 PM 10/08/1999 +1000, Dr. Dieter Becker wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Sirs, > >Samba 2.0.5a on solaris and NT-4.0-SP4/5-Workstations > >I have some registry-entries which I would insert at user-startup. >How can I do that, so that this is invisible by the user. regedit >requires an ok from the user. >Is it possible to do some jobs with administrator-rights at >user-startup? Sounds like the sort of thing that should be done with policies rather than directly by regedit to me. Have you had a look at policies ? David ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon D.Bannon@latrobe.edu.au School of Biochemistry Phone 61 03 9479 2197 La Trobe University, Plenty Rd, Fax 61 03 9479 2467 Bundoora, Vic, Australia, 3083 http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au ------------------------------------------------------------ ..... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From greg at discreet.com Wed Aug 11 01:00:50 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Samba Fileserver at daily use? In-Reply-To: <37ACC334.560B11B5@ibm.net> Message-ID: You can create smaller chunks into groups and then put those "sub-groups" into "Domain Users" which I thought was default. Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com On Sun, 8 Aug 1999, Doug VanLeuven wrote: > Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 09:39:12 +1000 > From: Doug VanLeuven > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: Samba Fileserver at daily use? > > Adam Williams wrote: > > > > Gerald Carter wrote: > > > > > > > ~2,000 users in smbpasswd > > > > > > How do you get everyone into "Domain Users" ? > > > I ran into 1024 byte limitations for the unix side > > > group line (AIX 4.2) limiting me to around 170 > > > 5 char unix names. > > > > Yep, I've had the same problem in AIX 4.2 and AIX 3.2.5, also bites you if you > > try to use NIS. > > Have you found a workaround ? > > -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) > Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net > Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov > > From puru at elbvilla.de Wed Aug 11 08:25:10 1999 From: puru at elbvilla.de (Jens Puruckherr) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: What does it mean?? References: <000201bedf1e$e9c88c80$0301a8c0@k6> Message-ID: <003c01bee3d5$ebaa5360$0301a8c0@k6> Hi! > > >Do you need to run nmbd through inetd or could you just run it as a > >standalone daemon? Also you could change the value of max to something > >that wouldn't cause it to exit, assuming it is inetd killing the process. > > > Good idea! I don't need to run the samba-daemons through inetd. I will try > it next. Brrr. I'd have to reboot the server and the warning messages are gone away. Let's be happy! Jens Puruckherr EDV-Manager Elbvilla facility Service GmbH Scharfenberger Stra?e 2 01039 Dresden ------------------------------------------------------- Tel. 03528/446372 mail:puru@elbvilla.de Fax. 0351/8588570 http://www.wohnmarkt-dresden.de From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Wed Aug 11 12:21:07 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Printing Error; level 20 In-Reply-To: <003c01bee3d5$ebaa5360$0301a8c0@k6> Message-ID: Maybe this level-20 log will give more insight into the difference between samba and win95 as a printer client. smbclient '\\Ps656ad8\Printer1' -P smb: \> print - ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access rights within the specified context for the reques opening remote file test-14130 smb: \> print test ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access rights within the specified context for the reques opening remote file test Ps686ad8 (what a name!) is an Intel Inbusiness PrintStation (2 port) that supports SMB over TCP/IP and SMB over NetBeui. It really works, we print OK from our win95 PC's which only have TCP/IP installed. I'm using the samba CVS head as of a few days ago, but returns this error: ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access rights within the specified context for the reques opening remote file test-14130 Whats smbclient trying to do that windows doesn't? It seems like it is the name of the remote file that is the problem. I've tried guessing a few, and a few experimental put commands, but no joy. smb: \>pwd Current directory is \\Ps656ad8\ Level 20 log below WARNING: The "alternate permissions"option is deprecated Added interface ip=172.16.1.1 bcast=172.16.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Client started (version 2.1.0-prealpha). cli_establish_connection: CSLUK<00> connecting to PS656AD8<20> (0.0.0.0) - ROOT [SERVER] with NTLMv1 resolve_name: Attempting wins lookup for name Ps656ad8<0x20> bind succeeded on port 0 nmb packet from 127.0.0.1(137) header: id=22117 opcode=Query(0) response=No header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 question: q_name=PS656AD8<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 Sending a packet of len 50 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 nmb packet from 127.0.0.1(137) header: id=22117 opcode=Query(0) response=No header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 question: q_name=PS656AD8<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 Sending a packet of len 50 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 nmb packet from 127.0.0.1(137) header: id=22117 opcode=Query(0) response=No header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 question: q_name=PS656AD8<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 Sending a packet of len 50 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name Ps656ad8 getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 127.0.0.1 localhost resolve_name: Attempting broadcast lookup for name Ps656ad8<0x20> bind succeeded on port 0 nmb packet from 172.16.1.255(137) header: id=22118 opcode=Query(0) response=No header: flags: bcast=Yes rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 question: q_name=PS656AD8<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 Sending a packet of len 50 to (172.16.1.255) on port 137 read_udp_socket: lastip 172.16.1.51 lastport 137 read: 62 parse_nmb: packet id = 22118 Received a packet of len 62 from (172.16.1.51) port 137 nmb packet from 172.16.1.51(137) header: id=22118 opcode=Query(0) response=Yes header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=Yes header: rcode=0 qdcount=0 ancount=1 nscount=0 arcount=0 answers: nmb_name=PS656AD8<20> rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=-65536 answers 0 char .....3 hex 0000AC100133 Got a positive name query response from 172.16.1.51 ( 172.16.1.51 ) Connecting to 172.16.1.51 at port 139 write_socket(3,76) write_socket(3,76) wrote 76 Sent session request got smb length of 0 size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 size=164 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=25259 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=129 [000] 02 50 43 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG [010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F RAM 1.0. .MICROSO [020] 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 FT NETWO RKS 1.03 [030] 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 ..MICROS OFT NETW [040] 4F 52 4B 53 20 33 2E 30 00 02 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E ORKS 3.0 ..LANMAN [050] 31 2E 30 00 02 4C 4D 31 2E 32 58 30 30 32 00 02 1.0..LM1 .2X002.. [060] 53 61 6D 62 61 00 02 4E 54 20 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E Samba..N T LANMAN [070] 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4E 54 20 4C 4D 20 30 2E 31 32 1.0..NT LM 0.12 [080] 00 . write_socket(3,168) write_socket(3,168) wrote 168 got smb length of 37 size=37 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=25259 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=1 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=0 size=69 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=25259 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=4 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=26 [000] 5C 5C 50 53 36 35 36 41 44 38 5C 50 52 49 4E 54 \\PS656A D8\PRINT [010] 45 52 31 00 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 00 ER1.???? ?. write_socket(3,73) write_socket(3,73) wrote 73 got smb length of 47 size=47 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=128 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=25259 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=47 (0x2F) smb_vwv[2]=1 (0x1) smb_bcc=6 [000] 4C 50 54 31 3A 00 LPT1:. smb: \> print - size=77 smb_com=0x2d smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=25259 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=15 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=66 (0x42) smb_vwv[4]=6 (0x6) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=18 (0x12) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=12 [000] 73 74 64 69 6E 2D 32 35 32 35 39 00 stdin-25 259. write_socket(3,81) write_socket(3,81) wrote 81 got smb length of 65 size=65 smb_com=0x2d smb_rcls=2 smb_reh=0 smb_err=4 smb_flg=128 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=25259 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=15 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[2]=16 (0x10) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]=16 (0x10) smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=0 ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access rights within the specified context for the reques opening remote file stdin-25259 smb: \> cli_shutdown From gayer at rw.sni.de Wed Aug 11 12:57:48 1999 From: gayer at rw.sni.de (gayer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: subscribe Message-ID: <01BEE40A.95C2CC90.gayer@rw.sni.de> subscribe Gerhard Gayer SBS TS IT INET Competence Manager Tel.: 0201/8138-134, 0173/2737597 Fax.: 0201/8138-132 From kellermg at potsdam.edu Wed Aug 11 14:01:04 1999 From: kellermg at potsdam.edu (Matthew Keller) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: [Off Topic] Post-job filter? Message-ID: <37B18220.D833313F@potsdam.edu> I apologize for the off-topic question, but this is the brightest group of UNIX ppl on my list of lists. :) I use RH Linux and the standard LPD for printing. Are there any printcap commands, or other means to run a script after a job has completed? -- - Matthew Keller - Lead Programmer/Analyst Distributed Computing and Telemedia State University of New York at Potsdam Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ From lee at hsh.com Wed Aug 11 14:23:21 1999 From: lee at hsh.com (Lee Havemann) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Can't bcecome connected user? In-Reply-To: <37B03FC5.64FB9009@bdsinc.com> Message-ID: <001401bee405$1171e980$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> What did you put in the config script to exclude these? ----- Lee Havemann, Comp Ops Dir. HSH Associates (973) 838-3330 Mailto: lee@hsh.com http://www.hsh.com "My opinions are probably not those of my employer" > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On > Behalf Of > Jens B. Jorgensen > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 11:07 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: Can't bcecome connected user? > > > On my system this problem was due to samba using the > setreuid (and setregid?) > system calls. Apparently these calls are broken on my system > (or samba is using > them incorrectly) once I could convince the configure script > not to use these > calls everything works fine. My system is Linux 2.0.34/libc > 2.1.1/gcc 2.91.66. > > Lee Havemann wrote: > > > Thanks to Alex, I have successfully joined our domain with > smaba 2.0.4b on > > a BSDI 4.0.1 box. > > > > The NT challenge/response seems to go okay, but all I get > is another prompt > > for a password, which as I understand it, I shouldn't get at all > > since I am using encrypted passwords and security=domain > in the smb.conf > > file. > > > > Can somebody be kind enough to point out what is probably > a dumb mistake? > > > > Here is a lever 4 debug form the samba machine: > > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) > > netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > Transaction 1 of length 158 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16605) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) > > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > Transaction 2 of length 154 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16605) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > > Mapped user hshpcf to lee > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) > > resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) > > Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) > > cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: > > C89CC750F1C7D32F > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) > > cred_session_key > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > > cred_create > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) > > cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal > > 555CF903585B5754 neg: 1ff > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > > cred_create > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > > cred_assert > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > > cred_create > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) > > cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt > E4F4B91D66981C9D 37af0f5e > > ll: 2 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > > cred_create > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > > cred_assert > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_home(1475) > > adding home directory lee at /home/lee > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) > > lee is in 8 groups: 20, 20, 0, 5, 84, 85, 100, 101 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) > > uid 150 registered to name lee > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) > > Clearing default real name > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(765) > > Chained message > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16605) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > > Got device type IPC > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > > Connect path is /tmp > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > > Can't become connected user! > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > Transaction 3 of length 66 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16605) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > > Got device type IPC > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > > Connect path is /tmp > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > > Can't become connected user! > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) > > end of file from client > > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) > > Closing connections > > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) > > Server exit (normal exit) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(544) > > Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(702) > > Initialised IPC area of size 1048576 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) > > Changed root to / > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(82) > > open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(721) > > bind succeeded on port 0 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(110) > > open_oplock ipc: pid = 16606, global_oplock_port = 50415 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:smbd_process(974) > > priming nmbd > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:send_one_packet(646) > > sending a packet of len 1 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 of > type DGRAM > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110) > > Serverzone is 14400 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > Transaction 0 of length 72 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) > > netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > Transaction 1 of length 158 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16606) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) > > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > Transaction 2 of length 156 > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16606) > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > > cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 0] > smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1369) > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for > user hshpcf in > > domain HSH to Domain controller HSHNTA. Error was > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(404) > > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > > Connect path is /tmp > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > > Can't become connected user! > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) > > end of file from client > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) > > Closing connections > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) > > Server exit (normal exit) > > > > ----- > > > > Lee Havemann, Comp Ops Dir. HSH Associates (973) 838-3330 > > Mailto: lee@hsh.com http://www.hsh.com > > "My opinions are probably not those of my employer" > > -- > Jens B. Jorgensen > jjorgens@bdsinc.com > > From jjorgens at bdsinc.com Wed Aug 11 14:32:12 1999 From: jjorgens at bdsinc.com (Jens B. Jorgensen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Can't bcecome connected user? References: <001401bee405$1171e980$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> Message-ID: <37B1896B.466C43D0@bdsinc.com> Actually, I didn't. I tried, at first to modify the config template. That didn't work for some reason (I was compiling the Debian Linux samba package, which is a process which wraps the building of the software itself and I guess was somehow generating the config defaults each time) so I just stopped the thing after it wrote the config.cache and before it wrote the config.h file and edited the config.cache manually to disable them. Ugly, I know, but I was in a hurry to set up some machines that were going to be shipped out shortly. Lee Havemann wrote: > What did you put in the config script to exclude these? > > ----- > > Lee Havemann, Comp Ops Dir. HSH Associates (973) 838-3330 > Mailto: lee@hsh.com http://www.hsh.com > "My opinions are probably not those of my employer" > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On > > Behalf Of > > Jens B. Jorgensen > > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 11:07 AM > > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > > Subject: Re: Can't bcecome connected user? > > > > > > On my system this problem was due to samba using the > > setreuid (and setregid?) > > system calls. Apparently these calls are broken on my system > > (or samba is using > > them incorrectly) once I could convince the configure script > > not to use these > > calls everything works fine. My system is Linux 2.0.34/libc > > 2.1.1/gcc 2.91.66. > > > > Lee Havemann wrote: > > > > > Thanks to Alex, I have successfully joined our domain with > > smaba 2.0.4b on > > > a BSDI 4.0.1 box. > > > > > > The NT challenge/response seems to go okay, but all I get > > is another prompt > > > for a password, which as I understand it, I shouldn't get at all > > > since I am using encrypted passwords and security=domain > > in the smb.conf > > > file. > > > > > > Can somebody be kind enough to point out what is probably > > a dumb mistake? > > > > > > Here is a lever 4 debug form the samba machine: > > > > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) > > > netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > > Transaction 1 of length 158 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > > switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16605) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) > > > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > > Transaction 2 of length 154 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16605) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > > > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > > > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > > > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > > > Mapped user hshpcf to lee > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(546) > > > resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name HSHNTA<0x20> > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(753) > > > Connecting to 165.254.123.198 at port 139 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(225) > > > cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from HSHNTA to HSHUNB: > > > C89CC750F1C7D32F > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64) > > > cred_session_key > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > > > cred_create > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(136) > > > cli_net_auth2: srv:\\HSHNTA acct:HSHUNB$ sc:2 mc: HSHUNB chal > > > 555CF903585B5754 neg: 1ff > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > > > cred_create > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > > > cred_assert > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > > > cred_create > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(362) > > > cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\HSHNTA mc:HSHUNB clnt > > E4F4B91D66981C9D 37af0f5e > > > ll: 2 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) > > > cred_create > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) > > > cred_assert > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_home(1475) > > > adding home directory lee at /home/lee > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) > > > lee is in 8 groups: 20, 20, 0, 5, 84, 85, 100, 101 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) > > > uid 150 registered to name lee > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) > > > Clearing default real name > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(765) > > > Chained message > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16605) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > > > Got device type IPC > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > > > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > > > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > > > Connect path is /tmp > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > > > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > > > Can't become connected user! > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > > > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > > Transaction 3 of length 66 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > > switch message SMBtconX (pid 16605) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(302) > > > Got device type IPC > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > > > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > > > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > > > Connect path is /tmp > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > > > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > > > Can't become connected user! > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:54, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > > > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) > > > end of file from client > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) > > > Closing connections > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:55, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) > > > Server exit (normal exit) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(544) > > > Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(702) > > > Initialised IPC area of size 1048576 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] smbd/server.c:main(709) > > > Changed root to / > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(82) > > > open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(721) > > > bind succeeded on port 0 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(110) > > > open_oplock ipc: pid = 16606, global_oplock_port = 50415 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:smbd_process(974) > > > priming nmbd > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/util_sock.c:send_one_packet(646) > > > sending a packet of len 1 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 of > > type DGRAM > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110) > > > Serverzone is 14400 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(249) > > > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > > Transaction 0 of length 72 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96) > > > netbios connect: name1=HSHUNB name2=HSHPCF > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > > Transaction 1 of length 158 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > > switch message SMBnegprot (pid 16606) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [MICROSOFT NETWORKS 3.0] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [DOS LM1.2X002] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [DOS LANMAN2.1] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(332) > > > Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(409) > > > Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) > > > Transaction 2 of length 156 > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) > > > switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 16606) > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) > > > Domain=[HSH] NativeOS=[Windows 4.0] NativeLanMan=[Windows 4.0] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) > > > sesssetupX:name=[HSHPCF] > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 4] lib/username.c:map_username(89) > > > Scanning username map /usr/local/samba/lib/username.map > > > [1999/08/09 13:26:57, 3] lib/username.c:map_username(122) > > > cli_net_sam_logon: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 0] > > smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1369) > > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for > > user hshpcf in > > > domain HSH to Domain controller HSHNTA. Error was > > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:01, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(404) > > > Allowed connection from hshpcf.hsh.com (165.254.123.9) > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) > > > ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) > > > Connect path is /tmp > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) > > > Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) > > > Can't become connected user! > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) > > > error packet at line 163 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2 > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(805) > > > end of file from client > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) > > > Closing connections > > > [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(433) > > > Server exit (normal exit) > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > Lee Havemann, Comp Ops Dir. HSH Associates (973) 838-3330 > > > Mailto: lee@hsh.com http://www.hsh.com > > > "My opinions are probably not those of my employer" > > > > -- > > Jens B. Jorgensen > > jjorgens@bdsinc.com > > > > -- Jens B. Jorgensen jjorgens@bdsinc.com From keverets at reamined.on.ca Wed Aug 11 15:05:29 1999 From: keverets at reamined.on.ca (Kevin Everets) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Open File list In-Reply-To: <37B1896B.466C43D0@bdsinc.com> Message-ID: Hello, I need to know if there's a way to find out who has what files open on a Samba box (running RH Linux 6.0, 2.0.4b). Under NT, there's the Server control panel which shows who has what open, and I need to find an equivalent for Samba (though not necessarily graphical). Any ideas? Kevin Everets. From timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com Wed Aug 11 15:42:15 1999 From: timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com (Cole, Timothy D.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Open File list Message-ID: <51FBD4A8EFD9D111BA7300A0C927DADB563115@xcgmd008.md.essd.northgrum.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Everets [SMTP:keverets@reamined.on.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 11:33 > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Open File list > > Hello, > > I need to know if there's a way to find out who has what files open on a > Samba box (running RH Linux 6.0, 2.0.4b). Under NT, there's the Server > control panel which shows who has what open, and I need to find an > equivalent for Samba (though not necessarily graphical). > To determine what processes have a specific files open, you should be able to use the "fuser" command, which will also work for local users. Since the smbd processes normally run as root (I think), you still need to use smbstatus to get from the process IDs to the actual users (might be a good task for a Perl script). I don't know if there are common tools for enumerating all open files, however. From alanh at pinacl.co.uk Wed Aug 11 15:46:15 1999 From: alanh at pinacl.co.uk (Alan Hourihane) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Open File list Message-ID: <01BEE419.09172660.alanh@pinacl.co.uk> Use SWAT. and go into status. http://:901 Alan. -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Everets [SMTP:keverets@reamined.on.ca] Sent: 11 August 1999 16:33 To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Open File list Hello, I need to know if there's a way to find out who has what files open on a Samba box (running RH Linux 6.0, 2.0.4b). Under NT, there's the Server control panel which shows who has what open, and I need to find an equivalent for Samba (though not necessarily graphical). Any ideas? Kevin Everets. From dhanson at seek.com Wed Aug 11 17:27:38 1999 From: dhanson at seek.com (Hanson, Don) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Setting up DNS Nameserver Message-ID: Hello, ? My apologies if this is the wrong list. I have two Linux boxes, each on their own static IP, and would like to set them up as nameservers for my domain (.com) on the Internet.? I understand how to make all necessary changes w/ Network Solutions.? My problem is I don't know where to add the domain name/IP information.? I was assuming I should use an lmhosts-type file, but realized I really didn't know where to put the information.? ??? Each box is already serving a local network, hooked up to the Internet and so on.? ? Thanks in advance, Don Hanson -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From awilliam at whitemice.org Tue Aug 10 23:07:42 1999 From: awilliam at whitemice.org (Adam Williams) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Open File list In-Reply-To: Kevin Everets "Open File list" (Aug 12, 1:32am) References: Message-ID: <9908102307.ZM20639@estate1.whitemice.org> On Aug 12, 1:32am, Kevin Everets wrote: > Subject: Open File list > Hello, > > I need to know if there's a way to find out who has what files open on a > Samba box (running RH Linux 6.0, 2.0.4b). Under NT, there's the Server > control panel which shows who has what open, and I need to find an > equivalent for Samba (though not necessarily graphical). > > Any ideas? > smbstatus Or SWAT will show you on the status page. From dhanson at seek.com Wed Aug 11 18:13:12 1999 From: dhanson at seek.com (Hanson, Don) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Setting up DNS Nameserver Message-ID: My apologies for targeting the wrong list and thank you to everyone who has offered their help! ? Don Hanson -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From lee at hsh.com Wed Aug 11 18:25:04 1999 From: lee at hsh.com (Lee Havemann) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Samba complains about password In-Reply-To: <37B1B787.CA784E3B@tao.agoron.com> Message-ID: <002301bee426$d5b8c9a0$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> > From: owner-bsdi-users@mailinglists.org > [mailto:owner-bsdi-users@mailinglists.org]On Behalf Of Andy Malato > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 1:49 PM > To: BSDi Users > Subject: Samba complains about password > > > I have just installed Samba 2.0.5a on my BSDI 3.1 box. I > have loaded smbd and > nmbd as daemons from rc.local-- now my windows machines can > see the samba server > and my samba server can see my windows machines, so that > part is fine, however, > it prompts me for my password, but it tells me that its > incorrect. Here is a > listing of my smb.conf file: > > ---smb.conf--- > > [global] > > > printing = bsd > printcap name = /etc/printcap > load printers = yes > guest account = pcguest > workgroup = agoron > security = share > domain master = yes > domain logons = yes > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > browseable = no > read only = yes > create mode = 0750 > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > browseable = no > printable = yes > public = yes > writable = no > create mode = 0700 > > [tao] > comment = UNIX BOX > path = / > public = yes > writable = yes > printable = no > > > [tmp] > comment = Temporary file space > path = /tmp > read only = yes > public = yes > > > --- > I think it might have something to do with some other > configuration, other than > smb.conf, but what other config files are used with samba? > Also when I was compiling the samba suite, it told me: > WARNING!! this is a trap > door system, what exactly does that mean? > > Thanks in advance, > > ---Andy > -- > To unsubscribe, send 'unsubscribe' to > bsdi-users-request@mailinglists.org > Archives of this list can be found at: I have the same problem with a 4.0.1 and a 3.1 system. Try starting samba with a debug of 4 or better (smbd -D -d 4), and logging in from a Windoze workstation and look at the log files. You will probably see an error like this: ---- [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(741) ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(386) Connect path is /tmp [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 20 currently set to (real=0,eff=20) [1999/08/09 13:27:04, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) Can't become connected user! ----- >From what I got from the samba list is that BSD seems to have a problem with samba's use of setreuid (and setregid?) system calls. I haven't been able to work around it at this time, but I am still trying. FWIW, I also tried to compiling 2.0.5a on a 4.0.1 (fully patched) system, and I didn't even get through the config: ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config For now I am sticking with 1.9.18p10, but I am losing out on a lot of features. :-( ----- Lee Havemann, Comp Ops Dir. HSH Associates (973) 838-3330 Mailto: lee@hsh.com http://www.hsh.com "My opinions are probably not those of my employer" From mg at plum.de Wed Aug 11 18:32:49 1999 From: mg at plum.de (Michael Glauche) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Open File list References: <9908102307.ZM20639@estate1.whitemice.org> Message-ID: <37B1C1D1.1DCD0093@plum.de> Adam Williams schrieb: > On Aug 12, 1:32am, Kevin Everets wrote: > > Subject: Open File list > > Hello, > > > > I need to know if there's a way to find out who has what files open on a > > Samba box (running RH Linux 6.0, 2.0.4b). Under NT, there's the Server > > control panel which shows who has what open, and I need to find an > > equivalent for Samba (though not necessarily graphical). > > > > Any ideas? > > > > smbstatus > > Or SWAT will show you on the status page. With svrmgr.exe you "could" see the connections, but IIRC it never displays the correct value. Are there some RPC-Calls missing ? or are the RPC calls there and only the share count code missing ? regards, Michael -- Samba NT-Domain howto (in german) http://www.sambahq.de From gerard.leymarie at epita.fr Wed Aug 11 20:59:25 1999 From: gerard.leymarie at epita.fr (Gerard LEYMARIE) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT4WS & Netware client32 Message-ID: <000501bee43c$82bdcc80$3d2b05a3@epita.fr> All, I'm using samba as a PDC for 4 months, no problems. (thanks samba team) Now, the samba version is 2.0.5a on slackware 3.5 20 Clients under NT4WS + SP5, all in french I must integrate a novell 3.12 server onto the network. this server run financial applications. So I installed Intranetware client 32 4.11a, and when I log on samba Winlogon.exe crash and I got the Blue screen of death. Since this installation, on the computer log, I Have the following error (previously no errors, everything find) [1999/08/11 22:11:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. [1999/08/11 22:11:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. [1999/08/11 22:13:51, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [1999/08/11 22:14:31, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. [1999/08/11 22:14:31, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. [1999/08/11 22:39:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host Please, can you help me. Many thanks, gerard From yua at artlover.com Wed Aug 11 21:06:15 1999 From: yua at artlover.com (Alex Yu) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT PDC and Encryption In-Reply-To: <000501bee43c$82bdcc80$3d2b05a3@epita.fr> Message-ID: Hello, My question is that if I want to use Samba as PDC and use the main /etc/passwd as a login and password file. All NT and 98 machines must change from encryption password scheme to plain text password scheme. Is it correct? Thanks, Alex Yu From aar at cypress.com Wed Aug 11 23:08:24 1999 From: aar at cypress.com (Aaron Rainwater) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT4WS & Netware client32 References: <000501bee43c$82bdcc80$3d2b05a3@epita.fr> Message-ID: <37B20268.27180A58@mailhost.cadc.cypress.com> I encountered similar behavior (winlogon.exe crashed and gave me BSOD) from Win95 machines (both A & B) until I started using the head code, instead of 2.0.4b. I don't know if that would fix your problem, and somebody with much more to offer will probably give you a better solution. I'm just sharing my own experience. Gerard LEYMARIE wrote: > > All, > I'm using samba as a PDC for 4 months, no problems. (thanks samba team) > Now, the samba version is 2.0.5a on slackware 3.5 > 20 Clients under NT4WS + SP5, all in french > > I must integrate a novell 3.12 server onto the network. > this server run financial applications. > > So I installed Intranetware client 32 4.11a, and when I log on samba > Winlogon.exe crash and I got the Blue screen of death. > > Since this installation, on the computer log, I Have the following error > (previously no errors, everything find) > > [1999/08/11 22:11:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:11:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:13:51, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) > read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer > > [1999/08/11 22:14:31, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:14:31, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:39:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) > read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host > > Please, can you help me. > > Many thanks, gerard -- Aaron Rainwater CADC Intern From matthias at waechter.wol.at Thu Aug 12 07:36:35 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: Mapping SAMBA NT-groupnames with a german NT system In-Reply-To: <001a01bee35a$0bee9720$47b15382@wyrm.pi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Message-ID: On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Thomas Leonhardt wrote: > Hi, > the problem is that I need a domain admin. Because I want to install an > Exchange Server on > a NT Server. Which does only work if the user's got doamin admin rights and > if the > server is memeber of the domain. This way you _are_ a Domain Admin additionally to a Local Admin (because the Domain Admins are typically members of the local admin group in NT). Try it this way, it should work. As long as you don't need any additional grouping/user functionality on the clients. > > > >> Hi, > >> I want to run Samba as a PDC. (I'm using the 2.1.0 prealpha, it's only a > >> testrun) > >> The problem is that all my client machines are running german NT > >> Workstations or Servers. > >> This means, that the admin group isn't called Domain Admins but > >> Dom?nen-Admins, with a a-umlaut. > > > >If the local-admin problem is the only cause you changed to 2.1, use 2.0 > >and say: > > > >domain admin group = @ntadmins > > > >(where ntadmins:x:1000:user1,user2,user3 is in your /etc/group file). > >... > >... > > Thanks Thomas > Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Thu Aug 12 08:50:34 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT4WS & Netware client32 Message-ID: <412567CB.003084DA.00@paris3.par.sita.int> What are the difference between head code and "normal" code Gerard Aaron Rainwater on 08/12/99 01:11:40 AM Please respond to aar@cypress.com To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > All, > I'm using samba as a PDC for 4 months, no problems. (thanks samba team) > Now, the samba version is 2.0.5a on slackware 3.5 > 20 Clients under NT4WS + SP5, all in french > > I must integrate a novell 3.12 server onto the network. > this server run financial applications. > > So I installed Intranetware client 32 4.11a, and when I log on samba > Winlogon.exe crash and I got the Blue screen of death. > > Since this installation, on the computer log, I Have the following error > (previously no errors, everything find) > > [1999/08/11 22:11:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:11:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:13:51, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) > read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer > > [1999/08/11 22:14:31, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:14:31, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:39:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) > read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host > > Please, can you help me. > > Many thanks, gerard -- Aaron Rainwater CADC Intern From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Thu Aug 12 08:02:46 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT4WS & Netware client32 In-Reply-To: <412567CB.003084DA.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > G?rard Leymarie > Sent: 12 August 1999 08:54 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: NT4WS & Netware client32 > > What are the difference between head code and "normal" code Normal code has been well tested and "officially" release. Head code has only just been written (and hence may have all manner of problems which you will discover in testing and report back before it is release). Sam From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Thu Aug 12 09:08:46 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT4WS & Netware client32 Message-ID: <412567CB.00321828.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Will I have the same problems with the NT client for netware? If no, I think I will have some problems, for password synchronisation, etc... gerard "Samuel Liddicott" on 08/12/99 10:02:46 AM To: G?rard Leymarie, "Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM" -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > G?rard Leymarie > Sent: 12 August 1999 08:54 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: NT4WS & Netware client32 > > What are the difference between head code and "normal" code Normal code has been well tested and "officially" release. Head code has only just been written (and hence may have all manner of problems which you will discover in testing and report back before it is release). Sam From matthias at waechter.wol.at Thu Aug 12 08:29:07 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT PDC and Encryption In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Alex Yu wrote: > My question is that if I want to use Samba as PDC and use the main > /etc/passwd as a login and password file. All NT and 98 machines must > change from encryption password scheme to plain text password scheme. Is it > correct? PDC functionality for WinNT Workstation clients only works with encryption, so this is no option for you. Read the NT Domain FAQ. Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 12 12:28:24 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald W. Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT PDC and Encryption In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Alex Yu wrote: > Hello, > > My question is that if I want to use Samba as PDC and use the main > /etc/passwd as a login and password file. All NT and 98 machines must > change from encryption password scheme to plain text password scheme. > Is it correct? > For Samba to work as a PDC for NT clients, you **must** enable encrypted passwords on the Samba server. No way around it. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From kellermg at potsdam.edu Thu Aug 12 12:42:43 1999 From: kellermg at potsdam.edu (Matthew Keller) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:53 2003 Subject: NT PDC and Encryption References: Message-ID: <37B2C143.C838B700@potsdam.edu> "Gerald W. Carter" wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Alex Yu wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > My question is that if I want to use Samba as PDC and use the main > > /etc/passwd as a login and password file. All NT and 98 machines must > > change from encryption password scheme to plain text password scheme. > > Is it correct? > > > > For Samba to work as a PDC for NT clients, you **must** enable encrypted > passwords on the Samba server. No way around it. Actually there is a registry hack you can apply to the clients to force them to send plaintext, but I don't advise it. -- - Matthew Keller - Lead Programmer/Analyst Distributed Computing and Telemedia State University of New York at Potsdam Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ From bec_ash at bigpond.com Thu Aug 12 12:50:37 1999 From: bec_ash at bigpond.com (Ashley Cambrell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Samba and user list in win9x Share menu References: Message-ID: <37B2C31D.69280063@bigpond.com> Hiya all, I was reading the newsgroup linux.samba and there was a person that said he had gotten the sharing user list in win9x to work with security = user (i think, he didn't say) This was with the CVS version 2.1 pre alpha. I know it's (very) unsupported, but does anyone know how to set it up? Thanks All.. Keep up the GREAT work!! Ashley Cambrell From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Thu Aug 12 13:51:49 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: NT4WS & Netware client32 Message-ID: <412567CB.004C191A.00@paris3.par.sita.int> I received the following answer Gerard ---------------------- Forwarded by G?rard Leymarie/Paris/SITA/WW on 08/12/99 02:51 PM --------------------------- "J.W. Fox" on 08/12/99 02:26:17 PM To: gerard.leymarie cc: (bcc: G?rard Leymarie) Subject: Re: NT4WS & Netware client32 -------------- next part -------------- Being a CNE, helps in this case. You should be running Client32 v4.6, Service Pack 1. This client and service pack eliminates almost all the problems people has with the 4.11a and 4.11b clients. Hope this helps J. W. Gerard LEYMARIE wrote: > All, > I'm using samba as a PDC for 4 months, no problems. (thanks samba team) > Now, the samba version is 2.0.5a on slackware 3.5 > 20 Clients under NT4WS + SP5, all in french > > I must integrate a novell 3.12 server onto the network. > this server run financial applications. > > So I installed Intranetware client 32 4.11a, and when I log on samba > Winlogon.exe crash and I got the Blue screen of death. > > Since this installation, on the computer log, I Have the following error > (previously no errors, everything find) > > [1999/08/11 22:11:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:11:04, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:13:51, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) > read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer > > [1999/08/11 22:14:31, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:14:31, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_grow(126) > prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 2 bytes. > > [1999/08/11 22:39:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) > read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host > > Please, can you help me. > > Many thanks, gerard -- --- J.W. Fox Systems Engineer KTLN Computing 179 Callodine Ave Amherst, NY 14226 Ph: 716-446-0597 Fax: 716-446-0607 jwfox@adelphia.net From guy at crossflight.co.uk Thu Aug 12 12:53:42 1999 From: guy at crossflight.co.uk (Guy Dawson) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Samba 2.0.5.a build errors - [WAS Re: Samba complains ...] References: <002301bee426$d5b8c9a0$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> Message-ID: <37B2C3D6.796F2DB9@crossflight.co.uk> Lee Havemann wrote: > FWIW, I also tried to compiling 2.0.5a on a 4.0.1 (fully > patched) system, and I didn't even get through the config: > > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config Hmm. I've just downloaded 2.0.5.a onto a fully patched BSD/OS V4.0.1 box and it has configured and built without error. Guy -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Guy Dawson I.T. Manager Crossflight Ltd guy@crossflight.co.uk 0973 797819 01753 776104 From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 12 13:09:09 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: NT PDC and Encryption References: <37B2C143.C838B700@potsdam.edu> Message-ID: <37B2C775.993921E6@eng.auburn.edu> Matthew Keller wrote: > > Actually there is a registry hack you can apply to > the clients to force them to send plaintext, but I > don't advise it. Yes I know. But to use Samba as an NT PDC, you must enable encrypted passwords on the samba server which means encrypt passwords = yes and populating a smbpasswd file,\. This of course means that the domain logon will not be validated against /etc/passwd which was the original question. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Thu Aug 12 14:38:36 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Number of open files error Message-ID: <412567CB.00503756.00@paris3.par.sita.int> All, In the log.smb file, I have the following message: [1999/08/12 14:29:22, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are available. How can I solve it? Thanks From todd.rosenthal at ac.com Thu Aug 12 17:51:35 1999 From: todd.rosenthal at ac.com (todd.rosenthal@ac.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: NT User Account Locked Out By Samba Message-ID: <862567CB.0061A7EA.00@amrhm1101.ac.com> I am currently using Samba 2.0.3 on several HP/UX unix servers, and have numerous users accessing them from NT workstation machines. I have my samba security set equal to DOMAIN and the server is set to my NT PDC. And I have successfully added the unix servers to the domain and created the domain accounts. The problem I have is not a constant problem, but it is a major inconvenience. Sometimes, when a user attempts to access the samba share, instead of gaining access to it, their NT account gets locked out. The following error messages show up in the samba log: [1999/08/12 10:15:23, 1] smbd/password.c:server_validate(1127) password server GREAT-GAZOO rejected the password [1999/08/12 10:15:23, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(500) Couldn't find user 'rosentha' in smb_passwd file. Often calling the NT administrator to unlock the account and waiting several minutes will clear up this problem for the user. Other times, the user also needs to reboot before they can access the share. I have not been able to find any kind of pattern in when this problem occurs. Does anyone know of the cause or a solution for this problem. If more info is needed about my particular setup, or problem, let me know. Thanks for the help. -Todd Rosenthal todd.rosenthal@ac.com From lee at hsh.com Thu Aug 12 18:39:34 1999 From: lee at hsh.com (Lee Havemann) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Why me? In-Reply-To: <002301bee426$d5b8c9a0$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> Message-ID: <001101bee4f2$06598060$097bfea5@hshpcf.hsh.com> We have been running samba here for years, and I am attempting to migrate from 1.9 up to the 2.0.x versions on a BSDI 4.0.1 box. After untarring the file I run the configure program and this is what I get: checking configure summary ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config OK, so I look in the config.log and I see this: configure:1695: gcc -o conftest -O conftest.c -ldir 1>&5 ld: cannot open -ldir: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 1684 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" ... configure:1885: sys/id.h: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 1884 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include ... configure:1925: compat.h: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 1924 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include configure:1925: rpcsvc/nis.h: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 1924 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include configure:2005: sys/priv.h: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 2004 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include And the last one (after a bunch of other ones) is: configure: failed program was: #line 9764 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include "./tests/summary.c" [EOB] After speaking to someone else who has BSDI 4.0.1, and it compiled fine, I think I have something wrong with this particular system, but I don't know where to start looking. Anyone care to take a stab at this and give me a hand? Thanks, -Lee From pol at ecircles.com Thu Aug 12 23:11:15 1999 From: pol at ecircles.com (Oleg Polyakov) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Netapp in Samba NT domain Message-ID: <19990812161115.A15641@ecircles.com> I had problems with Netapp filer - it did not want to enter Samba NT domain. For now problem is solved. I hope solution could help somebody. The version of filer OS is 5.5.2. I'm using FreeBSD 2.2.8 and Samba HEAD branch. The source text in Samba 2.0.5 is approximately same. Problem: Netapp filer couldn't enter Samba NT domain. Explanation: 1.Netapp sends TconX request in unicode, not ascii. 2.Netapp send SMBtrans request in unicode, not ascii. Solution: The patch is looks like this: *** reply.c.orig Thu Aug 12 15:02:14 1999 --- reply.c Fri Aug 6 17:34:52 1999 *************** *** 303,307 **** char *path; char *p; ! *service = *user = *password = *devicename = 0; --- 303,309 ---- char *path; char *p; ! int i; ! pstring upath; ! *service = *user = *password = *devicename = 0; *************** *** 323,326 **** --- 325,340 ---- *password = 0; passlen = strlen(password); + } + + /* Netapp unicode issues */ + + if ((*path=='\\')&&(*(path+1)=='\0')) { /* unicode */ + for(i=0;i tdscnt || pscnt > tpscnt) { Oleg Polyakov pol@ecircles.com From matty at samba.org Fri Aug 13 04:47:51 1999 From: matty at samba.org (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Samba and user list in win9x Share menu References: <37B2C31D.69280063@bigpond.com> Message-ID: <37B3A377.BB48A4D@samba.org> Ashley Cambrell wrote: > > I know it's (very) unsupported, but does anyone know how to set it up? (1) Upgrade to latest CVS. (2) Make sure security=user, and smbpasswd is set up correctly. (3) Test Win9x user list dialog. (4) If successful, go to 7. (5) Curse. Send tcpdump or netmon capture to matty@samba.org. (6) Wait for matty to fix. Go to 1. (7) Smile. Thank Samba Team. Cheers, - matty -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From hoffmann at uni-koblenz-landau.de Fri Aug 13 07:23:50 1999 From: hoffmann at uni-koblenz-landau.de (Christian Hoffmann) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Number of open files error References: <412567CB.00503756.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Message-ID: <37B3C805.CBB126F7@uni-koblenz-landau.de> Hello, G?rard Leymarie schrieb: > All, > In the log.smb file, I have the following message: > > [1999/08/12 14:29:22, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are > available. I habe the same error after updating from 2.04b to 2.05a on a Solaris 2.51-machine (sparc). How can I solve it ? Urgent!!! (It's our primary file-server an there are many of our people standing in the corridor...). Thanks, Christian -- ********************************************* Christian Hoffmann Universit?t Koblenz-Landau Pr?sidialamt Mainz Referat 32: EDV-Organisation und -Entwicklung Tel: +49-6131-3746022 Fax: +49-6131-3746040 Mail: hoffmann@uni-koblenz-landau.de ********************************************* From t.maekitalo at epgmbh.de Fri Aug 13 07:51:06 1999 From: t.maekitalo at epgmbh.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Tommi_M=E4kitalo?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Number of open files error Message-ID: <004a01bee560$99871320$0d29a8c0@pc3.eckpart.de> Hi, we have the same message in our log on SCO OpenServe 5.0.5 with 2.0.3 and 2.0.5a for long but had no problems. It seems to be really 'Information only'. Tommi M?kitalo Dr. Eckhardt + Partner GmbH t.maekitalo@epgmbh.de -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Christian Hoffmann An: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Datum: Freitag, 13. August 1999 09:22 Betreff: Re: Number of open files error Hello, G?rard Leymarie schrieb: > All, > In the log.smb file, I have the following message: > > [1999/08/12 14:29:22, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are > available. I habe the same error after updating from 2.04b to 2.05a on a Solaris 2.51-machine (sparc). How can I solve it ? Urgent!!! (It's our primary file-server an there are many of our people standing in the corridor...). Thanks, Christian -- ********************************************* Christian Hoffmann Universit?t Koblenz-Landau Pr?sidialamt Mainz Referat 32: EDV-Organisation und -Entwicklung Tel: +49-6131-3746022 Fax: +49-6131-3746040 Mail: hoffmann@uni-koblenz-landau.de ********************************************* From A.Boswell at uea.ac.uk Fri Aug 13 07:43:00 1999 From: A.Boswell at uea.ac.uk (A.Boswell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Thank you for your message ... Message-ID: [automatic reply] ... Sorry, I can't reply or help you as I am currently away. I will be back at UEA Thursday August 19th. Inside UEA, please try the following numbers/email: - for local technical problems, ITCS Help Desk 3169 - for School liaison issues: J.Colam@uea 3858 S.Mosley@uea 2384 P.Saward@uea 2386 Andrew ====================================================================== Dr Andrew Boswell email : A.Boswell@uea.ac.uk School Liaison Consultant phone : +44-1603-593856 IT and Computing Services fax : +44-1603-593467 University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK From hoffmann at uni-koblenz-landau.de Fri Aug 13 07:50:31 1999 From: hoffmann at uni-koblenz-landau.de (Christian Hoffmann) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Number of open files error References: <004a01bee560$99871320$0d29a8c0@pc3.eckpart.de> Message-ID: <37B3CE47.8F864FF7@uni-koblenz-landau.de> Hallo, Tommi M?kitalo schrieb: > we have the same message in our log on SCO OpenServe 5.0.5 with 2.0.3 and > 2.0.5a for long but had no problems. It seems to be really 'Information > only'. It looks like a problem with the operating system (number of simultaneously opened files). The problem is, that 2.0.4b works and 2.0.5a failed on the same machine, with the same configuration (nothing was changed execpt the samba-installation). Christian -- ********************************************* Christian Hoffmann Universit?t Koblenz-Landau Pr?sidialamt Mainz Referat 32: EDV-Organisation und -Entwicklung Tel: +49-6131-3746022 Fax: +49-6131-3746040 Mail: hoffmann@uni-koblenz-landau.de ********************************************* From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Fri Aug 13 09:57:16 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Why me? Message-ID: <412567CC.0036953F.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Hi, I think, youi have to install ALL ldiff and ld library on your system Gerard "Lee Havemann" on 08/13/99 06:55:05 AM Please respond to lee@hsh.com To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM &5 ld: cannot open -ldir: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 1684 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" .. configure:1885: sys/id.h: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 1884 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include .. configure:1925: compat.h: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 1924 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include configure:1925: rpcsvc/nis.h: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 1924 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include configure:2005: sys/priv.h: No such file or directory configure: failed program was: #line 2004 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include And the last one (after a bunch of other ones) is: configure: failed program was: #line 9764 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include "./tests/summary.c" [EOB] After speaking to someone else who has BSDI 4.0.1, and it compiled fine, I think I have something wrong with this particular system, but I don't know where to start looking. Anyone care to take a stab at this and give me a hand? Thanks, -Lee From greg at discreet.com Fri Aug 13 11:41:28 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: NT PDC and Encryption In-Reply-To: <37B2C143.C838B700@potsdam.edu> Message-ID: The registry hack only works in user space NOT with trust accounts. To have a michine on the domain you **must** enable encrypted passwords on the Samba server. No way around it. Greg On 13-Aug-99 Matthew Keller wrote: > "Gerald W. Carter" wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Alex Yu wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > My question is that if I want to use Samba as PDC and use the main >> > /etc/passwd as a login and password file. All NT and 98 machines must >> > change from encryption password scheme to plain text password scheme. >> > Is it correct? >> > >> >> For Samba to work as a PDC for NT clients, you **must** enable encrypted >> passwords on the Samba server. No way around it. > > Actually there is a registry hack you can apply to the clients to force > them to send plaintext, but I don't advise it. > > -- > > - Matthew Keller - > Lead Programmer/Analyst > Distributed Computing and Telemedia > State University of New York at Potsdam > > Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ > PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From duesing at fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de Fri Aug 13 14:14:58 1999 From: duesing at fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de (Lars Duesing) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Roaming Profiles?!? Message-ID: Hi, I have some problemes concerning roaming profiles. If a user logs on for the first time, the directory /home/profiles/ would be created, but, Windows keeps telling everyone that the profiles could not be stored at the server. :-( Here's my config: #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name workgroup = SPRECHERRAT # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = Server Sprecherrat # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. # if you want to automatically load your printer list rather # than setting them up individually then you'll need this printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes # It should not be necessary to spell out the print system type unless # yours is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx printing = bsd # Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd # otherwise the user "nobody" is used ; guest account = pcguest # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 50 # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See # security_level.txt for details. security = user # Use password server option only with security = server ; password server = # Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for # all combinations of upper and lower case. ; password level = 8 ; username level = 8 # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd # The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to # update the Linux sytsem password also. # NOTE: Use these with 'encrypt passwords' and 'smb passwd file' above. # NOTE2: You do NOT need these to allow workstations to change only # the encrypted SMB passwords. They allow the Unix password # to be kept in sync with the SMB password. unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* # Unix users can map to different SMB User names ; username map = /etc/smbusers # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /etc/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 # Configure remote browse list synchronisation here # request announcement to, or browse list sync from: # a specific host or from / to a whole subnet (see below) ; remote browse sync = 192.168.3.25 192.168.5.255 # Cause this host to announce itself to local subnets here ; remote announce = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.44 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply local master = yes # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable ; os level = 33 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job domain master = yes # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election preferred master = yes # Use only if you have an NT server on your network that has been # configured at install time to be a primary domain controller. ; domain controller = # Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for # Windows95 workstations. domain logons = yes # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or # per user logon script # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) ; logon script = %m.bat # run a specific logon batch file per username ; logon script = %U.bat # Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) # %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username # You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U # All NetBIOS names must be resolved to IP Addresses # 'Name Resolve Order' allows the named resolution mechanism to be specified # the default order is "host lmhosts wins bcast". "host" means use the unix # system gethostbyname() function call that will use either /etc/hosts OR # DNS or NIS depending on the settings of /etc/host.config, /etc/nsswitch.conf # and the /etc/resolv.conf file. "host" therefore is system configuration # dependant. This parameter is most often of use to prevent DNS lookups # in order to resolve NetBIOS names to IP Addresses. Use with care! # The example below excludes use of name resolution for machines that are NOT # on the local network segment # - OR - are not deliberately to be known via lmhosts or via WINS. ; name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server wins support = yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. ; wins proxy = yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = no # Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_ # NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis ; preserve case = no ; short preserve case = no # Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files ; default case = lower # Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things! ; case sensitive = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory [Profiles] path = /home/profiles browseable = no guest ok = yes # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes Thanks a lot! Lars Duesing ========================================================================= Lars Duesing eMail: duesing@fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de Pommernstr. 3 Telefon: 0172 / 4628919 82031 Gruenwald Fax: 089 / 64910791 PGP-Fingerprint: F7A6 093D 9910 E8B2 BFA0 AC96 0A17 70D6 BE05 6257 From john.rooke at lpsystems.com Fri Aug 13 15:12:14 1999 From: john.rooke at lpsystems.com (John Rooke) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Login problems after upgrade Message-ID: <37B435CE.7FA356A1@lpsystems.com> Hi, I have just upgraded Samba on our Linux box from samba-2.0.2-20.i386.rpm to samba-2.0.5a-0.i386.rpm and are using the same smb.conf and sbpasswd files that worked with 2.0.2. Now when I try to login using the new version I get the following: saturn:/etc # smbclient -L saturn Added interface ip=10.1.1.13 bcast=10.1.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: Domain=[LPTEST] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.0.5a] tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) saturn:/etc # All other samba tools seem to report everything is OK e.g. smbpasswd, swat, smbstatus all wortk OK. As soon as I re-install 2.0.2 I am OK again. We are using SuSE Linux 6.0 with the 2.0.36 kernel if that hapls. Any pointers on what I need to do would be very much appreciated. Thanks, -- John Rooke Director L&P Systems Limited john.rooke@lpsystems.com From jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 13 16:58:43 1999 From: jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Mapping SAMBA NT-groupnames with a german NT system References: Message-ID: <37B44EC3.6C13FAA6@engr.sgi.com> Matthias W?chter wrote: > > I patched 2.0.3 to support Umlauts for server names, shares, descriptions. > Then I patched 2.1.0 prealpha from somewhen in July to support the same, > seeing that 8-bit support even for filenames (which already worked in > 2.0.0) doesn't work at all. So I stopped development and wanted to wait > for 2.1 to support umlauts in filenames in general. Then I wanted to > continue with my efforts. > > Is there anyone who can (is willing to) estimate when umlauts in filenames > will work (again) in 2.1? Or even point me the piece of code where the > translation happens (or should happen) in 2.1? I'm working on this issue at the moment by adding proper code page -> UNICODE support into Samba. I currently have code in the SAMBA_2_0 branch that I'm testing but I'd appreciate a little more help next week (I could send tarballs to people if they don't have anon CVS access) once I've done a little more work on the code (it hasn't at least broken anything with a US codepage - yet :-). Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From ssparish at pittstate.edu Fri Aug 13 17:30:07 1999 From: ssparish at pittstate.edu (Scott Parish) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: DEBUGGING INFO: Samba 2.1.0-prealpha, Redirector error, and AIX 4.2 Message-ID: <37B4561F.CE08A8BD@pittstate.edu> I know this is a little long, but bare with me please. If you're impatient the really important piece is at the bottom. What I've got going after fixing some compliation errors and warnings that mainly deal with type casting, is a semi-working Samba PDC. I've got everything configured properly as far as I can tell. I took the same samba.conf and other configuration information to a Linux box and the PDC stuff works as expected and the workstation can join the samba domain under the Linux install. What doesn't work is joining an NT workstation SP5 to the samba domain under AIX v4.2. When I select the domain option in the network control panel of the NT wks and try to join the samba domain, I get 9 entries in the NT's event log that say there was a redirector error. Specifically the message says: The redirector received an SMB that was too short. I used NT's netmon to capture the traffic and it looks like there are 6 error entries created by wkssvc and another 3 by lsarpc. The transactions in the netmon capture have the following descriptions: Wks-->PDC C NT create & X, File = [This is either wkssvc or lsarpc] Wks<--PDC R NT create & X, Fid = 0x0 Wks-->PDC c/o RPC Bind: UUID {some uuid and some more info} Wks<--PDC R transact Wks-->PDC C close file, FID = 0x0 Wks<--PDC R close file - DOS Error, (6) INVALID_HANDLE There are 6 entries for wkssvc, and 3 entries for lsarpc in the netmon capture with the Fid incrementing by one each time. The samba workstation log file (wks.log) contains entries like the following: [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(482) nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \wkssvc. [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(515) nt_open_pipe: Known pipe wkssvc opening. [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(88) Open pipe requested wkssvc (pipes_open=0) [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(146) Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 80000000 (pipes_open=1) [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(153) open pipes: name wkssvc pnum=80000000 [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] smbd/nttrans.c:reply_ntcreate_and_X(646) reply_ntcreate_and_X: open pipe = \wkssvc [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(496) Several lines of output deleted...and then we come to this... [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(3025) [000] 5C 50 49 50 45 5C 00 00 00 05 00 0B 00 10 00 00 \PIPE\.. ........ [010] 00 48 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 30 16 30 16 00 00 00 .H...... .0.0.... [020] 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 98 D0 FF 6B 12 A1 10 ........ ....k... [030] 36 98 33 46 C3 F8 7E 34 5A 01 00 00 00 04 5D 88 6.3F..~4 Z.....]. [040] 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 60 02 00 00 ........ .+.H`... [050] 00 . [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(402) switch message SMBtrans (pid 43170) [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(237) Skipping become_user - already user [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3602) trans <\PIPE\> data=72 params=0 setup=2 [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3614) calling named_pipe [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3457) named pipe command on <> name [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3222) api_fd_reply [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3237) HELLO: unsigned=0, signed=0, setup0=38 setup1=0 [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(388) search for pipe pnum=0 [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(393) pipe name wkssvc pnum=80000000 (pipes_open=1) pfile_offset 0 [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 1] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3281) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 0 [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_no_reply(3198) Unsupported API fd command [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] smbd/ipc.c:copy_trans_params_and_data(151) copy_trans_params_and_data: params[0..4] data[0..0] [1999/08/13 11:36:51, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(496) The 0x80000000 gets incremented by one each time a new connection is attempted, corresponding with the NT workstation netmon data and what I've seen in the samba source this is to aid in debugging. The 0x80000000 number is interesting as it's a high order bit or sign bit set of a 32-bit number. But it is also apparently (under my AIX install) the pipe_handle_offset that gets set in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:set_pipe_handle_offset(). What I think is not occuring is this offset is not being taken into account in smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(). Thus when the following line (~3239) executes it is looking literally for pnum, not pnum+offset: p = get_rpc_pipe(pnum); If I hack the offset into this call like such: p = get_rpc_pipe(pnum + 0x80000000); the redirector error goes away and I can join the domain. I don't know enough about Samba to really fix this problem, but this should give somebody on the Samba Team something to go on to create a real patch (instead of a poor hack). Which I would be happy to apply and test. ;) -- Scott Parish | "I really can't live without Christ. It's like ssparish@pittstate.edu | impossible to really have a true life without Him." | -- Cassie Bernall, martyr at Columbine High School. From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 13 18:18:18 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: DEBUGGING INFO: Samba 2.1.0-prealpha, Redirector error, and AIX 4.2 In-Reply-To: <37B4561F.CE08A8BD@pittstate.edu> Message-ID: On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Scott Parish wrote: > I know this is a little long, but bare with me please. ^^^^ oo-er :-) From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 13 18:28:33 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: DEBUGGING INFO: Samba 2.1.0-prealpha, Redirector error, and AIX 4.2 In-Reply-To: <37B4561F.CE08A8BD@pittstate.edu> Message-ID: On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Scott Parish wrote: > I know this is a little long, but bare with me please. If you're impatient the > really important piece is at the bottom. > > What I've got going after fixing some compliation errors and warnings that > mainly deal with type casting, is a semi-working Samba PDC. hi scott, at line 3236 you see pnum = setup[1]. pnum is an int. setup[] is uint16*. therefore, bit 32 should NOT be set! i would guess that you have either made some modification or there is a bug in your compiler that has not picked this up. i am therefore changing pnum and subcommand to also be uint16s, please let me know if this causes any problems as get_rpc_pipe() still takes an int as its argument. > Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 80000000 (pipes_open=1) ^^^^^^^^ and what the heck is going on here??? what is the value of pipe_handle_offset in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c? From jjorgens at bdsinc.com Fri Aug 13 19:08:07 1999 From: jjorgens at bdsinc.com (Jens B. Jorgensen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Login problems after upgrade References: <37B435CE.7FA356A1@lpsystems.com> Message-ID: <37B46D17.D2104F83@bdsinc.com> Take a look at /var/log/smb. Do you see: [1999/07/02 10:00:55, 0] smbd/uid.c:become_gid(105) Couldn't set effective gid to 100 currently set to (real=0,eff=0) [1999/07/02 10:00:55, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(425) Can't become connected user! Then the problem is that the version you're installing is compiled to use the system calls setreuid/setregid. These calls seem to exist in 2.0.X but they do not work. Trouble is even if you compile the source yourself, the configure script will think it can use these calls. You have to manually fix it so these calls aren't used. That's what I did and I've got binaries up on my work home page: http://gatekeeper.bdsinc.com/~jjorgens/debian They're debian packages but a debian package is just an ar archive which has tar.gz's embedded in it so it shouldn't be too hard to extract what you want. John Rooke wrote: > Hi, > > I have just upgraded Samba on our Linux box from samba-2.0.2-20.i386.rpm > to samba-2.0.5a-0.i386.rpm and are using the same smb.conf and sbpasswd > files that worked with 2.0.2. Now when I try to login using the new > version I get the following: > > saturn:/etc # smbclient -L > saturn > Added interface ip=10.1.1.13 bcast=10.1.1.255 > nmask=255.255.255.0 > Password: > Domain=[LPTEST] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba > 2.0.5a] > tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password > pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are > invalid.) > saturn:/etc # > > All other samba tools seem to report everything is OK e.g. smbpasswd, > swat, smbstatus all wortk OK. > > As soon as I re-install 2.0.2 I am OK again. > > We are using SuSE Linux 6.0 with the 2.0.36 kernel if that hapls. > > Any pointers on what I need to do would be very much appreciated. > > Thanks, > > -- > John Rooke > Director > L&P Systems Limited > john.rooke@lpsystems.com -- Jens B. Jorgensen jjorgens@bdsinc.com From oswell at xcert.com Fri Aug 13 19:24:39 1999 From: oswell at xcert.com (Mike Oswell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: PDC/BDC && "domain logons = yes" Message-ID: Hello, I ran into a problem the other day where our NT PDC and BDCs starting flaking out. They all thought that there was another PDC on the network and so would not promote. After several hours of fighting with the NT servers, we checked a change that had been made to our smb.conf on our fileserver. Namely, the addition of "domain logons = yes". My understanding was that this addition would allow our fileserver to properly authenticate windows 95/98 machines against the domain. Now, we are running Samba 2.0.5a, and I have included our smb.conf below. Is it expected behavior that with this line in the smb.conf that samba would suddenly show up to the other NT boxes as a PDC? Running "net accounts" on any of our NT BDCs showed our samba server as the PDC, whereas I had thought that this version of samba did not have any of the NT PDC/BDC code in it. As a side note, if this is not the command that I should be using to get NT machines that are not a member of the domain, and windows 95/98 boxes, to authenticate against the domain properly, how _do_ I do this? Thanks. ----- Michael Oswell Xcert International Inc. ----- [ Snip of smb.conf ] ----- [global] workgroup = OURDOM netbios name = fileserver server string = Internal Fileserver # domain logons = yes local master = no security = domain password server = pdc-van bdc-van hosts allow = 10.0.1. 10.0.2. 10.0.3. name resolve order = hosts bcast lmhosts wins load printers = no printing = bsd dns proxy = yes encrypt passwords = yes debug level = 1 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 max log size = 1024 lock directory = /data/samba/var/locks log file = /data/samba/var/samba.log username map = /data/samba/lib/username.map printcap name = /etc/printcap lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc stop %p queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc start %p browsable = yes guest ok = no guest account = nobody From ssparish at pittstate.edu Fri Aug 13 19:45:36 1999 From: ssparish at pittstate.edu (Scott Parish) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: DEBUGGING INFO: Samba 2.1.0-prealpha, Redirector error, andAIX 4.2 References: Message-ID: <37B475E0.CFD38181@pittstate.edu> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Scott Parish wrote: > > > Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 80000000 (pipes_open=1) > ^^^^^^^^ > and what the heck is going on here??? > > what is the value of pipe_handle_offset in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c? [1999/08/13 14:45:36, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(219) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 2147483637 are available. [1999/08/13 14:45:36, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:set_pipe_handle_offset(56) HELLO: pipe_handle_offset = 7FFFFFFF -- Scott Parish | "I really can't live without Christ. It's like ssparish@pittstate.edu | impossible to really have a true life without Him." | -- Cassie Bernall, martyr at Columbine High School. From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 13 20:03:48 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: DEBUGGING INFO: Samba 2.1.0-prealpha, Redirector error, andAIX 4.2 In-Reply-To: <37B475E0.CFD38181@pittstate.edu> Message-ID: On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Scott Parish wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Scott Parish wrote: > > > > > Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 80000000 (pipes_open=1) > > ^^^^^^^^ > > and what the heck is going on here??? > > > > what is the value of pipe_handle_offset in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c? > > [1999/08/13 14:45:36, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(219) > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 2147483637 are > available. > [1999/08/13 14:45:36, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:set_pipe_handle_offset(56) > HELLO: pipe_handle_offset = 7FFFFFFF thanks scott. um... why is this so high???? is this against a typecast issue of max_open_files to something, or what? you using a severely brain-dead compiler or something? :-) ok, can you please attempt to track this a bit further, track real_max_open_files in smbd/files.c, see what's happening. From roamdad at ibm.net Fri Aug 13 20:20:15 1999 From: roamdad at ibm.net (Doug VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Roaming Profiles?!? References: Message-ID: <37B47DFF.CFDA1091@ibm.net> Lars Duesing wrote: > Hi, > I have some problemes concerning roaming profiles. If a user logs on for > the first time, the directory /home/profiles/ would be created, > Try: mkdir /home/profiles/ chown /home/profiles/ This works for me. > but, Windows keeps telling everyone that the profiles could not be stored > at the server. :-( -- Doug VanLeuven : 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Programmer/Analyst, SCWA : doug@scwa.ca.gov Chief Engineer, USMM : roamdad@ibm.net From ssparish at pittstate.edu Fri Aug 13 20:28:56 1999 From: ssparish at pittstate.edu (Scott Parish) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: DEBUGGING INFO: Samba 2.1.0-prealpha, Redirector error, andAIX4.2 References: Message-ID: <37B48008.E1FC2D3B@pittstate.edu> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Scott Parish wrote: > > > > > Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 80000000 (pipes_open=1) > > > ^^^^^^^^ > > > and what the heck is going on here??? > > > > > > what is the value of pipe_handle_offset in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c? > > > > [1999/08/13 14:45:36, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(219) > > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 2147483637 are > > available. > > [1999/08/13 14:45:36, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:set_pipe_handle_offset(56) > > HELLO: pipe_handle_offset = 7FFFFFFF > > thanks scott. um... why is this so high???? is this against a typecast > issue of max_open_files to something, or what? > > you using a severely brain-dead compiler or something? :-) > > ok, can you please attempt to track this a bit further, track > real_max_open_files in smbd/files.c, see what's happening. [What looks like an enumeration of files in my home directory deleted.] [1999/08/13 15:17:29, 5] smbd/mangle.c:name_map_mangle(982) name_map_mangle() ==> [.mailboxlist] [1999/08/13 15:17:29, 5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(616) New file profile [1999/08/13 15:17:29, 0] smbd/files.c:file_new(58) HELLO real_max_open_files = 7ffffff5 [1999/08/13 15:17:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [1999/08/13 15:17:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 49410 (2.1.0-prealpha) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [1999/08/13 15:17:29, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [1999/08/13 15:17:29, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(2535) PANIC: internal error This is interesting. No core dump though. I grabbed the latest cvs source, and am going to reexamine the castings that I needed to make to be sure this is not my fault. ;) -- Scott Parish | "I really can't live without Christ. It's like ssparish@pittstate.edu | impossible to really have a true life without Him." | -- Cassie Bernall, martyr at Columbine High School. From jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 13 20:52:05 1999 From: jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Netapp in Samba NT domain References: <19990812161115.A15641@ecircles.com> Message-ID: <37B48575.7DCC5A15@engr.sgi.com> Oleg Polyakov wrote: > > I had problems with Netapp filer - it did > not want to enter Samba NT domain. > For now problem is solved. > I hope solution could help somebody. > > The version of filer OS is 5.5.2. > I'm using FreeBSD 2.2.8 and Samba HEAD branch. > The source text in Samba 2.0.5 is approximately > same. > > Problem: > Netapp filer couldn't enter Samba NT > domain. > > Explanation: > 1.Netapp sends TconX request in unicode, not ascii. > 2.Netapp send SMBtrans request in unicode, not ascii. This is a bug in the NetApp code I'm afraid. It shouldn't be sending UNICODE text on a non-unicode negotiated connection. I would recommend that you contact NetApp and request a fix (they do know about this issue, they need customer demand to get them to allocate the engineering resources to address it though). Thanks for the patch though, I'll look into integrating it. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 13 20:54:41 1999 From: jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Number of open files error References: <412567CB.00503756.00@paris3.par.sita.int> <37B3C805.CBB126F7@uni-koblenz-landau.de> Message-ID: <37B48611.582C3899@engr.sgi.com> Christian Hoffmann wrote: > > Hello, > > G?rard Leymarie schrieb: > > > All, > > In the log.smb file, I have the following message: > > > > [1999/08/12 14:29:22, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) > > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are > > available. > > I habe the same error after updating from 2.04b to 2.05a on a Solaris > 2.51-machine (sparc). > > How can I solve it ? Urgent!!! (It's our primary file-server an there > are many of our people standing in the corridor...). This is *not* an error. As the message says : "Information only" It's just telling you how many open files each smbd will be able to have, in case you have problems and need to increase it. You can safely ignore it. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From bramovsk at softhome.net Fri Aug 13 21:02:54 1999 From: bramovsk at softhome.net (Branko Avramovski) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Login problems after upgrade References: <37B435CE.7FA356A1@lpsystems.com> Message-ID: <00ef01bee5d0$e59a3740$0100a8c0@branko> > Hi, > > I have just upgraded Samba on our Linux box from samba-2.0.2-20.i386.rpm > to samba-2.0.5a-0.i386.rpm and are using the same smb.conf and sbpasswd > files that worked with 2.0.2. Now when I try to login using the new > version I get the following: > > saturn:/etc # smbclient -L > saturn > Added interface ip=10.1.1.13 bcast=10.1.1.255 > nmask=255.255.255.0 > Password: > Domain=[LPTEST] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba > 2.0.5a] > tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password > pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are > invalid.) > saturn:/etc # > > All other samba tools seem to report everything is OK e.g. smbpasswd, > swat, smbstatus all wortk OK. > > As soon as I re-install 2.0.2 I am OK again. > > We are using SuSE Linux 6.0 with the 2.0.36 kernel if that hapls. > > Any pointers on what I need to do would be very much appreciated. > > Thanks, I have exactly the same problem on the same configuration (described message with subject: No locking available - Compiling problem in the samba@samba.org mailing list). If you start smbd with log level 10 you can see that in the log files the password check/ authentication passes but then samba cant change uid to a current user uid. I'm very interested in the solution/advice for this problem. I also tried to compile the source but the ./configure script crushes at the end with the message: No locking available... I'll also appreciate if you can tell me if the compiling (./configure script) passes on your system. Thanks Branko From ssparish at pittstate.edu Fri Aug 13 22:44:07 1999 From: ssparish at pittstate.edu (Scott Parish) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: DEBUGGING INFO: Samba 2.1.0-prealpha, Redirector error, andAIX4.2 References: <37B48008.E1FC2D3B@pittstate.edu> Message-ID: <37B49FB7.AA4A9D45@pittstate.edu> Scott Parish wrote: > > I grabbed the latest cvs source, and am going to reexamine the castings that I > needed to make to be sure this is not my fault. ;) I compiled the latest cvs source, and did not fix any casting warnings. Attempted to join the domain, but received the same messages as originally posted. Again hard-coded the offset of 0x8000000 in smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply()'s call to get_rpc_pipe() as per original message hack. Was allowed to join domain. So, it's not my fault. ;) Could this be an issue of int sizes? Ints being 4 bytes (32 bits) on AIX and 2 bytes on other platforms and some declaration somewhere being int vs. uint16? Have a nice weekend, I'll be back to dig some more on Monday. Thanks for the quick responses as well! -- Scott Parish | "I really can't live without Christ. It's like ssparish@pittstate.edu | impossible to really have a true life without Him." | -- Cassie Bernall, martyr at Columbine High School. From duesing at fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de Sat Aug 14 00:55:42 1999 From: duesing at fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de (Lars Duesing) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Roaming Profiles?!? In-Reply-To: <37B47DFF.CFDA1091@ibm.net> Message-ID: Hi Doug, > Try: > mkdir /home/profiles/ > chown /home/profiles/ > > This works for me. I'm really sorry, but it don't work for me... I have tried it before mailing this... Have a look at this: That's my test-site: drwxrwxrwx 13 root root 1024 Aug 9 19:15 . drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 1024 Feb 6 1996 .. drwx------ 2 root root 1024 Aug 9 17:52 Administrator drwxrwxrwx 15 brenner users 1024 Aug 9 19:02 brenner drwxr-xr-x 15 duersch users 1024 Aug 9 19:01 duersch drwxr-xr-x 15 duesing users 1024 Aug 9 19:01 duesing drwxr-xr-x 15 goebel users 1024 Aug 9 19:02 goebel drwxr-xr-x 15 hassling users 1024 Aug 9 19:04 hassling drwxr-xr-x 15 lang users 1024 Aug 9 19:04 lang drwx------ 2 ms users 1024 Aug 9 17:52 ms drwxr-xr-x 15 reiter users 1024 Aug 9 19:05 reiter drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 1024 Aug 9 19:05 root drwxr-xr-x 2 service service 1024 Aug 9 19:15 service Just about all permissions tried out :-( But thanks anyway! bye, Lars Duesing ========================================================================= Lars Duesing eMail: duesing@fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de Administrator of University of Applied Sciences of Munich. PGP-Fingerprint: F7A6 093D 9910 E8B2 BFA0 AC96 0A17 70D6 BE05 6257 From ldx at ibm.net Sat Aug 14 03:20:31 1999 From: ldx at ibm.net (Doug VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: DEBUGGING INFO: Samba 2.1.0-prealpha, Redirector error, andAIX4.2 References: Message-ID: <37B4E07F.2E383122@ibm.net> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Scott Parish wrote: > > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Scott Parish wrote: > > > > > > > Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 80000000 (pipes_open=1) > > > ^^^^^^^^ > > > and what the heck is going on here??? > > > > > > what is the value of pipe_handle_offset in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c? > > > > [1999/08/13 14:45:36, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(219) > > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 2147483637 are > > available. > > [1999/08/13 14:45:36, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:set_pipe_handle_offset(56) > > HELLO: pipe_handle_offset = 7FFFFFFF > > thanks scott. um... why is this so high???? is this against a typecast > issue of max_open_files to something, or what? > > you using a severely brain-dead compiler or something? :-) > > ok, can you please attempt to track this a bit further, track > real_max_open_files in smbd/files.c, see what's happening. I compile & run samba-2.0.5a on AIX. Yeah, thats not the issue here, but max files allowed on AIX is. I compile & run samba 2.1 HEAD branch (~ 7/29/99) on linux (right now for tests) So I'm concerned. As I read it: smbd/files.c file_init() calls set_maxfiles(10000 + MAX_OPEN_FUDGEFACTOR) lib/util.c set_maxifles() has been re-written to be aware AIX doesn't support setrlimit() & always returns RLIM_INFINITY ie: 0x7fffffff = 2147483647 My 2.0.5a version has #if defined(RLIM_INFINITY) and some code to handle this so it doesn't get outrageous. My CVS version is missing this code. Does a knowledgable one know if it is as simple as diff'ing & patching the CVS function to 2.0.5a levels? I suspect his problems will disappear once pipe_handle_offset doesn't drive the number into overflow or negative. -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov From ldx at ibm.net Sat Aug 14 04:40:44 1999 From: ldx at ibm.net (Doug VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:54 2003 Subject: Roaming Profiles?!? References: Message-ID: <37B4F34B.B92CBC81@ibm.net> Lars, can you add to smb.conf debug level = 2 timestamp logs = No then try to login again. Find the lines where connection to service Profiles is denied. It will look something like this: Allowed connection from hq95.ldxnet.com (192.168.200.7) ACCEPTED: validated uid ok as non-guest Initialising default vfs hooks Connect path is /home/profiles cindy is in 5 groups: 508, 41, 100, 101, 102 dos_ChDir to /home/profiles dos_ChDir to /etc/rc.d/init.d hq95 (192.168.200.7) connect to service Profiles as user cindy (uid=508, If the reason it can't connect isn't obvious, send it over here. -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov From duesing at fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de Sat Aug 14 17:04:15 1999 From: duesing at fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de (Lars Duesing) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Roaming Profiles?!? In-Reply-To: <37B4F34B.B92CBC81@ibm.net> Message-ID: On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Doug VanLeuven wrote: > Lars, > > can you add to smb.conf > debug level = 2 > timestamp logs = No > > then try to login again. > Find the lines where connection to service Profiles is denied. Sorry, Doug, nothing is denied: = ws4 (192.168.61.23) connect to service Profiles as user duesing (uid=502, gid=100) (pid 1421) = duesing opened file duesing/ntuser.dat read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) = del_share_modes Deleting share mode entry dev=812 ino=483330 = del_share_modes num entries = 0, deleting share_mode dev=812 ino=483330 = duesing closed file duesing/ntuser.dat (numopen=0) = duesing opened file duesing/ntuser.dat read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) = del_share_modes Deleting share mode entry dev=812 ino=483330 = del_share_modes num entries = 0, deleting share_mode dev=812 ino=483330 = duesing closed file duesing/ntuser.dat (numopen=0) = ws4 (192.168.61.23) connect to service netlogon as user duesing (uid=502, gid=100) (pid 1421) = ws4 (192.168.61.23) connect to service duesing as user duesing (uid=502, gid=100) (pid 1421) = call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. = ws4 (192.168.61.23) closed connection to service duesing Thats all samba says to me. :-( (Using Loglevel 2) > If the reason it can't connect isn't obvious, send it over here. The Problem is, the profiles cannot be stored. (Windows NT 4/SP 4 says (I have a German Version): "Windows cannot update server - saved profiles (65)") I'm really confused about it. thanks, Lars ========================================================================= Lars Duesing eMail: duesing@fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de Pommernstr. 3 Telefon: 0172 / 4628919 82031 Gruenwald Fax: 089 / 64910791 PGP-Fingerprint: F7A6 093D 9910 E8B2 BFA0 AC96 0A17 70D6 BE05 6257 From ldx at ibm.net Sat Aug 14 20:02:12 1999 From: ldx at ibm.net (Doug VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Roaming Profiles?!? References: Message-ID: <37B5CB44.9D48ADD6@ibm.net> Lars Duesing wrote: > > then try to login again. > > Find the lines where connection to service Profiles is denied. > Sorry, Doug, nothing is denied: > > = ws4 (192.168.61.23) connect to service Profiles as user duesing > (uid=502, gid=100) (pid 1421) > = duesing opened file duesing/ntuser.dat read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) > = del_share_modes Deleting share mode entry dev=812 ino=483330 > = del_share_modes num entries = 0, deleting share_mode dev=812 ino=483330 > = duesing closed file duesing/ntuser.dat (numopen=0) > = duesing opened file duesing/ntuser.dat read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) Try adding read only = no in the Profiles share -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov From lisa at usna.navy.MIL Sun Aug 15 00:17:09 1999 From: lisa at usna.navy.MIL (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Implementing system policy (ntconfig.pol) Message-ID: <99Aug14.201715-0400edt.4995-330+31@jupiter.usna.navy.mil> Hi: I need help implementing a policy for a group of users! If I have a UNIX group called "mids" on my Samba server, can I apply a restrictive system policy to this group only? How would I do it? I understand that you must have a netlogin share for your login scripts and system policies. But what is the nature of ntconfig.pol? It almost looks as if it's a single binary file, composed of several specific policies. I'm not very strong in NT. I know you can access the System Policy Editor from the Administrative Tools on an NT Server. But I'm confused about what I see there. There are policies for different machines and users. Suppose I wanted to copy just one of these over to my Samba netlogin share. How would I do it? It sounds like you MUST use an NT Server to create an ntconfig.pol file. But how do I get on the NT Server and create a policy for my mids group? Would I start the Policy Editor, and then copy and paste an existing policy (such as the one for Default User) to a new one called "mids"? Can I create such a policy on the NT Server if the "mids" group doesn't already exist on the NT Server? If you've implemented policies on your Samba server, PLEASE let me know how you did it! Lisa From Dominik-Fritz at gmx.de Sun Aug 15 08:55:36 1999 From: Dominik-Fritz at gmx.de (Dominik Fritz) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Implementing system policy (ntconfig.pol) Message-ID: <24162.934707336@www4.gmx.net> Hi Lisa You do not have to use a NT Server to create your ntconfig.pol. You should use a NT Box (Server or Workstation) which has joinded your Samba Domain. (I do not know if this is realy necassery) Now you have to create a new policy. After creating the new policy you can add the groups you want to by clicking on the group symbol. Now you can specify which is allowed and which is denied to the members of your group After all you have to save your policy as ntconfig.pol in your NETLOGON share. Hope my description will help you to solve your problem Dominik -- Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net From RohrMat at aol.com Sun Aug 15 10:58:23 1999 From: RohrMat at aol.com (RohrMat@aol.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message Message-ID: <27f8cdba.24e7f74f@aol.com> In einer eMail vom 10.08.1999 14:03:53 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerze schreibt justo@creditoycaucion.es: > Well, one script ala wall command: > > With the smbstatus report, get the machines and send it the message in > de file passed how argument. > > for i in `smbstatus -S | grep "(" | awk '{print $5}' | > sort | uniq` > do > echo $i > smbclient -i 1 -M $i < $1 > done > Hi Justo! My question: How can I get this popups under my win95-clients. I thing that I need to implement a winpopup-protocol under win. do you have an idea ? Thanks Matthias From matthias at waechter.wol.at Sun Aug 15 11:27:15 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message In-Reply-To: <27f8cdba.24e7f74f@aol.com> Message-ID: On Sun, 15 Aug 1999 RohrMat@aol.com wrote: > Hi Justo! > My question: How can I get this popups under my win95-clients. > I thing that I need to implement a winpopup-protocol under win. > > do you have an idea ? You either have to program it. It's not _that_ difficult, but you have a second option: Run WinPopup. OK, there are better things to do, but it's better than nothing... > Thanks > Matthias Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From appro at fy.chalmers.se Sun Aug 15 14:06:49 1999 From: appro at fy.chalmers.se (Andy Polyakov) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Number of open files error References: <412567CB.00503756.00@paris3.par.sita.int> <37B3C805.CBB126F7@uni-koblenz-landau.de> <37B48611.582C3899@engr.sgi.com> Message-ID: <37B6C979.7E71EE66@fy.chalmers.se> Hi, everybody! > > > [1999/08/12 14:29:22, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) > > > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 246 are > > > available. > > > > ... on a Solaris 2.51-machine (sparc). Speaking of which... > > It's just telling you how many open files each smbd > will be able to have, in case you have problems and > need to increase it. ^^^^^^^^ There is a flaw in Solaris stdio. It was inherited all the way from earliest SunOS (and BSD?) releases and was considered by Sun as a feature, not bug ever since. For more details examine attached patch (it's 2.0.4b based, but the problem is present and ought to be fixed in all versions including 2.1.0-prealpha). The catch is that some libc functions may "secretly" call stdio and that's why you have to play this (or similar:-) trick in order to be on the safe side... Cheers. Andy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** ./source/lib/system.c.orig Tue May 18 17:45:37 1999 --- ./source/lib/system.c Mon May 24 20:04:24 1999 *************** *** 268,273 **** --- 268,295 ---- #endif } + #if defined(SUNOS4) || (defined(SUNOS5) && !defined(__sparcv9)) + /* + * Under SunOS/32 the member of FILE structure that keeps the UNIX file + * descriptor is only 8 bits wide:-( This means that stdio will fail + * *miserably* if first 256 file descriptors are exhausted by calls to + * open(2) and creat(2). In order to avoid this let's try to shuffle file + * descriptors obtained from mentioned system calls over when we start + * approaching the limit. + * Andy + */ + #define KEEP_SOME_FD_FOR_STDIO 32 + #define SHUFFLE_OVER_256(fd) \ + if (fd < 256 && fd > 256-KEEP_SOME_FD_FOR_STDIO) { \ + int fdd; \ + if ((fdd = fcntl(fd,F_DUPFD,256)) >= 256) \ + close(fd), fd = fdd; \ + } + /* + * Other OS that would suffer from this is IRIX 5.x and earlier. + */ + #endif + /******************************************************************* A creat() wrapper that will deal with 64 bit filesizes. ********************************************************************/ *************** *** 274,288 **** int sys_creat(const char *path, mode_t mode) { #if defined(HAVE_EXPLICIT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_CREAT64) ! return creat64(path, mode); #else /* * If creat64 isn't defined then ensure we call a potential open64. * JRA. */ ! return sys_open(path, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, mode); #endif } /******************************************************************* --- 296,315 ---- int sys_creat(const char *path, mode_t mode) { + int fd; #if defined(HAVE_EXPLICIT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_CREAT64) ! fd = creat64(path, mode); #else /* * If creat64 isn't defined then ensure we call a potential open64. * JRA. */ ! fd = sys_open(path, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, mode); #endif + #ifdef SHUFFLE_OVER_256 + SHUFFLE_OVER_256(fd); + #endif + return fd; } /******************************************************************* *************** *** 291,301 **** int sys_open(const char *path, int oflag, mode_t mode) { #if defined(HAVE_EXPLICIT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_OPEN64) ! return open64(path, oflag, mode); #else ! return open(path, oflag, mode); #endif } /******************************************************************* --- 318,333 ---- int sys_open(const char *path, int oflag, mode_t mode) { + int fd; #if defined(HAVE_EXPLICIT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_OPEN64) ! fd = open64(path, oflag, mode); #else ! fd = open(path, oflag, mode); #endif + #ifdef SHUFFLE_OVER_256 + SHUFFLE_OVER_256(fd); + #endif + return fd; } /******************************************************************* From duesing at fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de Sun Aug 15 15:46:54 1999 From: duesing at fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de (Lars Duesing) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Roaming Profiles?!? In-Reply-To: <37B5CB44.9D48ADD6@ibm.net> Message-ID: On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Doug VanLeuven wrote: > Try adding > read only = no > in the Profiles share Thanks a lot, Doug! It works! Many thanks to you! bye, Lars ========================================================================= Lars Duesing eMail: duesing@fachschaft.informatik.fh-muenchen.de Pommernstr. 3 Telefon: 0172 / 4628919 82031 Gruenwald Fax: 089 / 64910791 PGP-Fingerprint: F7A6 093D 9910 E8B2 BFA0 AC96 0A17 70D6 BE05 6257 From pmal at space.gr Mon Aug 16 06:15:11 1999 From: pmal at space.gr (Panagiotis Malakoudis) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message References: Message-ID: <00f501bee7ae$b2a2ebe0$0502000a@space.gr> I tryied all the options I had (and knew) and I came to the following: - In order to send winpopup messages on a windows 9x client you have to run winpopup.exe locate under the windows directory.[is there any other way?] - To send tha same message on a windows NT machine all you need to do is have the messanger service started. If so the message will be automatically displayed on the desktop. If not the message will not be displayed since the messanger service is not started and you will get no error messages. Perhaps it is possible to setup a script on the PDC for the windows 9x clients to automatically execute winpopup.exe but what about the windows NT clients? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Malakoudis Panagiotis System Administrator Space Hellas S.A. Telephone:6547400 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----- Original Message ----- From: Matthias W?chter To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Sent: Sunday, August 15, 1999 2:30 PM Subject: Re: Win Pop-Up message On Sun, 15 Aug 1999 RohrMat@aol.com wrote: > Hi Justo! > My question: How can I get this popups under my win95-clients. > I thing that I need to implement a winpopup-protocol under win. > > do you have an idea ? You either have to program it. It's not _that_ difficult, but you have a second option: Run WinPopup. OK, there are better things to do, but it's better than nothing... > Thanks > Matthias Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - From D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au Mon Aug 16 16:52:48 1999 From: D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au (David Bannon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message In-Reply-To: <00f501bee7ae$b2a2ebe0$0502000a@space.gr> References: Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990817025248.008c0780@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> At 04:14 PM 16/08/1999 +1000, Panagiotis Malakoudis wrote: >I tryied all the options I had (and knew) and I came to the following: > > >Perhaps it is possible to setup a script on the PDC for the windows 9x >clients to automatically execute winpopup.exe but what about the windows NT >clients? > The message service is started by default on NT. Unless you (sys admin) have set it to not start, it will be there ! Start winpopup on the w95 by all means, however be warned, it will certainly encourage people to play with it ! Not only does it receive messages, it also sends them ! You also need to instruct your users not to close it down, as is all too easy to do.... Just put a shortcut to winpopup in the startup group to be really simple. I guess it depends on the situation you are in. david ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon D.Bannon@latrobe.edu.au School of Biochemistry Phone 61 03 9479 2197 La Trobe University, Plenty Rd, Fax 61 03 9479 2467 Bundoora, Vic, Australia, 3083 http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au ------------------------------------------------------------ ..... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Mon Aug 16 09:07:25 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: FYI, NT & client 32 NW 4.6, it doesn't work too! Message-ID: <412567CF.0032029D.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Sniff... From matthias at waechter.wol.at Mon Aug 16 10:10:10 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990817025248.008c0780@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> Message-ID: On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, David Bannon wrote: > Start winpopup on the w95 by all means, however be warned, it will > certainly encourage people to play with it ! Not only does it receive > messages, it also sends them ! You also need to instruct your users not to > close it down, as is all too easy to do.... Just put a shortcut to winpopup > in the startup group to be really simple. better create an entry in HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run as follows: REGEDIT4 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run] "WinPopup"="C:\\WINDOWS\\WINPOPUP.EXE" or make this one mandatory via the policies. Two years ago I programmed something I called "winpopdown.exe" :-) which is not seen but displays Net-Messages on Win95. Sorry, neither have the source nor the binaries here, but I know it was not _that_ difficult to do. Nicely, if winpopdown is running, noone can run winpopup since the pipe winpopup wants to use is already in use, so noone with Win95 can send Messages (while receiving is possible though). Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From tolga at lcsl.metu.edu.tr Mon Aug 16 12:34:46 1999 From: tolga at lcsl.metu.edu.tr (Tolga Ceylan) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Setting up samba with NIS (fwd) Message-ID: <199908161234.PAA28206@kekik.metu.edu.tr> > > Lisa, > Here is my smb.conf file I used to get NIS working with Samba 2.0.4b. Its > pretty simple, so nobody laugh :), but it works. > > [global] > workgroup = PNT-NAMERICA > server string = Solaris Samba Server > hosts allow = xxx.xxx. 127. > log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m > max log size = 50 > security = user > domain logons = yes > nis homedir = true > homedir map = auto.home > socket options = TCP_NODELAY > dns proxy = no > > This was a very simple setup of Samba with NIS username/password > authentication. Your Samba server should now allow NIS username/password > authentication. I don't know if this will help you out, but its the best > help I can offer. There is also support for NIS+, but I have yet to attempt > to tackle that beast. > > Jason P. Holland > Unix Administrator - Sprint Paranet > jphollan@sprintparanet.com > I am mixed up. Does NIS & Samba interaction mean that UNIX passwords are also valid in samba? What about smbpasswd file, shouldn't we feed it with plain text passwords? I have a linux PDC, serving to 40 NT SP3 clients, our department is basically unix, and I would be pleased to use the unix passwords... Tolga Ceylan System Administrator Middle East Technical University From Harald at iki.fi Mon Aug 16 14:46:56 1999 From: Harald at iki.fi (Harald Hannelius) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: username.map on pdc shows on client? Message-ID: Problem here, I'm running samba cvs as pdc and 2.0.5b as a 'slave' server. The slave is in 'security=domain' and all is fine. I'm trying to get the username.map feature working on the slave. Connecting as john.doe (unix jdoe) to the pdc works, but as soon as I try connecting to the slave server I get a: Aug 16 17:36:04 slave smbd[4578]: domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user john.doe in domain WORKGROUP to Domain controller THAT. Error was NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER. Shouldn't the pdc map the user 'john.doe' to 'jdoe' in 'security=domain' or should the mapping be done on the slave? I also have the username.map on the slave-server, no avail. Please help me out on this one! =========================================================== Harald H Hannelius | Harald@iki.fi | GSM +358405470870 =========================================================== From jthiel at chc-chimes.com Mon Aug 16 15:56:52 1999 From: jthiel at chc-chimes.com (Jeremy Thiel) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Case Preservation Problems Message-ID: <002c01bee7ff$f4e3d040$445110ac@internal.chcchimes.com> HI. I seem to be having a problem with case preservation on my Samba file server. I set the smb config with the "preserve case=yes" setting and the case of new directories and files is still forced to lower. I have the exact same setting enabled on my Samba DC but, it allows the case to be retained. Weird. Does anyone know of a different setting that needs to be added, removed or changed in the config to allow case preservation? BTW, i'm running version 2.0.5a. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From alexs at saturn.nmr.ion.ucl.ac.uk Mon Aug 16 15:59:52 1999 From: alexs at saturn.nmr.ion.ucl.ac.uk (Mr. Alex Stepney) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: No longer able to logon/join domain Message-ID: <199908161559.QAA27550@titania.nmr> All, I'm running CV's as a PDC on a Ultra-1 (Solaris 2.5.1) and I'm having a few problems this week joining a machine to a domain or logging into a machine that have previously joined the domain. Last week I changed the daemon start ups from inetd to rc2.d and all was well, but today nobody can log in. This is what happens when I try to join a domain: [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 5] lib/access.c:string_match(87) looking for 144.82.49.69 of domain nmr in netgroup suns gave No [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 5] lib/access.c:string_match(87) looking for pc36 of domain nmr in netgroup suns gave No [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 5] lib/access.c:string_match(87) looking for 144.82.49.69 of domain nmr in netgroup pcs gave No [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 5] lib/access.c:string_match(87) looking for pc36 of domain nmr in netgroup pcs gave No [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 0] lib/access.c:check_access(236) Denied connection from pc36 (144.82.49.69) [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 1] smbd/process.c:process_smb(562) Connection denied from 144.82.49.69 [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(185) write_socket(7,5) [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(188) write_socket(7,5) wrote 5 [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) Closing connections [1999/08/16 16:24:31, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(431) Server exit (connection denied) And I notice this when I try to log onto a machine that has previouly joined the domain: =============================================================== [1999/08/16 16:40:57, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 976 (2.1.0-prealpha) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [1999/08/16 16:40:57, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== I am currently recompiling the latest CV's and I'll see how that goes. Does anyone have any idea as to the cause of this? Many thanks Alex. ________________________________________________________________________ Mr A.Stepney BSc(Hons), Systems Administrator Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. phone : +44 (0) 20 7837 3611 Ext. 4268 fax : +44 (0) 20 7278 5616 pager : +44 (0) 4325 623722 email : a.stepney@ion.ucl.ac.uk www : http://www.nmr.ion.ucl.ac.uk/~alexs -------------- next part -------------- # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" # to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors. # #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] debug level = 15 workgroup = IONNMR server string = Samba %v %m hosts allow = @suns, @pcs # Printers load printers = yes printcap name = /etc/printers.conf lpq command = /usr/ucb/lpq -P%p lprm command = /usr/ucb/lprm -P%p %j print command = /usr/ucb/lpr -r -P%p %s printing = bsd smbrun = /usr/samba/bin/smbrun guest account = pcguest log file = /var/adm/sambalog.%m max log size = 5000 # For NIS nis homedir = true homedir map = auto.homedir # Assorted password/authentication. mangle case = yes case sensitive = no default case = lower preserve case = yes short preserve case = no password level = 0 smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd # unix password sync = yes # passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u # passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successfull* domain user map = /etc/samba/private/username.map # PDC stuff security = user encrypt passwords = yes local master = yes os level = 300 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes logon path = \\%N\profile\%U # For QS and NSE directory mappings logon script = %m.CMD # WINS/DNS wins support = yes wins proxy = no dns proxy = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [netlogon] comment = NT 4.0 Logon browseable = yes path = /usr/samba/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no [profile] comment = NT Roaming Profiles browseable = yes path = /export/home/profile writeable = yes create mode = 0755 public = yes [homes] comment = Current Users Home Directory path=/home browseable = yes read only = no create mode = 0755 public = no [home] comment = Home Directory path = /export/home browseable = yes read only = no create mode = 0755 public = yes [cdrom] comment = cdrom path = /cdrom/cdrom0 browseable = yes read only = yes create mode = 0755 public = yes [root] comment = Root Directory (per machine) path = / browseable = no read only = no create mode = 0755 public = yes [net] comment = Net Directory (per machine) path = /net browseable = yes read only = no create mode = 0755 public = yes ; NB - must be writable, as the pdoxnet file lives here [local-pc] comment = Local Software path = /local/pc browseable = yes create mode = 0755 public = yes writable = yes write list = pc [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp browseable = yes printable = yes public = yes writable = no create mode = 0700 guest ok = yes [tmp] comment = Temporary file space (subject to deletion without warning) path = /tmp read only = no public = yes #============================ End Share Definitions ============================== From alexs at saturn.nmr.ion.ucl.ac.uk Mon Aug 16 17:35:32 1999 From: alexs at saturn.nmr.ion.ucl.ac.uk (Mr. Alex Stepney) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: No longer able to logon/join domain Message-ID: <199908161735.SAA27625@titania.nmr> OK, > > I am currently recompiling the latest CV's and I'll see how that > goes. Does anyone have any idea as to the cause of this? > This seemed to sort the problems out........... Cheer, Alex. From D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au Tue Aug 17 08:44:37 1999 From: D.Bannon at latrobe.edu.au (David Bannon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.6.32.19990817025248.008c0780@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990817184437.00898970@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> At 12:10 PM 16/08/1999 +0200, Matthias W?chter wrote: > >> Start winpopup on the w95 by all means, however be warned, it will >Two years ago I programmed something I called "winpopdown.exe" :-) which That jogged my memory too. I did a similar thing using some libaries made by a fellow called martin Djernaes at http://einstein.ot.dk/~djernaes (then!). Worked fine and used a protocol called 'mail slot'. I think from memory martin provides both C and Delphi (pascal) libaries. This approach will at least let you make a receive only system that can be made a little harder to shut down. David ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon D.Bannon@latrobe.edu.au School of Biochemistry Phone 61 03 9479 2197 La Trobe University, Plenty Rd, Fax 61 03 9479 2467 Bundoora, Vic, Australia, 3083 http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au ------------------------------------------------------------ ..... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Tue Aug 17 08:34:12 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: REAL PIZZA RE: Printing Error; level 20 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Can I beg the indulgance of some wise man in exchange for REAL PIZZA (send me phone number of local pizza co. & deliver address)? I'm trying to work out why samba won't print to a tcp/ip-smb print server but win95 will. > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > Samuel Liddicott > Sent: 11 August 1999 01:22 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Printing Error; level 20 > > > Maybe this level-20 log will give more insight into the difference between > samba and win95 as a printer client. > > smbclient '\\Ps656ad8\Printer1' -P > smb: \> print - > ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access > rights > within the specified context for the reques opening remote file > test-14130 > smb: \> print test > ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access > rights > within the specified context for the reques opening remote file test > > Ps686ad8 (what a name!) is an Intel Inbusiness PrintStation (2 port) that > supports SMB over TCP/IP and SMB over NetBeui. > > It really works, we print OK from our win95 PC's which only have TCP/IP > installed. > > I'm using the samba CVS head as of a few days ago, but returns this error: > > ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access > rights > within the specified context for the reques opening remote file > test-14130 > > Whats smbclient trying to do that windows doesn't? It seems like > it is the > name of the remote file that is the problem. I've tried guessing > a few, and > a few experimental put commands, but no joy. > > smb: \>pwd > Current directory is \\Ps656ad8\ > > > Level 20 log below > > WARNING: The "alternate permissions"option is deprecated > Added interface ip=172.16.1.1 bcast=172.16.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > Client started (version 2.1.0-prealpha). > cli_establish_connection: CSLUK<00> connecting to PS656AD8<20> (0.0.0.0) - > ROOT > [SERVER] with NTLMv1 > resolve_name: Attempting wins lookup for name Ps656ad8<0x20> > bind succeeded on port 0 > nmb packet from 127.0.0.1(137) header: id=22117 opcode=Query(0) > response=No > header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No > header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 > question: q_name=PS656AD8<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 > Sending a packet of len 50 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 > nmb packet from 127.0.0.1(137) header: id=22117 opcode=Query(0) > response=No > header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No > header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 > question: q_name=PS656AD8<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 > Sending a packet of len 50 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 > nmb packet from 127.0.0.1(137) header: id=22117 opcode=Query(0) > response=No > header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No > header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 > question: q_name=PS656AD8<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 > Sending a packet of len 50 to (127.0.0.1) on port 137 > resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name Ps656ad8 > getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 127.0.0.1 localhost > resolve_name: Attempting broadcast lookup for name Ps656ad8<0x20> > bind succeeded on port 0 > nmb packet from 172.16.1.255(137) header: id=22118 opcode=Query(0) > response=No > header: flags: bcast=Yes rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No > header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0 > question: q_name=PS656AD8<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 > Sending a packet of len 50 to (172.16.1.255) on port 137 > read_udp_socket: lastip 172.16.1.51 lastport 137 read: 62 > parse_nmb: packet id = 22118 > Received a packet of len 62 from (172.16.1.51) port 137 > nmb packet from 172.16.1.51(137) header: id=22118 opcode=Query(0) > response=Yes > header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=Yes > header: rcode=0 qdcount=0 ancount=1 nscount=0 arcount=0 > answers: nmb_name=PS656AD8<20> rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=-65536 > answers 0 char .....3 hex 0000AC100133 > Got a positive name query response from 172.16.1.51 ( 172.16.1.51 ) > Connecting to 172.16.1.51 at port 139 > write_socket(3,76) > write_socket(3,76) wrote 76 > Sent session request > got smb length of 0 > size=0 > smb_com=0x0 > smb_rcls=0 > smb_reh=0 > smb_err=0 > smb_flg=0 > smb_flg2=0 > smb_tid=0 > smb_pid=0 > smb_uid=0 > smb_mid=0 > smt_wct=0 > smb_bcc=0 > size=164 > smb_com=0x72 > smb_rcls=0 > smb_reh=0 > smb_err=0 > smb_flg=8 > smb_flg2=1 > smb_tid=0 > smb_pid=25259 > smb_uid=0 > smb_mid=1 > smt_wct=0 > smb_bcc=129 > [000] 02 50 43 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 20 50 52 4F 47 .PC NETW ORK PROG > [010] 52 41 4D 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F RAM 1.0. .MICROSO > [020] 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 4F 52 4B 53 20 31 2E 30 33 FT NETWO RKS 1.03 > [030] 00 02 4D 49 43 52 4F 53 4F 46 54 20 4E 45 54 57 ..MICROS OFT NETW > [040] 4F 52 4B 53 20 33 2E 30 00 02 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E ORKS 3.0 ..LANMAN > [050] 31 2E 30 00 02 4C 4D 31 2E 32 58 30 30 32 00 02 1.0..LM1 .2X002.. > [060] 53 61 6D 62 61 00 02 4E 54 20 4C 41 4E 4D 41 4E Samba..N T LANMAN > [070] 20 31 2E 30 00 02 4E 54 20 4C 4D 20 30 2E 31 32 1.0..NT LM 0.12 > [080] 00 . > write_socket(3,168) > write_socket(3,168) wrote 168 > got smb length of 37 > size=37 > smb_com=0x72 > smb_rcls=0 > smb_reh=0 > smb_err=0 > smb_flg=136 > smb_flg2=1 > smb_tid=0 > smb_pid=25259 > smb_uid=0 > smb_mid=1 > smt_wct=1 > smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) > smb_bcc=0 > size=69 > smb_com=0x75 > smb_rcls=0 > smb_reh=0 > smb_err=0 > smb_flg=0 > smb_flg2=0 > smb_tid=0 > smb_pid=25259 > smb_uid=0 > smb_mid=1 > smt_wct=4 > smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) > smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) > smb_bcc=26 > [000] 5C 5C 50 53 36 35 36 41 44 38 5C 50 52 49 4E 54 \\PS656A D8\PRINT > [010] 45 52 31 00 3F 3F 3F 3F 3F 00 ER1.???? ?. > write_socket(3,73) > write_socket(3,73) wrote 73 > got smb length of 47 > size=47 > smb_com=0x75 > smb_rcls=0 > smb_reh=0 > smb_err=0 > smb_flg=128 > smb_flg2=0 > smb_tid=0 > smb_pid=25259 > smb_uid=0 > smb_mid=1 > smt_wct=3 > smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) > smb_vwv[1]=47 (0x2F) > smb_vwv[2]=1 (0x1) > smb_bcc=6 > [000] 4C 50 54 31 3A 00 LPT1:. > smb: \> print - > size=77 > smb_com=0x2d > smb_rcls=0 > smb_reh=0 > smb_err=0 > smb_flg=0 > smb_flg2=0 > smb_tid=0 > smb_pid=25259 > smb_uid=0 > smb_mid=1 > smt_wct=15 > smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) > smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[3]=66 (0x42) > smb_vwv[4]=6 (0x6) > smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[8]=18 (0x12) > smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0) > smb_bcc=12 > [000] 73 74 64 69 6E 2D 32 35 32 35 39 00 stdin-25 259. > write_socket(3,81) > write_socket(3,81) wrote 81 > got smb length of 65 > size=65 > smb_com=0x2d > smb_rcls=2 > smb_reh=0 > smb_err=4 > smb_flg=128 > smb_flg2=0 > smb_tid=0 > smb_pid=25259 > smb_uid=0 > smb_mid=1 > smt_wct=15 > smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) > smb_vwv[1]=65 (0x41) > smb_vwv[2]=16 (0x10) > smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[12]=16 (0x10) > smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) > smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0) > smb_bcc=0 > ERRSRV - ERRaccess (The requester does not have the necessary access > rights > within the specified context for the reques opening remote file > stdin-25259 > smb: \> cli_shutdown From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Tue Aug 17 08:36:30 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Win Pop-Up message In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990817184437.00898970@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > David Bannon > Sent: 16 August 1999 11:50 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: Win Pop-Up message > > That jogged my memory too. I did a similar thing using some libaries made > by a fellow called martin Djernaes at http://einstein.ot.dk/~djernaes > (then!). Worked fine and used a protocol called 'mail slot'. I think from > memory martin provides both C and Delphi (pascal) libaries. Try http://www.djernaes.dk/martin/delphi.html also http://software.webset.de/kaestner/winpopup.htm Sam From fricke at Team.OWL-Online.DE Tue Aug 17 09:06:03 1999 From: fricke at Team.OWL-Online.DE (Cord-H. Fricke) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Samba and Appletalk Message-ID: <37B925FB.45521FB9@team.owl-online.de> Hi there tools of samba, is there a possibility to use Mac?s and ?Dozies? in a network with Samba??? Are there any documentations??? Thanx Cord From dave at techdev.buffalostate.edu Tue Aug 17 13:06:15 1999 From: dave at techdev.buffalostate.edu (dave@techdev.buffalostate.edu) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Samba and Appletalk In-Reply-To: <37B925FB.45521FB9@team.owl-online.de> Message-ID: > is there a possibility to use Mac´s and ´Dozies´ in a network with > Samba??? > > Are there any documentations??? Samba for Windoze, netatalk for Macs. ( or use "Dave" on MACS ("dave" is an SMB client for the mac)) Dave J. Andruczyk Instructional Support Associate Department of Technology Buffalo State College From williamj at email.aston.ac.uk Tue Aug 17 13:37:01 1999 From: williamj at email.aston.ac.uk (John Williams) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Problem with policies and profiles Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990817143701.00be3100@email.aston.ac.uk> I am trying to set up a CAL lab of 100 NT4/SP5 Workstations using Samba as a PDC. What I would like to do is set up users so that they have a home directory they can keep files in etc, but make them use a mandatory profile from a standard share. I got a lot of useful advice from Dave Andruczyk of Buffalo State but have three problems and although I know the PDC stuff is pre-alpha I would be grateful for any ideas on how to solve them. I have created an ntconfig.pol on \\server\netlogon and created a group policy for the users. Initially it was not obeyed and I had to explicitly add the "users" to the group in /etc/group and then map it to the name used in poledit. As the users are already in the group domainUsers I am not sure why I had to add them again explicitly: >Extract from passwd: >mtest1:x:55001:500::/home/mtest1:/bin/bash >>Extract from group: >domainUsers:x:500:mtest1,mtest2,mtest3,mtest4,mtest5 >Extract from domaingroup.map >domainUsers="Domain Users" I found out that the users were not in Domain Users from User Manager for Domains. In ntconfig.pol I set up Custom Folders to point at the \\server\profiles share but found this was ignored. Again using User Manager I found that the profile location was set in smb.conf with the "logon path =" line and this seems to override the value from NTconfig.pol. I did not compile Samba with profile-support. Again User Manager for Domains showed where the profile path was pointing to. The main problem here is that this value applies to all users. The other problem I've noticed is that when I change a password I get this error: [root@lhs-jw1 lib]# smbpasswd mtest1 error connecting to 134.151.77.222:445 (Connection refused) New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Password changed for user mtest1 N.B 134.151.77.222 is the IP number of the Samba PDC. Is this related to the fact that I can view users with User Manager but not alter them without an RPC error message? Thanks John --- John Williams School Computer Officer LHS Aston University Aston Triangle Birmingham B4 7ET 0121 359 3611 x 5142 Mobile 07801266235 From norman at lithe.uark.edu Tue Aug 17 13:48:54 1999 From: norman at lithe.uark.edu (Norman Weathers) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Having some wierd things happen with samba... Message-ID: <37B96845.AACB1BA7@lithe.uark.edu> Yeah, I know, the subject is "real" descriptive... Anyway. A couple of times now, I have come in to my office in the morning to see my Linux server spewing SMB messages all over the console. I was able to capture a couple of them lately. They are: [root@lithe /root]# cd /[1999/08/17 08:11:08, 0] lib/debug.c:check_log_size(285) check_log_size: open of debug file /var/log/samba/log.smb failed - using console. [1999/08/17 08:11:08, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP Now, I went and checked my error logs, and they have been rotating correctly, and there is a /var/log/samba/log.smb available, and it is not as full as my last two logs that I keep for when I do comparisons. This is twice that is has done this. The services are still available and working, they just spew error's like that to the console. What I did last time was delete my logs, restart the services, and touch log.smb and log.nmb, and then it works for about a week or two. Is this a problem with samba (I am using samba 2.0.5a) or is this more than likely a log rotation problem with Linux (RedHat 6.0). Also, I have a question from one of my logs... Is this a very familiar message? I don't remember seeing this one very often. [1999/08/10 14:14:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(528) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 10520, port 1613, dev = 305, inode = 641552 [1999/08/10 14:14:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(513) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [1999/08/10 14:14:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(528) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 10520, port 1613, dev = 305, inode = 641552 [1999/08/10 14:14:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(513) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [1999/08/10 14:14:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(528) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 10520, port 1613, dev = 305, inode = 641552 This fills my logs along with the previous error. Any help would be appreciated. If I need to send an error log at a higher debug level, I can do that... Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------- Norman Weathers Technology Coordinator ETS University of Arkansas, Fayetteville phone: (501) 575-3553 or (501) 575-4344 email: nweathe@comp.uark.edu or norman@lithe.uark.edu "It's not that I 'prefer' to do this without an NT server.... I just 'prefer' to do it where it will work..." ------------------------------------------------------------------- From norman at lithe.uark.edu Tue Aug 17 14:08:22 1999 From: norman at lithe.uark.edu (Norman Weathers) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Follow up: Some weird things happening with Samba Message-ID: <37B96CD6.4815A17E@lithe.uark.edu> Following up my previous message: I also have another error message in my log files... This one has completely populated my log.smb file, causing it to becom around 48-49k. [1999/08/17 06:12:57, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 06:24:02, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 06:24:02, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 06:36:02, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 06:36:02, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 06:48:09, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 06:48:09, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 07:00:09, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 07:00:09, 0] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(868) Reloading services after SIGHUP [1999/08/17 08:02:11, 0] smbd/filename.c:print_stat_cache_statistics(108) stat cache stats: lookups = 41, hits = 8, misses = 33, stat cache was 19.512195% effective. [1999/08/17 08:08:34, 0] smbd/filename.c:print_stat_cache_statistics(108) stat cache stats: lookups = 41, hits = 9, misses = 32, stat cache was 21.951220% effective. [1999/08/17 08:11:08, 0] smbd/filename.c:print_stat_cache_statistics(108) stat cache stats: lookups = 38, hits = 8, misses = 30, stat cache was 21.052632% effective. Any idea's? Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------- Norman Weathers Technology Coordinator ETS University of Arkansas, Fayetteville phone: (501) 575-3553 or (501) 575-4344 email: nweathe@comp.uark.edu or norman@lithe.uark.edu "It's not that I 'prefer' to do this without an NT server.... I just 'prefer' to do it where it will work..." ------------------------------------------------------------------- From glauche at plum.de Tue Aug 17 14:23:42 1999 From: glauche at plum.de (Michael Glauche) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: rpcclient Message-ID: <37B9706E.6EF5CCB0@plum.de> Hi, is there some more accurate documentation on rpcclient avaible ? I mean Parameters like "-S" or "-U%" aren't documented anywhere. (not even on rpcclient -? ... :) TIA, Michael From greg at discreet.com Tue Aug 17 14:40:20 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: FW: quasi FAQ for ClearCase and samba Message-ID: -----FW: quasi FAQ for ClearCase and samba----- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 10:17:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Greg Dickie To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: quasi FAQ for ClearCase and samba Hi, I've been getting many questions from the ClearCase mailing list regarding the usage of samba. I've extracted a bunch of emails from my outbox that should cover most of the solutions but it's not in an FAQ format yet. Any chance you could stick it in some docs subdirectory in the distribution just so the people trying to do this will have something to start with? Thanks, Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com --------------End of forwarded message------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Tue Aug 17 14:59:19 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: FW: quasi FAQ for ClearCase and samba References: Message-ID: <37B978C7.130BAE7F@eng.auburn.edu> Yes! Send it to me. > I've been getting many questions from the > ClearCase mailing list regarding the usage of samba. > I've extracted a bunch of emails from my outbox that should > cover most of the solutions but it's not in an FAQ format > yet. Any chance you could stick it in some docs > subdirectory in the distribution just so the people > trying to do this will have something to start with? jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From owensc at enc.edu Tue Aug 17 16:30:20 1999 From: owensc at enc.edu (Charles Owens) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system Message-ID: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> Greetings, I have a system running both as PDC and file server for a Windows NT Terminal Server / Metaframe system that servers 20-30 users. I'm beginning to think that there are some stability issues regarding locking, etc. with the -HEAD branch. As such, I've tried to run both -HEAD and 2.0.5 on the same box using the virtual server techiques discussed on the various samba lists. (my idea is to use -HEAD for only its PDS funtionality and handle WINS and file/print sharing with 2.0.5) I've done this: * I've created a IP alias for each virtual server * To keep things straight I've compiled -HEAD to live in /usr/local/samba and left 2.0.5 in the defaul /usr/local/etc * I've set up separate smb.conf files for each, each with o socket address = o interfaces = / * I start the 2.0.5 nmbd, smbd (which is also providing WINS) * I try to start -HEAD nmbd, and it balks... complaining about its failing to bind to 0.0.0.0 . This seems to be what has worked for folks who've posted recently. Is this really correct? Is there any known difficulty in doing this with the -HEAD branch? I've tried a few variations and nothing has worked. Life will go on if I can't get this to work... but it seems straightforward enough and its bugging me... ;-) Thanks, --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From lkcl at switchboard.net Tue Aug 17 17:59:27 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: rpcclient In-Reply-To: <37B9706E.6EF5CCB0@plum.de> Message-ID: On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Michael Glauche wrote: > Hi, > is there some more accurate documentation on rpcclient avaible ? I > mean Parameters > like "-S" or "-U%" aren't documented anywhere. (not even on rpcclient -? > .. :) oops. sorry. From jens.skripczynski at igd.fhg.de Tue Aug 17 18:23:43 1999 From: jens.skripczynski at igd.fhg.de (Jens Skripczynski) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system In-Reply-To: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu>; from Charles Owens on Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 02:30:25AM +1000 References: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> Message-ID: <19990817202343.A16755@igd.fhg.de> Charles Owens: > * I start the 2.0.5 nmbd, smbd (which is also providing WINS) > * I try to start -HEAD nmbd, and it balks... complaining about its > failing to bind to 0.0.0.0 . > Life will go on if I can't get this to work... but it seems > straightforward enough and its bugging me... ;-) are there any plans to merge the 2.0.5a Code with the HEAD Code ? Because I would like to have the file permissions and the advanced User Management... : Ciao Jens Skripczynski -- E-Mail: skripi@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. From smelserks at uindy.edu Tue Aug 17 19:53:06 1999 From: smelserks at uindy.edu (Kelly S. Smelser) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Office 97 .ADM files Message-ID: <001701bee8ea$1fb80ee0$4bbf92c0@uindy.edu> I'm in search of the .ADM template files for Office 97. The System Policy Editor as part of the Office 97 Resource Kit is no longer available from Microsoft's site (seems they've conveniently "upgraded" the old tools and they're only available as part of the Office 2000 Resource Kit), and our old NTconfig.POL file is useless with the new System Policy Editor. Any help in finding those .ADM files would be much appreciated. Thanks. k -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From hendrik at pasadena.school.nz Tue Aug 17 20:05:23 1999 From: hendrik at pasadena.school.nz (Hendrik den Hartog) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Old Clients and Domain Auth Message-ID: Hello... I'm after some advice on how to set up SAMBA. We have a subnet that have 'old' clients that can *only* use clear text passwords for authorisation. The Main Server runs RedHat 5.0 and SAMBA 2.0.3. I want to use another SERVER for authorisation, so set security=domain, and named the password server. Now the few Win95 clients on this subnet can get authorised ok via this config, but these 'older' [non MS, non MAC] clients get their PW rejected? What config for both the SAMBA Server and the NT PDC may allow these older clients to authorise to another Server? Cheers! Hendrik -- Hendrik den Hartog:PASADENA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL:Auckland-NZ From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Tue Aug 17 20:07:19 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald W. Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Office 97 .ADM files In-Reply-To: <001701bee8ea$1fb80ee0$4bbf92c0@uindy.edu> Message-ID: On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Kelly S. Smelser wrote: > I'm in search of the .ADM template files for Office 97. The System > Policy Editor as part of the Office 97 Resource Kit is no longer > available from Microsoft's site (seems they've conveniently "upgraded" > the old tools and they're only available as part of the Office 2000 > Resource Kit), and our old NTconfig.POL file is useless with the new > System Policy Editor. Any help in finding those .ADM files would be > much appreciated. Thanks. > They are also in the Zero Admin Kit I'm fairly certain. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From ldx at ibm.net Tue Aug 17 19:10:34 1999 From: ldx at ibm.net (Doug VanLeuven) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system References: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> Message-ID: <37B9B3AA.EEAEA558@ibm.net> Charles Owens wrote: > * To keep things straight I've compiled -HEAD to live in > /usr/local/samba and left 2.0.5 in the defaul /usr/local/etc > * I've set up separate smb.conf files for each, each with > o socket address = > o interfaces = / > * I start the 2.0.5 nmbd, smbd (which is also providing WINS) > * I try to start -HEAD nmbd, and it balks... complaining about its > failing to bind to 0.0.0.0 . I can't help with all your problems, but the 0.0.0.0 might be solved with bind interfaces only = true on the HEAD branch machine. -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Wed Aug 18 11:09:05 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: Problem with %n Message-ID: <412567D1.003C8C36.00@paris3.par.sita.int> All, While changing the password under NT I have no problem. But I would like to synchronise it with LINUX and Yellow Page. So I use the following script (ypmake): /bin/echo $1:$2 | /usr/sbin/chpasswd /bin/echo $1:$2 > /usr/local/samba/var/passwd.$1 cd /var/yp /usr/bin/make exit 0 And , in my smb.conf I have: encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes passwd program = /usr/local/samba/bin/ypmake %u %n passwd chat = . passwd chat debug = Yes password level = 8 username level = 8 unix password sync = Yes when I use directly the script, It's working propely, but when I change password from NT, the samba password is changed correctly , but the linux password is %n, and not the value of %n. WHY? Thanks, Gerard From Daniel.Jung at megabit.net Wed Aug 18 10:43:36 1999 From: Daniel.Jung at megabit.net (Daniel Jung) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Samba and NT PDC Message-ID: <37BA8E58.CA51C699@megabit.net> Hi, I'm just trying to implement a Samba Server (V: 2.0.3) into a Windows NT - Domain (with NT as PDC). I followed each installation-guide I found. Samba is accessible, but i NOT visible in NTs network neighbourhood. How may I solve my problem? Yours Daniel From ahanson at vermeermfg.com Wed Aug 18 13:11:24 1999 From: ahanson at vermeermfg.com (Alan Hanson) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Samba 2.0.5a NT authentication question References: <37BA8E58.CA51C699@megabit.net> Message-ID: <37BAB0FC.8FA696AF@vermeermfg.com> Server: Solaris 2.7 Samba: 2.0.5a security = user workgroup = DPMAIN-NAME domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes We are using the server as a PDC in this test environment. I can get the NT workstations authenticated at some point in time. At that point in time, I captured a snapshot of the smbpasswd file. At some point later, the smbpasswd file was updated by a UNIX process that updates passwords around the network. After the smbpasswd was updated, the NT workstations will not authenticate at all, indicating it is not in the DOMAIN-NAME. There is an entry for the NT workstation in the smbpasswd, but it has different fields 3 and 4 from the "snapshot" version. I modified the smbpasswd file and copied in the NT workstation line from the "snapshot" version of the smbpasswd file, but that does not work either. QUESTIONS: 1. Does the NT system capture some data from the PDC when it initally authenticates and uses that information for subsequent connections? 2. Any suggestions on how to update the smbpasswd with the new user authentications without changing the NT system entries in the smbpasswd file? From kwame at epita.fr Wed Aug 18 15:21:07 1999 From: kwame at epita.fr (kwame) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Automatic Domain registration Message-ID: <37BACF63.13576AE5@epita.fr> Hello, I have a PDC on a Samba (2.0-pre-alpha), on a NetBSD UNIX, and I try to automaticly execute the domain registration on this PDC for my NT workstation. I try to use a NTRESKIT cmd (NETDOM) that allow you to perform this. But my PDC on SAMBA doesn't have any passwd so, netdom doesn't work : "bad network password !" If I perform the domain registration thru the graphic interface, there is no problem, and if I execute the cmd line for a NT PDC, it works Does anybody know how to fix it ? Kwame From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Wed Aug 18 13:37:39 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Automatic Domain registration References: <37BACF63.13576AE5@epita.fr> Message-ID: <37BAB723.513EDC5D@eng.auburn.edu> kwame wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a PDC on a Samba (2.0-pre-alpha), on a NetBSD > UNIX, and I try to automaticly execute the domain > registration on this PDC for my NT workstation. > > I try to use a NTRESKIT cmd (NETDOM) that allow you > to perform this. > > But my PDC on SAMBA doesn't have any passwd so, > netdom doesn't work : "bad network password !" If I rememeber correctly, you will need to execute net use \\sambaserv\ipc$ /user:"" "" first to initiate an anonymous connection. The execute the netdom command. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From owensc at enc.edu Wed Aug 18 13:43:59 1999 From: owensc at enc.edu (Charles Owens) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system References: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> <37B9B3AA.EEAEA558@ibm.net> Message-ID: <37BAB89F.9B98ACBB@enc.edu> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this... didn't seem to make any difference. Charles Doug VanLeuven wrote: > Charles Owens wrote: > > > * To keep things straight I've compiled -HEAD to live in > > /usr/local/samba and left 2.0.5 in the defaul /usr/local/etc > > * I've set up separate smb.conf files for each, each with > > o socket address = > > o interfaces = / > > * I start the 2.0.5 nmbd, smbd (which is also providing WINS) > > * I try to start -HEAD nmbd, and it balks... complaining about its > > failing to bind to 0.0.0.0 . > > I can't help with all your problems, but the 0.0.0.0 might be solved with > > bind interfaces only = true > > on the HEAD branch machine. > > -- Doug VanLeuven - 707-545-6933 (voice) 707-545-6945 (fax) > Chief Engineer, USMM roamdad@ibm.net > Programmer/Analyst, SCWA doug@scwa.ca.gov -- --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From appro at fy.chalmers.se Wed Aug 18 14:21:41 1999 From: appro at fy.chalmers.se (Andy Polyakov) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system References: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> <37B9B3AA.EEAEA558@ibm.net> <37BAB89F.9B98ACBB@enc.edu> Message-ID: <37BAC175.BEA8EAC9@fy.chalmers.se> > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this... didn't seem to make any > difference. post config files then. i run (slightly patched) 2.0.5a and HEAD on the same machine on different virtual interfaces. a. From owensc at enc.edu Wed Aug 18 15:28:27 1999 From: owensc at enc.edu (Charles Owens) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Help setting up Samba BDC of Samba PDC Message-ID: <37BAD11B.C89B573A@enc.edu> Matt, What's the status of the Samba BDC code? I see the smbpasswd -b and -S options... Can you provide a quick howto on setting this up? I can make some guesses, but I'd prefer to have a clue. :-) How does this work in the LDAP context? Does the BDC expect to be pointed at a different LDAP server than the PDC? If so, this seems unneccessary to me... couldn't both DC's be pointed at the same LDAP server? As long as the LDAP infrastructure is implemented with a decent degree of fault tolerence, this would seem to be preferable to having the BDC maintain its own private image of the SAM. (of course... I could be totally of my rocker... ;-) I'm assuming you're the person to ask about the BDC functionality because of a comment you made in http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-ntdom/5064.html Thanks, --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Wed Aug 18 15:35:34 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Help setting up Samba BDC of Samba PDC References: <37BAD11B.C89B573A@enc.edu> Message-ID: <37BAD2C6.872CBA1F@cse.unsw.edu.au> Charles Owens wrote: > > What's the status of the Samba BDC code? I see the smbpasswd -b and > -S options... Hmmm, sorry, not quite working yet in general... I must admit I've been off playing with other stuff. I promise to finish it soon :-) If you're using LDAP then you could try setting up two PDC's ("domain logons = yes") both pointed at the same LDAP server, and set "domain master = yes" on exactly one of them. This tends to work in a vaguely similar way to having a PDC/BDC. Cheers, Matt -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From icoupeau at unav.es Wed Aug 18 15:50:48 1999 From: icoupeau at unav.es (Ignacio Coupeau) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Help setting up Samba BDC of Samba PDC References: <37BAD11B.C89B573A@enc.edu> Message-ID: <37BAD658.C4339FA3@unav.es> Charles Owens wrote: > > Matt, > > What's the status of the Samba BDC code? I see the smbpasswd -b and > -S > options... > > Can you provide a quick howto on setting this up? I can make some > guesses, but I'd prefer to have a clue. :-) > > How does this work in the LDAP context? Does the BDC expect to be > pointed at a different LDAP server than the PDC? If so, this seems > unneccessary to me... couldn't both DC's be pointed at the same LDAP > server? As long as the LDAP infrastructure is implemented with a > decent > degree of fault tolerence, this would seem to be preferable to having > the BDC maintain its own private image of the SAM. (of course... I > could be totally of my rocker... ;-) for me, the LDAP runs with a very decent degree of fault tolerance... we have one LDAP (openldap) server with 3 PDC attached to the same database... for 50 WS runs fine; with 120 WS in a week I can tell you... with 420 WS (the final project) perhaps we need a replicated LDAP... Regards, Ignacio ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ From kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us Wed Aug 18 16:14:09 1999 From: kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us (Kevin Myer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Help setting up Samba BDC of Samba PDC In-Reply-To: <37BAD658.C4339FA3@unav.es> Message-ID: On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Ignacio Coupeau wrote: > for me, the LDAP runs with a very decent degree of fault tolerance... we > have one LDAP (openldap) server with 3 PDC attached to the same > database... for 50 WS runs fine; with 120 WS in a week I can tell you... > with 420 WS (the final project) perhaps we need a replicated LDAP... > Redundancy is achieved from the SMB side of things because you have 3 PDCs. However, regardless if you have 1, 50, 120, or 420 workstations attched and no matter how many PDCs you have, if your single LDAP server goes up the spout, you're out of luck. I'd definitely look at adding at least one slave ldap server. I hadn't thought of using a single LDAP directory with multiple PDC's to achive BDC functionality until it was suggested today :) Have to work on implimenting that now. Kevin -- ~ Kevin M. Myer . . Network/System Administrator /V\ ELANCO School District // \ /( )\ ^`~'^ From kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us Wed Aug 18 17:21:34 1999 From: kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us (Kevin Myer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: smbpasswd and connection refused errors Message-ID: Hi, I saw one other post in the past few days about an error message that keeps appearing when I attempt to use smbpasswd to add or modify anything. Setup - HEAD code from CVS, downloaded and compiled at 12:00pm EST, 8/18/99, x86 hardware with Linux. Using LDAP, PAM. Whenever I attempted to use smbpasswd to add or modify anything, I always get: error connecting to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:445 (Connection refused) >From a list of port numbers, this appears to be Microsft-DS (whatever that is -directory service? - someone enlighten me). It appears that it then falls back to netbios on port 139 and everything proceeds merrily but I would like to get rid of that message if I can. Thanks, Kevin -- ~ Kevin M. Myer . . Network/System Administrator /V\ ELANCO School District // \ /( )\ ^`~'^ From aar at cypress.com Wed Aug 18 20:54:11 1999 From: aar at cypress.com (Aaron Rainwater) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Read-only files, but why? Message-ID: <37BB1D73.436758BE@mailhost.cadc.cypress.com> Hello! I've been running Samba 2.1.0-prealpha as our PDC and fileserver. Lately, some users have been noticing problems with files being opened as "Read-only", even when the permissions for the UNIX file are global everything. Also, I checked the status of the connections under Samba and the line for the open file reads: 28341 DENY_WRITE RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH The line reads like this even during the few times that the file does NOT open as "Read Only". Here's the status for the same file, when I open it when it's already opened (which *should* create a "Read Only" opening: 28341 DENY_WRITE RDONLY NONE The problem has only occurred with powerpoint so far. It does NOT occur when the file is being opened from the local hard-drive. Oh, and Samba is set up for write access to the share in question. Any ideas out there? Is this just a problem with 2.1.0-prealpha? This issue is pretty urgent, since it could cause me to have to give up the great PDC features of 2.1.0-prealpha in exchange for the stability of 2.0.5a. Thanks... :) -- Aaron Rainwater CADC Intern From swaters at amicus.com Wed Aug 18 21:22:42 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Samba and NT PDC References: <37BA8E58.CA51C699@megabit.net> Message-ID: <37BB2422.1A663DB2@amicus.com> is your machine on the same subnet as the others? if not network neighborhood will not see it because it functions based on broadcast traffic which usually is not seen across subnets. -stephen Daniel Jung wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm just trying to implement a Samba Server (V: 2.0.3) into a Windows NT > - Domain (with NT as PDC). > I followed each installation-guide I found. > Samba is accessible, but i NOT visible in NTs network neighbourhood. > How may I solve my problem? > > Yours > Daniel From jmiles at smm.org Thu Aug 19 00:32:30 1999 From: jmiles at smm.org (Joel Miles) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: <002401bee9da$52dcd8a0$0200a8c0@miles.dyndns.org> Hi, I just signed up to the list and I am really excited about being able to emulate an NT server with Samba (since NT really, really sucks). Does anybody have any idea when we can see a stable version of Samba that supports NT Domain features for Win 95 as well as Win NT workstations? ----------------------- Joel Miles (651) 776-6870 jmiles@smm.org ----------------------- -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 19 04:12:40 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: References: <002401bee9da$52dcd8a0$0200a8c0@miles.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <37BB8438.12169D0D@eng.auburn.edu> OK. I got this one. > Joel Miles wrote: > > Does anybody have any idea when we can see a stable > version of Samba that supports NT Domain features > for Win 95 as well as Win NT workstations? I'm assuming you phrased you question in reverse as the support for Win9x domain logons has been stable for several years now. There is no estimated completion date for the NT domain support. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From SWingate at NEUUS.JNJ.com Wed Aug 18 21:43:33 1999 From: SWingate at NEUUS.JNJ.com (Wingate, Steve [IBM NON J&J]) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Read-only files, but why? Message-ID: <4327A1883D21D311AC9400508B0A1B9E7F41C3@NTGUSLAEXS1> I'm relatively new to Unix in general so perhaps I shouldn't be offering any help but here goes nothing. I see you have world perms on the files but what about the DIRECTORY itself? Just a thought. > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Rainwater [SMTP:aar@cypress.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 1:56 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Read-only files, but why? > > Hello! > > I've been running Samba 2.1.0-prealpha as our > PDC and fileserver. Lately, some users have > been noticing problems with files being opened > as "Read-only", even when the permissions for > the UNIX file are global everything. Also, I > checked the status of the connections under > Samba and the line for the open file reads: > > 28341 DENY_WRITE RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH > > The line reads like this even during the few > times that the file does NOT open as "Read Only". > > Here's the status for the same file, when I > open it when it's already opened (which *should* > create a "Read Only" opening: > > 28341 DENY_WRITE RDONLY NONE > > The problem has only occurred with powerpoint > so far. It does NOT occur when the file is > being opened from the local hard-drive. > > Oh, and Samba is set up for write access to > the share in question. > > Any ideas out there? Is this just a problem > with 2.1.0-prealpha? This issue is pretty urgent, > since it could cause me to have to give up the > great PDC features of 2.1.0-prealpha in exchange > for the stability of 2.0.5a. > > Thanks... :) > > -- > Aaron Rainwater > CADC Intern From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 19 04:40:39 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Read-only files, but why? References: <37BB1D73.436758BE@mailhost.cadc.cypress.com> Message-ID: <37BB8AC7.BACD064F@eng.auburn.edu> Aaron Rainwater wrote: > > Any ideas out there? Is this just a problem > with 2.1.0-prealpha? This issue is pretty urgent, > since it could cause me to have to give up the > great PDC features of 2.1.0-prealpha in exchange > for the stability of 2.0.5a. Aaron, I would suggest setting up two samba servers, one running the HEAD branch code and another running 2.0.5a. You get the best of both worlds. These can even run on the same box if you like. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Thu Aug 19 09:52:54 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: In-Reply-To: <37BB8438.12169D0D@eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > Gerald Carter > Sent: 19 August 1999 05:10 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: > > > Joel Miles wrote: > > Does anybody have any idea when we can see a stable > > version of Samba that supports NT Domain features > > for Win 95 as well as Win NT workstations? > > I'm assuming you phrased you question in reverse as > the support for Win9x domain logons has been stable > for several years now. There is no estimated completion > date for the NT domain support. Not entirely; user policies only work (actually they don't) whenthe win95 PC's are running in user-share mode, but the current release does not support win95 user lists (current head does) which makes sharing nigh impossible. Sam From bec_ash at bigpond.com Thu Aug 19 11:15:38 1999 From: bec_ash at bigpond.com (Ashley Cambrell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x References: Message-ID: <37BBE75A.AE7A507E@bigpond.com> Hi all, About the user lists in the head code.. I have dl'ed the CVS files and can't find any way to actually make the user lists in win9x work.. I keep getting the message that it can't find them and to try again later (have forgotten the exact wording). I understand that it is pre-alpha but would still loke to experiment.. Is there a HOWTO or something? (Have gone through ala the .txt files and can't find anything...) Thanks Everyone! Keep up the FANTASTIC work... Ashley Cambrell Samuel Liddicott wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > > Gerald Carter > > Sent: 19 August 1999 05:10 AM > > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > > Subject: Re: > > > > > Joel Miles wrote: > > > Does anybody have any idea when we can see a stable > > > version of Samba that supports NT Domain features > > > for Win 95 as well as Win NT workstations? > > > > I'm assuming you phrased you question in reverse as > > the support for Win9x domain logons has been stable > > for several years now. There is no estimated completion > > date for the NT domain support. > > Not entirely; user policies only work (actually they don't) whenthe win95 > PC's are running in user-share mode, but the current release does not > support win95 user lists (current head does) which makes sharing nigh > impossible. > > Sam From doko at cs.tu-berlin.de Thu Aug 19 12:34:04 1999 From: doko at cs.tu-berlin.de (Matthias Klose) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: time offset parameter ignored? Message-ID: <14267.63587.566761.351939@bolero> Version: samba 2.1.0alpha0.19990714 running as PDC on a Debian GNU/Linux system; the system clock is set to Greenwich time; local time on the samba server is set to MEST. On the NT4.0 host, system time is set to local time. The value of the 'time offset' parameter seems to be ignored; I always have a difference of 1 hour, even if time offset is set to 60. Does this configuration is suggested to work? From john at katy.com Thu Aug 19 12:36:27 1999 From: john at katy.com (John Schmerold) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Samba & MS Access References: <379C9C2E01B30000@smtp1.katy.com> Message-ID: <37BBFA4B.C22BFA3E@katy.com> We're replacing a Netware server with a Samba server. It's primary application is serving files for a MS Access application (that's why we're taking out the Netware server, it's choking on the Access application - probably due to way Access handles file & record locks). Any tricks I ought to be aware of? From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 19 12:46:18 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: References: Message-ID: <37BBFC9A.857D09AE@eng.auburn.edu> Samuel Liddicott wrote: > > Not entirely; user policies only work (actually they > don't) whenthe win95 PC's are running in user-share > mode, but the current release does not support win95 > user lists (current head does) which makes sharing nigh > impossible. Yes, but if you want a stable Win9x domain controller, run the 2.0.x branch. jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From Andreas.Miller at fmkdata.de Thu Aug 19 13:10:37 1999 From: Andreas.Miller at fmkdata.de (Andreas Miller) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: NT Profile preventing login? Message-ID: <000d01beea44$3ab1f750$7901a8c0@sys01.fmkdata.de> Hello, I have the following configuration: Linux SuSE 6.1, Samba 2.0.5a, Win NT 4.0 German, Win 95 German My problem is, that I can log into the domain with my Win 95 machines but not with the NT Client. The roaming profiles are working with Win 95 but not with NT. I created a local user and provided his profile as a network version of the NT profile, too. There are no ntuser.man and *.pol-Files. All the smbpasswd stuff for the COMPUTERNAME$ is done. The result is the following. 1) I log into the domain. 2) The clients hard disk is working for a short moment. 3) After this short moment I have the "Three-Finger-Salute" (CTR-ALT-DELETE) message again. 4) But ... now the ntuser.dat in the network share has a new date. So I had sucess with my login?! Attached you can find the logfile, maybe somebody can help.?! If I delete the profile data a new file tree is automatically created. So I have the correct paths and rights, too. Best regards Andreas mailto:Andreas.Miller@FMKdata.de Tel.: +49 9126 2611-50 Fax:-99 Leiter Softwareentwicklung FMKdata Software und Unternehmensberatung GmbH Ambazac-Strasse 4, D-90542 Eckental http://www.fmkdata.de, mailto:Info@FMKdata.de [1999/08/19 14:30:27, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 60 of length 366 [1999/08/19 14:30:27, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtrans (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:27, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3614) trans <\PIPE\> data=286 params=0 setup=2 [1999/08/19 14:30:27, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3471) named pipe command on <> name [1999/08/19 14:30:27, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3273) Got API command 0x26 on pipe "NETLOGON" (pnum 701e)Doing \PIPE\NETLOGON [1999/08/19 14:30:27, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1021) api_rpc_command: NET_SAMLOGON [1999/08/19 14:30:27, 3] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(673) SAM Logon (Interactive). Domain:[WORLDSITES]. User:[amiller] [1999/08/19 14:30:27, 3] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_domain_user_groups(183) domain group access 513/7 granted [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 61 of length 165 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(336) dos_ChDir to / [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(721) Domain=[WORLDSITES] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(725) sesssetupX:name=[amiller] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(196) amiller is in 1 groups: 100 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(274) uid 1040 registered to name amiller [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(276) Clearing default real name [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 62 of length 49 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBchkpth (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(336) dos_ChDir to /home/NT/Private/Profile/Win_NT [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [/amiller] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [amiller] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_chkpth(978) chkpth amiller mode=10 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 63 of length 101 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtrans2 (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2findfirst(665) call_trans2findfirst: dirtype = 22, maxentries = 3, close_after_first=1, close_if_end = 0 requires_resume_key = 1 level = 260, max_data_bytes = 352 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [/amiller/profile] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [amiller/profile] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [amiller] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/dir.c:dptr_create(474) creating new dirptr 256 for path amiller, expect_close = 1 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 64 of length 115 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [/amiller/profile/ntuser.man] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [amiller/profile/ntuser.man] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(508) Error opening file amiller/profile/ntuser.man (No such file or directory) (flags=0) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/open.c:fd_attempt_close(161) fd_attempt_close fd = -1, dev = ffffffff, inode = 4294967295, open_flags = 2, ref_count = 1. [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 837 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=2 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143) error string = No such file or directory [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 65 of length 115 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [/amiller/profile/ntuser.dat] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [amiller/profile/NTUSER.DAT] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(582) amiller opened file amiller/profile/NTUSER.DAT read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_set_share_mode(456) set_share_mode: Created share record for amiller/profile/NTUSER.DAT (dev 807 inode 446474) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_set_share_mode(495) set_share_mode: Created share entry for amiller/profile/NTUSER.DAT with mode 0x20 pid=7701 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 66 of length 46 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBclose (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_close(2736) close fd=8 fnum=4696 (numopen=1) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(355) del_share_modes Deleting share mode entry dev=807 ino=446474 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(376) del_share_modes num entries = 0, deleting share_mode dev=807 ino=446474 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/open.c:fd_attempt_close(161) fd_attempt_close fd = 8, dev = 807, inode = 446474, open_flags = 2, ref_count = 1. [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(165) amiller closed file amiller/profile/NTUSER.DAT (numopen=0) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 67 of length 115 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [/amiller/profile/ntuser.man] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [amiller/profile/ntuser.man] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(508) Error opening file amiller/profile/ntuser.man (No such file or directory) (flags=0) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/open.c:fd_attempt_close(161) fd_attempt_close fd = -1, dev = ffffffff, inode = 4294967295, open_flags = 2, ref_count = 1. [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 837 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=2 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143) error string = No such file or directory [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 68 of length 101 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(336) dos_ChDir to / [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(336) dos_ChDir to /home/NT/Netlogon [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [/ntconfig.pol] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(609) unix_clean_name [ntconfig.pol] [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(508) Error opening file ntconfig.pol (No such file or directory) (flags=0) [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/open.c:fd_attempt_close(161) fd_attempt_close fd = -1, dev = ffffffff, inode = 4294967295, open_flags = 2, ref_count = 1. [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(138) error packet at line 837 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=2 [1999/08/19 14:30:28, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143) error string = No such file or directory [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 69 of length 43 [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBulogoffX (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(336) dos_ChDir to / [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_ulogoffX(1656) ulogoffX vuid=104 [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(615) Transaction 70 of length 364 [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(448) switch message SMBtrans (pid 7701) [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(336) dos_ChDir to /tmp [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3614) trans <\PIPE\> data=284 params=0 setup=2 [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3471) named pipe command on <> name [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3273) Got API command 0x26 on pipe "NETLOGON" (pnum 701e)Doing \PIPE\NETLOGON [1999/08/19 14:30:29, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1021) api_rpc_command: NET_SAMLOGOFF From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 19 13:24:34 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: NT Profile preventing login? References: <000d01beea44$3ab1f750$7901a8c0@sys01.fmkdata.de> Message-ID: <37BC0592.BAFEBFF2@eng.auburn.edu> Andreas Miller wrote: > > The result is the following. > 1) I log into the domain. > 2) The clients hard disk is working for a short moment. > 3) After this short moment I have the "Three-Finger-Salute" > (CTR-ALT-DELETE) message again. > 4) But ... now the ntuser.dat in the network share has a new date. > So I had sucess with my login?! I seem to remember vaguely something about this being related to the NT client having problems running userinit.exe? My memory is very shady. Does this happen on all your NT clients or just specific ones? Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Thu Aug 19 13:43:46 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x In-Reply-To: <37BBE75A.AE7A507E@bigpond.com> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > Ashley Cambrell > Sent: 19 August 1999 12:14 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x > > > Hi all, > > About the user lists in the head code.. > > I have dl'ed the CVS files and can't find any way to actually > make the user > lists in win9x work.. I keep getting the message that it can't > find them and If it files once you may need to restart your win95 PC first. Also it depends strongly on your userdomainmap/usergroupman etc etc. I have: local group map = /etc/localgroup.map domain group map = /etc/domaingroup.map domain user map = /etc/domainuser.map localgroup.map wheel=BUILTIN\Administrators root="Admin Users" bin="Admin Users" daemon="Admin Users" ... news="Admin Users" uucp="Admin Users" man="Admin Users" games="Guest" gopher="Admin Users" dawn="Users" phil="Users" mark="Users" bs5750="Users" test="Users" etc domaingroup.map adm="Domain Admins" domainuser.map root=Administrator alan=alan amos=amos andrew=andrew ann=ann dave=dave david=david dawn=dawn dick=dick From aar at cypress.com Thu Aug 19 14:45:35 1999 From: aar at cypress.com (Aaron Rainwater) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Read-only files, but why? References: <37BB1D73.436758BE@mailhost.cadc.cypress.com> Message-ID: <37BC188F.3F0F432C@mailhost.cadc.cypress.com> UPDATE: Some of you suggested using 2.0.5a to serve files, while 2.1.0-prealpha does the PDC stuff. I did this, but 2.0.5a creates the same problem of locking people out of files for apparently no good reason. I've browsed the Samba logs and in the places where the file is being opened, Samba is opening it as read-only. Also, now that I reconfigured my Samba servers, the browse list in NT is not coming up. Just an empty Network Neighborhood. ACK!!! Aaron Rainwater wrote: > > Hello! > > I've been running Samba 2.1.0-prealpha as our > PDC and fileserver. Lately, some users have > been noticing problems with files being opened > as "Read-only", even when the permissions for > the UNIX file are global everything. Also, I > checked the status of the connections under > Samba and the line for the open file reads: > > 28341 DENY_WRITE RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH > > The line reads like this even during the few > times that the file does NOT open as "Read Only". > > Here's the status for the same file, when I > open it when it's already opened (which *should* > create a "Read Only" opening: > > 28341 DENY_WRITE RDONLY NONE > > The problem has only occurred with powerpoint > so far. It does NOT occur when the file is > being opened from the local hard-drive. > > Oh, and Samba is set up for write access to > the share in question. > > Any ideas out there? Is this just a problem > with 2.1.0-prealpha? This issue is pretty urgent, > since it could cause me to have to give up the > great PDC features of 2.1.0-prealpha in exchange > for the stability of 2.0.5a. > > Thanks... :) > > -- > Aaron Rainwater > CADC Intern -- Aaron Rainwater CADC Intern From swaters at amicus.com Thu Aug 19 15:24:06 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: AW: Samba and NT PDC References: <09A65DE69043D31199DF004F4E0199712AC6@ITZRMPDC> Message-ID: <37BC2196.FE5F5136@amicus.com> ya your setup looks ok. i don't know what the trouble is then. you might toy with the values in "name resolve order" in smb.conf, most specifically, you might put bcast before wins. just a thought. (quick note: you should always do "reply all" or at least manually CC to the list whenever someone writes back regarding your problem/question/comment. this is how we keep the archives useful.) sorry i can't be of more help, -stephen djung@itz.de wrote: > > Samba's IP-address is "192.168.2.99" and the other PCs are "192.168.2.100" > up to "192.168.2.253" it should be OK?! > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]Im > > Auftrag von > > Stephen Waters > > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 18. August 1999 23:28 > > An: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > > Betreff: Re: Samba and NT PDC > > > > is your machine on the same subnet as the others? if not network > > neighborhood will not see it because it functions based on broadcast > > traffic which usually is not seen across subnets. > > > > -stephen > > > > Daniel Jung wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm just trying to implement a Samba Server (V: 2.0.3) into > > a Windows NT > > > - Domain (with NT as PDC). > > > I followed each installation-guide I found. > > > Samba is accessible, but i NOT visible in NTs network neighbourhood. > > > How may I solve my problem? > > > > > > Yours > > > Daniel > > From owensc at enc.edu Thu Aug 19 15:48:53 1999 From: owensc at enc.edu (Charles Owens) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Help setting up Samba BDC of Samba PDC References: <37BAD11B.C89B573A@enc.edu> <37BAD2C6.872CBA1F@cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: <37BC2765.59976443@enc.edu> Matt Chapman wrote: > Charles Owens wrote: > > > > What's the status of the Samba BDC code? I see the smbpasswd -b and > > -S options... > > Hmmm, sorry, not quite working yet in general... I must admit I've been > off playing with other stuff. I promise to finish it soon :-) > > If you're using LDAP then you could try setting up two PDC's ("domain > logons = yes") both pointed at the same LDAP server, and set "domain > master = yes" on exactly one of them. This tends to work in a vaguely > similar way to having a PDC/BDC. Okay... so the "sorta-BDC" defaults to "domain master = auto" so it will eventually take over when the PDC goes down... I think I get it. What about the issue of differing SIDs? When setting this up, will it be sufficient to just copy the .SID file from the PDC to the BDC, or is deeper majick required? What about the file named just ".SID"? The failover time between domain master browsers isn't particularily quick, is it? I seem to remember someone mentioning the it should be less than 10 minutes or something. Is this right? Does this work any differently for a samba domain member as compared to a NT member? Does the ability to set multiple hosts in the "password server" parameter buy the samba domain member anything? Thanks for the feedback! > Cheers, > > Matt > > -- > Matthew "Austin" Chapman > SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member -- --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 19 16:15:40 1999 From: jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Samba & MS Access References: <379C9C2E01B30000@smtp1.katy.com> <37BBFA4B.C22BFA3E@katy.com> Message-ID: <37BC2DAC.A7A2673E@engr.sgi.com> John Schmerold wrote: > > We're replacing a Netware server with a Samba server. It's primary > application is serving files for a MS Access application (that's why we're > taking out the Netware server, it's choking on the Access application - > probably due to way Access handles file & record locks). > > Any tricks I ought to be aware of? More details please. Is this a Samba server running on Linux ? If so, what version of kernel and glibc (or what distribution plus patches). What does "choking" mean ? Please be more specific. Thanks, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From Daniel.Jung at megabit.net Wed Aug 18 21:14:03 1999 From: Daniel.Jung at megabit.net (Daniel Jung) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: another problem (was Samba Server in NT-Domain) Message-ID: <37BB221A.9EA2A400@megabit.net> Hi, In addition to my problem concerning the integrstion of my samba-server into a windows nt domain, there is another one: nmblookup or ping are completely unable to resolve any hostnames of the nt-domain. how can I solve this second problem? yours daniel From JasonB at Pointshare.com Thu Aug 19 18:02:23 1999 From: JasonB at Pointshare.com (Jason Brooks) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: FW: Oregon Health Net (omen) down Message-ID: Whoops, I forgot to click the little red exclamation point... > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Brooks > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 11:01 > To: Bill kelly (E-mail) > Cc: 'robertsm@ohsu.edu' > Subject: Oregon Health Net (omen) down > > Hey Bill, > > Beaverton clinic is unable to resolve the name statnet.omen.org to the ip > address 209.222.141.81. they were however able to ping that ip address. > I wonder if this is a result of redoing the name servers, but I haven't > gotten word from Mark Robertson. > > > > > > --Jason Brooks > --Pointshare Corporation > From lkcl at switchboard.net Thu Aug 19 18:17:07 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: FW: Oregon Health Net (omen) down In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jason Brooks wrote: > Whoops, I forgot to click the little red exclamation point... ok, ok, now i'm REALLY confused. the only place where the word samba is mentioned is in the subject line :) > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Brooks > > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 11:01 > > To: Bill kelly (E-mail) > > Cc: 'robertsm@ohsu.edu' > > Subject: Oregon Health Net (omen) down > > > > Hey Bill, > > > > Beaverton clinic is unable to resolve the name statnet.omen.org to the ip > > address 209.222.141.81. they were however able to ping that ip address. > > I wonder if this is a result of redoing the name servers, but I haven't > > gotten word from Mark Robertson. From kelly at ohsu.edu Thu Aug 19 18:35:16 1999 From: kelly at ohsu.edu (Bill Kelly) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: FW: Oregon Health Net (omen) down Message-ID: Jason: omen.org is not resolving via Network Solutions (Internic DNS hierarchy). As far as I know, OHSU has not implemented nor agreed to Private DNS with omen.org. Bill Kelly Information Technologies Group Oregon Health Sciences University Voice: (503)494-4604 E-Mail: kelly@ohsu.edu >>> Jason Brooks 8/19/99 11:02:23 AM >>> Whoops, I forgot to click the little red exclamation point... > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Brooks > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 11:01 > To: Bill kelly (E-mail) > Cc: 'robertsm@ohsu.edu' > Subject: Oregon Health Net (omen) down > > Hey Bill, > > Beaverton clinic is unable to resolve the name statnet.omen.org to the ip > address 209.222.141.81. they were however able to ping that ip address. > I wonder if this is a result of redoing the name servers, but I haven't > gotten word from Mark Robertson. > > > > > > --Jason Brooks > --Pointshare Corporation > From lamj at ohsu.edu Thu Aug 19 19:02:04 1999 From: lamj at ohsu.edu (Jason Lam) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: FW: Oregon Health Net (omen) down Message-ID: Hi Bill, as far as I know, our DNS server has never done any service for omen.org. -Jason >>> Bill Kelly 08/19 11:35 AM >>> Jason: omen.org is not resolving via Network Solutions (Internic DNS hierarchy). As far as I know, OHSU has not implemented nor agreed to Private DNS with omen.org. Bill Kelly Information Technologies Group Oregon Health Sciences University Voice: (503)494-4604 E-Mail: kelly@ohsu.edu >>> Jason Brooks 8/19/99 11:02:23 AM >>> Whoops, I forgot to click the little red exclamation point... > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Brooks > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 11:01 > To: Bill kelly (E-mail) > Cc: 'robertsm@ohsu.edu' > Subject: Oregon Health Net (omen) down > > Hey Bill, > > Beaverton clinic is unable to resolve the name statnet.omen.org to the ip > address 209.222.141.81. they were however able to ping that ip address. > I wonder if this is a result of redoing the name servers, but I haven't > gotten word from Mark Robertson. > > > > > > --Jason Brooks > --Pointshare Corporation > From greg at discreet.com Thu Aug 19 19:12:34 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: FW: Oregon Health Net (omen) down In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Any idea why you guys are sending mail to a completely unrelated mailing list? Greg On 19-Aug-99 Jason Lam wrote: > Hi Bill, as far as I know, our DNS server has never done any service for > omen.org. > > -Jason > >>>> Bill Kelly 08/19 11:35 AM >>> > Jason: > > omen.org is not resolving via Network Solutions (Internic DNS hierarchy). > > As far as I know, OHSU has not implemented nor agreed to Private DNS with > omen.org. > > Bill Kelly > Information Technologies Group > Oregon Health Sciences University > Voice: (503)494-4604 > E-Mail: kelly@ohsu.edu > >>>> Jason Brooks 8/19/99 11:02:23 AM >>> > Whoops, I forgot to click the little red exclamation point... > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jason Brooks >> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 11:01 >> To: Bill kelly (E-mail) >> Cc: 'robertsm@ohsu.edu' >> Subject: Oregon Health Net (omen) down >> >> Hey Bill, >> >> Beaverton clinic is unable to resolve the name statnet.omen.org to the ip >> address 209.222.141.81. they were however able to ping that ip address. >> I wonder if this is a result of redoing the name servers, but I haven't >> gotten word from Mark Robertson. >> >> >> >> >> >> --Jason Brooks >> --Pointshare Corporation >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From JasonB at Pointshare.com Thu Aug 19 19:17:57 1999 From: JasonB at Pointshare.com (Jason Brooks) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: FW: Oregon Health Net (omen) down Message-ID: Not a singular clue. somehow this list email address appeared in the cc box when I originally sent the message. I was once subscribed to this list. I think Outlook spasmed. Sorry for the trouble. --Jason Brooks -----Original Message----- From: Greg Dickie [mailto:greg@discreet.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 12:13 To: Jason Lam; kelly@ohsu.edu; JasonB@Pointshare.com Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: FW: Oregon Health Net (omen) down Any idea why you guys are sending mail to a completely unrelated mailing list? Greg On 19-Aug-99 Jason Lam wrote: > Hi Bill, as far as I know, our DNS server has never done any service for > omen.org. > > -Jason > >>>> Bill Kelly 08/19 11:35 AM >>> > Jason: > > omen.org is not resolving via Network Solutions (Internic DNS hierarchy). > > As far as I know, OHSU has not implemented nor agreed to Private DNS with > omen.org. > > Bill Kelly > Information Technologies Group > Oregon Health Sciences University > Voice: (503)494-4604 > E-Mail: kelly@ohsu.edu > >>>> Jason Brooks 8/19/99 11:02:23 AM >>> > Whoops, I forgot to click the little red exclamation point... > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jason Brooks >> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 11:01 >> To: Bill kelly (E-mail) >> Cc: 'robertsm@ohsu.edu' >> Subject: Oregon Health Net (omen) down >> >> Hey Bill, >> >> Beaverton clinic is unable to resolve the name statnet.omen.org to the ip >> address 209.222.141.81. they were however able to ping that ip address. >> I wonder if this is a result of redoing the name servers, but I haven't >> gotten word from Mark Robertson. >> >> >> >> >> >> --Jason Brooks >> --Pointshare Corporation >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From dave at techdev.buffalostate.edu Thu Aug 19 19:28:13 1999 From: dave at techdev.buffalostate.edu (dave@techdev.buffalostate.edu) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Disconnects, weird errors.. Message-ID: I'm having some serious problems. Our server (redhat 5.2) samba 2.0.5a (rpm update) started recently giving these errors, on some of our (DOS, ugghh) clients. Typically the client boots and logs onto the network and connects to a drive. This USUALLY works. A win95 install is started from the remote install point, and it makes it to the end of the detection, and than dies. The error is "cannont read from specified device", and the network drive is no longer accessable. I know its nothing wrong iwth the win95 installer as this works fine on several other types of machines. the only thing different about these "broken" clients is that they are slower (486dx-2), and all have Dec Etherworks Turbo 3's (de205) ethernet cards. the samba log is attached. Is this a network problem, NIC problem (I think it may), samba problem, or something else? [1999/08/19 15:04:06, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(521) 306_inst_01 (136.183.154.233) connect to service zak as user dave (uid=500, gi d=150) (pid 11524) [1999/08/19 15:05:37, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(507) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [1999/08/19 15:05:37, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(557) 306_inst_01 (0.0.0.0) closed connection to service zak [1999/08/19 15:19:43, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(557) 306_inst_01 (136.183.154.233) closed connection to service zak Please help! Dave J. Andruczyk Instructional Support Associate Department of Technology Buffalo State College From lkcl at switchboard.net Thu Aug 19 19:39:45 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: FW: Oregon Health Net (omen) down In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jason Brooks wrote: > I think Outlook spasmed. very cool!!!! > Sorry for the trouble. not at all. From owensc at enc.edu Thu Aug 19 20:12:23 1999 From: owensc at enc.edu (Charles Owens) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system References: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> <37B9B3AA.EEAEA558@ibm.net> <37BAB89F.9B98ACBB@enc.edu> <37BAC175.BEA8EAC9@fy.chalmers.se> Message-ID: <37BC6527.679115F8@enc.edu> Andy Polyakov wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this... didn't seem to make any > > difference. > post config files then. i run (slightly patched) 2.0.5a and HEAD on the > same machine on different virtual interfaces. a. Okay...thanks! ...below are the relevent portions of the two config files. What I have is a Ethernet NIC with address 10.100.0.12/16 and an IP alias 10.100.10.1/16. I wish to create two vitual samba hosts. 1. Name WHINNEY Role: WINS server, browse master, minor file serving Samba version: 2.0.5a 2. Name BIGFOO Role: PDC for domain ENC-DS Samba version: -HEAD I fire up #1 first... no problem (it needs to come up first so #2 can succeed in WINS registration as its coming up). I bring up #2... nmbd dies with this in the log.nmb file: 1999/08/17 08:41:06, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(663) bind failed on port 137 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use) I've tried using "bind interfaces only" but it doesn't seem to help. Here's the WHINNEY config: # Global parameters ; bind interfaces only = true socket address = 10.100.10.1 interfaces = 10.100.10.1/16 workgroup = ENC-DS netbios name = WHINNEY server string = fee fie foo fum security = USER ; security = DOMAIN ; to be switched to DOMAIN when/if vitual hosting problem is resolved encrypt passwords = Yes password server = BIGFOO unix password sync = No name resolve order = lmhosts wins host os level = 64 time server = Yes preferred master = True domain master = True wins support = Yes ... and the BIGFOO config: # Global parameters interfaces = 10.100.0.12/16 socket address = 10.100.0.12 ; bind interfaces only = yes ; Server Identity workgroup = ENC-DS netbios name = BIGFOO server string = fee fie foo fum ; Security / Passwords security = USER domain logons = Yes encrypt passwords = Yes unix password sync = No ; WINS / browsing options name resolve order = lmhosts wins host os level = 64 local master = True domain master = True wins server = 10.100.10.1 dns proxy = No --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From florian at void.s.bawue.de Thu Aug 19 20:43:22 1999 From: florian at void.s.bawue.de (Florian Laws) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: NT Profile preventing login? In-Reply-To: <37BC0592.BAFEBFF2@eng.auburn.edu>; from Gerald Carter on Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 11:24:56PM +1000 References: <000d01beea44$3ab1f750$7901a8c0@sys01.fmkdata.de> <37BC0592.BAFEBFF2@eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <19990819224322.A1333@void.s.bawue.de> On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 11:24:56PM +1000, Gerald Carter wrote: > Andreas Miller wrote: > > > > The result is the following. > > 1) I log into the domain. > > 2) The clients hard disk is working for a short moment. > > 3) After this short moment I have the "Three-Finger-Salute" > > (CTR-ALT-DELETE) message again. > > 4) But ... now the ntuser.dat in the network share has a new date. > > So I had sucess with my login?! > > I seem to remember vaguely something about this being > related to the NT client having problems running userinit.exe? > My memory is very shady. Does this happen on all your > NT clients or just specific ones? I had the same problems on one machine in our school computer pool. I had NT4SP4 on it running fine with Samba PDC until I tried to install an SCSI card for a scanner. Bue to unsuitable drivers I completely broke the machine, requiring reinstall, with I didn't do from scratch but over the old installation. Since then I had the same symptoms: I log in, the profile seems to load at least partially, the welcome-sound is played and the desktop background image is changed, and I am logged out again. Outfortunately I left school and only do remote administration anymore and it is holiday now so the others admins can't check just right now. But if you are interested and have suggestions I'll ask them to check when schhol starts again in September. Thanks, Florian From ba2k at virginia.edu Thu Aug 19 21:16:47 1999 From: ba2k at virginia.edu (Burt Avery) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: Connection Refused Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990819171647.0092fbe0@unix.mail.Virginia.edu> Greetings: I'm running version prealpha2.1.0, just downloaded and built today and seeing this message when I attempt to add my first client, ba2k, to my server named bmesamba with smbpasswd: error connecting to 192.168.4.42:445 The attempt to add an account/user subsequently fails. That account (mine) exists in the campus NIS database. 192.168 is ficticious of course, but you get the idea. What is 445? Should it be a service defined in my /etc/services file like 137, 138, 139 etc. smbclient -L bmesamba -N responds more favorably: Got positive name query response from 192.168.4.42 and I see the expected shares, server, workgroup and master browser. When I run nmblookup -S where server name is bmesamba it shows resource bytes <00>, <03>, <20> for bmesamba __mbrowser__<01>, and <00>, <1d>, <1e> for complab (my workgroup). Version 2.0.5a has been working perfectly well, in testing, as a domain for 98 clients with essentially the same smb.conf file. These parameters are in both smb.conf files: security = user, encrypt passwords, domain master = yes, domain logins = yes And, it is the only Samba server on my subnet. DO I need WINS? Since I'm new to Samba installs, I must be overlooking something very fundamental. Can someone give me a clue. Thanks, -ba- Burt Avery Computer Systems Engineer LSP Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22908 804-924-9813 From lisa at usna.navy.MIL Thu Aug 19 21:19:16 1999 From: lisa at usna.navy.MIL (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation Message-ID: <99Aug19.171921-0400edt.4995-334+20@jupiter.usna.navy.mil> Hi: I am running 2.0.5a as PDC (domain logins = yes) on both an SGI Origin 2000 and a Sun Ultra 30. When "unix passwd sync" is NOT turned on, I can successfully change my password entry in smbpasswd from the NT Workstation. I do this by logging in, pressing "ALT-CONTROL-DEL", selecting "Change Password", and entering old password/new password/confirm new password. This works very well. However, as soon as I enable "unix passwd sync", I cannot change either my smbpasswd entry or my /etc/passwd entry. I get this error message: The username or old password is incorrect. Letters in passwords must be typed using the correct case. Make sure that Caps Lock is not accidentally on. Am I incorrectly assuming that I can change both my UNIX password and my smbpasswd entries at the NT workstation level? Will "unix passwd sync" only work if I log onto the Samba server? I am trying "unix passwd sync" on the server that is the NIS master and the Samba PDC, as unix passwd changes cannot take place on an NIS slave. Here are my global settings: # Global parameters workgroup = CADIGTST server string = HERMES - Samba 2.0.5a = %v netbios name = hermes security = user encrypt passwords = Yes username level = 8 unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New password* %n\n *Re-enter new password* %n\n *NIS pass wd/attributes changed on* log level = 2 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log/%m.log max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY logon drive = H: logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = yes os level = 254 preferred master = yes local master = yes domain master = yes Thanks for any help you can offer! Lisa ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 ---------------------------------------------------------- From matthias at waechter.wol.at Thu Aug 19 22:17:54 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: another problem (was Samba Server in NT-Domain) In-Reply-To: <37BB221A.9EA2A400@megabit.net> Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Daniel Jung wrote: > Hi, > > In addition to my problem concerning the integrstion of my samba-server > into a windows nt domain, there is another one: > nmblookup or ping are completely unable to resolve any hostnames of the > nt-domain. > how can I solve this second problem? ping? If you want to be able to ping those, you have to use either DNS or /etc/hosts. Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From pafessel at netsol.com.br Thu Aug 19 22:17:29 1999 From: pafessel at netsol.com.br (Paulo Afonso Graner Fessel) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:56 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation In-Reply-To: <99Aug19.171921-0400edt.4995-334+20@jupiter.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hem... Excuse me if I'm mistaken, but if you`re using NIS shouldn't you use yppasswd instad of passwd? Just a thought, P. From lkcl at switchboard.net Thu Aug 19 22:35:02 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: Connection Refused In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990819171647.0092fbe0@unix.mail.Virginia.edu> Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Burt Avery wrote: > Greetings: > > I'm running version prealpha2.1.0, just downloaded and built today and > seeing this message when I attempt to add my first client, ba2k, to my > server named bmesamba with smbpasswd: > > error connecting to 192.168.4.42:445 > > The attempt to add an account/user subsequently fails. That account (mine) > exists in the campus NIS database. you should see this followed up with a successful attempt to connect to 192.168.4.42:139. if you do not then i have a bug to sort out. use debug log level 100. > 192.168 is ficticious of course, but you get the idea. What is 445? Should > it be a service defined in my /etc/services file like 137, 138, 139 etc. no. yes, actually, it should!!!! talk to microsoft about the name. it should be something like: smb 445/tcp smb # SMB over TCP From matthias at waechter.wol.at Thu Aug 19 22:46:48 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: Connection Refused In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > 192.168 is ficticious of course, but you get the idea. What is 445? Should > > it be a service defined in my /etc/services file like 137, 138, 139 etc. > > no. yes, actually, it should!!!! talk to microsoft about the name. it > should be something like: > > smb 445/tcp smb # SMB over TCP ?? Well, is there a place to read more about this topic? I thought, 137, 138 and 139 do all the "SMB over TCP" stuff! Thanks in advance, Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us Thu Aug 19 22:50:36 1999 From: kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us (Kevin Myer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: Connection Refused In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > no. yes, actually, it should!!!! talk to microsoft about the name. it > should be something like: > > smb 445/tcp smb # SMB over TCP > Its listed on copies of the well-known ports as: microsoft-ds 445/tcp Microsoft-DS microsoft-ds 445/udp Microsoft-DS So this refused notice is a feature, not a bug? That at least answers the question I posed yesterday (which was identical to the one you answered today for Burt;) But how do I get rid of the message? Is this in anticipation of future coding that will use port 445 instead of port 139? Or..???? Kevin -- ~ Kevin M. Myer . . Network/System Administrator /V\ ELANCO School District // \ /( )\ ^`~'^ From simonmu at optimation.co.nz Thu Aug 19 23:13:52 1999 From: simonmu at optimation.co.nz (Simon Murcott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Paulo Afonso Graner Fessel wrote: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hem... Excuse me if I'm mistaken, but if you`re using NIS shouldn't you use yppasswd instad of passwd? If you are using PAM, passwd is fine. PAM should figure it out. Regards Simon From jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 19 23:22:31 1999 From: jallison at cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation References: Message-ID: <37BC91B7.D0B104C1@engr.sgi.com> Simon Murcott wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Paulo Afonso Graner Fessel wrote: > > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Hem... Excuse me if I'm mistaken, but if you`re using NIS > shouldn't you use yppasswd instad of passwd? > > If you are using PAM, passwd is fine. PAM should figure it out. But remember, if you're using YP and changing passwords on a machien that isn't the YP master, then unix password sync isn't going to work, as the YP password change program needs the old password plaintext, which is not available for encrypted Windows password changing. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From vlendec at delphin.SerNet.DE Fri Aug 20 07:41:45 1999 From: vlendec at delphin.SerNet.DE (vlendec@delphin.SerNet.DE) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system In-Reply-To: <37BC6527.679115F8@enc.edu>; from Charles Owens on Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 06:12:34AM +1000 References: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> <37B9B3AA.EEAEA558@ibm.net> <37BAB89F.9B98ACBB@enc.edu> <37BAC175.BEA8EAC9@fy.chalmers.se> <37BC6527.679115F8@enc.edu> Message-ID: <19990820094145.B218@delphin.SerNet.DE> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 06:12:34AM +1000, Charles Owens wrote: > Okay...thanks! ...below are the relevent portions of the two config files. > What I have is a Ethernet NIC with address 10.100.0.12/16 and an IP alias > 10.100.10.1/16. I wish to create two vitual samba hosts. Probably I am completely wrong, but I once had difficulties with the /16 netmask notation. Since then I always use 255.255.0.0 and have no such problems anymore. Volker From t.maekitalo at epgmbh.de Fri Aug 20 08:03:26 1999 From: t.maekitalo at epgmbh.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Tommi_M=E4kitalo?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: process nnn no longer exists Message-ID: <004f01beeae2$7b993820$0d29a8c0@pc3.eckpart.de> Hi, we use samba 2.0.3 on SCO OpenServer 5.0.5 as NT-domainmember. After upgrading to 2.0.5a we got frequent errors when accessing files. It seems that open files get sometimes closed. Our log tells frequently: [1999/08/18 10:22:00, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(213) get_share_modes: process 9552 no longer exists After switching back to 2.0.3 the problem disappeared. Any ideas? Tommi M?kitalo Dr. Eckhardt + Partner GmbH t.maekitalo@epgmbh.de From F.vanKruijl at delftgeot.nl Fri Aug 20 12:41:16 1999 From: F.vanKruijl at delftgeot.nl (F. van Kruijl) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: Netlogon and Samba-macro's Message-ID: <37BD4CEC.2A2CE668@GeoDelft.nl> I'm looking for a possibility to pass Samba-macro's into the NETLOGON.BAT, so that I can use the macro's within the batch-file. I tried this in the smb.conf: logon script = NETLOGON.BAT %U but then the logon script didn't start at all. Is there a way to pass the macro's to the NETLOGON.BAT? Thanks, Frank van Kruijl From john.rooke at lpsystems.com Fri Aug 20 12:55:03 1999 From: john.rooke at lpsystems.com (John Rooke) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: Restoring files with smbtar Message-ID: <37BD5027.80DAED3@lpsystems.com> Hi, Can someone let me know what is the syntax for restoring files with win95 style filenames (i.e. filenames containing spaces) from a backup made with smbtar. I use the syntax as follows for normal 8.3 filenames. smbtar -r -v -s mars -x fdrive -t /dev/rStp0 -u username -p password ./wtksrv.ini I have tried enclosing the filename in quotes but this did not seem to work. Any help would be appreciated. -- John Rooke Director L&P Systems Limited john.rooke@lpsystems.com From aar at cypress.com Fri Aug 20 13:39:08 1999 From: aar at cypress.com (Aaron Rainwater) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: No browse list!!! Message-ID: <37BD5A7C.4858CD42@mailhost.cadc.cypress.com> For some reason, Samba up and decided to stop supplying a browse list to windows machines. On any windows machine we have, I can open Network Neighborhood, and there is either *no* machine listed their, or there is only that machine's name. Now, some of the machines are starting to also show the name of our NT TS server. What could cause Samba to stop displaying itself in Network Neighborhood? I can see it using smbclient, just not from any windows machine. Oh, and I am still able to access the share, I just have to do it from the dos-prompt or from RUN. Does anyone have a clue about this one? I've worn myself out on it... -- Aaron Rainwater CADC Intern From timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com Fri Aug 20 14:11:07 1999 From: timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com (Cole, Timothy D.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: No browse list!!! Message-ID: <51FBD4A8EFD9D111BA7300A0C927DADB56311C@xcgmd008.md.essd.northgrum.com> I've been seeing very odd browing behavior as well. No idea what the problem is, specifically. One thing that did seem to sort of help was to get the guest account set up properly for the "anonymous" SMB connections that are apparently made when the NT clients are browsing. > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Rainwater [SMTP:aar@cypress.com] > Sent: Friday, August 20, 1999 9:42 > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: No browse list!!! > > For some reason, Samba up and decided to > stop supplying a browse list to windows > machines. On any windows machine we have, > I can open Network Neighborhood, and there > is either *no* machine listed their, or > there is only that machine's name. Now, > some of the machines are starting to also > show the name of our NT TS server. > > What could cause Samba to stop displaying > itself in Network Neighborhood? I can see > it using smbclient, just not from any > windows machine. Oh, and I am still able > to access the share, I just have to do it > from the dos-prompt or from RUN. > > Does anyone have a clue about this one? > I've worn myself out on it... > > -- > Aaron Rainwater > CADC Intern From bec_ash at bigpond.com Fri Aug 20 15:10:24 1999 From: bec_ash at bigpond.com (Ashley Cambrell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x References: Message-ID: <37BD6FE0.C82351D8@bigpond.com> Thanks For That... Just a quick question, Any reason wheel is BULTIN\Administrators ? (something to do with the first line??) Thank You Again! Ashley Cambrell Samuel Liddicott wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > > Ashley Cambrell > > Sent: 19 August 1999 12:14 PM > > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > > Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > About the user lists in the head code.. > > > > I have dl'ed the CVS files and can't find any way to actually > > make the user > > lists in win9x work.. I keep getting the message that it can't > > find them and > > If it files once you may need to restart your win95 PC first. > Also it depends strongly on your userdomainmap/usergroupman etc etc. > I have: > local group map = /etc/localgroup.map > domain group map = /etc/domaingroup.map > domain user map = /etc/domainuser.map > > localgroup.map > wheel=BUILTIN\Administrators > root="Admin Users" > bin="Admin Users" > daemon="Admin Users" > ... > news="Admin Users" > uucp="Admin Users" > man="Admin Users" > games="Guest" > gopher="Admin Users" > dawn="Users" > phil="Users" > mark="Users" > bs5750="Users" > test="Users" > etc > > domaingroup.map > adm="Domain Admins" > > domainuser.map > root=Administrator > alan=alan > amos=amos > andrew=andrew > ann=ann > dave=dave > david=david > dawn=dawn > dick=dick From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Fri Aug 20 15:16:17 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x In-Reply-To: <37BD6FE0.C82351D8@bigpond.com> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: root@server.ash.net.au [mailto:root@server.ash.net.au]On Behalf Of > Ashley Cambrell > Sent: 20 August 1999 04:10 PM > To: Samuel Liddicott > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x > > > Thanks For That... > > Just a quick question, Any reason wheel is BULTIN\Administrators ? > (something to do with the first line??) Its all black magic, I don't understand a word of it despite heavy reading through winNT books. I look forward to the day it is documented as a: * You have this? * Setup like this howto-type-cookbook. Sam From lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil Fri Aug 20 15:19:33 1999 From: lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation Message-ID: <199908201519.LAA04967@leto15.usna.navy.mil> ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 11:17:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} Subject: Re: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation To: pafessel@netsol.com.br Cc: lisa@hermes.ewlab.usna.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-MD5: ZEd1oQpZtkXbfndUGYrvwQ== Hi, Paulo: Thanks for your e-mail. Sun seems to have combined yppasswd and passwd - perhaps they do a test on whether NIS is up and running? We use "passwd" on the NIS master to change the NIS passwd table. But it's worth a try to specify "yppasswd" - maybe there is a difference.... The listings for "passwd" and "yppasswd" looks like this: ! hermes# ls -al /bin/yppasswd -r-sr-sr-x 3 root sys 99640 Oct 6 1998 /bin/yppasswd ! hermes# ls -al /usr/bin/yppasswd -r-sr-sr-x 3 root sys 99640 Oct 6 1998 /usr/bin/yppasswd ! hermes# ls -al /bin/passwd -r-sr-sr-x 3 root sys 99640 Oct 6 1998 /bin/passwd ! hermes# ls -al /usr/bin/passwd -r-sr-sr-x 3 root sys 99640 Oct 6 1998 /usr/bin/passwd Are you using NIS and "unix passwd sync"? Could I take a look at your smb.conf globals? THANKS! Lisa > Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 19:17:29 -0300 (EST) > From: Paulo Afonso Graner Fessel > To: Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} > cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Hem... Excuse me if I'm mistaken, but if you`re using NIS > shouldn't you use yppasswd instad of passwd? > > Just a thought, > > P. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil Fri Aug 20 15:20:30 1999 From: lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation Message-ID: <199908201520.LAA04971@leto15.usna.navy.mil> ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 11:02:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} Subject: Re: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation To: jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Cc: samba_ntdom@samba.org, lisa@hermes.ewlab.usna.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-MD5: qj8XMykyA7jgx2g5UJEqdg== Hi, Jeremy: Thanks for your response. I set "unix passwd sync" on the SUN server that acts as NIS master. Server name is hermes. Hermes is also acting as the Samba PDC. On the NIS master, if I run "/usr/bin/passwd user" as root, I get these prompts: New password: Re-enter new password: NIS passwd/attributes changed on hermes I tried to reflect this dialogue in my "passwd chat" command: passwd chat = *New password* %n\n *Re-enter new password* %n\n *NIS passwd/attributes changed on* Do you see any problems with this "passwd chat" command? The NT workstation that is a member of the hermes Samba domain complains: The username or old password is incorrect. Letters in passwords must be typed using the correct case. Make sure that Caps Lock is not accidentally on. This same NT workstation has no problem changing the smbpasswd password when "unix passwd sync" is disabled. Which would be the best log to look in for debugging? I have log level set to 2. THANKS, Jeremy! Lisa > Originator: samba-ntdom@samba.org > From: Jeremy Allison > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0d -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas > X-URL: http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc > X-Comment: Discussion of NT domain controller support in Samba > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:25:00 +1000 > > Simon Murcott wrote: > > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Paulo Afonso Graner Fessel wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > > > > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > Hem... Excuse me if I'm mistaken, but if you`re using NIS > > shouldn't you use yppasswd instad of passwd? > > > > If you are using PAM, passwd is fine. PAM should figure it out. > > But remember, if you're using YP and changing passwords > on a machien that isn't the YP master, then unix password > sync isn't going to work, as the YP password change program > needs the old password plaintext, which is not available > for encrypted Windows password changing. > > Regards, > > Jeremy Allison, > Samba Team. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > Buying an operating system without source is like buying > a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. > -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From bec_ash at bigpond.com Fri Aug 20 15:38:57 1999 From: bec_ash at bigpond.com (Ashley Cambrell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x References: Message-ID: <37BD7691.2FF3E840@bigpond.com> Actually (after having tried it) it doesn't work (ver 2.1.0-prealpha) Is there a compile time switch you have to activate? in log.smb I get : [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) smbd version 2.0.5a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) Unknown parameter encountered: "local group map" [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) Ignoring unknown parameter "local group map" [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) Unknown parameter encountered: "domain group map" [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) Ignoring unknown parameter "domain group map" [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) Unknown parameter encountered: "domain user map" [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) Ignoring unknown parameter "domain user map" [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are available. smb.conf Global parameters netbios name = SERVER1 server string = Samba Server interfaces = 127.0.0.1 192.168.1.3/24 username map = /etc/smbusers name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast host socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 wins support = Yes # Domain Stuff security = domain preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes domain logons = Yes local master = Yes dns proxy = No remote browse sync = 192.168.1.255 local group map = /etc/samba/localgroup.map domain group map = /etc/samba/domaingroup.map domain user map = /etc/samba/domainusername.map os level = 300 *** domainusers.map root=root ash=Ashley bec=Rebecca *** domaingroup.map adm="Domain Admins" users="Users" *** localgroup.map wheel=BULTIN\Administrators root="Admin Users" bin="Admin Users" daemon="Admin Users" sys="Admin Users" adm="Admin Users" ... ftp="Admin Users" nobody="Users" users="Users" floppy="Admin Users" sort of correct?? Thanks All ( Thank Samuel !) Ashley Cambrell Samuel Liddicott wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: root@server.ash.net.au [mailto:root@server.ash.net.au]On Behalf Of > > Ashley Cambrell > > Sent: 20 August 1999 04:10 PM > > To: Samuel Liddicott > > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > > Subject: Re: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x > > > > > > Thanks For That... > > > > Just a quick question, Any reason wheel is BULTIN\Administrators ? > > (something to do with the first line??) > > Its all black magic, I don't understand a word of it despite heavy reading > through winNT books. > > I look forward to the day it is documented as a: > * You have this? > * Setup like this > > howto-type-cookbook. > > Sam From matthias at waechter.wol.at Fri Aug 20 15:37:52 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation In-Reply-To: <199908201520.LAA04971@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > On the NIS master, if I run "/usr/bin/passwd user" as root, I get > these prompts: > > New password: > Re-enter new password: > NIS passwd/attributes changed on hermes > > I tried to reflect this dialogue in my "passwd chat" command: > > passwd chat = *New password* %n\n *Re-enter new password* %n\n *NIS > passwd/attributes changed on* > > Do you see any problems with this "passwd chat" command? The NT workstation > that is a member of the hermes Samba domain complains: you need to use \s to reflect a space - the password chat will not recognize which part of the "passwd chat" line is output and which is input otherwise! so the line should read: passwd chat = New\spassword: %n\n \nRe-enter\snew\spassword: %n\n \nNIS\spasswd/attributes\schanged\son\shermes\n to have it more readable you can also use stars (but you know that they do more than \s and \n): passwd chat = *New*password: %n\n *Re-enter*new*password: %n\n *NIS*passwd/attributes*changed*on* Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Fri Aug 20 15:45:17 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x References: <37BD7691.2FF3E840@bigpond.com> Message-ID: <37BD780D.948D4BDA@cse.unsw.edu.au> Ashley Cambrell wrote: > > (ver 2.1.0-prealpha) ... > > in log.smb I get : > > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) > smbd version 2.0.5a started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 Ahm... :-) - matty -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From bec_ash at bigpond.com Fri Aug 20 15:58:18 1999 From: bec_ash at bigpond.com (Ashley Cambrell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x References: <37BD7691.2FF3E840@bigpond.com> <37BD780D.948D4BDA@cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: <37BD7B1A.A899CC6F@bigpond.com> Matt Chapman wrote: > Ashley Cambrell wrote: > > > > (ver 2.1.0-prealpha) > ... > > > > in log.smb I get : > > > > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) > > smbd version 2.0.5a started. > > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > > Ahm... :-) > > - matty > > -- > Matthew "Austin" Chapman > SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member woops... did I do something wrong? sorry if I did.. Ashley Cambrell From bec_ash at bigpond.com Fri Aug 20 15:59:29 1999 From: bec_ash at bigpond.com (Ashley Cambrell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x References: <37BD7691.2FF3E840@bigpond.com> <37BD780D.948D4BDA@cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: <37BD7B60.A309BE9B@bigpond.com> Matt Chapman wrote: > Ashley Cambrell wrote: > > > > (ver 2.1.0-prealpha) > ... > > > > in log.smb I get : > > > > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) > > smbd version 2.0.5a started. > > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > > Ahm... :-) > > - matty > > -- > Matthew "Austin" Chapman > SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member HAHAHAH!! Sorry... strange... just recompiled it as well.. ARGH!! (I'm usually not that stupid... ) Ashley Cambrell From swaters at amicus.com Fri Aug 20 16:08:04 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation References: <199908201520.LAA04971@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: <37BD7D64.84E3E441@amicus.com> > > But remember, if you're using YP and changing passwords > > on a machien that isn't the YP master, then unix password > > sync isn't going to work, as the YP password change program > > needs the old password plaintext, which is not available > > for encrypted Windows password changing. i think this is the most pertinent response so far. from what i can tell from reading the docs, unix passwd sync cannot work unless you have all of your workstations' registries set to pass plaintext passwds rather than encrypted ones because, as jeremy notes above, "the password plaintext... is not available for encrypted Windows password changing." then again, i could be wrong, :) -stephen From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Fri Aug 20 16:11:30 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation References: <199908201520.LAA04971@leto15.usna.navy.mil> <37BD7D64.84E3E441@amicus.com> Message-ID: <37BD7E32.B92CC5CD@cse.unsw.edu.au> Stephen Waters wrote: > > > > But remember, if you're using YP and changing passwords > > > on a machien that isn't the YP master, then unix password > > > sync isn't going to work, as the YP password change program > > > needs the old password plaintext, which is not available > > > for encrypted Windows password changing. > > i think this is the most pertinent response so far. from what i can tell > from reading the docs, unix passwd sync cannot work unless you have all > of your workstations' registries set to pass plaintext passwds rather > than encrypted ones because, as jeremy notes above, "the password > plaintext... is not available for encrypted Windows password changing." No. Jeremy says, rightly, that the "old password plaintext" is not available. The "new password plaintext" *is* available regardless of encryption. Thus the point made is that "unix passwd sync" will only work with encrypted passwords when the unix passwd program does not require the old password. This is normally the case for local password databases, but for YP this is only possible on the YP master itself. Cheers, Matt -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From swaters at amicus.com Fri Aug 20 16:49:11 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation References: <199908201520.LAA04971@leto15.usna.navy.mil> <37BD7D64.84E3E441@amicus.com> <37BD7E32.B92CC5CD@cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: <37BD8707.23CC4837@amicus.com> Matt Chapman wrote: > > Stephen Waters wrote: > > > > > > But remember, if you're using YP and changing passwords > > > > on a machien that isn't the YP master, then unix password > > > > sync isn't going to work, as the YP password change program > > > > needs the old password plaintext, which is not available > > > > for encrypted Windows password changing. > > > > i think this is the most pertinent response so far. from what i can tell > > from reading the docs, unix passwd sync cannot work unless you have all > > of your workstations' registries set to pass plaintext passwds rather > > than encrypted ones because, as jeremy notes above, "the password > > plaintext... is not available for encrypted Windows password changing." > > No. Jeremy says, rightly, that the "old password plaintext" is not > available. The "new password plaintext" *is* available regardless of > encryption. > > Thus the point made is that "unix passwd sync" will only work with > encrypted passwords when the unix passwd program does not require the > old password. This is normally the case for local password databases, > but for YP this is only possible on the YP master itself. example situation: you're on a Windows NT workstation and you change your password. does it send the changed password as plaintext over the wire the first time, and is it encrypted from then on? sorry, i'm just trying to understand how this mechanism works.. thanks, stephen From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Fri Aug 20 16:49:33 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation References: <199908201520.LAA04971@leto15.usna.navy.mil> <37BD7D64.84E3E441@amicus.com> <37BD7E32.B92CC5CD@cse.unsw.edu.au> <37BD8707.23CC4837@amicus.com> Message-ID: <37BD871D.89150CCE@cse.unsw.edu.au> Stephen Waters wrote: > > example situation: you're on a Windows NT workstation and you change > your password. does it send the changed password as plaintext over the > wire the first time, It is encrypted with the old hash, which is known. Cheers, Matt -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 20 17:09:29 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation In-Reply-To: <37BD8707.23CC4837@amicus.com> Message-ID: > example situation: you're on a Windows NT workstation and you change > your password. does it send the changed password as plaintext over the > wire the first time, and is it encrypted from then on? user must be added to domain by admin. first time, therefore, usrmgr.exe rpcclient or net.exe is used to set user's password. thereafter, user changes password from nt: plaintext unicode password is encrypted with old password hash as key. From owensc at enc.edu Fri Aug 20 17:11:13 1999 From: owensc at enc.edu (Charles Owens) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: Help setting up Samba BDC of Samba PDC Message-ID: <37BD8C31.E094EDEA@enc.edu> Ignacio Coupeau wrote: > Charles Owens wrote: >> >> Matt, >> >> What's the status of the Samba BDC code? I see the smbpasswd -b and >> -S >> options... >> >> Can you provide a quick howto on setting this up? I can make some >> guesses, but I'd prefer to have a clue. :-) >> >> How does this work in the LDAP context? Does the BDC expect to be >> pointed at a different LDAP server than the PDC? If so, this seems >> unneccessary to me... couldn't both DC's be pointed at the same LDAP >> server? As long as the LDAP infrastructure is implemented with a >> decent >> degree of fault tolerence, this would seem to be preferable to having >> the BDC maintain its own private image of the SAM. (of course... I >> could be totally of my rocker... ;-) > > for me, the LDAP runs with a very decent degree of fault tolerance... we > have one LDAP (openldap) server with 3 PDC attached to the same > database... for 50 WS runs fine; with 120 WS in a week I can tell you... > with 420 WS (the final project) perhaps we need a replicated LDAP... If I'm reading you correctly, with and LDAP based PDC we can achieve two benefits: * BDC-functionality (PDC failover) * PDC scalability via a "cluster" approach (multiple _active_ Samba-PDC nodes serving the same domain) Is this what you're saying, Ignacio, when you say you're serving 50 workstations with 3 PDCs? Is anything special required to get all three nodes to actively share the burden of workstation authentication? When a true BDC (by Microsoft's definition) is set up, there is a trust relationship between it and the PDC. In your scenerio, there are no trust relationships, right? In fact, there isn't really a single node identifiable as _the_ PDC. All 3 nodes are "collectively" the PDC. All nodes must share a common .SID file, right? The role of domain browse master (as set by the "domain master" parameter), however, can only be handled by a single node at a time, right? So, if all 3 nodes have the setting "domain master = auto" they'll settle by election which one is the domain browse master. But this is a separate isse (mostly) from whatever mechanism the PDC nodes use to advertise themselves as valid PDCs for the domain, right? What happens when more than one PDC node (in the Samba-PDC/LDAP scenerio) tries to register themselves with WINS as _the_ PDC for a domain? I'm raising a bunch of questions here... sorry... just trying to talk it out. Any comments from anyone are most appreciated! Thanks, Charles -- --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From gerard.leymarie at epita.fr Fri Aug 20 17:26:00 1999 From: gerard.leymarie at epita.fr (Gerard LEYMARIE) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: URGENT - URGENT Message-ID: <003601beeb31$1459b1e0$3d2b05a3@epita.fr> All, I've got a very big problem: all my users can't connect to domain When we enter the login/password in the right domain, i've got a message such as this : station password is not valid, contact admin I tried to remove one of them from the domain, and re-enter after, I can't, message, Check the station account in the domain I removed the station in smbpasswd file and add again with smbpasswd -a -m name -> No problems Before yesterday I had no problems, and nothing Have been changed Does any one have an idea? It's very urgent!! I use samba 2.0.5a on slackware 3.5 linux 2.0.34 25 NT4 WS +SP5 in french From lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil Fri Aug 20 17:30:28 1999 From: lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation Message-ID: <199908201730.NAA05022@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Luke: Help! Now I am really confused. Do I have to use plaintext passwords on the NT workstation in order for "unix passwd sync" to work on the Samba PDC/NIS master? An NT server will NOT authenticate an NT workstation or user unless encrypted passwords are used, right? I know that I can change my smbpasswd password from the NT workstation just fine when "unix passwd sync" is NOT set. The NT workstation's registry has been altered to send plaintext passwords - it sends the default encrypted password when I log into the Samba domain. But I can't change either my smbpasswd or /var/yp/passwd entry when I have "unix passwd sync" set on the Samba PDC/NIS master. Are you guys saying I have to use plaintext passwords on the NT workstation side in order to enable "unix password sync"? THANKS Lisa > Originator: samba-ntdom@samba.org > From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0d -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas > X-URL: http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc > X-Comment: Discussion of NT domain controller support in Samba > Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:10:30 +1000 > > > example situation: you're on a Windows NT workstation and you change > > your password. does it send the changed password as plaintext over the > > wire the first time, and is it encrypted from then on? > > user must be added to domain by admin. first time, therefore, usrmgr.exe > rpcclient or net.exe is used to set user's password. > > thereafter, user changes password from nt: plaintext unicode password is > encrypted with old password hash as key. > ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 20 17:34:36 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: URGENT - URGENT In-Reply-To: <003601beeb31$1459b1e0$3d2b05a3@epita.fr> Message-ID: standard procedure: change the name of the workstation as well as un-joining it from the domain. change the name back again when re-joining it. if you were using cvs main i would say type in admin username / password in the network control panel join-domain dialog, but you're using 2.0.5a so you can't do that. luke On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Gerard LEYMARIE wrote: > All, > > I've got a very big problem: all my users can't connect to domain > > When we enter the login/password in the right domain, i've got a message > such as this : station password is not valid, contact admin > > I tried to remove one of them from the domain, and re-enter after, > I can't, message, Check the station account in the domain > > I removed the station in smbpasswd file and add again with smbpasswd -a -m > name -> No problems > > Before yesterday I had no problems, and nothing Have been changed > Does any one have an idea? It's very urgent!! > > I use samba 2.0.5a on slackware 3.5 linux 2.0.34 > 25 NT4 WS +SP5 in french > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Samba and Network Development Samba Web site Internet Security Systems, Inc. From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Fri Aug 20 17:32:09 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation References: <199908201730.NAA05022@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: <37BD9119.A1F04530@cse.unsw.edu.au> Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > > Are you guys saying I have to use plaintext passwords on the NT > workstation side in order to enable "unix password sync"? No, you do not need to apply the plaintext password hack (providing that as you say the PDC is the NIS master). If password changing is failing then it is probably because your "passwd chat" parameter is set incorrectly. Set the "passwd chat debug" option and turn debug level up to 100 to see the chat/response buffers. Cheers, Matt -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From gerard.leymarie at epita.fr Fri Aug 20 17:56:12 1999 From: gerard.leymarie at epita.fr (Gerard LEYMARIE) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: URGENT - URGENT References: Message-ID: <004e01beeb35$4e515660$3d2b05a3@epita.fr> Luke, Why this problem appear? Are you agree with this procedure: unjoin the domain with the WS change the name of the WS reboot change back the name of the WS remove the WS from smbpasswd add it again with -a -m rejoin the domain I will have to do this for all 25 WS?? ----- Message d'origine ----- De : Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ? : Gerard LEYMARIE Cc : Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Envoy? : vendredi 20 ao?t 1999 19:34 Objet : Re: URGENT - URGENT > standard procedure: change the name of the workstation as well as > un-joining it from the domain. change the name back again when re-joining > it. > > if you were using cvs main i would say type in admin username / password > in the network control panel join-domain dialog, but you're using 2.0.5a > so you can't do that. > > luke > > > On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Gerard LEYMARIE wrote: > > > All, > > > > I've got a very big problem: all my users can't connect to domain > > > > When we enter the login/password in the right domain, i've got a message > > such as this : station password is not valid, contact admin > > > > I tried to remove one of them from the domain, and re-enter after, > > I can't, message, Check the station account in the domain > > > > I removed the station in smbpasswd file and add again with smbpasswd -a -m > > name -> No problems > > > > Before yesterday I had no problems, and nothing Have been changed > > Does any one have an idea? It's very urgent!! > > > > I use samba 2.0.5a on slackware 3.5 linux 2.0.34 > > 25 NT4 WS +SP5 in french > > > > > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > Samba and Network Development > Samba Web site > Internet Security Systems, Inc. > From lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil Fri Aug 20 17:59:52 1999 From: lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation Message-ID: <199908201759.NAA05028@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Matt: Thanks for clarification! Will "passwd chat debug" work with encrypted passwords? I thought it only worked with plaintext passwords - I might have picked this up from old documentation, though. I'm going to give it a try.... Thanks again. Lisa > Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:32:09 +1000 > From: Matt Chapman > X-Accept-Language: en > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: lisa@usna.navy.mil > CC: samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Re: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > > > > Are you guys saying I have to use plaintext passwords on the NT > > workstation side in order to enable "unix password sync"? > > No, you do not need to apply the plaintext password hack (providing that > as you say the PDC is the NIS master). > > If password changing is failing then it is probably because your "passwd > chat" parameter is set incorrectly. Set the "passwd chat debug" option > and turn debug level up to 100 to see the chat/response buffers. > > Cheers, > > Matt > > -- > Matthew "Austin" Chapman > SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member > ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 20 18:39:18 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: URGENT - URGENT In-Reply-To: <004e01beeb35$4e515660$3d2b05a3@epita.fr> Message-ID: On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Gerard LEYMARIE wrote: > Luke, > > Why this problem appear? > > Are you agree with this procedure: > > unjoin the domain with the WS > change the name of the WS > reboot > change back the name of the WS > remove the WS from smbpasswd > add it again with -a -m > rejoin the domain yep. > I will have to do this for all 25 WS?? yep. but before that you better track down the exact problem with log level 100. recompile with -DDEBUG_PASSWORD. luke From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 20 18:43:44 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation In-Reply-To: <199908201730.NAA05022@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > Luke: > > Help! Now I am really confused. > > Do I have to use plaintext passwords on the NT workstation in order > for "unix passwd sync" to work on the Samba PDC/NIS master? i don't use unix passwd sync so can't answer. i would say no. > An NT server will NOT authenticate an NT workstation or user unless > encrypted passwords are used, right? this is correct. > I know that I can change my smbpasswd password from the NT workstation > just fine when "unix passwd sync" is NOT set. The NT workstation's > registry has been altered to send plaintext passwords - it sends > the default encrypted password when I log into the Samba domain. > > But I can't change either my smbpasswd or /var/yp/passwd entry when > I have "unix passwd sync" set on the Samba PDC/NIS master. check matt's answer on this: the NIS master may need the old plain-text password in order to update the new one, and the nt workstation just ain't gonna give that out, period. From swaters at amicus.com Fri Aug 20 19:01:33 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: SWAT idea, probably offtopic References: Message-ID: <37BDA60D.9E0DBB89@amicus.com> this probably isn't the right list, but i thought i'd toss in an idea for SWAT. have 2 setup options: 1) basic- automagically configures tuning to match the corresponding Windows platform Select the SAMBA configuration that you would like: 1) Windows NT, domain member 2) Windows NT, PDC or BDC 3) Windows 95, share only after this, you are presented with just a few options to fill in like "workgroup" and really basic stuff like that that you need for each specific configuration. or maybe you'd be presented with all the options, but pre-taylored to fit the specified desired configuration except the required manual entries. 2) advanced- so you can do crazy stuff :) just a thought, -stephen From lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil Fri Aug 20 20:49:24 1999 From: lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:57 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation Message-ID: <199908202049.QAA05206@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Hi: I turned on "passwd chat debug", but I don't see much except this entry in nmb.log: [1999/08/20 15:58:21, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 131.122.84.164: code = 7 I also see lots of local/master browser contention.... O.K., now both "debug level" and "log level" are set to 100. In smb.log, I see: [1999/08/20 16:35:16, 2] smbd/reply.c:(96) netbios connect: name1=HERMES name2=PC109S05 Which seems to indicate a logon from my NT workstation, PC109S05. O.k., in my pc109s05.log, I do see some calls to lib/util.c that look like passwd stuff: [1999/08/20 16:35:08, 10] lib/util.c:(2879) [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 04 00 00 ........ .D...... [1999/08/20 16:35:08, 10] lib/util.c:(2887) [010] 00 30 16 30 16 00 00 00 00 0D 00 5C 50 49 50 45 .0.0.... ...\PIPE [1999/08/20 16:35:08, 10] lib/util.c:(2887) [020] 5C 6E 74 73 76 63 73 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \ntsvcs. ........ [1999/08/20 16:35:08, 10] lib/util.c:(2887) [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H Then again, maybe not....Looks like it's processing some start-up text. Problem is, I don't know what I'm looking for. Which log should I check? I have nmb.log, smb.log, and pc105s05.log. I don't see anything especially pertinent appear in these logs when I login from NT workstation. Lisa > Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:56:50 +1000 > From: Matt Chapman > X-Accept-Language: en > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} > Subject: Re: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > > > > Will "passwd chat debug" work with encrypted passwords? > > Yes. > > > -- > Matthew "Austin" Chapman > SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From ari at snafu.de Fri Aug 20 20:42:03 1999 From: ari at snafu.de (Ari) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation Message-ID: <01BEEB5D.39F9A320@ari@snafu.de> Lisa Becktold wrote: > I am trying "unix passwd sync" on the server that is the NIS master and > the Samba PDC, as unix passwd changes cannot take place on an NIS slave. > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *New password* %n\n *Re-enter new password* %n\n *NIS > passwd/attributes changed on* I've a similar setup here, samba pdc and nis master on the same machine with "unix password sync = yes". The settings that work for me are passwd program = /usr/sbin/passwd %u ; true passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *passw*d*d*on* The unusual passwd program line is to mask the exit status from passwd, bacause it returns 1 on successfully updating a nis password. All error detecting is done by the chat. I don't know if this is the same on other systems. The machine here runs on FreeBSD. HTH Ari From simonmu at optimation.co.nz Sun Aug 22 20:25:16 1999 From: simonmu at optimation.co.nz (Simon Murcott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation In-Reply-To: <199908201519.LAA04967@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: The listings for "passwd" and "yppasswd" looks like this: ! hermes# ls -al /bin/yppasswd -r-sr-sr-x 3 root sys 99640 Oct 6 1998 /bin/yppasswd ! hermes# ls -al /usr/bin/yppasswd -r-sr-sr-x 3 root sys 99640 Oct 6 1998 /usr/bin/yppasswd ! hermes# ls -al /bin/passwd -r-sr-sr-x 3 root sys 99640 Oct 6 1998 /bin/passwd ! hermes# ls -al /usr/bin/passwd -r-sr-sr-x 3 root sys 99640 Oct 6 1998 /usr/bin/passwd /bin is a symbolic link to /usr/bin and yppasswd is a hard link to passwd. Regards Simon Murcott -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Optimation New Zealand Limited Exchange Place, Willeston Street, Wellington, New Zealand Phone +64 4 4727218, Fax +64 4 4727219, Mobile 025 405821 S.Murcott@optimation.co.nz -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- A closed mouth gathers no foot. From JFBOUCHE at EURIWARE.FR Mon Aug 23 08:07:58 1999 From: JFBOUCHE at EURIWARE.FR (BOUCHET Jean-Francois) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Samba NT Domain Controller code Message-ID: <199908230745.JAA16913@mail.euriware.fr> Hello, Sorry for the stupid question and for my poor English. I want to download the latest Samba code but it seems that I can't use cvs (because of the firewall we have here ?). I have the message : " cvs [login aborted] : connect to cvs.samba.org : 2401 failed : connection refused " How can I obtain this code via ftp for example ? Thanks! Jeff From lobo at geolog.geol.agh.edu.pl Mon Aug 23 08:38:46 1999 From: lobo at geolog.geol.agh.edu.pl (Lukasz Sznajder) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Strange error 1208 Message-ID: Hello, I'm using Samba prealpha, i get sources 3 days ago. It is really good soft, no problems in instalation and configuration ( i read FAQ before) but... If i trying using computer browser in NT client (NT4 sp5 polish version) i got strange error 1208 (system cannot find description of this error) if i trying to make "net view \\samba-system" i got error 59551 and 0xe89f, but if i trying to make "net view \\nt-wosrkstation" everything is OK... It is strange. Anybody have got experience in this subject?? (I know my english is not very good :>) Lukasz Sznajder GGiOS AGH Krakow From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Mon Aug 23 08:46:36 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x In-Reply-To: <37BD7691.2FF3E840@bigpond.com> Message-ID: All I know is that is magic. I not your map files aren't the same as mine - you have wheel mentioned - I do not. This means you might need to mention wheel in other places where I mention root. As I say, it is magic, copy me exactly, (apart from real user names) and see if that works (you may need to restart the win95 PC AND samba before you know if it works) Sam > -----Original Message----- > From: root@server.ash.net.au [mailto:root@server.ash.net.au]On Behalf Of > Ashley Cambrell > Sent: 20 August 1999 04:39 PM > To: Samuel Liddicott > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x > > > Actually (after having tried it) it doesn't work > > (ver 2.1.0-prealpha) > > Is there a compile time switch you have to activate? > > > > in log.smb I get : > > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) > smbd version 2.0.5a started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) > Unknown parameter encountered: "local group map" > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) > Ignoring unknown parameter "local group map" > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) > Unknown parameter encountered: "domain group map" > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) > Ignoring unknown parameter "domain group map" > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1624) > Unknown parameter encountered: "domain user map" > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(1996) > Ignoring unknown parameter "domain user map" > [1999/08/21 01:31:43, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) > > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are > available. > > smb.conf > > Global parameters > netbios name = SERVER1 > server string = Samba Server > interfaces = 127.0.0.1 192.168.1.3/24 > > username map = /etc/smbusers > name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast host > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 > > wins support = Yes > > # Domain Stuff > > security = domain > preferred master = Yes > > domain master = Yes > domain logons = Yes > local master = Yes > dns proxy = No > remote browse sync = 192.168.1.255 > local group map = /etc/samba/localgroup.map > domain group map = /etc/samba/domaingroup.map > domain user map = /etc/samba/domainusername.map > os level = 300 > > > *** domainusers.map > > root=root > ash=Ashley > bec=Rebecca > > *** domaingroup.map > > adm="Domain Admins" > users="Users" > > *** localgroup.map > > wheel=BULTIN\Administrators > root="Admin Users" > bin="Admin Users" > daemon="Admin Users" > sys="Admin Users" > adm="Admin Users" > ... > ftp="Admin Users" > nobody="Users" > users="Users" > floppy="Admin Users" > > > > sort of correct?? > > Thanks All ( Thank Samuel !) > > > Ashley Cambrell > > > Samuel Liddicott wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: root@server.ash.net.au [mailto:root@server.ash.net.au]On Behalf Of > > Ashley Cambrell > > Sent: 20 August 1999 04:10 PM > > To: Samuel Liddicott > > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > > Subject: Re: (WAS Re: ) User Lists in Win9x > > > > > > Thanks For That... > > > > Just a quick question, Any reason wheel is BULTIN\Administrators ? > > (something to do with the first line??) > > Its all black magic, I don't understand a word of it despite heavy reading > through winNT books. > > I look forward to the day it is documented as a: > * You have this? > * Setup like this > > howto-type-cookbook. > > Sam From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Mon Aug 23 08:51:03 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Strange error 1208 References: Message-ID: <37C10B77.E4D60BE1@cse.unsw.edu.au> Lukasz Sznajder wrote: > > I'm using Samba prealpha, i get sources 3 days ago. It is really > good soft, no problems in instalation and configuration ( i read FAQ > before) but... If i trying using computer browser in NT client (NT4 sp5 > polish version) i got strange error 1208 (system cannot find description > of this error) if i trying to make "net view \\samba-system" i got error > 59551 and 0xe89f, but if i trying to make "net view \\nt-wosrkstation" > everything is OK... It is strange. Anybody have got experience in this > subject?? (I know my english is not very good :>) Sorry, HEAD (2.1-prealpha) is a little broken currently... I've just fixed your particular problem; you will need to CVS update and try again. Matt -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From jens.skripczynski at igd.fhg.de Mon Aug 23 09:53:05 1999 From: jens.skripczynski at igd.fhg.de (Jens Skripczynski) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: smbmount broken under 2.1.0pre too ? Message-ID: <19990823115304.A2469@igd.fhg.de> From: Jens Skripczynski To: Samba NT Cc: Bcc: Subject: smbmount broken under 2.1.0pre too ? Message-ID: <19990823115124.A22722@igd.fhg.de> Reply-To: Jens Skripczynski From: Jens Skripczynski To: Samba NT Cc: Bcc: Subject: brocken too ? smbmount Message-ID: <19990823114939.A22698@igd.fhg.de> Reply-To: Jens Skripczynski Hi, For some month"s I cannot get the smbmount util in the samba-2.1.0pre compiled. (I am using Redhat 6.0). Does anyone have a fix for that ? (Can I use the smbmount from 2.0.5a or can someone (if i can) check the changes into the 2.1.0 ?). Ciao Jens Skripczynski -- E-Mail: skripi@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. From pilsl at goldfisch.atat.at Mon Aug 23 11:02:09 1999 From: pilsl at goldfisch.atat.at (peter pilsl) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: add reg-entries to policy ? Message-ID: <19990823130209.B7466@goldfisch.atat.at> we decided to change some common settings in our network (mainly for these office2000-things) and so we have to change settings in each users registry (HKCU). Is there a way to add this changes to the NTconfig.pol in the servers netlogon-share, so the changes are done automatically when the user logs on ? example: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Common\General\UserTemplates need to be changed for each user. thanks, peter ------------------------------------------- mag. peter pilsl phone: +43/(0)/6763574035 fax : +43/(0)/6763546512 email: pilsl@goldfisch.atat.at sms: pilsl_mobil@goldfisch.atat.at pgp-key available ------------------------------------------- From shonn at midrex.com Mon Aug 23 12:31:48 1999 From: shonn at midrex.com (Nixon, Shon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Samba 2.0.5a RPM Message-ID: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB92245C@comm.midrex.com> Does anyone know whether or not the RPMs available from RedHat for 6.0 were compiled with LDAP support? -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From glauche at plum.de Mon Aug 23 12:36:37 1999 From: glauche at plum.de (Michael Glauche) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Samba 2.0.5a RPM References: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB92245C@comm.midrex.com> Message-ID: <37C14055.DA76C65E@plum.de> > "Nixon, Shon" wrote: > > Does anyone know whether or not the RPMs available from RedHat for 6.0 > were compiled with LDAP support? IIRC there are no rpms of the HEAD tree aviable, only as cvs source. And if I followed the discussion about LDAP correctly the HEAD tree works best with LDAP. regards, Michael From glauche at plum.de Mon Aug 23 12:38:58 1999 From: glauche at plum.de (Michael Glauche) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: HEAD-Snapshots ? Message-ID: <37C140E2.6974AC58@plum.de> Hi, how about making regulary snapshots of the HEAD branch ? It could save the cvs server a bit load, and some people (with firewall or so) quite some hassle. I think some cvs update / tar / rsync script should not be that hard ... :) (i.e. I would even write it :P) regards, Michael From Dominik-Fritz at gmx.de Mon Aug 23 12:48:40 1999 From: Dominik-Fritz at gmx.de (Dominik Fritz) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: add reg-entries to policy ? Message-ID: <15745.935412520@www7.gmx.net> hi One possibility is to use on of the policy templates from the ZAK (Zero Administraon Kit). With Office97 this works fine. But I don't not if it works with office 2000 or if there are newer templates for Office 2000 An other possibility is to write your own template with all the Reg keys in it, which you use. Or you can make a .reg File an path it in the Regestry at Logon. Dominik -- Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net From ccunning at math.ohio-state.edu Mon Aug 23 13:24:51 1999 From: ccunning at math.ohio-state.edu (Chad) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: 2.0.5a problems Message-ID: <37C14BA2.B3FF5739@math.ohio-state.edu> I didn't see any mention of this in a search of the archives. I have two major problems after upgrading to 2.0.5a for domain controller duty. First, whenever you try to start Find, explorer crashes. Second, the Print menu option is not enabled on any of the applications on clients. The printer is properly configured, and will print a test page. Both of these things work fine as a local user, but not a domain user. Failing any way to fix that, where can I get a copy of 2.0.3? The FTP sites don't have it, and if I can fix the above problems, I need to revert. I screwed up my installation the first time, so doing a make revert goes back to my screwed up installation rather than the proper 2.0.3 installation... -- Chad Cunningham ccunning@math.ohio-state.edu From icoupeau at unav.es Mon Aug 23 15:00:49 1999 From: icoupeau at unav.es (Ignacio Coupeau) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Help setting up Samba BDC of Samba PDC References: <37BD8C31.E094EDEA@enc.edu> Message-ID: <37C16221.BE797B5C@unav.es> Charles Owens wrote: > > Ignacio Coupeau wrote: > > > Charles Owens wrote: > >> ... > > for me, the LDAP runs with a very decent degree of fault tolerance... ... > If I'm reading you correctly, with and LDAP based PDC we can achieve two > benefits: > > * BDC-functionality (PDC failover) > * PDC scalability via a "cluster" approach (multiple _active_ > Samba-PDC nodes serving the same domain) > > Is this what you're saying, Ignacio, when you say you're serving 50 > workstations with 3 PDCs? Is anything special required to get all three > nodes to actively share the burden of workstation authentication? ...is quite different to a BDC. Now we share the "smbpasswd" between all the domains: the LDAP is a "common and centric smbpasswd database" for all the domains. "All the domains" means all the NT-WS and "all the users". So, in each PDC we have a list of the WS in the /etc/passwd, and with the bin/smbpasswd (with ldap) from a PDC we can add a NT-WS to a domain: only the ldap database keeps the WS record: ... lmpassword: CAEF8D32BEC47FDE41FE21646AC40B0C ntpassword: CAEF8D32BEC47FDE41FE21646AC40B0C pwdlastset: 37C13C3E ... We maintains only the WS in each /etc/passwd's PDC because with the LDAP I can manage a WS account with bin/smbpasswd from any PDC: this is practical but also may be a disaster... If a LDAP server is down, we need a Backup (for example, upgraded via slurpd) and the PDC find the new ldap via DNS record. I don't tested if "ldap server" can allow several ldap servers, but may be very useful.. If a PDC is down, perhaps -with a the secondary WINS server- the NT can find another PDC, but you need a tuning of the "preferred master = yes" and "os level = " parameters. If you remember, the NT allows a second wins server: I hope this'll be a way. I think that an advantage of the ldap is the common database, because any Samba server with the appropriate smb.conf/SID can act as PDC. But this is my opinion: at this time, I no tested the competition between two PDC with different "os level" for the same domain with LDAP. In few days I can write something. > > When a true BDC (by Microsoft's definition) is set up, there is a trust > relationship between it and the PDC. In your scenerio, there are no > trust relationships, right? In fact, there isn't really a single node > identifiable as _the_ PDC. All 3 nodes are "collectively" the PDC. All > nodes must share a common .SID file, right? No are "collectively PDC": we have several domains (PDCs). Our plan is that the pseudo-BDC will be pointed via WINS... > > The role of domain browse master (as set by the "domain master" > parameter), however, can only be handled by a single node at a time, > right? So, if all 3 nodes have the setting "domain master = auto" > they'll settle by election which one is the domain browse master. ... that is my plan more or less but playing with "os level", "domain master = yes", and so. Regards, Ignacio ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ From oh at geology.ohio-state.edu Mon Aug 23 15:24:26 1999 From: oh at geology.ohio-state.edu (Frank Oh) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: WinNT login problems Message-ID: <4.0.1.19990822171809.00e4bba0@pop.service.ohio-state.edu> Hello, I'm running a samba server [2.0.5a] as a PDC for Win98 clients and it seems there aren't any problems authenticating against samba server, but somehow NT4.0 machines can't authenticate against samba. I already set enabled password encryption. I can only login to the NT4.0 machine with the local user name and password and I don't have problem with access my shares. Am I missing anything? -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Frank Oh oh@geology.ohio-state.edu Lab Manager 292.7552 Geo. Department The Ohio State University -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- From timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com Mon Aug 23 15:48:23 1999 From: timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com (Cole, Timothy D.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: HEAD-Snapshots ? Message-ID: <51FBD4A8EFD9D111BA7300A0C927DADB563122@xcgmd008.md.essd.northgrum.com> A friend of mine wrote a shell script to do just this for zeux.org (modulo the rsync)... I'll see if I can get a copy; it was quite nice. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Glauche [SMTP:glauche@plum.de] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 8:45 > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: HEAD-Snapshots ? > > Hi, > how about making regulary snapshots of the HEAD branch ? It could save > the cvs server a bit load, and some people (with firewall or so) quite > some hassle. I think some cvs update / tar / rsync script should not be > that hard ... :) (i.e. I would even write it :P) > > regards, > Michael From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Mon Aug 23 16:03:21 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Samba 2.0.5a RPM In-Reply-To: <37C14055.DA76C65E@plum.de> Message-ID: But look in packages/bin and packages/RedHat and see how to roll your own instant RPM. Sam > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > Michael Glauche > Sent: 23 August 1999 01:38 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.5a RPM > > > > "Nixon, Shon" wrote: > > > > Does anyone know whether or not the RPMs available from RedHat for 6.0 > > were compiled with LDAP support? > > IIRC there are no rpms of the HEAD tree aviable, only as cvs source. And > if I followed the discussion about LDAP correctly the HEAD tree works > best with LDAP. > > regards, > Michael From lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil Mon Aug 23 17:19:54 1999 From: lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: SOLUTION - UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation Message-ID: <199908231719.NAA08253@leto15.usna.navy.mil> MUCH thanks to the following people, who responded to my questions regarding "UNIX PASSWD SYNC/changing password on NT workstation". Jeremy Allison Paul Afonso Graner Fessel mmt4q Matthias Wachter Stephen Waters Matt Chapman Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Ari Simon Murcott Every answer I got helped to clarify the password-changing process, or offered a suggestion which I implemented. Ari's "password chat" worked on my system. passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *passw*d*d*on* THANKS AGAIN TO A GREAT BUNCH OF TECHNICIANS! I really appreciate the time you took to help me. Lisa ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From shonn at midrex.com Mon Aug 23 17:43:00 1999 From: shonn at midrex.com (Nixon, Shon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Compiling Samba Message-ID: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB92245E@comm.midrex.com> I have downloaded the source code from cvs.samba.org/pub/unpacked/samba. While trying to compile with ldap support, I get the following error (I do have the OpenLDAP 1.2.3 installed BTW): checking configure summary configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config I am using a dual PP-200 with RedHat 6.0 intel as the OS. Any suggestions? Shon -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From lkcl at switchboard.net Mon Aug 23 17:42:24 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Strange error 1208 In-Reply-To: <37C10B77.E4D60BE1@cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Matt Chapman wrote: > Lukasz Sznajder wrote: > > > > polish version) i got strange error 1208 (system cannot find description > > of this error) if i trying to make "net view \\samba-system" i got error > > 59551 and 0xe89f, but if i trying to make "net view \\nt-wosrkstation" > I've just fixed your particular problem; you will need to CVS update and > try again. i'm using samba source for vulnerability testing, i accidentally committed something i shouldn't have. sorry! From lkcl at switchboard.net Mon Aug 23 18:12:56 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: HEAD-Snapshots ? In-Reply-To: <37C140E2.6974AC58@plum.de> Message-ID: this was done for a while when 2.0 was in alpha, and disabled when 2.0 went to major release. so the scripts exist, they just need to be enabled. luke On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Michael Glauche wrote: > Hi, > how about making regulary snapshots of the HEAD branch ? It could save > the cvs server a bit load, and some people (with firewall or so) quite > some hassle. I think some cvs update / tar / rsync script should not be > that hard ... :) (i.e. I would even write it :P) > > regards, > Michael > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Samba and Network Development Samba Web site Internet Security Systems, Inc. From kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us Mon Aug 23 18:45:21 1999 From: kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us (Kevin Myer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server Message-ID: Hello, Sorry for the slightly off topic post but I'm in the last debugging leg of my NT to Linux/Samba/LDAP conversion process. I need to extract the SIDs and RIDs from my NT server because somewhere, in one of my LDAP entries, I'm missing an rid. Microsoft describes a mechanism for listing the entries at However, I do not have the NT 4 Resource Kit and I'm a bit miffed that I have to shell out close to a hundred dollars to get the added functionality in an OS that should already be there. Its my assumption that GETSID.EXE and GLOBAL.EXE are value-added Microsoft products and not some third party tool that they've included. So barring buying the resource kit, does anyone know of a tool that will list the RIDs and SIDs on an NT server and output to a text file? Can this be done with rpcclient or is there a third party NT utility for this function? Thanks, Kevin -- ~ Kevin M. Myer . . Network/System Administrator /V\ ELANCO School District // \ /( )\ ^`~'^ From GLeblanc at cu-portland.edu Mon Aug 23 18:53:47 1999 From: GLeblanc at cu-portland.edu (Gregory Leblanc) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server Message-ID: I believe that you can download these tools from Technet Online. Check out http://technet.microsoft.com Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Myer [mailto:kevin_myer@elanco.k12.pa.us] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 11:47 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server > > > Hello, > > Sorry for the slightly off topic post but I'm in the last > debugging leg of > my NT to Linux/Samba/LDAP conversion process. I need to > extract the SIDs > and RIDs from my NT server because somewhere, in one of my > LDAP entries, > I'm missing an rid. Microsoft describes a mechanism for listing the > entries at > > > However, I do not have the NT 4 Resource Kit and I'm a bit > miffed that I > have to shell out close to a hundred dollars to get the added > functionality in an OS that should already be there. Its my > assumption > that GETSID.EXE and GLOBAL.EXE are value-added Microsoft > products and not > some third party tool that they've included. So barring buying the > resource kit, does anyone know of a tool that will list the > RIDs and SIDs > on an NT server and output to a text file? Can this be done with > rpcclient or is there a third party NT utility for this function? > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > > -- > ~ Kevin M. Myer > . . Network/System Administrator > /V\ ELANCO School District > // \ > /( )\ > ^`~'^ > From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Mon Aug 23 18:59:23 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server References: Message-ID: <37C19A0B.8ED9796C@eng.auburn.edu> Kevin Myer wrote: > > that GETSID.EXE and GLOBAL.EXE are value-added ^^^^^^ There's aversion of this on the NTBUGTRAQ site i think. > So barring buying the resource kit, does anyone know of > a tool that will list the RIDs and SIDs on an NT server > and output to a text file? Actually, i think I remmeber a download site for the Resource Kit tools from MS. let me check. jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From lkcl at switchboard.net Mon Aug 23 19:00:51 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: rpcclient -S samba -U administrator -W domain -l log Password: xxxx smb: /> enumusers -g -u -a gives you everything except the user passwords. otherwise, work out how to set samba up as a BDC and then issue an rpcclient "samsync" command, it will again list everything, including the user passwords. luke On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Kevin Myer wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for the slightly off topic post but I'm in the last debugging leg of > my NT to Linux/Samba/LDAP conversion process. I need to extract the SIDs > and RIDs from my NT server because somewhere, in one of my LDAP entries, > I'm missing an rid. Microsoft describes a mechanism for listing the > entries at > > > However, I do not have the NT 4 Resource Kit and I'm a bit miffed that I > have to shell out close to a hundred dollars to get the added > functionality in an OS that should already be there. Its my assumption > that GETSID.EXE and GLOBAL.EXE are value-added Microsoft products and not > some third party tool that they've included. So barring buying the > resource kit, does anyone know of a tool that will list the RIDs and SIDs > on an NT server and output to a text file? Can this be done with > rpcclient or is there a third party NT utility for this function? > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > > -- > ~ Kevin M. Myer > . . Network/System Administrator > /V\ ELANCO School District > // \ > /( )\ > ^`~'^ > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Samba and Network Development Samba Web site Internet Security Systems, Inc. From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Mon Aug 23 19:18:38 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server References: Message-ID: <37C19E8E.8118BCD1@eng.auburn.edu> Found it... ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/winnt-public/reskit/nt40/i386/ jerry From owensc at enc.edu Mon Aug 23 19:22:49 1999 From: owensc at enc.edu (Charles Owens) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system References: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> <37B9B3AA.EEAEA558@ibm.net> <37BAB89F.9B98ACBB@enc.edu> <37BAC175.BEA8EAC9@fy.chalmers.se> <37BC6527.679115F8@enc.edu> <19990820094145.B218@delphin.SerNet.DE> Message-ID: <37C19F89.D89BEDDA@enc.edu> vlendec@delphin.SerNet.DE wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 06:12:34AM +1000, Charles Owens wrote: > > Okay...thanks! ...below are the relevent portions of the two config files. > > What I have is a Ethernet NIC with address 10.100.0.12/16 and an IP alias > > 10.100.10.1/16. I wish to create two vitual samba hosts. > > Probably I am completely wrong, but I once had difficulties with the > /16 netmask notation. Since then I always use 255.255.0.0 and have no > such problems anymore. Thanks for the suggestion... I tried this... no luck. Nmbd for the second virtual host still dies complaing about being unable to bind to port 137 on 0.0.0.0 . Is there any problem with the "interfaces" line for both virtual hosts Enough people have talked about doing exactly what I'm trying that either: * I'm missing something (or there's more to it than just setting 'interfaces' and 'socket address') * or perhaps there's something different about FreeBSD's IP alias feature that's getting in the way. I'd really like to get this working, but I think I've played enough. Unless someone else has any ideas I guess I'll just live without virtual hosting for now. Thanks, --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us Mon Aug 23 19:25:35 1999 From: kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us (Kevin Myer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Gregory Leblanc wrote: > I believe that you can download these tools from Technet Online. Check out > http://technet.microsoft.com > Greg I had hoped that was the case but it doesn't appear to (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong and if someone found a link that works - Microsoft's web site is full of outdated links - maybe they have one to the Resource Kit). What I did find was a link to a resource kit, service pak 4 update, which I can download and install but which only contains the updated versions of any utilities since the first release. Neither of the utilities I wish to use have been updated. Microsoft so kindly offers a 15 day free trial to their Resource Network, with the caveat that you can't download the resource kits, just browse and read the documentation :( I'm going to kick myself if there is a link to the full resource kit freely available - I did just manage to find GetSID_x86.exe in ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/winnt-public/reskit/nt40/i386/ but that appears to be only updated files. And I just saw Jerry Carter's reply to the same effect (GLOBAL.EXE isn't there though..) :) I just had a thought - maybe if I download the Resource Kits service pack 1, 2, 3, 4 and apply them all, I'll end up with all the utilities the full version has..... If I find anything, I'll post - thanks for the suggestions. I'll give the rpcclient command a try too. Kevin -- ~ Kevin M. Myer . . Network/System Administrator /V\ ELANCO School District // \ /( )\ ^`~'^ From shonn at midrex.com Mon Aug 23 19:34:52 1999 From: shonn at midrex.com (Nixon, Shon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source Message-ID: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB922460@comm.midrex.com> I have downloaded the source code from cvs.samba.org/pub/unpacked/samba. While trying to compile with ldap support, I get the following error (I do have the OpenLDAP 1.2.3 installed BTW): checking configure summary configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config I am using a dual PP-200 with RedHat 6.0 intel as the OS. Any suggestions? Shon -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us Mon Aug 23 19:41:47 1999 From: kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us (Kevin Myer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Duh - not a good day for me. This cold is really affecting my thinking. Both global.exe and getsid_x86.exe are in that directory Jerry and I even looked at that directory and saw getsid_x86.exe but totally missed global.exe when you emailed me. Sorry for cluttering the list folks. I should have searched a bit harder. Kevin -- ~ Kevin M. Myer . . Network/System Administrator /V\ ELANCO School District // \ /( )\ ^`~'^ From shonn at midrex.com Mon Aug 23 19:49:25 1999 From: shonn at midrex.com (Nixon, Shon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source Message-ID: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB922461@comm.midrex.com> Correction, this is while running the configure script...sorry -----Original Message----- From: Nixon, Shon [mailto:shonn@midrex.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 3:40 PM To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source I have downloaded the source code from cvs.samba.org/pub/unpacked/samba. While trying to compile with ldap support, I get the following error (I do have the OpenLDAP 1.2.3 installed BTW): checking configure summary configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config I am using a dual PP-200 with RedHat 6.0 intel as the OS. Any suggestions? Shon -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From jfilling at es.com Mon Aug 23 19:57:31 1999 From: jfilling at es.com (Jeremy D. Fillingim) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Trouble joining NT domain Message-ID: <37C1A7AB.744132C8@es.com> I am running samba 2.0.5a-1. I am unable to join an NT domain. I have created a new machine account in the domain and the command I am using is smbpasswd -j DOM -r DOMPDC The message that shows up is cli_net_req_chal: Error NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED cli_nt_setup_creds: request challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine DOMPDC. Error was : NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED. 1999/08/23 13:56:08 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain DOM. Unable to join domain DOM. The NT domain PDC is NT Server SP5. Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- Jeremy D. Fillingim Hardware Engineer Evans & Sutherland (801) 588-7674 From shonn at midrex.com Mon Aug 23 19:59:38 1999 From: shonn at midrex.com (Nixon, Shon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source Message-ID: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB922462@comm.midrex.com> Correction, this is while running the configure script...sorry Shon -----Original Message----- From: Nixon, Shon [mailto:shonn@midrex.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 3:40 PM To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source I have downloaded the source code from cvs.samba.org/pub/unpacked/samba. While trying to compile with ldap support, I get the following error (I do have the OpenLDAP 1.2.3 installed BTW): checking configure summary configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config I am using a dual PP-200 with RedHat 6.0 intel as the OS. Any suggestions? Shon -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From SWingate at NEUUS.JNJ.com Mon Aug 23 20:41:40 1999 From: SWingate at NEUUS.JNJ.com (Wingate, Steve [IBM NON J&J]) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server Message-ID: <4327A1883D21D311AC9400508B0A1B9E7F41D3@NTGUSLAEXS1> IMHO, sites employing NT in a meaningful way should subscribe to Technet, which would provide you with reskit supplement 3. MCSE's get a free subscription of course. Just my 2 cents before inflation. If I had my CD's with me I'd put it on an ftp but I took them home. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Myer [SMTP:kevin_myer@elanco.k12.pa.us] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 12:31 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: RE: [OT] Extracting SIDs and RIDs from NT server > > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Gregory Leblanc wrote: > > > I believe that you can download these tools from Technet Online. Check > out > > http://technet.microsoft.com > > Greg > > I had hoped that was the case but it doesn't appear to (feel free to > correct me if I'm wrong and if someone found a link that works - > Microsoft's web site is full of outdated links - maybe they have one to > the Resource Kit). What I did find was a link to a resource kit, service > pak 4 update, which I can download and install but which only contains the > updated versions of any utilities since the first release. Neither of the > utilities I wish to use have been updated. Microsoft so kindly offers a > 15 day free trial to their Resource Network, with the caveat that you > can't download the resource kits, just browse and read the documentation > :( > > I'm going to kick myself if there is a link to the full resource kit > freely available - I did just manage to find GetSID_x86.exe in > ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/winnt-public/reskit/nt40/i386/ but > that appears to be only updated files. And I just saw Jerry Carter's > reply to the same effect (GLOBAL.EXE isn't there though..) :) > > I just had a thought - maybe if I download the Resource Kits service pack > 1, 2, 3, 4 and apply them all, I'll end up with all the utilities the full > version has..... > > If I find anything, I'll post - thanks for the suggestions. I'll give the > rpcclient command a try too. > > Kevin > > -- > ~ Kevin M. Myer > . . Network/System Administrator > /V\ ELANCO School District > // \ > /( )\ > ^`~'^ > From pilsl at goldfisch.atat.at Mon Aug 23 22:21:03 1999 From: pilsl at goldfisch.atat.at (peter pilsl) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: add reg-entries to policy ? In-Reply-To: <15745.935412520@www7.gmx.net>; from Dominik Fritz on Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 10:50:12PM +1000 References: <15745.935412520@www7.gmx.net> Message-ID: <19990824002103.A9367@goldfisch.atat.at> On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 10:50:12PM +1000, Dominik Fritz wrote: > hi > > One possibility is to use on of the policy templates from the ZAK > (Zero Administraon Kit). With Office97 this works fine. But I don't not if > it works with office 2000 or if there are newer templates for Office 2000 > thanks, templates was the keyword I was looking for. I didnt find it in zak, but in the freely available office resource kit called ork. ------------------------------------------- mag. peter pilsl phone: +43/(0)/6763574035 fax : +43/(0)/6763546512 email: pilsl@goldfisch.atat.at sms: pilsl_mobil@goldfisch.atat.at pgp-key available ------------------------------------------- From natej at cin.butte.cc.ca.us Tue Aug 24 05:57:54 1999 From: natej at cin.butte.cc.ca.us (Nathan Martinez) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: subscribe Message-ID: <199908240557.WAA01506@logon.cin.butte.cc.ca.us> subscribe -- -Nate Martinez From tomek at is.fh-hamburg.de Tue Aug 24 07:01:40 1999 From: tomek at is.fh-hamburg.de (Tomek Jarosinski) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: New MS Logo ... Message-ID: <37C24354.2446C8A9@is.fh-hamburg.de> Greetings, Tomek -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Neandert.gif Type: application/octet-stream Size: 23559 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/19990824/0575eb63/Neandert.obj From richard.ferris at ncn.ac.uk Tue Aug 24 08:33:47 1999 From: richard.ferris at ncn.ac.uk (Richard Ferris) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: NT machines - tempramentle logins Message-ID: <6114EF4D9AF0D1119ADD00805F9F11B1222890@VOYAGER> I have 18 NT client machines using an Origin 200 IRIX samba 2.0.4b server. I am using NT user profiles and a policy file in the NETLOGIN share. The majority of the time users are logging in fine, but I keep getting errors now and again with the PDC refusing to log the machines on. I an error something like 'Cannot load roaming profile attempting to load localy stored profile'. Because I have the option 'Delete locally cached profiles' selected within the policy file, all cached profiles are deleted. NT then tells the user this and then returns them to the login screen. This is becomming a pain as I then have to log the users in as a local user account and then on to the server afterwards. Is there anything I may have missed from the machines registries or the global policy file that may be afecting this? Thanks. From appro at fy.chalmers.se Tue Aug 24 08:36:31 1999 From: appro at fy.chalmers.se (Andy Polyakov) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: running 2.0.5 and -HEAD on same system References: <37B98E1C.71751AB@enc.edu> <37B9B3AA.EEAEA558@ibm.net> <37BAB89F.9B98ACBB@enc.edu> <37BAC175.BEA8EAC9@fy.chalmers.se> <37BC6527.679115F8@enc.edu> <19990820094145.B218@delphin.SerNet.DE> <37C19F89.D89BEDDA@enc.edu> Message-ID: <37C2598F.1A665B87@fy.chalmers.se> > > > Okay...thanks! ...below are the relevent portions of the two config files. > > > What I have is a Ethernet NIC with address 10.100.0.12/16 and an IP alias > > > 10.100.10.1/16. I wish to create two vitual samba hosts. > > > > Probably I am completely wrong, but I once had difficulties with the > > /16 netmask notation. Since then I always use 255.255.0.0 and have no > > such problems anymore. > > Thanks for the suggestion... I tried this... no luck. Nmbd for the second > virtual host still dies complaing about being unable to bind to port 137 on > 0.0.0.0 . Is there any problem with the "interfaces" line for both virtual > hosts > > Enough people have talked about doing exactly what I'm trying that either: > > * I'm missing something (or there's more to it than just setting 'interfaces' > and 'socket address') You do need 'interfaces', 'socket address' *and* 'bind interfaces only'. But the 'bind interfaces only' is engaged much later when nmbd decides to ignore a packet ment for another virtual interface. The first "bastion" you get stopped at is 'socket address'. Did you try to trace system calls? Just before the bind (the one that fails) it should call setsockopt and set SO_REUSEADDR option. Try to explicitely set 'socket options = SO_REUSEADDR'. Try to comment out lines #873-876 in lib/util_sock.c. Do you have lsof? What does it show if you run 'lsof -p <21nmbd>'? > * or perhaps there's something different about FreeBSD's IP alias feature that's > getting in the way. I have no idea. I run it on SPARC Solaris. Andy. From inge at cc.uit.no Tue Aug 24 09:01:18 1999 From: inge at cc.uit.no (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Inge=2DH=E5vard?= Hunstad) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source References: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB922462@comm.midrex.com> Message-ID: <37C25F5E.432A2830@cc.uit.no> > "Nixon, Shon" wrote: > > Correction, this is while running the configure script...sorry > > Shon > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nixon, Shon [mailto:shonn@midrex.com] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 3:40 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source > > I have downloaded the source code from > cvs.samba.org/pub/unpacked/samba. While trying to compile with ldap > support, I get the following error (I do have the OpenLDAP 1.2.3 > installed BTW): > > checking configure summary > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > I am using a dual PP-200 with RedHat 6.0 intel as the OS. Any > suggestions? > > Shon Hi Shon Try looking in the file config.log it gives you a little bit more info on what's going wrong. I think I remeber that there where some problems finding ldaps header files. You should also check out this link: http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb-howto.html Inge From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Tue Aug 24 10:49:25 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: ./configure Message-ID: <412567D7.003B6DE6.00@paris3.par.sita.int> All, I would like to install samba 2.0.5a on a linux kernel 2.0.34 (slackware 3.5), but when I start ./configure I have the following error: checking configure summary ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config /tmp/samba-2.0.5a/source -> Can you help me? Thks, Gerard From shonn at midrex.com Tue Aug 24 11:42:35 1999 From: shonn at midrex.com (Nixon, Shon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source Message-ID: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB922465@comm.midrex.com> Thanks for the reply. I am afraid I am at a disadvantage here. I am new to LDAP and do not exactly know where the "header" files are. Is this the same as the include files? I have attached the last part of the log file for some one to hopefully look at. I do find a lot of failed program issues and undefined references. I really do not know how to fix these issues. Any help is appreciated. I do have the howto. Shon > -----Original Message----- > From: Inge-H?vard Hunstad [mailto:inge@cc.uit.no] > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 5:01 AM > To: shonn@midrex.com > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: Having problems compiling Samba source > > > > "Nixon, Shon" wrote: > > > > Correction, this is while running the configure script...sorry > > > > Shon > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nixon, Shon [mailto:shonn@midrex.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 3:40 PM > > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > > Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source > > > > I have downloaded the source code from > > cvs.samba.org/pub/unpacked/samba. While trying to compile with ldap > > support, I get the following error (I do have the OpenLDAP 1.2.3 > > installed BTW): > > > > checking configure summary > > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > > > I am using a dual PP-200 with RedHat 6.0 intel as the OS. Any > > suggestions? > > > > Shon > Hi Shon > > Try looking in the file config.log it gives you a little bit more info > on what's going wrong. I think I remeber that there where > some problems > finding ldaps header files. > > You should also check out this link: > http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb-howto.html Inge -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: config.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 6140 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/19990824/924b19ba/config.obj From natej at cin.butte.cc.ca.us Tue Aug 24 14:15:11 1999 From: natej at cin.butte.cc.ca.us (Nathan Martinez) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Getting Started Message-ID: <003101beee3b$1d55dc80$19976fce@nathan_pc.chamchum.com> Hello. I tried looking on a mirror for samba.org and could not find any info on how to go about setting up samba as an NT PDC. Could someone just point me towards some documentation. Thanks in advance. -Nathan Martinez From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Tue Aug 24 14:31:46 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:58 2003 Subject: Getting Started References: <003101beee3b$1d55dc80$19976fce@nathan_pc.chamchum.com> Message-ID: <37C2ACD1.30B4DA2A@eng.auburn.edu> Nathan Martinez wrote: > > Hello. I tried looking on a mirror for samba.org and > could not find any info on how to go about setting up > samba as an NT PDC. Could someone just point me > towards some documentation. Thanks in advance. http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/ntdom_faq/samba_ntdom_faq.html Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From matthias at waechter.wol.at Tue Aug 24 14:32:16 1999 From: matthias at waechter.wol.at (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Matthias_W=E4chter?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Getting Started In-Reply-To: <003101beee3b$1d55dc80$19976fce@nathan_pc.chamchum.com> Message-ID: On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Nathan Martinez wrote: > Hello. I tried looking on a mirror for samba.org and could not find any > info on how to go about setting up samba as an NT PDC. Could someone just > point me towards some documentation. Thanks in advance. On your favourite samba mirror, klick "documentation" -> "Other Documentation" -- "Samba NT domain FAQ", usually located in http://your-samba-mirror/samba/docs/ntdom_faq/samba_ntdom_faq.html The documentation you find there only covers the "CVS" version of Samba, though it's possible to do the trick with 2.0.x, too. Unfortunately, 2.0.x doesn't include all the PDC functionality (domain groups, NT admin tools etc.) additionally to having _no_ documentation and _NO_ support PDCing with 2.0.x Sehr Wus, - Matthias -- Verkauft f?r 339,88 Dollar! - aus: Groundhog Day (Und t?glich gr??t das Murmeltier) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From icoupeau at unav.es Tue Aug 24 14:54:22 1999 From: icoupeau at unav.es (Ignacio Coupeau) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Having problems compiling Samba source References: <29D009A91BABD21189520060B057BB922465@comm.midrex.com> Message-ID: <37C2B21E.CF8F9350@unav.es> "Nixon, Shon" wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. I am afraid I am at a disadvantage here. I am new to > LDAP and do not exactly know where the "header" files are. Is this the same > as the include files? I have attached the last part of the log file for some > one to hopefully look at. I do find a lot of failed program issues and > undefined references. I really do not know how to fix these issues. Any help > is appreciated. I do have the howto. You need the includes (*.h) files and libraries from a __compiled__ openldap; for example: /usr/local/etc/openldap/include/* /usr/local/etc/openldap/lib/* or some place indicates via: /configure --prefix=/usr/local/etc/openldap yo need copy these files in /usr/include /usr/lib, where the /configure script search for... Ignacio ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ From greg at discreet.com Tue Aug 24 16:27:17 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: rpcclient "at" command Message-ID: Hi, I'm trying to use the rpcclient "at now" to start a batch job but it seems to end up in the at queue for this time tomorrow. Is the "now" processed in rpcclient or does it get passed to NT? TIA, Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au Tue Aug 24 16:46:40 1999 From: matthewc at cse.unsw.edu.au (Matt Chapman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: rpcclient "at" command References: Message-ID: <37C2CC70.DCE3B9E2@cse.unsw.edu.au> Greg Dickie wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to use the rpcclient "at now" to start a batch job but it seems to > end up in the at queue for this time tomorrow. Is the "now" processed in > rpcclient or does it get passed to NT? It's processed in rpcclient. It asks the server for the current time, adds SOON_OFFSET seconds and schedules it then. See the at_soon function in rpcclient/cmd_atsvc.c. You may need to increase SOON_OFFSET (defined just above at_soon). Then again, if you look at the code you'll see I'm not actually wrapping the seconds into the minutes properly, so that could be a problem too. Do you have the reskit handy? I'd be very interested to know exactly how the "soon" utility works. I'll have to check that out sometime. Matt -- Matthew "Austin" Chapman SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member From oswell at xcert.com Tue Aug 24 16:54:45 1999 From: oswell at xcert.com (Mike Oswell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Multiple PDCs -- One box Message-ID: Does anyone know if it is possible to run multiple PDC's on box using Samba? .. We will be splitting up our domain into three seperate domains, and would like to not have to run three seperate PDCs. If it means running three samba's on one server, that may be fine. Also.. If there _is_ a way, does anyone know of any documentation explaining how? Thanks. ----- Michael Oswell Xcert International Inc. From greg at discreet.com Tue Aug 24 16:57:23 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: rpcclient "at" command In-Reply-To: <37C2CC70.DCE3B9E2@cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: Excellent! I'll take a look thanks for the quick (as usual) answer. Greg On 24-Aug-99 Matt Chapman wrote: > Greg Dickie wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to use the rpcclient "at now" to start a batch job but it seems >> to >> end up in the at queue for this time tomorrow. Is the "now" processed in >> rpcclient or does it get passed to NT? > > It's processed in rpcclient. It asks the server for the current time, > adds SOON_OFFSET seconds and schedules it then. See the at_soon function > in rpcclient/cmd_atsvc.c. > > You may need to increase SOON_OFFSET (defined just above at_soon). Then > again, if you look at the code you'll see I'm not actually wrapping the > seconds into the minutes properly, so that could be a problem too. > > Do you have the reskit handy? I'd be very interested to know exactly how > the "soon" utility works. I'll have to check that out sometime. > > Matt > > > -- > Matthew "Austin" Chapman > SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From lkcl at switchboard.net Tue Aug 24 22:22:02 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Vulnerabilities needed in Windows NT! Message-ID: your assistance is needed to crash Windows NT. i have now been working for internet security systems for a year. part of my job is to produce a confidential report to microsoft of any vulnerabilities found in Windows NT. once a fix is available then microsoft releases a report. or if too much time goes by for a serious problem (e.g six months and it's an anonymous denial of service attack) then at the risk of alienating microsoft (but not microsoft's customers), ISS releases a report. the person that finds the problem (originator) is credited at the end of these reports. if anyone finds that Windows NT crashes whilst using samba (smbd, nmbd, rpcclient, rpctorture, smbtorture) then please either provide a report to myself (lkcl@iss.net) or contact secure@microsoft.com directly (but also please let me know as well, e.g by cc on the message!) this message is also intended to encourage people to _actively_ find ways to crash Windows NT... AND TO BE RESPONSIBLE ABOUT IT (by sticking to the confidential reporting rules, above). if you need to know what kind of things to put in a report, please do not hesistate to ask. best regards, luke (samba team) Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Samba and Network Development Samba Web site Internet Security Systems, Inc. From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Wed Aug 25 09:11:17 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Vulnerabilities needed in Windows NT! Message-ID: <412567D8.00326D02.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Can we do the same with NOVELL for their client32?? From F.vanKruijl at delftgeot.nl Wed Aug 25 08:50:49 1999 From: F.vanKruijl at delftgeot.nl (F. van Kruijl) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: 143 en 144 Message-ID: <37C3AE69.F8C8F958@GeoDelft.nl> Jan, ze staan klaar. From sture at rocketrange.no Wed Aug 25 09:05:04 1999 From: sture at rocketrange.no (Sture Lygren) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: <01beeed8$ebcc1640$8a662780@NTBIB.ARRDOMAIN> Hi! As I'm new to this list I hope you ppl will excuse me for asking already answered(?) questions. My setup is: Linux box (kernel 2.2.1) that I hope to set up as a PDC for 12 PC's running NT WS (SP3) using Samba2.0.5a. I configured and compiled the source without any problems and after configuring the smb.conf file I can see the shares trough 'Network neighbourhood' on the PC's. So far so good but ... As noted above I would like to have samba act as a PDC and also be the logon server for the PC's. I read the NTDomain-FAQ (section 2.2 'How do I get my NT Workstation / Server to login to the Samba controlled domain?'. I followed the instructions therein. Edited the passwd file and ran 'smbpasswd -a -m name_of_nt_workstation'. After that I had a look at the smbpasswd file, and noticed that the syntax didn't look like what the doc said it would (it didn't have the 'LM_' and 'NT_' part). Anyways I tried connection to the domain from one of the workstations, but nothing happened (syslog was silent). Then I manually edited the smbpasswd file and added 'LM_' and 'NT_' in front of the crypted stuff for that particular machine. Again I tried to join the domain from the NT workstation, and this time syslog reported 'a malformed passwd file (missing : ), 'no trust_account for machinname$' . My linux box is using shadow password. Read some place (diagnostic.txt?) that the source should be configured to use shadow password, but I couldn't find any options for it with 'configure'... I have to mention that I have also tried the latest cvs version of Samba. Compile went fine, but I couldn't use smbpasswd (couldn't connect on port 445 something - error). I tried using smbpasswd from the 2.0.5a distribution, but I experienced the same error as described above. I'm lost here - feeling I've tried everything (surely I haven't but ...) So please - could someone help me out here. What do I need to do in order to get this working? Regards Sture Lygren From ulf at twc.de Wed Aug 25 10:29:25 1999 From: ulf at twc.de (Ulf Bartelt) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Prealpha PDC and 2.0.x File Server... Message-ID: <37C3C585.A06631B7@twc.de> Hi! Seems, I successfully set up a samba PDC... My environment: Samba-prealpha running on SuSE6.2 as PDC... Samba-2.0.x running on Debian-2.0 having an external raid as file server, DNS server, NIS server... My wishes: I want as less stuff as possible on the PDCs harddisk and I want to keep PDC and file server on different systems. If possible without conflict I'd love to put NIS and DNS on the PDC too... User's profiles shall be in a subdir of the unix home of the user... Status quo: The homedirs of the users are on the file server, on the PDC I automount the whole /home from the file server for being able to create users on the PDC having their newly created homedir on the file server. The user profiles (for NT clients) are in /home/USERNAME/.smbprofile and to ease administration I have an auto mounted directory /profiles on the PDC mapping /profile/USERNAME to fileserver:/home/USERNAME/.smbprofile. Maybe this will not be as useful as I think right now... The profiles share on the PDC is declared to be \\fileserver\%U\.smbprofile. "logon path" and "logon home" are pointing to \\fileserver\%U\.smbprofile and \\fileserver\%U. Questions: Are there any reasons NOT to put DNS and NIS on the PDC machine? Can I declare homes on the PDC as \\fileserver\homes? Or is the declaration of "logon home" enough? Especially: What about putting the netlogon share on the fileserver too? What is the right machine to declare "logon path" and friends? For now I put this in smb.conf of both machines, \\-style on the PDC and unix path style on the fileserver... How does NT time syncronisation (with samba) work? Once on logon or periodically? "net time \\SERVER /set /yes" makes me assume it is done once... I hope these questions aren't too silly... Bye! Ulf. From glauche at plum.de Wed Aug 25 11:00:52 1999 From: glauche at plum.de (Michael Glauche) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: References: <01beeed8$ebcc1640$8a662780@NTBIB.ARRDOMAIN> Message-ID: <37C3CCE4.C369F3D7@plum.de> Sture Lygren wrote: > > Hi! > > As I'm new to this list I hope you ppl will excuse me for asking already answered(?) questions. > > My setup is: > > Linux box (kernel 2.2.1) that I hope to set up as a PDC for 12 PC's running NT WS (SP3) using > Samba2.0.5a. > > I configured and compiled the source without any problems and after configuring the smb.conf file I can see the shares trough 'Network neighbourhood' on the PC's. > > So far so good but ... > > As noted above I would like to have samba act as a PDC and also be the logon server for the PC's. I read the NTDomain-FAQ (section 2.2 'How do I get my NT Workstation / Server to login to the Samba controlled domain?'. I followed the instructions therein. Edited the passwd file and ran 'smbpasswd -a -m name_of_nt_workstation'. After that I had a look at the smbpasswd file, and noticed that the syntax didn't look like what the doc said it would (it didn't have the 'LM_' and 'NT_' part). Anyways I tried connection to the domain from one of the workstations, but nothing happened (syslog was silent). Then I manually edited the smbpasswd file and added 'LM_' and 'NT_' in front of the crypted stuff for that particular machine. Again I tried to join the domain from the NT workstation, and this time syslog reported 'a malformed passwd file (missing : ), 'no trust_account for machinname$' . ? some bug in the doku ? Never saw some LM_ or NT_ thing in my smbpasswd either. It looks like : machine_name$:2054:DE84598F50608A0C44CAE360917AB146:DE84598F50608A0C44CAE360917AB146:[W ]:LCT-37C23FC0: > My linux box is using shadow password. Read some place (diagnostic.txt?) that the source should be configured to use shadow password, but I couldn't find any options for it with 'configure'... A PDC MUST have "encrypted" passwords (i.e. passwords in the MS style) Read ENCRYPTION.txt ! > > I have to mention that I have also tried the latest cvs version of Samba. Compile went fine, but I couldn't use smbpasswd (couldn't connect on port 445 something - error). I tried using smbpasswd from the 2.0.5a distribution, but I experienced the same error as described above. In CVS stuff can be broken for some time, update the to the current version, and see if this problem still exists. IIRC the port 445 issue is an optional thing, it should not stop things from runnging, so your problem might be elswehre.) regards, Michael From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Wed Aug 25 11:04:16 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: SMBwrite not SMBWriteX In-Reply-To: <37C3C585.A06631B7@twc.de> Message-ID: WHat changes can I make to clientgen.c so cli_issue_smbwrite uses SMBWrite and not SMBWriteX ? Thanks Sam From glauche at plum.de Wed Aug 25 11:08:57 1999 From: glauche at plum.de (Michael Glauche) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Prealpha PDC and 2.0.x File Server... References: <37C3C585.A06631B7@twc.de> Message-ID: <37C3CEC9.17D4B16D@plum.de> Ulf Bartelt wrote: > > Hi! > > Seems, I successfully set up a samba PDC... > > My environment: > > Samba-prealpha running on SuSE6.2 as PDC... > > Samba-2.0.x running on Debian-2.0 having an external raid as file > server, DNS server, NIS server... > > My wishes: > > I want as less stuff as possible on the PDCs harddisk and I want to keep > PDC and file server on different systems. > > If possible without conflict I'd love to put NIS and DNS on the PDC > too... > > User's profiles shall be in a subdir of the unix home of the user... > > Status quo: > > The homedirs of the users are on the file server, on the PDC I automount > the whole /home from the file server for being able to create users on > the PDC having their newly created homedir on the file server. > > The user profiles (for NT clients) are in /home/USERNAME/.smbprofile and > to ease administration I have an auto mounted directory /profiles on the > PDC mapping /profile/USERNAME to fileserver:/home/USERNAME/.smbprofile. > Maybe this will not be as useful as I think right now... > > The profiles share on the PDC is declared to be > \\fileserver\%U\.smbprofile. > > "logon path" and "logon home" are pointing to > \\fileserver\%U\.smbprofile and \\fileserver\%U. > > Questions: > > Are there any reasons NOT to put DNS and NIS on the PDC machine? Don't think so .. > Can I declare homes on the PDC as \\fileserver\homes? Or is the > declaration of "logon home" enough? Yes .. works perfect : logon home=\\fileserver\%U logon path=\\fileserver\profiles\%U > Especially: What about putting the netlogon share on the fileserver too? Don't know about this one, but you could mount it via NFS from the fileserver, it is not very busy .. :) > What is the right machine to declare "logon path" and friends? For now I > put this in smb.conf of both machines, \\-style on the PDC and unix path > style on the fileserver... The PDC > How does NT time syncronisation (with samba) work? Once on logon or > periodically? "net time \\SERVER /set /yes" makes me assume it is done > once... its made on every logon (if the user has the right to modify the clock !!) regards, Michael -- http://www.sambahq.de From kvanderhart at vermeermfg.com Wed Aug 25 11:30:43 1999 From: kvanderhart at vermeermfg.com (Kevin Van Der Hart) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Multiple PDC's Message-ID: <37C3D3E2.61FEA6AD@vermeermfg.com> We are needing to be able to do NT Workstation domain logons into an entirely SUN server environment. I have been able to set up a Samba PDC and get the domain logons to work in a testing area. My problem is that we have 15 different subnets which all need to be able to do the domain logons but we do all of our user administration from one centralized server and all users are valid on any of the subnets. If I setup a Samba PDC on each subnet to do the domain authentication, how can I keep the user information synchronized across all of the PDC's? Because of the machine accounts in the smbpasswd file, synchronizing this file is out of the question. Or is there a better way to accomplish the domain logons? Thanks in advance. -- Kevin Van Der Hart LAN Administrator Vermeer Mfg Co kvanderhart@vermeermfg.com From greg at discreet.com Wed Aug 25 11:40:43 1999 From: greg at discreet.com (Greg Dickie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Multiple PDC's In-Reply-To: <37C3D3E2.61FEA6AD@vermeermfg.com> Message-ID: If you use WINS you do not need a PDC on each subnet. Greg On 25-Aug-99 Kevin Van Der Hart wrote: > We are needing to be able to do NT Workstation domain logons into an > entirely SUN server environment. I have been able to set up a Samba PDC > and get the domain logons to work in a testing area. My problem is that > we have 15 different subnets which all need to be able to do the domain > logons but we do all of our user administration from one centralized > server and all users are valid on any of the subnets. If I setup a Samba > PDC on each subnet to do the domain authentication, how can I keep the > user information synchronized across all of the PDC's? Because of the > machine accounts in the smbpasswd file, synchronizing this file is out > of the question. Or is there a better way to accomplish the domain > logons? > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Kevin Van Der Hart > LAN Administrator > Vermeer Mfg Co > > kvanderhart@vermeermfg.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie Just A Guy* *from discreet (the logic is gone) Montreal (514) 954-7171 greg@discreet.com From krause at ppi.de Wed Aug 25 12:01:33 1999 From: krause at ppi.de (Dietmar Krause) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: ./configure References: <412567D7.003B6DE6.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Message-ID: <37C3DB1D.DCC24412@ppi.de> G?rard Leymarie wrote: > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > /tmp/samba-2.0.5a/source -> > > Can you help me? Do you have the Kernel-Sources installed ? Some includes come with it. If they are missing, configure will fail compiling the testprograms. I have had the same problem today, after reinstalling the sources configure stopped complaining... -- Dietmar Krause PPI Informationssysteme GmbH Graumannsweg 54 D-22087 Hamburg Tel.: +49(40)227433-46 Fax: +49(40)227433-33 Mailto: krause@ppi.de From icoupeau at unav.es Wed Aug 25 11:58:21 1999 From: icoupeau at unav.es (Ignacio Coupeau) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Multiple PDC's References: <37C3D3E2.61FEA6AD@vermeermfg.com> Message-ID: <37C3DA5D.6E7B6E32@unav.es> Kevin Van Der Hart wrote: > > We are needing to be able to do NT Workstation domain logons into an > entirely SUN server environment. I have been able to set up a Samba PDC > and get the domain logons to work in a testing area. My problem is that > we have 15 different subnets which all need to be able to do the domain > logons but we do all of our user administration from one centralized > server and all users are valid on any of the subnets. If I setup a Samba > PDC on each subnet to do the domain authentication, how can I keep the > user information synchronized across all of the PDC's? Because of the > machine accounts in the smbpasswd file, synchronizing this file is out > of the question. Or is there a better way to accomplish the domain > logons? If the number of WS/users is little you can use the WINS param in the Network|TCP/IP config pane, to redirect the PDC search, but if the number of WS is big and you need several PDCs. The last year, we have synchronized the smbpasswd (and /etc/passwd) files via NFS or similar, but this year we are testing samba with LDAP (CVS source HEAD branch). Another solution is samba with NIS+. configure: --with-ldap Include LDAP support --with-nisplus Include NISPLUS password database support ...but you need the /etc/passwd accounts in one PDC and almost the /etc/group well synchronized... Ignacio -- ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ From JFBOUCHE at EURIWARE.FR Wed Aug 25 12:42:56 1999 From: JFBOUCHE at EURIWARE.FR (BOUCHET Jean-Francois) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Viewing (and changing) the permission from my NT box Message-ID: <199908251246.OAA10119@mail.euriware.fr> Hi, With Samba 2.0.5a and my Linux box as member of a Domain, I had no problems to use the dialog box of the others NT members to view and change the permissions. But now with my Linux box as PDC (pre-alpha), I can't use it anymore and there is no menu for the security settings ! There is no more the " nt acl support " parameter in the pre-alpha but I suppose that is has disappeared to be always set to true... The security of my PDC is " user ". Is it the reason or is this dialog box not available yet with the pre-alpha ? What's up Doc ? Thanks Jean-Fran?ois From sture at rocketrange.no Wed Aug 25 13:21:38 1999 From: sture at rocketrange.no (Sture Lygren) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Samba as PDC for NT wks Message-ID: <01beeefc$c350e320$8a662780@NTBIB.ARRDOMAIN> Hi! This is a follow-up on my first entry here. I'm running samba2.0.5a on a linux box and would like it to be a PDC for a subnet of 11 PC's running NT4 workstation (SP3). I've followed the instructions to make a 'computer' account in the smbpasswd file, and I'm using encrypted passwords. Still I get 'Unable to connect to the domain controller for this domain. Have your administrator check your computer account on the domain' when I try to connect to the domain from NT. Be aware - questions following could be considered stupid ... 1) Settings in the global section of my smb.conf are (the ones I figured conserned beeing a PDC): security = user domain master = yes domain logons = yes Did I miss anything? What? 2) Are the 'logon path' and 'logon home' settings vital? What should they be for NT machines (considering I would like to have profiles stored on each users home directories)? 3) Making the entries in /etc/passwd (to create the computer account with smbpasswd) - should the name be in uppercase, or in lowercase letters? (the machinename on NT is in uppercase letters). 4) Should I make a password for the machine? What should it be? I've read all the documentation (at least so it feels), but get nowere. Hope someone will spare some time answering this - it'll be greatly appreciated. Regards Sture Lygren From adam.w.cabler at lmco.com Wed Aug 25 15:07:36 1999 From: adam.w.cabler at lmco.com (Cabler, Adam W) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: 445? Message-ID: I saw a post a few days ago about the new port being used, 445. I never saw any definate answers to this, so I would like to bring that back up. I have used past head versions to successfully create nt domains, but I can't even get a recent version(since about a week ago) to do basic samba stuff. I get several errors, the first being unable to connect to port 445. This is nothing that I have seen in past experiences. Because of this, smbpasswd will not execute properly so I am unable to do anything. I assume that others have had this problem and have fixed it since there haven't been any more posts. If I need to post more information, I can do that, including logs, exact errors, etc. thanks, Adam Cabler Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space Computer Support From icoupeau at unav.es Wed Aug 25 16:03:13 1999 From: icoupeau at unav.es (Ignacio Coupeau) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: multiple "ldap server" runs References: <37C3DC6F.D1E25222@unav.es> Message-ID: <37C413C1.5F2B6BAB@unav.es> Jean Francois Micouleau wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Ignacio Coupeau wrote: > > > Some one knows how to use several ldap servers via: > > ldap server = server_1, server_2,... > > param in te smb.conf > > if my memory serves well, ldap server = server1 server2 > > should work. The value is passed directly to the libldap.a ldap_open() > which fall back to server2 if server1 is unavailable. > Tested: [global] ... ldap server = LDAP-SMB1, LDAP-SMB2 ldap port = 389 runs fine: the multiple ldap server is native in ldap_open (for example, with a directory in Netscape Address Book) Ignacio -- ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ From swaters at amicus.com Wed Aug 25 16:51:21 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Viewing (and changing) the permission from my NT box References: <199908251246.OAA10119@mail.euriware.fr> Message-ID: <37C41F09.B0B3795B@amicus.com> i think i remember someone saying that the alpha PDC code is best used as PDC-only and that you should run 2.0.5a for file&print. this is because all the nice file&print features in 2.0.5a have not been migrated to alpha b/c developers are focusing in on PDC code functionality first and foremost. hence, you run the alpha code AND 2.0.5a on the same box (or separately, whatever). i could be mistaken, -stephen BOUCHET Jean-Francois wrote: > > Hi, > > With Samba 2.0.5a and my Linux box as member of a Domain, I had no problems > to use the dialog box of the others NT members to view and change the > permissions. > But now with my Linux box as PDC (pre-alpha), I can't use it anymore and > there is no menu for the security settings ! > > There is no more the " nt acl support " parameter in the pre-alpha but I > suppose that is has disappeared to be always set to true... The security of > my PDC is " user ". Is it the reason or is this dialog box not available yet > with the pre-alpha ? > > What's up Doc ? > Thanks > Jean-Fran?ois From lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil Wed Aug 25 18:37:39 1999 From: lisa at USNA.Navy.Mil (Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: smbpasswd and NIS Message-ID: <199908251837.OAA10499@leto15.usna.navy.mil> ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- From: "Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}" To: samba_ntdom@samba.org cc: lisa@usna.navy.MIL Subject: smbpasswd and NIS Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:32:27 -0400 Hi: Is anyone using NIS to distribute a common smbpasswd table to several UNIX/samba servers? I have two Samba servers, each acting as PDC of its own domain. One is set up as an NIS master and the other an NIS slave. They are successfully using the same /etc/passwd table. I know machine accounts in smbpasswd cannot be shared across domains. But would it be possible to define a basic table on each Samba PDC that listed only the machine accounts, and then access the NIS smbpasswd table for users? Seems to me this would work, since Samba happily uses an NIS passwd table. BUT - could you change your smbpasswd on the server that was an NIS slave? Can the binary smbpasswd handle this? Or can you only change your smbpasswd on the NIS master OR if the smbpasswd table is local to the machine and is not an NIS copy? Thanks for any insights you can offer...I'd experiment with htis but classes are in session. Lisa ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From adam.w.cabler at lmco.com Wed Aug 25 19:14:10 1999 From: adam.w.cabler at lmco.com (Cabler, Adam W) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: smbpasswd and NIS Message-ID: I am having trouble getting this to work properly. I have just one samba server set up that is using NIS. I have run into several problems. First, I need a way to convert my yppasswd file into a smbpasswd file. I know there is a way to do this, but I haven't ben able to find it yet. Second, I can't seem to find the appropriate syntax to enter into the passwd chat and passwd program dialog on swat. I hope that these two things will give me a better start. I am running this on an SGI origin 200 running IRIX 6.4. thanks in advance, Adam Cabler Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space Computer Support -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} [mailto:lisa@USNA.Navy.Mil] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 1:44 PM To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: smbpasswd and NIS ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- From: "Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}" To: samba_ntdom@samba.org cc: lisa@usna.navy.MIL Subject: smbpasswd and NIS Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:32:27 -0400 Hi: Is anyone using NIS to distribute a common smbpasswd table to several UNIX/samba servers? I have two Samba servers, each acting as PDC of its own domain. One is set up as an NIS master and the other an NIS slave. They are successfully using the same /etc/passwd table. I know machine accounts in smbpasswd cannot be shared across domains. But would it be possible to define a basic table on each Samba PDC that listed only the machine accounts, and then access the NIS smbpasswd table for users? Seems to me this would work, since Samba happily uses an NIS passwd table. BUT - could you change your smbpasswd on the server that was an NIS slave? Can the binary smbpasswd handle this? Or can you only change your smbpasswd on the NIS master OR if the smbpasswd table is local to the machine and is not an NIS copy? Thanks for any insights you can offer...I'd experiment with htis but classes are in session. Lisa ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 United States Naval Academy - CADIG 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From oh at geology.ohio-state.edu Wed Aug 25 19:29:40 1999 From: oh at geology.ohio-state.edu (Frank Oh) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Password Synchronization Problem Message-ID: <19990825193016Z12865645-446+3416@samba.anu.edu.au> Help!! I am running samba server [v2.0.5a] as a PDC for Win9x. I am trying to set up samba so that it can change a Windows user's UNIX password when that person changes one's Windows password. I think I set it up right, but when I run `testparm` command to check smb.conf it shows following error: Load smb config files from /etc/smb.conf Processing section "[ml356]" Processing section "[ml354]" Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[software]" Processing section "[tmp]" Loaded services file OK. ERROR: the 'passwd chat' script [*current*UNIX*password* %o\n *New*UNIX*password * %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*update d*successfully*] expects to use the old plaintext password via the %o substitution. With encrypted passwords this is not possible. Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions I thought that I have to have the following parameters to the global section in my smb.conf file: encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd unix password sync = true passwd chat = *current*UNIX*password* %o\n *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u it seems like I have to set "encrypt passwords = no" I really would like to use encrypt passwords. Am I missing something? -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Frank Oh oh@geology.ohio-state.edu Lab Manager 292.7552 Geo. Department The Ohio State University -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- From kevinc at grainsystems.com Wed Aug 25 21:43:55 1999 From: kevinc at grainsystems.com (Kevin Colby) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: smbpasswd and NIS References: <199908251837.OAA10499@leto15.usna.navy.mil> Message-ID: <37C4639B.2F37D9E3@grainsystems.com> Forgive me if I've missed something, but I thought that NIS-slave+PDC was impossible due to NIS-slave password changes requiring the plaintext old password. If it weren't for that, they would work. - Kevin Colby kevinc@grainsystems.com Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF} wrote: > > ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- > > From: "Lisa Becktold {CADIG STAFF}" > To: samba_ntdom@samba.org > cc: lisa@usna.navy.MIL > Subject: smbpasswd and NIS > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:32:27 -0400 > > Hi: > > Is anyone using NIS to distribute a common smbpasswd table > to several UNIX/samba servers? > > I have two Samba servers, each acting as PDC of its own > domain. One is set up as an NIS master and the other an > NIS slave. They are successfully using the same /etc/passwd > table. > > I know machine accounts in smbpasswd cannot be shared across > domains. But would it be possible to define a basic table > on each Samba PDC that listed only the machine accounts, and > then access the NIS smbpasswd table for users? > > Seems to me this would work, since Samba happily uses an NIS > passwd table. BUT - could you change your smbpasswd on the > server that was an NIS slave? Can the binary smbpasswd > handle this? > > Or can you only change your smbpasswd on the NIS master OR > if the smbpasswd table is local to the machine and is not > an NIS copy? > > Thanks for any insights you can offer...I'd experiment with htis > but classes are in session. > > Lisa > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 > United States Naval Academy - CADIG > 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Lisa M. Becktold - lisa@usna.navy.mil, (410) 293-6480 > United States Naval Academy - CADIG > 590 Holloway Road, Rickover Hall, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000 From oh at geology.ohio-state.edu Thu Aug 26 03:33:27 1999 From: oh at geology.ohio-state.edu (Frank Oh) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Password Synchronization Problem Message-ID: <19990826003152Z12864020-450+3579@samba.anu.edu.au> Please ignore this message, somehow I solved this problem. Thanks :-) >Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 09:29:40 -0700 > >Help!! >I am running samba server [v2.0.5a] as a PDC for Win9x. >I am trying to set up samba so that it can change a Windows user's UNIX password when that person changes one's Windows password. >I think I set it up right, but when I run `testparm` command to check smb.conf it shows following error: >Load smb config files from /etc/smb.conf >Processing section "[ml356]" >Processing section "[ml354]" >Processing section "[homes]" >Processing section "[netlogon]" >Processing section "[software]" >Processing section "[tmp]" >Loaded services file OK. >ERROR: the 'passwd chat' script [*current*UNIX*password* %o\n *New*UNIX*password >* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*update >d*successfully*] expects to use the old plaintext password via the %o substitution. With encrypted passwords this is not possible. >Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions > >I thought that I have to have the following parameters to the global section in my smb.conf file: >encrypt passwords = yes >smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd > >unix password sync = true >passwd chat = *current*UNIX*password* %o\n *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* >passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > >it seems like I have to set "encrypt passwords = no" I really would like to use encrypt passwords. > >Am I missing something? > >-------------------------- ----------------------------------------- >Frank Oh oh@geology.ohio-state.edu >Lab Manager 292.7552 >Geo. Department The Ohio State University >-------------------------- ----------------------------------------- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Frank Oh oh@geology.ohio-state.edu Lab Manager 292.7552 Geological Sciences The Ohio State University -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- From awilliam at whitemice.org Thu Aug 26 02:39:08 1999 From: awilliam at whitemice.org (Adam Williams) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: ./configure In-Reply-To: Dietmar Krause "Re: ./configure" (Aug 25, 10:02pm) References: <412567D7.003B6DE6.00@paris3.par.sita.int> <37C3DB1D.DCC24412@ppi.de> Message-ID: <9908260239.ZM26906@estate1.whitemice.org> On Aug 25, 10:02pm, Dietmar Krause wrote: > Subject: Re: ./configure > G?rard Leymarie wrote: > > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > /tmp/samba-2.0.5a/source -> > > > > Can you help me? I've had this error if I try to do a ./configure as non-root on my Red Hat boxes. From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Thu Aug 26 11:35:50 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Intel Printstation In-Reply-To: <19990826003152Z12864020-450+3579@samba.anu.edu.au> Message-ID: [Was real pizza] Just to keep all informed and try and drum up some advice; The intel PrintStation which supports SMB over TCP/IP has these requirements to work with samba: The remote filename as written to by Samba must be: \DEV\LPT1 and not stdin-1234 etc. I don't know if this filename is calculated from any values the printstation gives at connect time; but here is some useful dumps (the final line: ServiceType=LPT1: may be significant): 14:22:12.676939 sam-pc.ethernet.1027 > ps656ad8.ethernet.netbios-ssn: P 231:387( 156) ack 89 win 8672 >>> NBT Packet NBT Session Packet Flags=0x0 Length=152 (0x98) SMB PACKET: SMBsesssetupX (REQUEST) SMB Command = 0x73 Error class = 0x0 Error code = 0 (0x0) Flags1 = 0x10 Flags2 = 0x0 Tree ID = 0 (0x0) Proc ID = 4637 (0x121d) UID = 1 (0x1) MID = 7169 (0x1c01) Word Count = 10 (0xa) Com2=0x75 Off2=114 (0x72) BufSize=2920 (0xb68) MpxMax=50 (0x32) VcNum=0 (0x0) SessionKey=0x0 PassLen=24 (0x18) CryptLen=0 (0x0) CryptOff=0 (0x0) Pass&Name= [000] 30 82 CC 54 65 D6 00 3E 35 1D AB 48 AA D5 2E 0A 0..Te..> 5..H.... [010] 01 99 51 F3 76 F4 E1 F3 53 41 4D 00 53 45 52 56 ..Q.v... SAM.SERV [020] 45 52 00 57 69 6E 64 6F 77 73 20 34 2E 30 00 57 ER.Windo ws 4.0.W [030] 69 6E 64 6F 77 73 20 34 2E 30 00 indows 4 .0. SMB PACKET: SMBtconX (REQUEST) (CHAINED) smbvwv[]= Com2=0xFF Off2=0 (0x0) Flags=0x2 PassLen=1 (0x1) Passwd&Path&Device= smb_bcc=27 smb_buf[]= [000] 00 5C 5C 50 53 36 35 36 41 44 38 5C 50 52 49 4E .\\PS656 AD8\PRIN [010] 54 45 52 31 00 4C 50 54 31 3A 00 TER1.LPT 1:. (DF) 14:22:12.676939 ps656ad8.ethernet.netbios-ssn > sam-pc.ethernet.1027: P 89:175(8 6) ack 387 win 5454 >>> NBT Packet NBT Session Packet Flags=0x0 Length=82 (0x52) SMB PACKET: SMBsesssetupX (REPLY) SMB Command = 0x73 Error class = 0x0 Error code = 0 (0x0) Flags1 = 0x90 Flags2 = 0x0 Tree ID = 0 (0x0) Proc ID = 4637 (0x121d) UID = 243 (0xf3) MID = 7169 (0x1c01) Word Count = 3 (0x3) Com2=0x75 Off2=67 (0x43) Action=0x1 [000] 43 4F 53 20 32 2E 33 30 00 50 72 69 6E 74 53 74 COS 2.30 .PrintSt [010] 61 74 69 6F 6E 20 33 2E 31 00 ation 3. 1. SMB PACKET: SMBtconX (REPLY) (CHAINED) smbvwv[]= Com2=0xFF Off2=82 (0x52) Data: (2 bytes) [000] 01 00 .. smbbuf[]= ServiceType=LPT1: So.... is this hinting to samba that "\DEV\LPT1" should be the name of the remote file? Also samba uses SMBWriteX which seems not to be correctly implemented in the PrintStation. This info has been passed on to intel engineers who may or may not care; but is there any way (at least for test purposes) to get Samba to do SMBWrite instead of SMBWriteX ? Is there and old version of Samba that does this that I can try? Sam From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Thu Aug 26 12:35:17 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: 445? References: Message-ID: <37C53485.28D719F6@eng.auburn.edu> Cabler, Adam W wrote: > > I saw a post a few days ago about the new port being used, 445. Port 445 is the NetBIOS-less CIFS port. Luke's been playing with implementing NetBIOS-less CIFS connections "ala" Windows2000. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From pafessel at netsol.com.br Thu Aug 26 14:27:08 1999 From: pafessel at netsol.com.br (Paulo Afonso Graner Fessel) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Running HEAD and 2.0.x in the same machine Message-ID: <37C55CCC.5B2E5312@netsol.com.br> I've read that the CVS code has better support for PDC functionality; OTOH, 2.0.x seems to do better for file and print serving. So I'd like to know whether is possible run HEAD and 2.0.x in the same machine, given that I'd running 2.0.x as a member server of the domain controlled by the HEAD smbd. TIA, Paulo Fessel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pafessel.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 848 bytes Desc: Card for Paulo Afonso Graner Fessel Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/19990826/9f7febe3/pafessel.vcf From chiodi+ at pitt.edu Thu Aug 26 19:01:19 1999 From: chiodi+ at pitt.edu (John T Chiodi) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: unix ssamba nis passwd sync Message-ID: I am getting the following message when I attempt to change my smbpasswd. Any ideas what could be wrong? I have nothing in my hosts.allow or hosts.deny. samba and the NIS master are the same server. also bind interfaces only = yes is NOT in my smb.conf error connecting to 192.168.1.3:445 (Connection refused) Old SMB password: error connecting to 127.0.0.1:445 (Connection refused) machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the session setup. Error was : RAP code 131. smb.conf unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/yppasswd %u passwd chat = *old*password* %o\n *new*password* %n\n *retype*new*password* %n\n *successfull* _______________ Jt Chiodi Unix Administrator University of Pittsburgh chiodi@pitt.edu From mharris at meteng.on.ca Thu Aug 26 22:22:19 1999 From: mharris at meteng.on.ca (Mike A. Harris) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: New MS Logo ... In-Reply-To: <37C24354.2446C8A9@is.fh-hamburg.de> Message-ID: On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Tomek Jarosinski wrote: >Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:03:16 +1000 >From: Tomek Jarosinski >To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM >Subject: New MS Logo ... > >Greetings, Tomek Normally, when someone posts a gif/jpg/whatever to a mailing list, I get pretty ticked off. I usually look at the thing first however, and I must say that I am glad that I did! That is absolutely HILARIOUS! HHAAHAHAHA! ALL Windows NT machines that I can get my hands on are getting that logo installed on them! TTYL -- Mike A. Harris Linux advocate Computer Consultant GNU advocate Capslock Consulting Open Source advocate Drop me a line if you require a Linux system administator. I administer Linux machines over the net. From aaron at compedge.co.nz Fri Aug 27 07:45:40 1999 From: aaron at compedge.co.nz (Aaron Knauf) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Security issue with home directories Message-ID: <37C64224.810B0985@compedge.co.nz> I have read the posts in the archives, and the mention in the DOMAIN.txt file regarding the home directory remaining connected after logout. I am not sure if this is the same problem, or not. Either way, I would love to know if anyone has a fix. My setup is as follows - Server - RedHat linux 6.0, Samba-2.0.5a (RH6 rpm). Samba is setup as a PDC. Client - NT Workstation 4.0 SP4. The problem goes like this - User "joeadmin" logs on to the samba domain, then browses his home share (\\sambaserver\joeadmin) via network neighborhood. He then logs off. User "freduser" logs on to the samba domain, from the same PC. He is then able to browse his own home share (\\sambaserver\freduser) in addition to being able to browse the home share of joeadmin! (He shouldn't even be able to *see* the other user's share!) I have confirmed that unix permissions are set to exclude freduser from access to joeadmin's directory (and vice versa), by the following - chmod -R g-rwx,o-rwx /home/joeadmin chown -R joeadmin:joeadmin /home/joeadmin ... and the same for freduser. I have confirmed that freduser has complete access to joeadmin's files by creating and deleting a number of them and also reading from existing ones. The created files have user and group owners of joeadmin. The /etc/smbuser file has no mapping that might cause this (there are only two lines, so it would be easy to spot). The /etc/smb.conf file has no admin users=freduser or anything else suspicious. This is a newly installed, test system ( - both the server and the client). If anyone has any light to shed on this one, it would be much appreciated. Cheers Aaron Knauf Technical Consultant Computing Edge Limited Auckland, New Zealand aaron@compedge.co.nz From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Fri Aug 27 09:11:36 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: ./configure Message-ID: <412567DA.00327C41.00@paris3.par.sita.int> I am root! "Adam Williams" on 08/27/99 09:48:14 AM Please respond to awilliam@whitemice.org To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: ./configure > G?rard Leymarie wrote: > > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > /tmp/samba-2.0.5a/source -> > > > > Can you help me? I've had this error if I try to do a ./configure as non-root on my Red Hat boxes. From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Fri Aug 27 09:25:14 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: ./configure In-Reply-To: <412567DA.00327C41.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > G?rard Leymarie > Sent: 27 August 1999 09:20 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: ./configure > > I am root! What version redhat? What version kernel? Sam From Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int Fri Aug 27 10:53:54 1999 From: Gerard.Leymarie at sita.int (=?iso-8859-1?Q? G=E9rard_Leymarie ?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: ./configure Message-ID: <412567DA.003B9989.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Linux is a slackware 3.5 with Kernel 2.0.34 I have to use a slackware, because the server is a HP server and only the slackware recognise the SCSI controler NOte, I have already compile this samba version, on this server with no problems Thks for your help "Samuel Liddicott" on 08/27/99 11:33:40 AM Please respond to sam@campbellsci.co.uk To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > G?rard Leymarie > Sent: 27 August 1999 09:20 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: ./configure > > I am root! What version redhat? What version kernel? Sam From sam at campbellsci.co.uk Fri Aug 27 10:07:04 1999 From: sam at campbellsci.co.uk (Samuel Liddicott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: ./configure In-Reply-To: <412567DA.003B9989.00@paris3.par.sita.int> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: G?rard Leymarie [mailto:Gerard.Leymarie@sita.int] > Sent: 27 August 1999 11:54 AM > To: sam@campbellsci.co.uk > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: RE: ./configure > > Linux is a slackware 3.5 with Kernel 2.0.34 > I have to use a slackware, because the server is a HP server and only the > slackware > recognise the SCSI controler > NOte, I have already compile this samba version, on this server with no > problems Ah. Bummers.. Did you point out on the list that you had successfully compiled in the past? Are you able still to compile an older version? Sam > > Thks for your help > > > > > > "Samuel Liddicott" on 08/27/99 11:33:40 AM > > Please respond to sam@campbellsci.co.uk > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM cc: (bcc: G?rard Leymarie) > Subject: RE: ./configure > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > > G?rard Leymarie > > Sent: 27 August 1999 09:20 AM > > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > > Subject: Re: ./configure > > > > I am root! > > What version redhat? What version kernel? > > Sam > > > > > > > From ba2k at virginia.edu Fri Aug 27 12:07:31 1999 From: ba2k at virginia.edu (Burt Avery) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: 445? In-Reply-To: <37C53485.28D719F6@eng.auburn.edu> References: Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990827080731.0090c7c0@unix.mail.Virginia.edu> At 05:55 PM 8/27/99 +1000, Gerald Carter wrote: >Cabler, Adam W wrote: >> >> I saw a post a few days ago about the new port being used, 445. > >Port 445 is the NetBIOS-less CIFS port. Luke's been playing >with implementing NetBIOS-less CIFS connections "ala" Windows2000. > In some list of services I came across 445 was referenced as microsoft-ds which seemed to implicate W2K via directory services or something of the sort. I'm eager to see how it is used. -ba- Burt Avery Computer Systems Engineer LSP Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22908 804-924-9813 From Picard at adelphia.net Fri Aug 27 13:53:20 1999 From: Picard at adelphia.net (J.W. Fox) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Problems with ./configure Message-ID: Hello group, I am trying to build the latest HEAD code on a UnixWare 7. Have been able to bring in the CVS tree with no problem. The problem that I am having is that when I run ./configure as root, it bombs out when checking HOSTTYPE. It appears that it cannot guess what the HOSTTYPE is. I am running this on a Compaq Proliant 1600 server. If anyone could help me out this would be greatly appreciated. Thank you J.W. From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 27 15:48:51 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: 445? In-Reply-To: <37C53485.28D719F6@eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Gerald Carter wrote: > Cabler, Adam W wrote: > > > > I saw a post a few days ago about the new port being used, 445. > > Port 445 is the NetBIOS-less CIFS port. Luke's been playing > with implementing NetBIOS-less CIFS connections "ala" Windows2000. i've done client-side (clientgen.c) in cvs main, it was incredibly simple: if (port != 445) { cli_session_request(...) } server-side i haven't done, i don't know enough about sockets: you need to listen on both 445 and 139. if 445, then skip the session request and fake up the netbios names (called / calling) from reverse dns lookups (gethostbyaddr()). @begin rant ... which is, of course, where the problems start rolling in [gethostbyaddr()] in nt 5 because they are using dynamic dns, and of course the ttl can sometimes be long enough on a cached dns lookup to cause the wrong name to be returned from the gethostbyaddr() call... we told them to include the name in a suitable first SMB request (e.g an SMBnegprotX) but of course, because nt5 beta 1 had been released and feature-frozen at the same time that the first draft cifs spec was released they "of course" couldn't do anything about it. amazing. @end rant luke From lkcl at switchboard.net Fri Aug 27 15:49:55 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: 445? In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990827080731.0090c7c0@unix.mail.Virginia.edu> Message-ID: On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Burt Avery wrote: > At 05:55 PM 8/27/99 +1000, Gerald Carter wrote: > >Cabler, Adam W wrote: > >> > >> I saw a post a few days ago about the new port being used, 445. > > > >Port 445 is the NetBIOS-less CIFS port. Luke's been playing > >with implementing NetBIOS-less CIFS connections "ala" Windows2000. > > > > In some list of services I came across 445 was referenced as microsoft-ds uh oh... well, they lied :-) ports 1501 and 445 are nt5 SMB. From aaron at compedge.co.nz Fri Aug 27 22:18:33 1999 From: aaron at compedge.co.nz (Aaron Knauf) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: Security issue with home directories References: <199908270847.KAA03931@prag.fluent.de> Message-ID: <37C70EB9.E35F90A0@compedge.co.nz> Juergen Bock wrote: > Hi there, > > do you have something like admin users or so set in smb.conf? Yes, I have an "admin users" line in smb.conf admin users = +admin The relevant line from /etc/group is admin:x:800:root,joeadmin > > This allows root access to the UNIX system. Try creating files via > windoze and then look on the UNIX side who own them. As mentioned in my previous post, all files created through access to this problem share are owned by joeadmin, despite it being freduser logged in. It seems that the share remains connected, as joeadmin, when freduser logs in. ADK From Baero at t-online.de Fri Aug 27 20:18:00 1999 From: Baero at t-online.de (Dietlind Baero) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19990827221800.00929580@pop.btx.dtag.de> subscribe end Dietlind B?ro D - 69469 Weinheim Deutschland FAX: +49 - (0)6201 962025 mailto:baero@t-online.de From elvis at gracelands.com Sun Aug 29 02:13:35 1999 From: elvis at gracelands.com (Robert Brooks) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:59 2003 Subject: smbmount broken under 2.1.0pre too Message-ID: <007901bef1c4$1c7eab20$0200000a@gracelands.com> Jens, looking at the source for smbmount.c (see below) it appears there is a missing #define NR_OPEN 256 in the cvs smbmount.c. I wouldn't recommend patching in your cvs tree (take a copy aside and patch that maybe), and I can't guarantee my interpretation is right. Hopefully someone will apply this or a more correct fix soon. Regards, Rob --- samba-2.1.0pre/source/client/smbmount.c --- close_our_files(void) { int i; for (i = 0; i < NR_OPEN; i++) { if (i == Client) { continue; ----------------------------------------------------------------- --- samba-2.0.5a/source/client/smbmount.c --- static void close_our_files(int client_fd) { int i; for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) { if (i == client_fd) continue; --------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smbmount-patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 338 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/19990829/b387a50d/smbmount-patch.obj From lkcl at switchboard.net Sun Aug 29 13:22:10 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: creategroup, addgroupmem, delgroupmem, addgroup, delgroup tests reqd Message-ID: hi, i do not currently have access to an nt pdc against which to run the above commands. could someone help me out here by running: rpcclient -S your_pdc -U administrator -d 100 -l log then use the above group commands, and any others you can find in rpcclient to do with groups (not aliases, as you can run those against an nt non-pdc which i have already done) and then send me the resultant log.client output? i need it for examples in the dce/rpc smb book, so please the examples need to be short (e.g only add one member to a group). thanks! luke Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Samba and Network Development Samba Web site Internet Security Systems, Inc. From kevin at easyadv.com Sun Aug 29 17:10:32 1999 From: kevin at easyadv.com (Kevin Mak) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: add Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19990830011032.0084cba0@205.252.156.1> add From jasonlam at softhome.net Sun Aug 29 17:21:45 1999 From: jasonlam at softhome.net (Jason Lam) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: (URGENT) Problems loggin in Message-ID: <00dd01bef242$f8fc4c00$4ba77018@cr951892a> I am using 2.05a on Mandrake Linux (RH clone). I was having a trouble with user loggin in. All machines were running fine, and login were OK before production. However, when in production, every work station cannot login, obviously the boss isn't happy. I tried to trace the problem, I am havng one samba server as the PDC, and 7 other wks. Everything was ok, then I change the ip and put this into production and deleted the smbpasswd file because I got too many test account. Afterwards, I put it into production, then none of the machine is able to login. There seems to be two problems here. First of all, when trying to login at the clients' computer. It gives me a message, "The system could not log you on......" It seems that the clients is not reconizing the PDC (samba). And is forming itself something like a workgroup. With one of the wks as a master browser. I am guessing it is due to myself deleting the smbpasswd and the machine accounts are gone. The following are what I can find in the SAMBA NT DOMAIN FAQ. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2.7 I joined the domain successfully but after upgrading to a newer version of the Samba code I get the message, "The system can not log you on (C000019B), Please try again or consult your system administrator" when attempting to logon This occurs when the domain SID stored in private/WORKGROUP.SID is changed. For example, you remove the file and smbd automaticaaly creates a new one. Or you are swapping back and forth between versions 2.0.x and the HEAD branch code (not recommended). The only way to correct the problem is to Restore the original domain SID Remove the domain client from the domain and rejoin. ----------------------------------------------------------------- My first question is, how do I do the above? Please be as detailed as possible, rebooting the wks doesn't seems to help. Second problem is with the IP, since I changed the IP of the samba server. It seems that there are problems with samba when the server IP has changed. I did went into the /var/lock/samba and deleted EVERY files in that directory. However, it still doesn't seems to help, when I do "smbclient -L SERVER" it is still trying to get to the old ip rather than the new ip and therefore no route to host. Anyone have a solution to this? Jason Lam -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From lkcl at switchboard.net Sun Aug 29 17:40:09 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: add In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990830011032.0084cba0@205.252.156.1> Message-ID: see http://samba.org/listproc On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Kevin Mak wrote: > add > From moser at egu.schule.ulm.de Sun Aug 29 22:54:34 1999 From: moser at egu.schule.ulm.de (Steffen Moser) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: (URGENT) Problems loggin in References: <00dd01bef242$f8fc4c00$4ba77018@cr951892a> Message-ID: <37C9BA2A.C80C0C9D@egu.schule.ulm.de> Hello, Jason Lam wrote: > There seems to be two problems here. First of all, when trying to > login at the clients' computer. It gives me a message, "The system > could not log you on......" It seems that the clients is not > reconizing the PDC (samba). Your WinNT clients must join your Samba controlled domain. Every machine which should be able to do a domain logon must be a member of this domain. > My first question is, how do I do the above? Please be as detailed as > possible, rebooting the wks doesn't seems to help. I think the best way would be to create new machine accounts in "smbpasswd". Every NT Workstation must join the domain after that. > Second problem is with the IP, since I changed the IP of the samba > server. It seems that there are problems with samba when the server IP > has changed. I did went into the /var/lock/samba and deleted EVERY > files in that directory. However, it still doesn't seems to help, when > I do "smbclient -L SERVER" it is still trying to get to the old ip > rather than the new ip and therefore no route to host. Anyone have a > solution to this? Perhaps there is still an invalid record in a LMHOSTS file or an invalid record in WINS or DNS? Did you have a look at "smb.conf" whether there is the new IP address defined in the option "interface"? Bye, Steffen -- Steffen Moser eMail: Registered Linux User: #130716 WWW: http://www.egu.schule.ulm.de [http://counter.li.org] From JFBOUCHE at EURIWARE.FR Mon Aug 30 07:16:34 1999 From: JFBOUCHE at EURIWARE.FR (BOUCHET Jean-Francois) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Network Properties for a member of a Samba Domain Message-ID: <199908300715.JAA09657@mail.euriware.fr> Hi all and sorry for my poor English, I have a Samba Box (2.0.5a) PDC of my domain and it work fine but..... the networks properties of my NT Workstation, member of the domain seem to be disable : I can't change the share on my NT Box and the Networks Properties in the control panel are in a restricted mode (no change are possible). Is it normal or did I miss something ? Thanks for the help Jean-Fran?ois From leemc at cdf.toronto.edu Mon Aug 30 07:20:51 1999 From: leemc at cdf.toronto.edu (Matthew Lee) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: I am away Message-ID: <99Aug30.032054edt.6461@marvin.cdf.toronto.edu> I'll be away from the office until Tuesday, August 31. I will read your message when I return. If your message pertains to CDF/CDFPC, please contact admin@cdfpc.toronto.edu. Thank you Matthew Lee From JBruns at spectro-ai.com Mon Aug 30 07:51:42 1999 From: JBruns at spectro-ai.com (Jochen Bruns) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: subscribe Message-ID: please subscribe me to your Mailinglist! jbruns@spectro-ai.com best regards From Harald at iki.fi Mon Aug 30 08:02:28 1999 From: Harald at iki.fi (Harald Hannelius) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: add reg-.. [Roaming netscape on samba, WORKS!] (fwd) Message-ID: This should maybe be public knowledge too... There's a new hint too: 'ln -s ${HOME}/.netscape/bookmarks Windows/Netscape/bookmark.htm', seems to work w/ NT4sp5. =========================================================== Harald H Hannelius | Harald@iki.fi | GSM +358405470870 =========================================================== ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:09:07 +0300 (EEST) From: Harald Hannelius To: peter pilsl Subject: Re: add reg-.. [Roaming netscape on samba, WORKS!] There's a good article on adding reg entries using .inf files on http://www.performancecomputing.com/unixintegration, they are one of the most powerful MICROS~1 tools available. I used that information, and some more that I found on netscape.com to allow users to have their 'own' netscape directory on their network drive. This is how you do it: Add this call to the logon-script: rundll32 setupapi,InstallHinfSection DefaultInstall 132 \\server\netlogon\netscapeusrprof.inf This will inject the registry entries described in the .inf file into the users HKCU. This is how the netscapeusrprof.inf file looks like: (There may be some extra line-breaks here now, please use your head :) ; To set the netscape prefs before starting it. ; 24 Aug 99 Harald ; First version [version] signature="$Windows NT$" ; For windows NT [DefaultInstall] AddReg=AddNetscapeProfile [AddNetscapeProfile] HKCU,"Software\Netscape\Netscape Navigator\UserInfo", HKCU,"Software\Netscape\Netscape Navigator\UserInfo", DirRoot,,"H:\\Windows\Netscape" HKCU,"Software\Netscape\Netscape Navigator\UserInfo", ProfileDirectory,,"H:\\Windows\Netscape" ; EOF After that you get roaming profiles for your network users. This is most convenient when you have multiple users/machine as you would often have in a school environment. I have only tested this on NT4, sp5, and I can confirm that i works like you would expect. The users preferences, cache, maildir and everything goes with the user as he roams about on different wks's. Have fun :) On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, peter pilsl wrote: > we decided to change some common settings in our network (mainly for these office2000-things) and so we have to change > settings in each users registry (HKCU). Is there a way to add this changes to the NTconfig.pol in the servers netlogon-share, > so the changes are done automatically when the user logs on ? > > example: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Common\General\UserTemplates need to be changed for each user. > > thanks, > peter > > > ------------------------------------------- > mag. peter pilsl > > phone: +43/(0)/6763574035 > fax : +43/(0)/6763546512 > email: pilsl@goldfisch.atat.at > sms: pilsl_mobil@goldfisch.atat.at > > pgp-key available > ------------------------------------------- > =========================================================== Harald H Hannelius | Harald@iki.fi | GSM +358405470870 =========================================================== From avi at inf.unitn.it Mon Aug 30 11:47:32 1999 From: avi at inf.unitn.it (Andrea Avi) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: problems with file's ownership Message-ID: <37CA6F54.AE82B718@inf.unitn.it> I need help... I have samba 2.0.4b on solaris7 acting as a PDC >From NT4.0 workstation I can logon into samba PDC as a samba user (in /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd) and it work fine. The problem is that when a user create a file on a NTFS partition (on the local workstation) the ownership of this file is "Account Unknown" I did not find any answer in the FAQs neither in the NT-dom mailing list Probably my smb.conf is miscounfigured or I forgot some simple entry... in my smb.conf I have security = user encrypt password = true nt acl support = true guest access = no guest account = nobody If somebody had the same problem and resolved it... please help me From angus at gactr.uga.edu Mon Aug 30 12:48:38 1999 From: angus at gactr.uga.edu (Angus Robertson) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Kixtart 3.5.5 and latest cvs Message-ID: <19990830084838.B2686@iguana.gactr.uga.edu> I'm running the latest samba cvs w/ ldap as a pdc and kixtart 3.5.5. Kixtart runs and the drives map, but I get this error - anyone seen this or know how to resolve it. Is this Samba denying access to WkstaGetInfo - or smthg I've missed? The description for Event ID ( 5 ) in Source ( KIXTART ) could not be found. It contains the following insertion string(s): WkstaGetInfo failed Error : Access is denied. (0x5/5). Here's the kixtart script: setconsole ("HIDE") break off $s="\\FS1\" $u=@userid $x="$$" $dir=$s+$u+$x use * /delete use g: \\FS1\Groups use h:$dir use i: \\PDC\Icons Thanks, angus From lkcl at switchboard.net Mon Aug 30 13:11:14 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Kixtart 3.5.5 and latest cvs In-Reply-To: <19990830084838.B2686@iguana.gactr.uga.edu> Message-ID: angus, standard procedure required in order for someone to know how to implement the DCE/RPC functionality required, which is: please run proram against an nt wksta or pdc whilst netmon is running. send either netmon trace or text print-out of netmon trace (with lines of hex set to 1,000 in the advanced print options). that is, of course, if you want someone to add functional support for this program into samba :) alternatively, you could buy someone on the samba team (or anyone else prepared to implement this) a license for the program you are using. luke p.s i keep repeating the above about once every month or two. if people want to use third party programs or variations from the tried-and-tested versions of NT (e.g nt tse or windd), we _need_ network traces: there is simply no other way to do this stuff without a microsoft source code license. On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Angus Robertson wrote: > > I'm running the latest samba cvs w/ ldap as a pdc and kixtart 3.5.5. Kixtart > runs and the drives map, but I get this error - anyone seen this or know how > to resolve it. Is this Samba denying access to WkstaGetInfo - or smthg I've > missed? > > The description for Event ID ( 5 ) in Source ( KIXTART ) could not be found. > It contains the following insertion string(s): WkstaGetInfo failed Error : > Access is denied. (0x5/5). > > Here's the kixtart script: > > setconsole ("HIDE") > > break off > > $s="\\FS1\" > $u=@userid > $x="$$" > $dir=$s+$u+$x > > use * /delete > > use g: \\FS1\Groups > use h:$dir > use i: \\PDC\Icons > > Thanks, > > angus > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Samba and Network Development Samba Web site Internet Security Systems, Inc. From westermann at imm-mainz.de Mon Aug 30 15:16:26 1999 From: westermann at imm-mainz.de (Westermann, Torsten; (839); IUK) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Mount Shares Message-ID: <401B8FD6C59@immnfa.imm-mainz.de> Hi there.... We have samba 2.0.5a on Linux acting as a PDC and much Win95 and WinNT Clients. How can one special WinNT Workstations 4.0 (SP4) mount different shares from our Samba PDC, idependent from the user ? We use DHCP for the IP-Adresses, Wins on Samba and DNS. Must we configure these in the /etc/smb.conf or need we a Batch - File? I am sorry for my very bad English! Best Regards Torsten Westermann E-Mail.: westermann@imm-mainz.de WWW: http://www.imm-mainz.de Institute of Microtechnology Mainz 55129 Mainz Germany From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Mon Aug 30 13:23:40 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Kixtart 3.5.5 and latest cvs References: Message-ID: <37CA85DC.683A95B6@eng.auburn.edu> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > >alternatively, you could buy someone on the samba > team (or anyone else prepared to implement this) a > license for the program you are using. Luke, Kixtart is part of the NT Resource Kit. jerry From lkcl at switchboard.net Mon Aug 30 13:41:10 1999 From: lkcl at switchboard.net (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Kixtart 3.5.5 and latest cvs In-Reply-To: <37CA85DC.683A95B6@eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Gerald Carter wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > >alternatively, you could buy someone on the samba > > team (or anyone else prepared to implement this) a > > license for the program you are using. > > Luke, > > Kixtart is part of the NT Resource Kit. oh goodie! then we don't have to buy it :) From rdab100 at cam.ac.uk Mon Aug 30 16:17:38 1999 From: rdab100 at cam.ac.uk (Dominic Baines) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Kixtart 3.5.5 and latest cvs References: Message-ID: <37CAAEA1.2EF0012B@cam.ac.uk> Luke did you kown that... A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The following address(es) failed: lkcl@switchboard.net: SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO: : host mail.globecomm.net [206.253.130.51]: 523 ... The IP address 194.217.242.41 is blacklisted. contact your administrator for details. Bit odd !! Dominic Baines From kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us Mon Aug 30 18:13:15 1999 From: kevin_myer at elanco.k12.pa.us (Kevin Myer) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Default umask/file locking problem Message-ID: Hello, Leave it to the first day of school starting to uncover some problems with my current Samba implimentation. For reference, I'm running the HEAD CVS branch from about a week ago on a dual Pentium II 300Mhz with 512Mb of RAM. We are using an old(er) DOS library checkout system from Follett Software. The workstations are now running NT with DOS in a shell and access a Samba-based file server which holds the database records and config files. Previously, the file server had been NT based. I successfully moved everything from the NT server to the Samba-server and ran the checkout system from that for most of this past summer. However, today, as I was setting up some client search workstations, I found that a semaphore file is apparently only allowing one user at a time to use the system. The share I am using for this system comes off of \\SERVER\UNISON and every time an instance of the program is run from a different workstation, a file in \\SERVER\UNISON\TEMP is created or modified. It is called UNISON.SEM. The TEMP directory has full rwx for everyone. So I logon as Circulation and run the program. UNISON.SEM is created with a file mode of 744 (rwxr--r--) and owned by Circulation/lmc. If I attempt to login as another user on a search station, I can't because it attempts to create a new UNISON.SEM but can't. So I am wondering if there isn't a problem with the file being locked or with umask creation modes not properly being set, at least for this application. What I'd like is to have the UNISON.SEM file created with full rwx access for everyone or barring that, have some sort of non-exclusive lock. I'm really grasping at straws as to why this isn't working - having the file locked wrong or having it created with the wrong umask is all that I can think of that is causing this problem. I welcome any other suggestions of things to try. Sorry about the muddled nature of this post. If you need more info or a debug log, let me know what level and I'll pass the info along. Thanks, Kevin -- ~ Kevin M. Myer . . Network/System Administrator /V\ ELANCO School District // \ /( )\ ^`~'^ From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Mon Aug 30 18:24:11 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Default umask/file locking problem References: Message-ID: <37CACC4B.775F91C0@eng.auburn.edu> Kevin Myer wrote: > > What I'd like is to have the UNISON.SEM file created with > full rwx access for everyone or barring that, have some > sort of non-exclusive lock. Are the only files created located in the TEMP dir? If so, create mode = 0666 force create mode = 0666 will force all files created on the share to have rw-rw-rw. Be careful though. Another possibility would be to use the 'force user' parameter. This maybe a better option. Hope this helps, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From hulet at ittc.ukans.edu Mon Aug 30 18:40:53 1999 From: hulet at ittc.ukans.edu (Michael S. Hulet) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Mount Shares In-Reply-To: <401B8FD6C59@immnfa.imm-mainz.de> Message-ID: I accomplish this using the smb.conf parameter config file = /usr/system/samba/lib/smb.conf.%m then in my /usr/system/samba/lib directory, I created a unique smb.conf.machine_name with the share available. When a user logs into that machine, they can see the shares. Michael Hulet Network System Administrator ITTC, University of Kansas On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Westermann, Torsten; (839); IUK wrote: > Hi there.... > > We have samba 2.0.5a on Linux acting as a PDC and > much Win95 and WinNT Clients. > How can one special WinNT Workstations 4.0 (SP4) > mount different shares from our Samba PDC, > idependent from the user ? > We use DHCP for the IP-Adresses, Wins on Samba and DNS. > > Must we configure these in the /etc/smb.conf or need we a > Batch - File? > > I am sorry for my very bad English! > > Best Regards > > Torsten Westermann > > E-Mail.: westermann@imm-mainz.de > WWW: http://www.imm-mainz.de > > Institute of Microtechnology Mainz > 55129 Mainz > Germany > From aaron at compedge.co.nz Mon Aug 30 21:20:45 1999 From: aaron at compedge.co.nz (Aaron Knauf) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: WinNT and auto-reconnect Message-ID: <37CAF5AD.E38EF2CA@compedge.co.nz> Hi all, I have another weird one here. When using a WinNT server, you can reboot the server while (win/NT) clients are connected and the clients will automatically re-establish their connections when the server comes back up. With Samba you can do the same. Here's the catch. If you restart samba, then logout your client *without accessing any of the previously opened shares* then the profile is written back to the home directory and that share is left open on the server (shown by smbstatus). From this point on, no-one can log in to the server (at least, not from the same workstation - I haven't tried it with more than one). Another samba restart is required to get people logging in again. TIA ADK From jmiles at smm.org Mon Aug 30 23:34:35 1999 From: jmiles at smm.org (Joel Miles) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells Message-ID: <000f01bef340$5b9b1820$0200a8c0@miles.ods.org> I'm running Samba 2.0.5a on a Redhat 6 server. I have several Win95 clients. How do I specify a different shell (other than explorer.exe) for each user? ----------------------- Joel Miles (651) 776-6870 jmiles@smm.org http://miles.nailed.com ----------------------- From jjm at iname.com Mon Aug 30 23:40:57 1999 From: jjm at iname.com (Johan Meiring) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Kixtart 3.5.5 and latest cvs Message-ID: <000201bef341$1bab7d80$da24e1d8@sandra98> Hi all, Latest version of kixtart always available form http://netnet.net/~swilson/kix In an earlier post today, another user wanted to know how to find out which groups a user belongs to in the login script. Kixtart is also the right tool for this Johan T/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > >On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Gerald Carter wrote: > >> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> > >> >alternatively, you could buy someone on the samba >> > team (or anyone else prepared to implement this) a >> > license for the program you are using. >> >> Luke, >> >> Kixtart is part of the NT Resource Kit. >> >oh goodie! then we don't have to buy it :) From swalker at geo.Arizona.EDU Mon Aug 30 23:53:54 1999 From: swalker at geo.Arizona.EDU (C. Scott Walker) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Solaris Samba PDC for NT/Mac LAN Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:20:08 -0700 (MST) From: C. Scott Walker To: listproc@samba.org Subject: Solaris Samba PDC for NT/Mac LAN Hi, We have just set up our Sparc20 / Solaris 2.6 with Samba 2.1 pre-alpha as a PDC for 10 NT workstations. So far, so good - $600.00 saved! Our lab also has a Mac G3 server, running AppleShare IP 6.1.1 and At Ease for Workgroups. The Mac server folders/directories are transparently accessible when a user logs in locally to one of the workstations, provided an identical user account (name and password) has been set up on the Mac. However, when a user logs in to the samba domain - again, with identical user accounts on the Sun and the Mac - the Mac is visible in Network Neighborhood, but shared folders are not browsable (file system not accessible message). Interestingly, the Mac reports that a connection has been established, with the correct user and IP address, a connection that persists until the user logs out on the NT side. Our ultimate goal is to set up user home directories and NT profiles on the Mac server. Are we nuts? Has anyone done this, successfully or otherwise? Thanks in advance for any help or advice. Scott C. Scott Walker Research Assistant - Geosciences Department University of Arizona From GLeblanc at cu-portland.edu Tue Aug 31 00:05:25 1999 From: GLeblanc at cu-portland.edu (Gregory Leblanc) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells Message-ID: AFAIK, you have to change that on workstations, and not on the server. You change it in win.ini (I think), in the line called SHELL=explorer.exe. The only think that I ever wanted to change it to was NAL (Novell Application Launcher), and only then as a security precaution. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Joel Miles [mailto:jmiles@smm.org] > Sent: Monday, August 30, 1999 4:38 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: different shells > > > I'm running Samba 2.0.5a on a Redhat 6 server. I have several Win95 > clients. How do I specify a different shell (other than > explorer.exe) for > each user? > > ----------------------- > Joel Miles > (651) 776-6870 > jmiles@smm.org > http://miles.nailed.com > ----------------------- > From jmiles at smm.org Tue Aug 31 00:28:03 1999 From: jmiles at smm.org (Joel Miles) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells References: Message-ID: <007601bef347$b1b1ce00$0200a8c0@miles.ods.org> > AFAIK, you have to change that on workstations, and not on the server. You > change it in win.ini (I think), in the line called SHELL=explorer.exe. The > only think that I ever wanted to change it to was NAL (Novell Application > Launcher), and only then as a security precaution. > Greg I've tried this, but this is only works on a workstation basis. I want a different shell for each USER (ie. if they logon at a different computer, the shell changes for them). From GLeblanc at cu-portland.edu Tue Aug 31 00:35:50 1999 From: GLeblanc at cu-portland.edu (Gregory Leblanc) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells Message-ID: Well, with some REALLY complex scripting, you might be able to accomplish that. You know, parse win.ini, check to see what the value of the SHELL line is, compare that to what it should be for that user. If it's different, replace it and reboot, if it's the same, then just log them in. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Joel Miles [mailto:jmiles@smm.org] > Sent: Monday, August 30, 1999 5:30 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: Re: different shells > > > > > AFAIK, you have to change that on workstations, and not on > the server. > You > > change it in win.ini (I think), in the line called > SHELL=explorer.exe. > The > > only think that I ever wanted to change it to was NAL > (Novell Application > > Launcher), and only then as a security precaution. > > Greg > > I've tried this, but this is only works on a workstation > basis. I want a > different shell for each USER (ie. if they logon at a > different computer, > the shell changes for them). > From jmiles at smm.org Tue Aug 31 00:40:38 1999 From: jmiles at smm.org (Joel Miles) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells References: Message-ID: <008e01bef349$7299d940$0200a8c0@miles.ods.org> > Well, with some REALLY complex scripting, you might be able to accomplish > that. You know, parse win.ini, check to see what the value of the SHELL > line is, compare that to what it should be for that user. If it's > different, replace it and reboot, if it's the same, then just log them in. > Greg Do you know where I could get some help in writing this (also, what language would I use, Perl?)? From aaron at compedge.co.nz Tue Aug 31 03:59:12 1999 From: aaron at compedge.co.nz (Aaron Knauf) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: WinNT and auto-reconnect References: Message-ID: <37CB5310.1D722BB9@compedge.co.nz> Mithat Olut wrote: > then delete them manually with a script before starting samba... I can't do that. The connections are not maintained at the server. Visiting every client and closing the connections is not feasible on a real LAN. ADK > > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom@samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom@samba.org]On Behalf Of > Aaron Knauf > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 12:18 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM > Subject: WinNT and auto-reconnect > > Hi all, > > I have another weird one here. > > When using a WinNT server, you can reboot the server while (win/NT) > clients are connected and the clients will automatically re-establish > their connections when the server comes back up. > > With Samba you can do the same. > > Here's the catch. If you restart samba, then logout your client > *without accessing any of the previously opened shares* then the profile > is written back to the home directory and that share is left open on the > server (shown by smbstatus). From this point on, no-one can log in to > the server (at least, not from the same workstation - I haven't tried it > with more than one). Another samba restart is required to get people > logging in again. > > TIA > > ADK From thwartedefforts at wonky.org Tue Aug 31 05:32:35 1999 From: thwartedefforts at wonky.org (thwartedefforts@wonky.org) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: WinNT and auto-reconnect Message-ID: <19990831053235.28777.cpmta@c008.sfo.cp.net> This is related to a known NT bug that Microsoft won't fix because, I'm told: 1- it doesn't effect NT servers in the same way it effects Samba. 2- MS can't reliably reproduce it (I think this claim is bogus). Here's references to when I was looking at this: http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-technical/2119.html http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-technical/2120.html http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-technical/2128.html 2120 is especially interesting, where Luke points out that it's listed on NTBUGTRAQ. Also, the thread that starts at http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-ntdom/4281.html especially the following two http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-ntdom/4285.html http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba-ntdom/4298.html On Mon, 30 August 1999, Aaron Knauf wrote: > Hi all, > > I have another weird one here. > > When using a WinNT server, you can reboot the server while (win/NT) > clients are connected and the clients will automatically re-establish > their connections when the server comes back up. > > With Samba you can do the same. > > Here's the catch. If you restart samba, then logout your client > *without accessing any of the previously opened shares* then the profile > is written back to the home directory and that share is left open on the > server (shown by smbstatus). From this point on, no-one can log in to > the server (at least, not from the same workstation - I haven't tried it > with more than one). Another samba restart is required to get people > logging in again. > > TIA > > ADK From Blaise.Lab at cpln.ch Tue Aug 31 10:03:45 1999 From: Blaise.Lab at cpln.ch (Lab Blaise) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Samba 2.0.5a Message-ID: Hello, After I downloaded the version 2.0.5a I compiled it on my server who ever had the version 2.0.3. Then I did "make" and then "make install". The problem is that on a nt-Workstation we always see that the version of samba is 2.0.3 instead 2.0.5a. Thus I can't change Unix permissions on linux-shares on a nt-Workstation. Thank you for your answers and advices. Blaise Lab blaise.lab@cpln.ch From fricke at Team.OWL-Online.DE Tue Aug 31 08:42:25 1999 From: fricke at Team.OWL-Online.DE (Cord-H. Fricke) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Samba 2.0.5a References: Message-ID: <37CB9571.E851F17A@team.owl-online.de> Then, I think, you didn?t installed the new Samba-Version correct. I had the same problem with 2.04b. But I just changed a path in the configurescript and so the old version was running and the new one was sleeping. The other way is to kill all the nmbd and smbd?s and restart samba... Maybe it works :-p Cord Lab Blaise schrieb: > Hello, > > After I downloaded the version 2.0.5a I compiled it on my server who ever > had the version 2.0.3. Then I did "make" and then "make install". The > problem is that on a nt-Workstation we always see that the version of samba > is 2.0.3 instead 2.0.5a. Thus I can't change Unix permissions on > linux-shares on a nt-Workstation. > > Thank you for your answers and advices. > > Blaise Lab > blaise.lab@cpln.ch -- Cord-H. Fricke Technik 0 52 1 / 52 51 133 fricke@team.owl-online.de http://www.team.owl-online.de/ Thanx God it?s friday... From stwo at bofh.maldata.se Tue Aug 31 12:28:37 1999 From: stwo at bofh.maldata.se (Stefan Wold) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: W2k and joining a Samba PDC? Message-ID: Hi.... I've been running samba as a PDC for a while, but however I have never tried NT wks to join my domain (only win9x clients which work perfectly). I then decided to try Windows 2000 Pro and let it join my PDC. I read somewhere that you had to add a line to your smbpasswd with the same name as the netbios name of the Nt client, in my case octopusy =) yes its a silly name....I dont remember exactly the line i added but its something like "octopusy$:800:password here?(same as netbios name?):password here?(same as netbios name?):[W ]:and something here".... I then tried (without username and password in Windows 2000" to join my domain, it then says Wrong domain name or it doesnt exist. I have encryption enabled on my samba....I have tried this PDC function in both samba 2.0.5a and CVS 2.1.0 prealpha.... Neither of them work...Could someone give me a hint? And please a example file of smbpasswd.... Sincerely Stefan Wold From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Tue Aug 31 12:48:36 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: W2k and joining a Samba PDC? References: Message-ID: <37CBCF23.CF8AE966@eng.auburn.edu> Stefan Wold wrote: > > decided to try Windows 2000 Pro and let it join my PDC. Won't work currently. Only up to WinNT 4 SP5 Have you read the Samba NT Domain FAQ? It's linked of the documentation page on the Samba site. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From swaters at amicus.com Tue Aug 31 15:15:57 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells References: <008e01bef349$7299d940$0200a8c0@miles.ods.org> Message-ID: <37CBF1AD.A9E6E126@amicus.com> Joel Miles wrote: > > > Well, with some REALLY complex scripting, you might be able to accomplish > > that. You know, parse win.ini, check to see what the value of the SHELL > > line is, compare that to what it should be for that user. If it's > > different, replace it and reboot, if it's the same, then just log them in. > > Greg > > Do you know where I could get some help in writing this (also, what language > would I use, Perl?)? if you have perl for win32 on all of your workstations, this might be workable. otherwise, you should probably use a .bat file with some decent text manipulation utilites (kind of a "cat win.ini |grep shell" bash comparison thing), though i'm not a .bat genius. just a thought, -stephen From norman at lithe.uark.edu Tue Aug 31 15:20:44 1999 From: norman at lithe.uark.edu (Norman Weathers) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Samba 2.0.5a and some Strange Doings... Message-ID: <37CBF2CC.2A20BFF1@lithe.uark.edu> Hello All! Well, I have been a happy user of samba for several months now. It has performed better than we could ever hope. But, lately, there have been some problems. The big thing is that samba seems to overflow its logs, and then, instead of swapping the logs out (I read that it checks the log size, then swaps out the large log to the *.old extension, is that still correct?), it dumps everything to the console. Currently, I have the log size set at 50K, and it is doing this dump problem every 1 to 2 days (Today, I upped the log size to 500K). This last time, it caused a major malfunction on the server. It basically disabled the nmbd and severley crippled the smbd (Took over 15 minutes for a typical login). Anyway, is this a known problem? I can send someone my logs and configs if you would like, but I didn't want to waste the bandwidth just yet if they weren't needed. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Other information: Server: RedHat 6.0 with latest ERRATAs. Gateway 2000 P-II 266 64 M Ram Clients: WinNT WS 4.0 SP4 and some SP5 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Norman Weathers Technology Coordinator ETS University of Arkansas, Fayetteville phone: (501) 575-3553 or (501) 575-4344 email: nweathe@comp.uark.edu or norman@lithe.uark.edu "It's not that I 'prefer' to do this without an NT server.... I just 'prefer' to do it where it will work..." ------------------------------------------------------------------- From pburch at oralis.com Tue Aug 31 15:39:47 1999 From: pburch at oralis.com (Phil Burch) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells Message-ID: <81F006A86C19D311B1880060089A3E72036261@PDC> I wrote some quick and ugly c that changes the netbios name of a dos for lanman client in system.ini You could change it to edit Win.ini Phil Burch Network Administrator http://www.Oralis.com -- code below #include #include #include #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]){ FILE *infileh; FILE *outfileh; char input[80]; char sysfile[] = "C:\\Net\\SYSTEM.INI"; char tempfile[] = "C:\\Net\\SYSTEM.TMP"; char syscmd[80] = "copy "; strcat(syscmd, tempfile); strcat(syscmd, " "); strcat(syscmd, sysfile); if(argc < 2){ printf("MSNAME ERROR:\tNo name specified!\n\t\tUsage MSNAME XXXX_XX\n"); return 0; } if((infileh = fopen(sysfile, "rt")) == NULL){ printf("MSNAME ERROR: Error opening input file %s\n", &sysfile); return 0; } if((outfileh = fopen(tempfile, "wt")) == NULL){ printf("MSNAME ERROR: Error opening output file %s\n", &tempfile); return 0; } while(!(feof(infileh))){ fgets(input, 80, infileh); if(!(strncmpi(input, "computername", 12) == 0)){ fprintf(outfileh, input); } else { if((fprintf(outfileh, "computername=%s\n", argv[1])) == EOF){ printf("Error writing to file!\n"); fclose(infileh); return 0; } } } fclose(infileh); fclose(outfileh); if(system(syscmd) != 0){ printf("MSNAME ERROR: Error executing syscmd!\n"); return 0; } return 1; } -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Waters [mailto:swaters@amicus.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 8:21 AM To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: different shells Joel Miles wrote: > > > Well, with some REALLY complex scripting, you might be able to accomplish > > that. You know, parse win.ini, check to see what the value of the SHELL > > line is, compare that to what it should be for that user. If it's > > different, replace it and reboot, if it's the same, then just log them in. > > Greg > > Do you know where I could get some help in writing this (also, what language > would I use, Perl?)? if you have perl for win32 on all of your workstations, this might be workable. otherwise, you should probably use a .bat file with some decent text manipulation utilites (kind of a "cat win.ini |grep shell" bash comparison thing), though i'm not a .bat genius. just a thought, -stephen From aperrin at demog.Berkeley.EDU Tue Aug 31 15:53:18 1999 From: aperrin at demog.Berkeley.EDU (Andrew Perrin - Demography) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells In-Reply-To: <37CBF1AD.A9E6E126@amicus.com> Message-ID: Actually, we have perl-win32 loaded on a samba share (\\population\perl), and it works fine for each NT machine to run perl scripts; that keeps us from having to install perl on each pc. Also, perl's include structure is flexible enough that it finds installed modules in the same hierarchy - very clean. Cheers- Andy --------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew J. Perrin - aperrin@demog.berkeley.edu - NT/Unix Admin/Support Department of Demography - University of California at Berkeley 2232 Piedmont Avenue #2120 - Berkeley, California, 94720-2120 USA http://demog.berkeley.edu/~aperrin --------------------------SEIU1199 On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Stephen Waters wrote: > Joel Miles wrote: > > > > > Well, with some REALLY complex scripting, you might be able to accomplish > > > that. You know, parse win.ini, check to see what the value of the SHELL > > > line is, compare that to what it should be for that user. If it's > > > different, replace it and reboot, if it's the same, then just log them in. > > > Greg > > > > Do you know where I could get some help in writing this (also, what language > > would I use, Perl?)? > > if you have perl for win32 on all of your workstations, this might be > workable. otherwise, you should probably use a .bat file with some > decent text manipulation utilites (kind of a "cat win.ini |grep shell" > bash comparison thing), though i'm not a .bat genius. > > just a thought, > > -stephen > From Ron.E.Sinsley at mail.sprint.com Tue Aug 31 15:56:17 1999 From: Ron.E.Sinsley at mail.sprint.com (Ron E Sinsley) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: connection problems Message-ID: We are experiencing issues when trying to connect to our Linux Samba server from several NT 4.0 Workstations. Several of the workstations are having the following problem when trying to connect: When trying to connect from the DOS prompt using net use the user is asked for his/her password, then the error "System error 1240 has occurred" and they are not allowed to connect to the shared drive. When trying to connect via Network Neighborhood an error that basically says "this workstation is not allowed access to the server" is given. The strange part is that only a few of the NT workstation experience this problem, and their IP's are in the range allowed in the smb.conf file. Is there some other element that affects a workstations access to the server? Ron Sinsley Sprint NPAP Systems Analyst I (913) 323-4779 From icoupeau at unav.es Tue Aug 31 16:21:34 1999 From: icoupeau at unav.es (Ignacio Coupeau) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: samba-ldap howto updated Message-ID: <37CC010E.A07952AE@unav.es> The last update has a final section with the fine tuning for several LDAP servers. http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb-howto.html I tested here and runs fine with a couple of hundreds of ws (and 12.000 users or so). The configuration of the master/slave replication needs a replication account _with userpasswd_ for the binddn/replica. The replication account needs write access to the _all_ the samba suffix. Ignacio -- ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ From dnoltemeier at co.clatsop.or.us Tue Aug 31 16:22:36 1999 From: dnoltemeier at co.clatsop.or.us (Doug Noltemeier) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: Workgroup name conflict Message-ID: I have Samba 2.04b running on Solaris 7 with both NT and Win98 clients. After upgrading Solaris to the 5/99 interm release of Solaris 7 my NT clients have been unable to start the Workstation service because it says that the workgroup or domain name is already in use by another computer on the network. Win98 clients are still able to access the server. Running testparm I noticed that Samba was not reading my smb.conf file and instead using default parameters. Using the "-s" options I was able to point it at the correct smb.conf file. I also removed Samba and reinstalled it to no avail. Any ideas would be appreciated. I'm not even sure that this is actually a Samba problem but I thought that I'd start here. Thanks From swaters at amicus.com Tue Aug 31 16:24:40 1999 From: swaters at amicus.com (Stephen Waters) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: different shells References: Message-ID: <37CC01C8.2FCA5A6D@amicus.com> so, you could mount this directory, do perl script, and do an NT equiv of shutdown -r now if shell= was incorrect or continue login process if everything is ok. -stephen Andrew Perrin - Demography wrote: > > Actually, we have perl-win32 loaded on a samba share (\\population\perl), > and it works fine for each NT machine to run perl scripts; that keeps us > from having to install perl on each pc. Also, perl's include structure is > flexible enough that it finds installed modules in the same hierarchy - > very clean. > > Cheers- > Andy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Andrew J. Perrin - aperrin@demog.berkeley.edu - NT/Unix Admin/Support > Department of Demography - University of California at Berkeley > 2232 Piedmont Avenue #2120 - Berkeley, California, 94720-2120 USA > http://demog.berkeley.edu/~aperrin --------------------------SEIU1199 > > On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Stephen Waters wrote: > > > Joel Miles wrote: > > > > > > > Well, with some REALLY complex scripting, you might be able to accomplish > > > > that. You know, parse win.ini, check to see what the value of the SHELL > > > > line is, compare that to what it should be for that user. If it's > > > > different, replace it and reboot, if it's the same, then just log them in. > > > > Greg > > > > > > Do you know where I could get some help in writing this (also, what language > > > would I use, Perl?)? > > > > if you have perl for win32 on all of your workstations, this might be > > workable. otherwise, you should probably use a .bat file with some > > decent text manipulation utilites (kind of a "cat win.ini |grep shell" > > bash comparison thing), though i'm not a .bat genius. > > > > just a thought, > > > > -stephen > > From cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU Tue Aug 31 17:13:34 1999 From: cartegw at Eng.Auburn.EDU (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:00 2003 Subject: [Final notes] Re: different shells References: <37CC01C8.2FCA5A6D@amicus.com> Message-ID: <37CC0D3E.A303475B@eng.auburn.edu> OK. Hopefully this will wrap things up. It is possible to set the shell on a per user basis in NT4 using system policies. Perl scripts are now necessary here and neither are reboots. Cheers, jerry ________________________________________________________________________ Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter Engineering Network Services Auburn University jerry@eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From oscar.sanchez at cpeurope.com Tue Aug 31 16:30:52 1999 From: oscar.sanchez at cpeurope.com (Oscar Sanchez) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:01 2003 Subject: NT ws looses privileges Message-ID: <37CC033C.2FA00730@cpeurope.com> Hi I am sure the answer is documented, but I could get the solution trying several "settings" and different versions on samba. I have created a domain with samba 2.0.3-8 over Linux Redahat 6.0. W95/98 and NT servers works fine, but a NT WS after joining the domain has loose all the privileges from the local/domain users with admin provileges. So no way to reach admin privileges in this local machine. When I set up a administrator in the domain using admin users = username in the smb.conf this username can modify everything in the shares, but I can't reach admin privileges on the local machines. Any idea on how to setup a Domain Administrator so I can reach provileges again? Any hint will be really welcome. Thanks for any help. -- Oscar Sanchez Hernan Computer People Poudrieres 135 CH - 2006 Neuchatel Tel: +41 32 732 1000 Fax: +41 32 731 4463 oscar.sanchez@cpeurope.com www.cpeurope.com From giulioo at tiscalinet.it Tue Aug 31 19:21:02 1999 From: giulioo at tiscalinet.it (Giulio Orsero) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:01 2003 Subject: Cannot Allocate pty for password change: Message-ID: <19990831192201.C7D4C26E5B@i3.golden.dom> 2.0.5a (compiled myself) on rh60. Samba PDC for win9x. I can change smbpasswd from Win9x if "unix password sync" is disabled. If password sync is enabled it doesn't work; samba cannot even run the chat (passwd chat debug is true but there is no chat in the log). I could do it (password sync) in the past with a Caldera13/2.0.33. While attempting to change the pwd with sync enabled I get: [1999/08/31 20:55:33, 3] smbd/chgpasswd.c:chgpasswd(394) Password change for user: go [1999/08/31 20:55:33, 3] smbd/chgpasswd.c:chat_with_program(295) Cannot Allocate pty for password change: go [1999/08/31 20:55:33, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(828) end of file from client Don't know if it is related, but I compiled the kernel (2.2.12) with UNIX ptys, but then I disabled them by renaming /dev/ptmx to /dev/ptmx- (I want to have the option to use ptys without recompiling the kernel), so that now I use standard /dev/tty.... and not /dev/pts... -- giulioo@tiscalinet.it From florian at void.s.bawue.de Tue Aug 31 20:23:07 1999 From: florian at void.s.bawue.de (Florian Laws) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:01 2003 Subject: different shells In-Reply-To: <000f01bef340$5b9b1820$0200a8c0@miles.ods.org>; from Joel Miles on Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 09:37:04AM +1000 References: <000f01bef340$5b9b1820$0200a8c0@miles.ods.org> Message-ID: <19990831222307.A960@void.s.bawue.de> On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 09:37:04AM +1000, Joel Miles wrote: > I'm running Samba 2.0.5a on a Redhat 6 server. I have several Win95 > clients. How do I specify a different shell (other than explorer.exe) for > each user? Why not just use a policy setting for it? At least under WinNT there is an entry in the predefined policy template for it. Florian From Daniel.Jung at megabit.net Mon Aug 30 17:59:13 1999 From: Daniel.Jung at megabit.net (Daniel Jung) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:01 2003 Subject: security=domain Message-ID: <37CAC671.31A0638A@megabit.net> Hi, I finally managed running Samba with an Windows NT-PDC in a single domain. But now I?ve got a problem: Using "security=server" I can access the Samba-Server without any problems. But after setting "security=domain" I can?t access it any more. What may be the problem. Yours Daniel Jung From jjm at iname.com Mon Aug 9 22:20:31 1999 From: jjm at iname.com (Johan Meiring) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:34 2003 Subject: Mapping Drive Z Message-ID: Chris, How about writing two batch files: login1.bat --------------- net use L: \\SERVER\netlogon L:\login2.bat login2.bat ---------- net use z: /d ... rest of login file ... ... >Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 11:08:28 -0600 >From: "Chris Tooley" >To: >Subject: RE: Mapping Drive Z > >The only problem with that is that we are converting from a Novell server >where all of the Database directories for the 30-40 databases in house were >stored were mapped to drive Z: as well as about 8 billion other shortcuts, >all of which will be broken if we map the new share of those things to a >different drive letter. This wouldn't be a problem if we had users that >understood the concept of changing the driver letter in the shortcuts. >However, changing 10-20 shortcuts on 50-60 machines would take quite a lot >of time, especially when you don't have a clue what those shortcuts are. > >Chris Tooley