Bad machine accounts
mhaigh at village.vut.edu.au
Fri May 22 00:31:03 GMT 1998
Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> > I'll check with Andrew for the exact meaning of the
> > revalidate parameter, as I think it may be redundent
> > with security=user, in which case we can replace this
> > code with
> > && (!lp_revalidate(snum) || lp_security() > SEC_SHARE) &&....
> yep, that would be good. revalidate was intended for share level
> security and is basically useless for user level security.
> I suggest we also add a testparm warning "WARNING; revalidate set with
> user level security" and fix the smb.conf manpage entry for revalidate.
> I wonder how many people have this set with user level security?
I did suggest this to samba-bugs a while back, but I guess you guys never
got to see it for some reason. Not to worry - tis done now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 275 bytes
Desc: Card for Mick Haigh
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/19980522/aea8682d/vcard.vcf
More information about the samba-ntdom