NTDOM: Bug report clarification
jgarber at eng.utoledo.edu
Fri Feb 6 20:23:14 GMT 1998
> jeremy garber wrote:
> > I downloaded the latest (I think) BRANCH_NTDOM code on Wednesday
> > (02/04/1998). I had to make several changes to the Makefile to get it to
> > complete. Solaris 2.5.1.
> > Should I report those fixes on this list or submit them to samba-bugs?
> Are you referring to the addition of smbgetpass.o to smbd and nmbd
> linking? That was the only one I had to chnage for a clean compile (
> under Solaris 2.5.1 of course ).
> In answer to your question, I belive that they should be reported to
> samba-bugs with the Subject beginning with NTDOM:
> Gerald ( Jerry ) Carter
> Engineering Network Services Auburn University
> jerry at eng.auburn.edu http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/cartegw
> "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
> - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Yes, I added smbgetpass.o to the definition of UTILOBJ. Probably not the best
place to put it, but it worked. Yes, I haven't had a great deal of exposure to
Also had to add the definition of ARCFOUR_OBJ. Shouldn't there at least be a
comment and stub for us to fill in?
I'm not complaining... just trying to help out.
Luke did respond privately that samba-bugs is appropriate.
More information about the samba-ntdom