Bind failure in smblog and nmblog
matsaki at statcan.ca
Thu Aug 20 16:55:22 GMT 1998
Gerald Carter wrote:
> Akira Matsuno wrote:
> > bind failed on port 137 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use)
> > bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use)
> > doing parameter interfaces = 126.96.36.199/255.255.254.0
> This is a strange network mask. Is that what you meant? So you would
> be using 9 bits for the address?
Yes.. Our network is divided into many different subnets.. The network
infrastructure group decided on it.. gives us more subnets.. and the
number of hosts is acceptable with room for growth...
You think it may be a problem with the IP config?
* Akira Matsuno
* Network Administrator / Oracle DBA
* Statistics Canada
* Ottawa Ontario
More information about the samba-ntdom