possibly fixed dce/rpc long headers in smbd, BRANCH_NTDOM.

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at regent.push.net
Tue Apr 21 03:58:58 GMT 1998


On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 mathewss at nutech.com wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> !!!!!SNIP!!!!!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ok - "Hey everyone, stop using BRANCH NT_DOM!!"
> > > 
> > > It really only exists for Luke to do experiments.
> > 
> > yeah.  "hey everyone, stop using BRANCH_NTDOM!!"
> > 
> ummm :/ well isnt that just a joy.. ok then a multiple
> choice question for ya ..
> 
> 1. The cvs branch i loaded a week ago is 
>   A. not as current as say the main SAMBA CVS for PDC support.
>   B. the only place to go if you want to have a samba pdc

uh... i'd recommend keeping off of BRANCH_NTDOM.  i've just checked in the
code needed for long dce/rpc responses, in  the main branch.



More information about the samba-ntdom mailing list