possibly fixed dce/rpc long headers in smbd, BRANCH_NTDOM.
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at regent.push.net
Tue Apr 21 03:58:58 GMT 1998
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 mathewss at nutech.com wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> !!!!!SNIP!!!!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok - "Hey everyone, stop using BRANCH NT_DOM!!"
> > >
> > > It really only exists for Luke to do experiments.
> >
> > yeah. "hey everyone, stop using BRANCH_NTDOM!!"
> >
> ummm :/ well isnt that just a joy.. ok then a multiple
> choice question for ya ..
>
> 1. The cvs branch i loaded a week ago is
> A. not as current as say the main SAMBA CVS for PDC support.
> B. the only place to go if you want to have a samba pdc
uh... i'd recommend keeping off of BRANCH_NTDOM. i've just checked in the
code needed for long dce/rpc responses, in the main branch.
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list