[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
Volker Lendecke
vlendec at samba.org
Fri Aug 15 16:52:01 UTC 2025
The branch, master has been updated
via 65d86082338 smbd: improve lease break when handling overwrite create disposition
via b2f7a1c7623 smbtorture: add test "smb2.lease.sharing_violation"
via 215b2c741a9 smbd: when going to truncate the file, explicitly set the filesize to 0
via 1fcc1500eed smbtorture: add test smb2.lease.lock3
via debcd77ae78 s3/locking: fix checking for byterange locks when granting RH lease
via 0fdd231f80e s3/locking: modernize file_has_brlocks()
via f26ae02a1bf smbd: make file_has_brlocks() public
via 196efe52814 smbd: avoid granting "H"-only lease
via 9eba1a1423b smbtorture: add test smb2.lease.lock2
from 0be53d7ac0a smbd: return correct reparse tag DFS when listing directories
https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 65d86082338c0b46358520ba5134b3f9c39291ee
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Fri Aug 8 13:52:59 2025 +0200
smbd: improve lease break when handling overwrite create disposition
If the contending create uses overwrite create disposition, but has caused a
sharing violation and the existing create has a SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE, then the
server should just send break the SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE.
The break will then either result in a close and the contending open succeeds,
or a STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION. Either way, there's no need to additionally break
SMB2_LEASE_READ or SMB2_LEASE_WRITE.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 15 16:51:05 UTC 2025 on atb-devel-224
commit b2f7a1c7623248b3a42a0ba3e07ab523403d9f9b
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Sat Aug 9 12:31:17 2025 +0200
smbtorture: add test "smb2.lease.sharing_violation"
Verifies an existing RWH lease on a file is only broken to RW when a contending
create fails with STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION.
Passes against Windows, fails against Samba.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
commit 215b2c741a93023d13e8a9f82739ac3e91b64a66
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Thu Aug 7 19:15:43 2025 +0200
smbd: when going to truncate the file, explicitly set the filesize to 0
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
commit 1fcc1500eedf4c08d1245c8c71d8002e32d8e40f
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Sat Aug 9 11:53:23 2025 +0200
smbtorture: add test smb2.lease.lock3
Verifies a create with overwrite disposition on a file with a byterange lock can
get an RH lease.
Passes against Windows, fails against Samba.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
commit debcd77ae7818ec953058e7524642ef76e0e6c7b
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Thu Aug 7 18:44:27 2025 +0200
s3/locking: fix checking for byterange locks when granting RH lease
From MS-FSA 2.1.5.18 "Server Requests an Oplock":
...
* Else If Type is LEVEL_GRANULAR:
* If RequestedOplockLevel is READ_CACHING or (READ_CACHING|HANDLE_CACHING):
* The operation MUST be failed with STATUS_OPLOCK_NOT_GRANTED under either of the
following conditions:
* Open.Stream.ByteRangeLockList is not empty and Open.Stream.AllocationSize
is greater than any ByteRangeLock.LockOffset in
Open.Stream.ByteRangeLockList.
...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
commit 0fdd231f80eb9afe783e065c50b0f93c813d0857
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Sat Aug 9 11:41:45 2025 +0200
s3/locking: modernize file_has_brlocks()
No change in behaviour. Minimizes diff in the next commit that introduce a
behaviour change.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
commit f26ae02a1bf739f25975143d1e1706d30ff98b2f
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Sat Aug 9 11:39:55 2025 +0200
smbd: make file_has_brlocks() public
Prepares for a change to file_has_brlocks() in the next commit. No change in
behaviour.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
commit 196efe52814a24cd4a8c47346226407af17eadbd
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Mon Jun 2 12:07:26 2025 +0200
smbd: avoid granting "H"-only lease
If an "RH" lease was requested and due to existing brl-lock we do not grant
an "R" lease, we end up granting an "H"-only lease which is not a valid lease
state.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
commit 9eba1a1423be253216ea862029cee2398961f7d4
Author: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Sat Aug 9 09:09:47 2025 +0200
smbtorture: add test smb2.lease.lock2
Verifies byterange locks only affect lease state if the lock is actually
"backed" by the file. Eg, if a file has size 0, byterange locks will never
affect lease state.
Passes against Windows, fails against Samba.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15894
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
source3/locking/brlock.c | 25 +++++
source3/locking/proto.h | 1 +
source3/smbd/open.c | 26 ++---
source4/torture/smb2/lease.c | 258 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/source3/locking/brlock.c b/source3/locking/brlock.c
index 787c65c16f8..e0f5c14c302 100644
--- a/source3/locking/brlock.c
+++ b/source3/locking/brlock.c
@@ -1998,3 +1998,28 @@ void brl_set_modified(struct byte_range_lock *br_lck, bool modified)
{
br_lck->modified = modified;
}
+
+bool file_has_brlocks(files_struct *fsp)
+{
+ struct byte_range_lock *br_lck = NULL;
+ uint i, num_locks;
+
+ br_lck = brl_get_locks_readonly(fsp);
+ if (br_lck == NULL) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ num_locks = brl_num_locks(br_lck);
+ if (num_locks == 0) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_locks; i++) {
+ struct lock_struct *l = &br_lck->lock_data[i];
+
+ if (l->start < fsp->fsp_name->st.st_ex_size) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
+}
diff --git a/source3/locking/proto.h b/source3/locking/proto.h
index 29a4092c805..ab19632abb7 100644
--- a/source3/locking/proto.h
+++ b/source3/locking/proto.h
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct byte_range_lock *brl_get_locks(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
struct byte_range_lock *brl_get_locks_readonly(files_struct *fsp);
bool brl_cleanup_disconnected(struct file_id fid, uint64_t open_persistent_id);
void brl_set_modified(struct byte_range_lock *br_lck, bool modified);
+bool file_has_brlocks(files_struct *fsp);
/* The following definitions come from locking/locking.c */
diff --git a/source3/smbd/open.c b/source3/smbd/open.c
index e50b6b68fab..e898829c52c 100644
--- a/source3/smbd/open.c
+++ b/source3/smbd/open.c
@@ -1879,17 +1879,6 @@ static bool is_same_lease(const files_struct *fsp,
&e->lease_key);
}
-static bool file_has_brlocks(files_struct *fsp)
-{
- struct byte_range_lock *br_lck;
-
- br_lck = brl_get_locks_readonly(fsp);
- if (!br_lck)
- return false;
-
- return (brl_num_locks(br_lck) > 0);
-}
-
struct fsp_lease *find_fsp_lease(struct files_struct *new_fsp,
const struct smb2_lease_key *key,
uint32_t current_state,
@@ -2280,7 +2269,7 @@ static bool delay_for_oplock_fn(
break_to = e_lease_type & ~state->delay_mask;
- if (state->will_overwrite) {
+ if (state->will_overwrite && !(state->delay_mask & SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE)) {
break_to &= ~(SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE|SMB2_LEASE_READ);
}
@@ -2299,7 +2288,7 @@ static bool delay_for_oplock_fn(
return false;
}
- if (state->will_overwrite) {
+ if (state->will_overwrite && !(state->delay_mask & SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE)) {
/*
* If we break anyway break to NONE directly.
* Otherwise vfs_set_filelen() will trigger the
@@ -2500,7 +2489,7 @@ grant:
if (lp_locking(fsp->conn->params) && file_has_brlocks(fsp)) {
DBG_DEBUG("file %s has byte range locks\n",
fsp_str_dbg(fsp));
- granted &= ~SMB2_LEASE_READ;
+ granted &= ~(SMB2_LEASE_READ | SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE);
}
if (state.disallow_write_lease) {
@@ -4074,6 +4063,15 @@ static NTSTATUS open_file_ntcreate(connection_struct *conn,
} else {
if (flags & O_TRUNC) {
info = FILE_WAS_OVERWRITTEN;
+ /*
+ * We did not truncate the file yet, we're doing that
+ * explicitly with SMB_VFS_FTRUNCATE() below under the
+ * sharemode glock. For correct handling of RH leases in
+ * the presence of byterange locks, the leases code
+ * needs the "correct" filesize which should be 0 at
+ * this place if we did the O_TRUNC at open() time.
+ */
+ fsp->fsp_name->st.st_ex_size = 0;
} else {
info = FILE_WAS_OPENED;
}
diff --git a/source4/torture/smb2/lease.c b/source4/torture/smb2/lease.c
index c2bcda1d887..de6c2dd69ad 100644
--- a/source4/torture/smb2/lease.c
+++ b/source4/torture/smb2/lease.c
@@ -3533,6 +3533,261 @@ done:
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * Verifies byterange locks only affect lease state if the lock is actually
+ * "backed" by the file. Eg, if a file has size 0, byterange locks will never
+ * affect lease state.
+ *
+ * Client 1: create file with lease=RWH
+ * Client 1: set brl off=0, size=1
+ * Client 2: open file, expect pending
+ * Server: expect lease break to RH
+ * Client 2: expect open success with lease=RH
+ */
+static bool test_lease_lock2(struct torture_context *tctx,
+ struct smb2_tree *tree1,
+ struct smb2_tree *tree2)
+{
+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx = talloc_new(tctx);
+ struct smb2_create io1 = {};
+ struct smb2_create io2 = {};
+ struct smb2_lease ls1 = {};
+ struct smb2_lease ls2 = {};
+ struct smb2_handle h1 = {};
+ struct smb2_handle h2 = {};
+ struct smb2_lock lck = {};
+ struct smb2_lock_element el = {};
+ const char *fname = __FUNCTION__;
+ bool ret = true;
+ NTSTATUS status;
+ uint32_t caps;
+
+ caps = smb2cli_conn_server_capabilities(tree1->session->transport->conn);
+ torture_assert_goto(tctx, caps & SMB2_CAP_LEASING, ret, done, "leases are not supported");
+
+ /* Set up handlers. */
+ tree1->session->transport->lease.handler = torture_lease_handler;
+ tree1->session->transport->lease.private_data = tree1;
+ tree2->session->transport->lease.handler = torture_lease_handler;
+ tree2->session->transport->lease.private_data = tree2;
+
+ smb2_util_unlink(tree1, fname);
+
+ torture_reset_lease_break_info(tctx, &lease_break_info);
+
+ /* Open a handle on tree1. */
+ smb2_lease_create_share(&io1, &ls1, false, fname,
+ smb2_util_share_access("RWD"),
+ LEASE1,
+ smb2_util_lease_state("RWH"));
+ status = smb2_create(tree1, mem_ctx, &io1);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ h1 = io1.out.file.handle;
+ CHECK_CREATED(&io1, CREATED, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ARCHIVE);
+ CHECK_LEASE(&io1, "RWH", true, LEASE1, 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Try and get get an exclusive byte
+ * range lock on H1 (LEASE1).
+ */
+ lck.in.locks = ⪙
+ lck.in.lock_count = 1;
+ lck.in.lock_sequence = 1;
+ lck.in.file.handle = h1;
+ el.offset = 0;
+ el.length = 1;
+ el.reserved = 0;
+ el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
+ status = smb2_lock(tree1, &lck);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /* Open a second handle on tree2. */
+ smb2_lease_create_share(&io2, &ls2, false, fname,
+ smb2_util_share_access("RWD"),
+ LEASE2,
+ smb2_util_lease_state("RWH"));
+ status = smb2_create(tree2, mem_ctx, &io2);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ h2 = io2.out.file.handle;
+ CHECK_CREATED(&io2, EXISTED, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ARCHIVE);
+ CHECK_LEASE(&io2, "RH", true, LEASE2, 0);
+ /* And LEASE1 got broken to RH. */
+ CHECK_BREAK_INFO("RWH", "RH", LEASE1);
+ torture_reset_lease_break_info(tctx, &lease_break_info);
+
+done:
+ smb2_util_close(tree1, h1);
+ smb2_util_close(tree2, h2);
+
+ smb2_util_unlink(tree1, fname);
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Verifies a create with overwrite disposition on a file with a byterange lock
+ * can get an RH lease.
+ *
+ * Client 1: create file with lease=RWH
+ * Client 1: write 1 byte to the file
+ * Client 1: set brl off=0, size=1
+ * Client 2: open file with overwrite disposition, expect status pending
+ * Server -> Client 1: Break lease break to none
+ * Client 2: expect open success with lease=RH
+ */
+static bool test_lease_lock3(struct torture_context *tctx,
+ struct smb2_tree *tree1,
+ struct smb2_tree *tree2)
+{
+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx = talloc_new(tctx);
+ struct smb2_create io1 = {};
+ struct smb2_create io2 = {};
+ struct smb2_lease ls1 = {};
+ struct smb2_lease ls2 = {};
+ struct smb2_handle h1 = {};
+ struct smb2_handle h2 = {};
+ struct smb2_lock lck = {};
+ struct smb2_lock_element el = {};
+ const char *fname = __FUNCTION__;
+ char c = 'x';
+ bool ret = true;
+ NTSTATUS status;
+ uint32_t caps;
+
+ caps = smb2cli_conn_server_capabilities(tree1->session->transport->conn);
+ torture_assert_goto(tctx, caps & SMB2_CAP_LEASING, ret, done, "leases are not supported");
+
+ /* Set up handlers. */
+ tree1->session->transport->lease.handler = torture_lease_handler;
+ tree1->session->transport->lease.private_data = tree1;
+ tree2->session->transport->lease.handler = torture_lease_handler;
+ tree2->session->transport->lease.private_data = tree2;
+
+ smb2_util_unlink(tree1, fname);
+
+ torture_reset_lease_break_info(tctx, &lease_break_info);
+
+ /* Open a handle on tree1. */
+ smb2_lease_create_share(&io1, &ls1, false, fname,
+ smb2_util_share_access("RWD"),
+ LEASE1,
+ smb2_util_lease_state("RWH"));
+ status = smb2_create(tree1, mem_ctx, &io1);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ h1 = io1.out.file.handle;
+ CHECK_CREATED(&io1, CREATED, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ARCHIVE);
+ CHECK_LEASE(&io1, "RWH", true, LEASE1, 0);
+
+ status = smb2_util_write(tree1, h1, &c, 0, 1);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /*
+ * Try and get an exclusive byte
+ * range lock on H1 (LEASE1).
+ */
+ lck.in.locks = ⪙
+ lck.in.lock_count = 1;
+ lck.in.lock_sequence = 1;
+ lck.in.file.handle = h1;
+ el.offset = 0;
+ el.length = 1;
+ el.reserved = 0;
+ el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
+ status = smb2_lock(tree1, &lck);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /* Open a second handle on tree2. */
+ smb2_lease_create_share(&io2, &ls2, false, fname,
+ smb2_util_share_access("RWD"),
+ LEASE2,
+ smb2_util_lease_state("RWH"));
+ io2.in.create_disposition = NTCREATEX_DISP_OVERWRITE;
+ status = smb2_create(tree2, mem_ctx, &io2);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ h2 = io2.out.file.handle;
+ CHECK_LEASE(&io2, "RH", true, LEASE2, 0);
+ /* And LEASE1 got broken to NONE. */
+ CHECK_BREAK_INFO("RWH", "", LEASE1);
+ torture_reset_lease_break_info(tctx, &lease_break_info);
+
+done:
+ smb2_util_close(tree1, h1);
+ smb2_util_close(tree2, h2);
+
+ smb2_util_unlink(tree1, fname);
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Verifies an existing RWH lease on a file is only broken to RW when a
+ * contending create fails with STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION.
+ *
+ * Client 1: open file with lease=RWH sharemode=none
+ * Client 2: open file, expect STATUS_PENDING
+ * Server: send lease break to RW to client 1
+ * Client 2: expect open to fail with STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION.
+ */
+static bool test_lease_sharing_violation(struct torture_context *tctx,
+ struct smb2_tree *tree1,
+ struct smb2_tree *tree2)
+{
+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx = talloc_new(tctx);
+ struct smb2_create io1 = {};
+ struct smb2_create io2 = {};
+ struct smb2_lease ls1 = {};
+ struct smb2_lease ls2 = {};
+ struct smb2_handle h1 = {};
+ struct smb2_handle h2 = {};
+ const char *fname = __FUNCTION__;
+ bool ret = true;
+ NTSTATUS status;
+ uint32_t caps;
+
+ caps = smb2cli_conn_server_capabilities(tree1->session->transport->conn);
+ torture_assert_goto(tctx, caps & SMB2_CAP_LEASING, ret, done, "leases are not supported");
+
+ /* Set up handlers. */
+ tree1->session->transport->lease.handler = torture_lease_handler;
+ tree1->session->transport->lease.private_data = tree1;
+ tree2->session->transport->lease.handler = torture_lease_handler;
+ tree2->session->transport->lease.private_data = tree2;
+
+ smb2_util_unlink(tree1, fname);
+
+ torture_reset_lease_break_info(tctx, &lease_break_info);
+
+ /* Open a handle on tree1. */
+ smb2_lease_create_share(&io1, &ls1, false, fname,
+ smb2_util_share_access(""),
+ LEASE1,
+ smb2_util_lease_state("RWH"));
+ status = smb2_create(tree1, mem_ctx, &io1);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ h1 = io1.out.file.handle;
+ CHECK_CREATED(&io1, CREATED, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ARCHIVE);
+ CHECK_LEASE(&io1, "RWH", true, LEASE1, 0);
+
+ /* Open a second handle on tree2. */
+ smb2_lease_create_share(&io2, &ls2, false, fname,
+ smb2_util_share_access("RWD"),
+ LEASE2,
+ smb2_util_lease_state("RWH"));
+ io2.in.create_disposition = NTCREATEX_DISP_OVERWRITE;
+ status = smb2_create(tree2, mem_ctx, &io2);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION);
+ /* And LEASE1 got broken to RW. */
+ CHECK_BREAK_INFO("RWH", "RW", LEASE1);
+
+done:
+ smb2_util_close(tree1, h1);
+ smb2_util_close(tree2, h2);
+
+ smb2_util_unlink(tree1, fname);
+ talloc_free(mem_ctx);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static bool test_lease_complex1(struct torture_context *tctx,
struct smb2_tree *tree1a)
{
@@ -5863,6 +6118,9 @@ struct torture_suite *torture_smb2_lease_init(TALLOC_CTX *ctx)
torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite, "breaking5", test_lease_breaking5);
torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite, "breaking6", test_lease_breaking6);
torture_suite_add_2smb2_test(suite, "lock1", test_lease_lock1);
+ torture_suite_add_2smb2_test(suite, "lock2", test_lease_lock2);
+ torture_suite_add_2smb2_test(suite, "lock3", test_lease_lock3);
+ torture_suite_add_2smb2_test(suite, "sharing_violation", test_lease_sharing_violation);
torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite, "complex1", test_lease_complex1);
torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite, "v2_flags_breaking", test_lease_v2_flags_breaking);
torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite, "v2_flags_parentkey", test_lease_v2_flags_parentkey);
--
Samba Shared Repository
More information about the samba-cvs
mailing list