autobuild[sn-devel-104]: intermittent test failure detected
autobuild
autobuild at samba.org
Thu Dec 1 03:07:49 UTC 2016
The autobuild test system (on sn-devel-104) has detected an intermittent failing test in
the current master tree.
The autobuild log of the failure is available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey.sn-devel-104/2016-12-01-0407/flakey.log
The samba build logs are available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey.sn-devel-104/2016-12-01-0407/samba.stderr
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey.sn-devel-104/2016-12-01-0407/samba.stdout
The top commit at the time of the failure was:
commit c98bdf24941ad95250d79eeed26c57d600cedc7b
Author: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz>
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:56:16 2016 +1300
smbd/service_stream: connection processing flag is not really bool
The warning is:
../source4/smbd/service_stream.c: In function ‘stream_io_handler’:
../source4/smbd/service_stream.c:94:18: warning: increment of a boolean expression [-Wbool-operation]
conn->processing++;
^~
../source4/smbd/service_stream.c:100:18: warning: decrement of a boolean expression [-Wbool-operation]
conn->processing--;
^~
while the code in question looks like:
conn->processing++;
if (flags & TEVENT_FD_WRITE) {
conn->ops->send_handler(conn, flags);
} else if (flags & TEVENT_FD_READ) {
conn->ops->recv_handler(conn, flags);
}
conn->processing--;
If this is never going to be nested, processing can be bool and the ++
and -- can be true/false assignments. But it seems possible that these
might be nested so it is better to go the other way.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 1 00:28:05 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
More information about the samba-cvs
mailing list