quiet enum warnings

[Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer]

Okay, these are different point of views.

Tridge, what do you think?

Cheers,
Matthias

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
>    
>>   	case RAW_FILEINFO_GETATTR:
>>   		info->getattr.out.attrib     = name->dos.attrib;
>>   		info->getattr.out.size       = name->st.st_size;
>> @@ -333,9 +330,11 @@ static NTSTATUS pvfs_map_fileinfo(struct pvfs_state *pvfs,
>>   							      name->original_name);
>>   		NT_STATUS_HAVE_NO_MEMORY(info->all_info2.out.fname.s);
>>   		return NT_STATUS_OK;
>> +
>> +	default:
>> +		return NT_STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL;
>>   	}
>>
>> -	return NT_STATUS_INVALID_LEVEL;
>>   }
>>      
> I think we should better fix this by adding the missing enum values
> explicit instead of
> using a default, as that will make sure we'll get a warning again if
> someone adds a new
> value.
>
> metze
>
>