[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated
Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
mdw at samba.org
Tue Jan 12 10:02:44 MST 2010
Hi Matthieu,
as you obviously didn't notice you can't find the differences at the
moment. This is because tridge reverted the modifications in
"provision_users.ldif" for now. This was due to a failing torture test
in "make test" which wasn't fixed.
So my apologies, you have to wait. I will recheckin the patches first,
in a more clear manner (since the last time the diff's were indeed very
hard to read - I forgot to control them and noticed this only later) and
second, when the torture suite also works against them.
Regarding the correction of the "upgradeprovision" script: I find this
very good. I introduced it since previously we had no real mechanism for
linked-attribute dependency resolving. Therefore I would really like to
let this in. Obviously, this doesn't fix the other issue with the wrong
"groupType"s (but I think we should work on this after the mentioned
"provision_users.ldif" changes - since now you can't notice them).
Greets,
Matthias
Matthieu Patou wrote:
> Hello Mathias,
> I'm not too pleased with this change as it tends to commit stuff
> partially instead of one together once we are sure that everything was
> (correctly) added at least with this way of doing we are sure that
> once that the commit is done all the schema or all the partitions has
> been updated and that the whole thing is relatively coherent.
>
>
> Also apart from the groupType that we talk last sunday on irc, you
> told me that some object where misplaced but when I do an
> upgradeprovision against a alpha10 provision and I only found those 2
> changes:
>
> * CN=dns,CN=Users,DC=home,DC=matws,DC=net exist but with the wrong
> objectSID
> * CN=RID Set,CN=ARES,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=home,DC=matws,DC=net
>
> Where are the other problem that you faced ?
>
> Mattieu.
>
More information about the samba-cvs
mailing list