[SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch master updated -
release-4-0-0alpha6-784-g1884b92
Tim Prouty
tprouty at samba.org
Wed Feb 11 20:29:06 GMT 2009
The branch, master has been updated
via 1884b928723e362250272f6986fb08fcee57ebc1 (commit)
via 4e1a4cbe1f939f771554fa313eaf905fd72c2ff9 (commit)
via 307f4a66acfe3836550d57caf9aba347b24ba61e (commit)
from dc9387ec42b40ace38ba398148f5c20ae13e4a2c (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 1884b928723e362250272f6986fb08fcee57ebc1
Author: todd stecher <todd.stecher at gmail.com>
Date: Wed Feb 11 09:52:02 2009 -0800
s3 OneFS: Expand the usage of the ignore sacl parameter
commit 4e1a4cbe1f939f771554fa313eaf905fd72c2ff9
Author: Zack Kirsch <zack.kirsch at isilon.com>
Date: Mon Feb 9 21:58:50 2009 -0800
s4 torture: Smbtorture additions for Windows BRL
- Adds a few new BRL tests to RAW-LOCK
- Adds a "win7" target to allow torture to handle protocol changes in
windows 7
commit 307f4a66acfe3836550d57caf9aba347b24ba61e
Author: Zack Kirsch <zack.kirsch at isilon.com>
Date: Mon Feb 9 21:59:40 2009 -0800
s4 torture: Two minor fixes to smbtorture BRL tests.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
libcli/util/ntstatus.h | 3 +
source3/modules/onefs_acl.c | 6 +
source3/modules/onefs_open.c | 5 +
source4/torture/basic/locking.c | 2 +-
source4/torture/raw/lock.c | 573 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
source4/torture/smbtorture.c | 2 +
6 files changed, 583 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Changeset truncated at 500 lines:
diff --git a/libcli/util/ntstatus.h b/libcli/util/ntstatus.h
index 139562d..1608e28 100644
--- a/libcli/util/ntstatus.h
+++ b/libcli/util/ntstatus.h
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ typedef uint32_t NTSTATUS;
#define ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER NT_STATUS(0x007a)
#define ERROR_INVALID_DATATYPE NT_STATUS(0x070c)
+/* XXX Win7 Status code: Name unknown. */
+#define NT_STATUS_WIN7_INVALID_RANGE NT_STATUS(0xC0000000 | 0x01a1)
+
/* Win32 Error codes extracted using a loop in smbclient then printing a
netmon sniff to a file. */
diff --git a/source3/modules/onefs_acl.c b/source3/modules/onefs_acl.c
index 0ef7e0b..0239479 100644
--- a/source3/modules/onefs_acl.c
+++ b/source3/modules/onefs_acl.c
@@ -619,6 +619,12 @@ onefs_fget_nt_acl(vfs_handle_struct *handle, files_struct *fsp,
DEBUG(5, ("Getting sd for file %s. security_info=%u\n",
fsp->fsp_name, security_info));
+ if (lp_parm_bool(SNUM(fsp->conn), PARM_ONEFS_TYPE,
+ PARM_IGNORE_SACL, PARM_IGNORE_SACL_DEFAULT)) {
+ DEBUG(5, ("Ignoring SACL on %s.\n", fsp->fsp_name));
+ security_info &= ~SACL_SECURITY_INFORMATION;
+ }
+
if (fsp->fh->fd == -1) {
if ((fsp->fh->fd = onefs_sys_create_file(handle->conn,
-1,
diff --git a/source3/modules/onefs_open.c b/source3/modules/onefs_open.c
index b2b11eb..e335dc7 100644
--- a/source3/modules/onefs_open.c
+++ b/source3/modules/onefs_open.c
@@ -744,6 +744,11 @@ NTSTATUS onefs_open_file_ntcreate(connection_struct *conn,
open_access_mask |= FILE_WRITE_DATA;
}
+ if (lp_parm_bool(SNUM(fsp->conn), PARM_ONEFS_TYPE,
+ PARM_IGNORE_SACL, PARM_IGNORE_SACL_DEFAULT)) {
+ access_mask &= ~SYSTEM_SECURITY_ACCESS;
+ }
+
DEBUG(10, ("onefs_open_file_ntcreate: fname=%s, after mapping "
"open_access_mask=%#x, access_mask=0x%x\n",
fname, open_access_mask, access_mask));
diff --git a/source4/torture/basic/locking.c b/source4/torture/basic/locking.c
index fcac52c..06a960b 100644
--- a/source4/torture/basic/locking.c
+++ b/source4/torture/basic/locking.c
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(smbcli_unlock(cli1->tree, fnum1, 0, 4)) &&
NT_STATUS_IS_OK(smbcli_unlock(cli1->tree, fnum1, 0, 4));
EXPECTED(ret, true);
- torture_comment(tctx, "the same process %s unlock the stack of 4 locks\n", ret?"can":"cannot");
+ torture_comment(tctx, "the same process %s unlock the stack of 3 locks\n", ret?"can":"cannot");
/* Ensure the next unlock fails. */
ret = NT_STATUS_IS_OK(smbcli_unlock(cli1->tree, fnum1, 0, 4));
diff --git a/source4/torture/raw/lock.c b/source4/torture/raw/lock.c
index 2d1eae3..72a03e1 100644
--- a/source4/torture/raw/lock.c
+++ b/source4/torture/raw/lock.c
@@ -38,8 +38,34 @@
goto done; \
}} while (0)
+#define CHECK_STATUS_CONT(status, correct) do { \
+ if (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, correct)) { \
+ printf("(%s) Incorrect status %s - should be %s\n", \
+ __location__, nt_errstr(status), nt_errstr(correct)); \
+ ret = false; \
+ }} while (0)
+
+#define CHECK_STATUS_OR(status, correct1, correct2) do { \
+ if ((!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, correct1)) && \
+ (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, correct2))) { \
+ printf("(%s) Incorrect status %s - should be %s or %s\n", \
+ __location__, nt_errstr(status), nt_errstr(correct1), \
+ nt_errstr(correct2)); \
+ ret = false; \
+ goto done; \
+ }} while (0)
+
+#define CHECK_STATUS_OR_CONT(status, correct1, correct2) do { \
+ if ((!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, correct1)) && \
+ (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, correct2))) { \
+ printf("(%s) Incorrect status %s - should be %s or %s\n", \
+ __location__, nt_errstr(status), nt_errstr(correct1), \
+ nt_errstr(correct2)); \
+ ret = false; \
+ }} while (0)
#define BASEDIR "\\testlock"
+#define TARGET_IS_WIN7(_tctx) (torture_setting_bool(_tctx, "win7", false))
/*
test SMBlock and SMBunlock ops
@@ -337,15 +363,25 @@ static bool test_lockx(struct torture_context *tctx, struct smbcli_state *cli)
lock[0].pid++;
lock[0].count = 2;
status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
- CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ if (TARGET_IS_WIN7(tctx))
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_WIN7_INVALID_RANGE);
+ else
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
lock[0].pid--;
io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
lock[0].count = 1;
status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
- CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
- status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
- CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED);
+
+ /* XXX This is very strange - Win7 gives us an invalid range when we
+ * unlock the range even though the range is locked! Win7 bug? */
+ if (TARGET_IS_WIN7(tctx))
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_WIN7_INVALID_RANGE);
+ else {
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED);
+ }
done:
smbcli_close(cli->tree, fnum);
@@ -354,7 +390,6 @@ done:
return ret;
}
-
/*
test high pid
*/
@@ -410,8 +445,6 @@ static bool test_pidhigh(struct torture_context *tctx,
goto done;
}
- cli->session->pid |= 0x10000;
-
cli->session->pid = 2;
if (smbcli_read(cli->tree, fnum, &c, 0, 1) == 1) {
@@ -1321,6 +1354,525 @@ done:
return ret;
}
+struct double_lock_test {
+ struct smb_lock_entry lock1;
+ struct smb_lock_entry lock2;
+ NTSTATUS exp_status;
+};
+
+/**
+ * Tests zero byte locks.
+ */
+struct double_lock_test zero_byte_tests[] = {
+ /* {pid, offset, count}, {pid, offset, count}, status */
+
+ /** First, takes a zero byte lock at offset 10. Then:
+ * - Taking 0 byte lock at 10 should succeed.
+ * - Taking 1 byte locks at 9,10,11 should succeed.
+ * - Taking 2 byte lock at 9 should fail.
+ * - Taking 2 byte lock at 10 should succeed.
+ * - Taking 3 byte lock at 9 should fail.
+ */
+ {{1000, 10, 0}, {1001, 10, 0}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1000, 10, 0}, {1001, 9, 1}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1000, 10, 0}, {1001, 10, 1}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1000, 10, 0}, {1001, 11, 1}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1000, 10, 0}, {1001, 9, 2}, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED},
+ {{1000, 10, 0}, {1001, 10, 2}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1000, 10, 0}, {1001, 9, 3}, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED},
+
+ /** Same, but opposite order. */
+ {{1001, 10, 0}, {1000, 10, 0}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1001, 9, 1}, {1000, 10, 0}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1001, 10, 1}, {1000, 10, 0}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1001, 11, 1}, {1000, 10, 0}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1001, 9, 2}, {1000, 10, 0}, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED},
+ {{1001, 10, 2}, {1000, 10, 0}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+ {{1001, 9, 3}, {1000, 10, 0}, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED},
+
+ /** Zero zero case. */
+ {{1000, 0, 0}, {1001, 0, 0}, NT_STATUS_OK},
+};
+
+static bool test_zerobytelocks(struct torture_context *tctx, struct smbcli_state *cli)
+{
+ union smb_lock io;
+ struct smb_lock_entry zerozero;
+ NTSTATUS status;
+ bool ret = true;
+ int fnum, i;
+ const char *fname = BASEDIR "\\zero.txt";
+
+ printf("Testing zero length byte range locks:\n");
+
+ if (!torture_setup_dir(cli, BASEDIR)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ io.generic.level = RAW_LOCK_LOCKX;
+
+ fnum = smbcli_open(cli->tree, fname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, DENY_NONE);
+ if (fnum == -1) {
+ printf("Failed to create %s - %s\n", fname, smbcli_errstr(cli->tree));
+ ret = false;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ /* Setup initial parameters */
+ io.lockx.level = RAW_LOCK_LOCKX;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum;
+ io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_LARGE_FILES; /* Exclusive */
+ io.lockx.in.timeout = 0;
+
+ /* Try every combination of locks in zero_byte_tests. The first lock is
+ * assumed to succeed. The second lock may contend, depending on the
+ * expected status. */
+ for (i = 0;
+ i < sizeof(zero_byte_tests) / sizeof(struct double_lock_test);
+ i++) {
+ printf(" ... {%d, %llu, %llu} + {%d, %llu, %llu} = %s\n",
+ zero_byte_tests[i].lock1.pid,
+ zero_byte_tests[i].lock1.offset,
+ zero_byte_tests[i].lock1.count,
+ zero_byte_tests[i].lock2.pid,
+ zero_byte_tests[i].lock2.offset,
+ zero_byte_tests[i].lock2.count,
+ nt_errstr(zero_byte_tests[i].exp_status));
+
+ /* Lock both locks. */
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 1;
+
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &zero_byte_tests[i].lock1;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &zero_byte_tests[i].lock2;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+
+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(zero_byte_tests[i].exp_status,
+ NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED)) {
+ /* Allow either of the failure messages and keep going
+ * if we see the wrong status. */
+ CHECK_STATUS_OR_CONT(status,
+ NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED,
+ NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT);
+
+ } else {
+ CHECK_STATUS_CONT(status,
+ zero_byte_tests[i].exp_status);
+ }
+
+ /* Unlock both locks. */
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
+
+ if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_OK)) {
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ }
+
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &zero_byte_tests[i].lock1;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ }
+
+done:
+ smbcli_close(cli->tree, fnum);
+ smb_raw_exit(cli->session);
+ smbcli_deltree(cli->tree, BASEDIR);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static bool test_unlock(struct torture_context *tctx, struct smbcli_state *cli)
+{
+ union smb_lock io;
+ NTSTATUS status;
+ bool ret = true;
+ int fnum1, fnum2;
+ const char *fname = BASEDIR "\\unlock.txt";
+ struct smb_lock_entry lock1;
+ struct smb_lock_entry lock2;
+
+ printf("Testing LOCKX unlock:\n");
+
+ if (!torture_setup_dir(cli, BASEDIR)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ fnum1 = smbcli_open(cli->tree, fname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, DENY_NONE);
+ if (fnum1 == -1) {
+ printf("Failed to create %s - %s\n", fname, smbcli_errstr(cli->tree));
+ ret = false;
+ goto done;
+ }
+ fnum2 = smbcli_open(cli->tree, fname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, DENY_NONE);
+ if (fnum2 == -1) {
+ printf("Failed to create %s - %s\n", fname, smbcli_errstr(cli->tree));
+ ret = false;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ /* Setup initial parameters */
+ io.lockx.level = RAW_LOCK_LOCKX;
+ io.lockx.in.timeout = 0;
+
+ lock1.pid = cli->session->pid;
+ lock1.offset = 0;
+ lock1.count = 10;
+ lock2.pid = cli->session->pid - 1;
+ lock2.offset = 0;
+ lock2.count = 10;
+
+ /**
+ * Take exclusive lock, then unlock it with a shared-unlock call.
+ */
+ printf(" taking exclusive lock.\n");
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.mode = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum1;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock1;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ printf(" unlock the exclusive with a shared unlock call.\n");
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum1;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock1;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ printf(" try shared lock on pid2/fnum2, testing the unlock.\n");
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum2;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock2;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /**
+ * Unlock a shared lock with an exclusive-unlock call.
+ */
+ printf(" unlock new shared lock with exclusive unlock call.\n");
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.mode = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum2;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock2;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ printf(" try exclusive lock on pid1, testing the unlock.\n");
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.mode = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum1;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock1;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /* cleanup */
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /**
+ * Test unlocking of 0-byte locks.
+ */
+
+ printf(" lock shared and exclusive 0-byte locks, testing that Windows "
+ "always unlocks the exclusive first.\n");
+ lock1.pid = cli->session->pid;
+ lock1.offset = 10;
+ lock1.count = 0;
+ lock2.pid = cli->session->pid;
+ lock2.offset = 5;
+ lock2.count = 10;
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum1;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock1;
+
+ /* lock 0-byte shared
+ * Note: Order of the shared/exclusive locks doesn't matter. */
+ io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /* lock 0-byte exclusive */
+ io.lockx.in.mode = 0;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /* test contention */
+ io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock2;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum2;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS_OR(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED,
+ NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT);
+
+ /* unlock */
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum1;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock1;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+ /* test - can we take a shared lock? */
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 0;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK;
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum2;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock2;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+
+ /* XXX Samba will fail this test. This is temporary(because this isn't
+ * new to Win7, it succeeds in WinXP too), until I can come to a
+ * resolution as to whether Samba should support this or not. There is
+ * code to preference unlocking exclusive locks before shared locks,
+ * but its wrapped with "#ifdef ZERO_ZERO". -zkirsch */
+ if (TARGET_IS_WIN7(tctx))
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ else {
+ CHECK_STATUS_OR(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED,
+ NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT);
+ }
+
+ /* cleanup */
+ io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
+ io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+
+ /* XXX Same as above. */
+ if (TARGET_IS_WIN7(tctx))
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+ else
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED);
+
+ io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum1;
+ io.lockx.in.locks = &lock1;
+ status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
+ CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+done:
+ smbcli_close(cli->tree, fnum1);
+ smbcli_close(cli->tree, fnum2);
+ smb_raw_exit(cli->session);
+ smbcli_deltree(cli->tree, BASEDIR);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static bool test_multiple_unlock(struct torture_context *tctx, struct smbcli_state *cli)
+{
+ union smb_lock io;
+ NTSTATUS status;
+ bool ret = true;
+ int fnum1;
+ const char *fname = BASEDIR "\\unlock_multiple.txt";
+ struct smb_lock_entry lock1;
+ struct smb_lock_entry lock2;
+ struct smb_lock_entry locks[2];
+
+ printf("Testing LOCKX multiple unlock:\n");
+
+ if (!torture_setup_dir(cli, BASEDIR)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ fnum1 = smbcli_open(cli->tree, fname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, DENY_NONE);
+ if (fnum1 == -1) {
+ printf("Failed to create %s - %s\n", fname, smbcli_errstr(cli->tree));
+ ret = false;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ /* Setup initial parameters */
+ io.lockx.level = RAW_LOCK_LOCKX;
+ io.lockx.in.timeout = 0;
+
+ lock1.pid = cli->session->pid;
+ lock1.offset = 0;
+ lock1.count = 10;
+ lock2.pid = cli->session->pid;
+ lock2.offset = 10;
+ lock2.count = 10;
+
--
Samba Shared Repository
More information about the samba-cvs
mailing list