Rev 685: merge from ronnie in http://samba.org/~tridge/ctdb

[tridge at samba.org]

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 685
revision-id:tridge at samba.org-20071204042040-8ih81hoipueakyu9
parent: tridge at samba.org-20071204041827-qk47nxxpbhhoo7cm
parent: sahlberg at ronnie-20071203044553-qkn87ec0fm39vhf1
committer: Andrew Tridgell <tridge at samba.org>
branch nick: tridge.stable
timestamp: Tue 2007-12-04 15:20:40 +1100
message:
  merge from ronnie
modified:
  server/ctdb_recoverd.c         recoverd.c-20070503213540-bvxuyd9jm1f7ig90-1
  tools/ctdb.c                   ctdb_control.c-20070426122705-9ehj1l5lu2gn9kuj-1
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.369
    revision-id:sahlberg at ronnie-20071203044553-qkn87ec0fm39vhf1
    parent: sahlberg at ronnie-20071203003917-m7uq2euljw4a7jcn
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg at ronnie>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-12-03 15:45:53 +1100
    message:
      rework banning/unbanning nodes
      
      ctdb_recoverd.c
      Always handle banning/unbanning locally on the node that is being 
      banned/unbanned instead of on the recovery master.
      This means that if a ban request comes in to the recovery master for a 
      remote node, we pass the request on to the remote node instead of 
      setting up the ban and ban timeouts locally.
      
      ctdb.c
      send ban/unban requests to the node being banned/unbanned instead of to 
      the recmaster
    modified:
      server/ctdb_recoverd.c         recoverd.c-20070503213540-bvxuyd9jm1f7ig90-1
      tools/ctdb.c                   ctdb_control.c-20070426122705-9ehj1l5lu2gn9kuj-1
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.368
    revision-id:sahlberg at ronnie-20071203003917-m7uq2euljw4a7jcn
    parent: sahlberg at ronnie-20071202232145-avvdc9c6caa0inih
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg at ronnie>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-12-03 11:39:17 +1100
    message:
      for the banned status, we should allocate this structure as a child of 
      the banned_nodes array and not the rec structure so that  ban_state is 
      destroyed when the banned_nodes array gets destroyed
      (and so that when this struct is destroyed, that any pending 
      ctdb_ban_timeout events are also destroyed.)
      
      othervise we may end up with multiple ban_timeout timed events going in 
      parallell since we destroy/recreate the banned_nodes structure during 
      election   but we never destroy/recreate the rec structure.
    modified:
      server/ctdb_recoverd.c         recoverd.c-20070503213540-bvxuyd9jm1f7ig90-1
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    revno: 432.1.367
    revision-id:sahlberg at ronnie-20071202232145-avvdc9c6caa0inih
    parent: sahlberg at ronnie-20071130230642-d1rjmxqtsxi412lj
    parent: tridge at samba.org-20071202231924-btpfcs8a4oyo221q
    committer: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg at ronnie>
    branch nick: ctdb
    timestamp: Mon 2007-12-03 10:21:45 +1100
    message:
      merge from tridge
    modified:
      server/ctdb_monitor.c          ctdb_monitor.c-20070518100625-8jf4ft1mjzmb22ck-1
      server/ctdb_recover.c          ctdb_recover.c-20070503002147-admmfgt1oj6gexfo-1
      server/ctdb_recoverd.c         recoverd.c-20070503213540-bvxuyd9jm1f7ig90-1
      server/ctdb_takeover.c         ctdb_takeover.c-20070525071636-a5n1ihghjtppy08r-2

Diff too large for email (269, the limit is 200).