svn commit: samba r17046 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/locking: .
jra at samba.org
jra at samba.org
Sat Jul 15 00:34:09 GMT 2006
Author: jra
Date: 2006-07-15 00:34:08 +0000 (Sat, 15 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17046
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=17046
Log:
Ensure we're using the right pointers ...
Jeremy.
Modified:
branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/locking/brlock.c
Changeset:
Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/locking/brlock.c
===================================================================
--- branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/locking/brlock.c 2006-07-15 00:31:48 UTC (rev 17045)
+++ branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/locking/brlock.c 2006-07-15 00:34:08 UTC (rev 17046)
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@
Check if an unlock overlaps a pending lock.
****************************************************************************/
-static BOOL brl_pending_overlap(struct lock_struct *lock, struct lock_struct *pend_lock)
+static BOOL brl_pending_overlap(const struct lock_struct *lock, const struct lock_struct *pend_lock)
{
if ((lock->start <= pend_lock->start) && (lock->start + lock->size > pend_lock->start))
return True;
@@ -739,7 +739,6 @@
static BOOL brl_unlock_windows(struct byte_range_lock *br_lck, const struct lock_struct *plock)
{
unsigned int i, j;
- struct lock_struct *lock = NULL;
struct lock_struct *locks = (struct lock_struct *)br_lck->lock_data;
enum brl_type deleted_lock_type = READ_LOCK; /* shut the compiler up.... */
@@ -748,7 +747,7 @@
is sorted in the zero zero case. */
for (i = 0; i < br_lck->num_locks; i++) {
- lock = &locks[i];
+ struct lock_struct *lock = &locks[i];
if (lock->lock_type == WRITE_LOCK &&
brl_same_context(&lock->context, &plock->context) &&
@@ -770,7 +769,7 @@
#endif
for (i = 0; i < br_lck->num_locks; i++) {
- lock = &locks[i];
+ struct lock_struct *lock = &locks[i];
/* Only remove our own locks that match in start, size, and flavour. */
if (brl_same_context(&lock->context, &plock->context) &&
@@ -822,7 +821,7 @@
}
/* We could send specific lock info here... */
- if (brl_pending_overlap(lock, pend_lock)) {
+ if (brl_pending_overlap(plock, pend_lock)) {
DEBUG(10,("brl_unlock: sending unlock message to pid %s\n",
procid_str_static(&pend_lock->context.pid )));
@@ -844,7 +843,6 @@
static BOOL brl_unlock_posix(struct byte_range_lock *br_lck, const struct lock_struct *plock)
{
unsigned int i, j, count;
- struct lock_struct *lock = NULL;
struct lock_struct *tp;
struct lock_struct *locks = (struct lock_struct *)br_lck->lock_data;
BOOL overlap_found = False;
@@ -873,12 +871,11 @@
count = 0;
for (i = 0; i < br_lck->num_locks; i++) {
+ struct lock_struct *lock = &locks[i];
struct lock_struct tmp_lock[3];
BOOL lock_was_added = False;
unsigned int tmp_count;
- lock = &locks[i];
-
/* Only remove our own locks - ignore fnum. */
if (lock->lock_type == PENDING_LOCK ||
!brl_same_context(&lock->context, &plock->context)) {
@@ -979,11 +976,10 @@
br_lck->num_locks = count;
SAFE_FREE(br_lck->lock_data);
- br_lck->lock_data = (void *)tp;
+ locks = br_lck->lock_data = (void *)tp;
br_lck->modified = True;
/* Send unlock messages to any pending waiters that overlap. */
- locks = tp;
for (j=0; j < br_lck->num_locks; j++) {
struct lock_struct *pend_lock = &locks[j];
@@ -994,7 +990,7 @@
}
/* We could send specific lock info here... */
- if (brl_pending_overlap(lock, pend_lock)) {
+ if (brl_pending_overlap(plock, pend_lock)) {
DEBUG(10,("brl_unlock: sending unlock message to pid %s\n",
procid_str_static(&pend_lock->context.pid )));
More information about the samba-cvs
mailing list