svn commit: samba r17766 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/lib: .

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher metze at samba.org
Thu Aug 24 08:11:38 GMT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher schrieb:
> jra at samba.org schrieb:
>>> Author: jra
>>> Date: 2006-08-24 01:31:00 +0000 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006)
>>> New Revision: 17766
>>>
>>> WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=17766
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Getting ready to properly expose 100ns times on
>>> the wire. Move the internals of nt_time functions
>>> to use struct timespecs.
>>> Jeremy.
> 
> Hi Jeremy,
> 
> wouldn't it make sense to use struct timeval,
> as we use that in samba4 already. Is there any difference?

ah, ok it uses nanoseconds and timeval milliseconds.

what's the function that gets the current time as a timespec struct?

maybe it would also make sense to use timespec in samba3 and samba4.
But we should try to use the same in both.

metze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE7V86m70gjA5TCD8RAn2xAKC5V1GYCP6YRxc0qG27mWrVedmn5gCgjJx4
Z7+uJnMqxnVe+D/C1Zzb4AY=
=ZyBi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the samba-cvs mailing list