CVS update: samba/source/smbd

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 22:29, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> Hi, Andrew!
> 
> > If you specify a service type (ie. you don't send '?????' as the
> > service type) then windows will check that this service type matches
> > the service you are connecting to and will return
> > NT_STATUS_BAD_DEVICE_TYPE if it doesn't match.
> 
> Thanks for the clarification!
> 
> With the following patch HEAD passes the (new) TCONDEV
> test. NT4SP6/W2kSP3 also pass that, I did not check anything older
> though.
> 
> I'm not sure if share_sanity_checks is the right place to put these
> checks, but it looked best to me.

Yep, it's the right place.  

Could we extend our client lib to return the "servers" value for that
share?  That way we could also check what we get back for "?????". 
(another field on the cli struct would seem like the right place)

Once this is in the tree, I'll update the build farm to run it, so we
never fail again... :-)

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/attachments/20030329/14151d4f/attachment.bin