CVS update: samba/source/lib

[Andrew Bartlett]

Jeremy Allison wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:38:11AM -0700, abartlet at samba.org wrote:
> >
> > I expect we have lost some functionality, but the stuff I had expected
> > to loose was already broken before I started.  In particular, we don't 'fall
> > back' to guest if the user cannot access a share (for security=user).  If you
> > want this kind of stuff then you really want security=share anyway.
> 
> Hmmmm. I think we'll need to make this fallback work
> before we ship a 3.0. This is breaking functionality that
> I know some sites depend on.

As far as I can tell, this is broken in 2.2 anyway.  Can you explain
*exactly* what behaviour is desired, and fix 2.2 so I can try to match
it?

I *really* don't like 'magic' fallbacks and the like.  BTW, 'guest only
= yes' is still perfectly functional and is probably a more appropriate
paramater for this situation anyway.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net