CVS update: samba/source

Jean Francois Micouleau Jean-Francois.Micouleau at dalalu.fr
Sun Feb 3 09:22:43 EST 2002


On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Tim Potter wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:50:10AM -0800, abartlet at samba.org wrote:
>
> > Modified Files:
> > 	Makefile.in
> > Log Message:
> > An attempt at producing the correct Makefile magic for wrepld_proto.h to be
> > automatically generated on first 'make'.  This wasn't being picked up by the
> > build farm becouse of the explicit 'make proto'.
> >
> > The 'make proto' bit isn't somthing our alpha testers know about (its certainly
> > not clearly documented) and its meant to be automatic.
>
> I think we should revisit our assumptions about why we don't do this
> automatically.  Was the only reason why make proto wasn't done all the
> time for speed reasons?  Does anyone still do Samba development (compiling
> it once doesn't count) on a 486 or a P90 these days?

proto.h should be splitted first. The code has been splitted, the proto
should too.

	J.F.






More information about the samba-cvs mailing list