CVS update: samba/source/utils
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at pcug.org.au
Thu Sep 27 22:43:44 EST 2001
Tim Potter wrote:
>
> Simo Sorce writes:
>
> > seem Tim likes ghost code, I waded through rpc_client dismissed code for a
> > while before discovering the new code was in lib/cli_... :-)
>
> That's the old rpc client code. Unfortunately it's rather
> tightly coupled with pretty much everything else in Samba. It's
> a long term project of mine to move everything to the
> libsmb/cli_* code.
>
> It's pretty hard doing refactoring work considering not many
> companies are interested in supporting it so there isn't much
> time available to do it. I believe small rewrites of things
> within Samba are necessary to avoid bitrot in the future and make
> Samba nicer to work with and to avoid bugs. Tridge's NTSTATUS
> stuff is a really good example of this.
So thats how authentication got is this mess? grumble, grumble...
What happened to 'for the good of the code'?
Andrew,
--
Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au
Samba Team member, Build Farm maintainer abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
More information about the samba-cvs
mailing list