CVS update: samba/source/smbd

[Dave O'Neill]

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jeremy Allison wrote:

> Log Message:
> Fix inspited by Alan Romeril. 50% speedup in domain logins with this
> change to default break response time of 10ms -> 0ms.
> Jeremy.

Isn't a default break response time of 0 a bad thing?  The code comments
(in oplock.c) say:

    /*
     * If we are sending an oplock break due to an SMB sent
     * by our own client we ensure that we wait at leat
     * lp_oplock_break_wait_time() milliseconds before sending
     * the packet. Sending the packet sooner can break Win9x
     * and has reported to cause problems on NT. JRA.
     */

Has this changed, and it's now OK to not wait?  If so, the comment should
probably be removed.

Dave
-- 
Dave O'Neill, Senior Linux Consultant
Linuxcare, Inc. tel: (613) 562-9949  fax: (613) 562-9700
doneill at linuxcare.com          http://www.linuxcare.com/
Linuxcare. Putting open source to work.