CVS update: samba/source/lib

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

> When I examined them and the context they were being used, I
> found that there were actually doing the incorrect thing under
> some of the circumstances they were used. (ie. the IS_BITS_SET_ALL
> macro was being used erroneously when IS_BITS_SET_SOME should have
> been used).

that being the case, you should have either raised it as a bug or fixed
it.

how can it not be clear that IS_BITS_SET_ALL is true when all bits are set
(having SET and ALL in the macro name), and IS_BITS_SET_SOME is true when
some bits are set (having SET and SOME in the macro name)?