CVS update: samba/source/lib/rpc/client

[Jeremy Allison]

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> 
> no, don't do this: if you do this, then because of bugs in cvs, anyone
> checking out a branch with a cvs tag will get the *main* branch version of
> those files instead of the tagged ones.
> 

Well that's the whole point. These files shouldn't exist
in the 1_9_18_BRANCH, but should exist in the main branch
and the NTDOM branch.

So I checked them out in the 1_9_18_BRANCH (they were
then untagged), tagged them with the 1_9_18_BRANCH tag
(they now have a separate existance in this branch)
and then did a cvs remove of them (only in this branch).

Thus anyone doing a cvs co -r 1_9_18_BRANCH samba
will not get the lib/rpc directory (as they should
not).

> it is vital that the directory structure that exists in the BRANCH_NTDOM
> branch also exist in the main branch.
> 

It does. When you created the new directory
structure did you tag everything in it with
the BRANCH_NTDOM tag ?

I recon the change is correct. Maybe Andrew
could comment.

Jeremy.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
--------------------------------------------------------