Problems building rsync with Clang 15 beta

Paul Eggert eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Thu Aug 18 16:51:51 UTC 2022


On 8/18/22 09:38, Khem Raj wrote:
> I think the autoconf patch should be good on its own merits regardless

It partly depends on how much we care about compatibility. Putting the 
'void' in there will break pre-C89 compilers, as well as C++ compilers 
pretending (badly) to be C compilers. I doubt whether we care about the 
former any more, but the latter might be an issue.


> there were few other package
> builds which started to succeed after this change in autoconf

Which ones, exactly, and why?



More information about the rsync mailing list