Problems building rsync with Clang 15 beta
Paul Eggert
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Thu Aug 18 16:51:51 UTC 2022
On 8/18/22 09:38, Khem Raj wrote:
> I think the autoconf patch should be good on its own merits regardless
It partly depends on how much we care about compatibility. Putting the
'void' in there will break pre-C89 compilers, as well as C++ compilers
pretending (badly) to be C compilers. I doubt whether we care about the
former any more, but the latter might be an issue.
> there were few other package
> builds which started to succeed after this change in autoconf
Which ones, exactly, and why?
More information about the rsync
mailing list