[Bug 11075] Shouldn't --inplace fail immediately if it can't make files?
samba-bugs at samba.org
samba-bugs at samba.org
Tue Feb 10 21:23:57 MST 2015
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11075
--- Comment #1 from Robin Powell <rlpowell at digitalkingdom.org> ---
Apparently it's not just --inplace??
rlpowell at flowcytech01> rsync -aPv
/data/cytobank/Data/experiments/1/1053/experiment_11053/attachments/attachment_24023_RightCells150Clusters5%Downsampling.zip
shell01:/var/www/special/attachment_24023_RightCells150Clusters5%Downsampling.zip
rlpowell at shell01's password:
sending incremental file list
attachment_24023_RightCells150Clusters5%Downsampling.zip
18455631835 100% 2.43MB/s 2:00:36 (xfer#1, to-check=0/1)
rsync: mkstemp
"/var/www/special/.attachment_24023_RightCells150Clusters5%Downsampling.zip.jCvdjG"
failed: Permission denied (13)
sent 18457884862 bytes received 31 bytes 2548551.59 bytes/sec
total size is 18455631835 speedup is 1.00
rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code
23) at main.c(1039) [sender=3.0.6]
So after *two hours* it finally noticed that it *wasn't writing to disk*??
How does that work? That seems *really* bad! I don't think rsync used to work
like this??
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
More information about the rsync
mailing list